Merge #7592: mempool: Re-remove ERROR logging for mempool rejects

8fc81e0 mempool: Reduce ERROR logging for mempool rejects (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan 2016-03-11 08:20:24 +01:00 committed by Alexander Block
parent 23eeaeef8f
commit 24cf36972c

View File

@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
*pfMissingInputs = false;
if (!CheckTransaction(tx, state))
return error("%s: CheckTransaction: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
return false; // state filled in by CheckTransaction
if (!ContextualCheckTransaction(tx, state, chainActive.Tip()))
return error("%s: ContextualCheckTransaction: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
@ -814,10 +814,11 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
const uint256 &hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash();
if (setConflicts.count(hashAncestor))
{
return state.DoS(10, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: %s spends conflicting transaction %s",
return state.DoS(10, false,
REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", false,
strprintf("%s spends conflicting transaction %s",
hash.ToString(),
hashAncestor.ToString()),
REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx");
hashAncestor.ToString()));
}
}
@ -854,11 +855,11 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
// that we don't spend too much time walking descendants.
// This should be rare.
if (mi->IsDirty()) {
return state.DoS(0,
error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; cannot replace tx %s with untracked descendants",
return state.DoS(0, false,
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false,
strprintf("too many potential replacements: rejecting replacement %s; cannot replace tx %s with untracked descendants",
hash.ToString(),
mi->GetTx().GetHash().ToString()),
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements");
mi->GetTx().GetHash().ToString()));
}
// Don't allow the replacement to reduce the feerate of the
@ -880,12 +881,12 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize());
if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate)
{
return state.DoS(0,
error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
return state.DoS(0, false,
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
hash.ToString(),
newFeeRate.ToString(),
oldFeeRate.ToString()),
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee");
oldFeeRate.ToString()));
}
BOOST_FOREACH(const CTxIn &txin, mi->GetTx().vin)
@ -909,12 +910,12 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize();
}
} else {
return state.DoS(0,
error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
return state.DoS(0, false,
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false,
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
hash.ToString(),
nConflictingCount,
maxDescendantsToVisit),
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements");
maxDescendantsToVisit));
}
for (unsigned int j = 0; j < tx.vin.size(); j++)
@ -929,9 +930,10 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
// it's cheaper to just check if the new input refers to a
// tx that's in the mempool.
if (pool.mapTx.find(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash) != pool.mapTx.end())
return state.DoS(0, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d",
hash.ToString(), j),
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed");
return state.DoS(0, false,
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", false,
strprintf("replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d",
hash.ToString(), j));
}
}
@ -940,9 +942,10 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
// transactions would not be paid for.
if (nModifiedFees < nConflictingFees)
{
return state.DoS(0, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s",
hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nModifiedFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees)),
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee");
return state.DoS(0, false,
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s",
hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nModifiedFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees)));
}
// Finally in addition to paying more fees than the conflicts the
@ -950,12 +953,12 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
CAmount nDeltaFees = nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees;
if (nDeltaFees < ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))
{
return state.DoS(0,
error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
return state.DoS(0, false,
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
hash.ToString(),
FormatMoney(nDeltaFees),
FormatMoney(::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))),
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee");
FormatMoney(::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))));
}
}
@ -965,7 +968,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState& state, const C
// Check against previous transactions
// This is done last to help prevent CPU exhaustion denial-of-service attacks.
if (!CheckInputs(tx, state, view, true, STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS, true))
return error("%s: CheckInputs: %s, %s", __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
return false; // state filled in by CheckInputs
// Check again against just the consensus-critical mandatory script
// verification flags, in case of bugs in the standard flags that cause