Merge #11565: Make listsinceblock refuse unknown block hash
659b206 Make listsinceblock refuse unknown block hash (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: Change suggested by @theuni who noticed listsinceblock would ignore invalid block hashes causing it to return a completely unfiltered list of transactions. Tree-SHA512: 3c8fb160265780d1334e856e853ab48e2e18372b8f1fc71ae480c3f45317048cc1fee0055d5c58031981a91b9c2bdbeb8e49a889d04ecba61729ce8109f2ce3f
This commit is contained in:
parent
4096433ad9
commit
46373f5ee2
@ -1793,19 +1793,20 @@ UniValue listsinceblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
|
||||
int target_confirms = 1;
|
||||
isminefilter filter = ISMINE_SPENDABLE;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!request.params[0].isNull()) {
|
||||
if (!request.params[0].isNull() && !request.params[0].get_str().empty()) {
|
||||
uint256 blockId;
|
||||
|
||||
blockId.SetHex(request.params[0].get_str());
|
||||
BlockMap::iterator it = mapBlockIndex.find(blockId);
|
||||
if (it != mapBlockIndex.end()) {
|
||||
paltindex = pindex = it->second;
|
||||
if (chainActive[pindex->nHeight] != pindex) {
|
||||
// the block being asked for is a part of a deactivated chain;
|
||||
// we don't want to depend on its perceived height in the block
|
||||
// chain, we want to instead use the last common ancestor
|
||||
pindex = chainActive.FindFork(pindex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (it == mapBlockIndex.end()) {
|
||||
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Block not found");
|
||||
}
|
||||
paltindex = pindex = it->second;
|
||||
if (chainActive[pindex->nHeight] != pindex) {
|
||||
// the block being asked for is a part of a deactivated chain;
|
||||
// we don't want to depend on its perceived height in the block
|
||||
// chain, we want to instead use the last common ancestor
|
||||
pindex = chainActive.FindFork(pindex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Invalid blockhash");
|
||||
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
||||
"""Test the listsincelast RPC."""
|
||||
|
||||
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
||||
from test_framework.util import assert_equal
|
||||
from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_array_result, assert_raises_rpc_error
|
||||
|
||||
class ListSinceBlockTest (BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
def set_test_params(self):
|
||||
@ -16,10 +16,43 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest (BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
self.nodes[2].generate(101)
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
|
||||
self.test_no_blockhash()
|
||||
self.test_invalid_blockhash()
|
||||
self.test_reorg()
|
||||
self.test_double_spend()
|
||||
self.test_double_send()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_blockhash(self):
|
||||
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1)
|
||||
blockhash, = self.nodes[2].generate(1)
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
|
||||
txs = self.nodes[0].listtransactions()
|
||||
assert_array_result(txs, {"txid": txid}, {
|
||||
"category": "receive",
|
||||
"amount": 1,
|
||||
"blockhash": blockhash,
|
||||
"confirmations": 1,
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert_equal(
|
||||
self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(),
|
||||
{"lastblock": blockhash,
|
||||
"removed": [],
|
||||
"transactions": txs})
|
||||
assert_equal(
|
||||
self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(""),
|
||||
{"lastblock": blockhash,
|
||||
"removed": [],
|
||||
"transactions": txs})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_invalid_blockhash(self):
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
|
||||
"42759cde25462784395a337460bde75f58e73d3f08bd31fdc3507cbac856a2c4")
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
|
||||
"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
|
||||
"invalid-hex")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reorg(self):
|
||||
'''
|
||||
`listsinceblock` did not behave correctly when handed a block that was
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user