Require no cs_main lock for ProcessNewBlock/ActivateBestChain
This requires the removal of some very liberal (incorrect) cs_mains sprinkled in some tests. It adds some chainActive.Tip() races, but the tests are all single-threaded anyway.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2eb5531747
commit
95192d5b56
@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
|
||||
entry.dPriority = 111.0;
|
||||
entry.nHeight = 11;
|
||||
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
fCheckpointsEnabled = false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Simple block creation, nothing special yet:
|
||||
@ -224,6 +223,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
|
||||
auto createAndProcessEmptyBlock = [&]() {
|
||||
int i = chainActive.Height();
|
||||
CBlock *pblock = &pemptyblocktemplate->block; // pointer for convenience
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
pblock->nVersion = 2;
|
||||
pblock->nTime = chainActive.Tip()->GetMedianTimePast()+1;
|
||||
CMutableTransaction txCoinbase(*pblock->vtx[0]);
|
||||
@ -245,7 +246,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
|
||||
while (!CheckProofOfWork(pblock->GetHash(), pblock->nBits, chainparams.GetConsensus())) {
|
||||
pblock->nNonce++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> shared_pblock = std::make_shared<const CBlock>(*pblock);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, shared_pblock, true, NULL));
|
||||
pblock->hashPrevBlock = pblock->GetHash();
|
||||
@ -256,6 +257,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
|
||||
createAndProcessEmptyBlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
// Just to make sure we can still make simple blocks
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2886,6 +2886,7 @@ bool ActivateBestChain(CValidationState &state, const CChainParams& chainparams,
|
||||
// far from a guarantee. Things in the P2P/RPC will often end up calling
|
||||
// us in the middle of ProcessNewBlock - do not assume pblock is set
|
||||
// sanely for performance or correctness!
|
||||
AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
CBlockIndex *pindexMostWork = NULL;
|
||||
CBlockIndex *pindexNewTip = NULL;
|
||||
@ -3599,6 +3600,8 @@ static bool AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, CValidation
|
||||
|
||||
bool ProcessNewBlock(const CChainParams& chainparams, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> pblock, bool fForceProcessing, bool *fNewBlock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
CBlockIndex *pindex = NULL;
|
||||
if (fNewBlock) *fNewBlock = false;
|
||||
|
@ -363,14 +363,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ApproximateBestSubset)
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(rescan, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
// Cap last block file size, and mine new block in a new block file.
|
||||
CBlockIndex* oldTip = chainActive.Tip();
|
||||
GetBlockFileInfo(oldTip->GetBlockPos().nFile)->nSize = MAX_BLOCKFILE_SIZE;
|
||||
CreateAndProcessBlock({}, GetScriptForRawPubKey(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()));
|
||||
CBlockIndex* newTip = chainActive.Tip();
|
||||
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify ScanForWalletTransactions picks up transactions in both the old
|
||||
// and new block files.
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -435,8 +435,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(rescan, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(importwallet_rescan, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CWallet *pwalletMainBackup = ::pwalletMain;
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
// Create two blocks with same timestamp to verify that importwallet rescan
|
||||
// will pick up both blocks, not just the first.
|
||||
const int64_t BLOCK_TIME = chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockTimeMax() + 5;
|
||||
@ -450,6 +448,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(importwallet_rescan, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
SetMockTime(KEY_TIME);
|
||||
coinbaseTxns.emplace_back(*CreateAndProcessBlock({}, GetScriptForRawPubKey(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey())).vtx[0]);
|
||||
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
// Import key into wallet and call dumpwallet to create backup file.
|
||||
{
|
||||
CWallet wallet;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user