Merge #10045: [trivial] Fix typos in comments
dbf30ff [trivial] Fix typos in comments (practicalswift) Tree-SHA512: a841c96ba1a80ab57206e8ef4fa9b40ecff2244075a5539fc09f57e763bf2e92b0ed089e32a0dbac3902518dcda43d224f75a3462a560148841746560640ba70
This commit is contained in:
parent
2c833eff3e
commit
f2e976a051
@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ bool DecodeBase58Check(const char* psz, std::vector<unsigned char>& vchRet)
|
||||
vchRet.clear();
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// re-calculate the checksum, insure it matches the included 4-byte checksum
|
||||
// re-calculate the checksum, ensure it matches the included 4-byte checksum
|
||||
uint256 hash = Hash(vchRet.begin(), vchRet.end() - 4);
|
||||
if (memcmp(&hash, &vchRet.end()[-4], 4) != 0) {
|
||||
vchRet.clear();
|
||||
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
// Simple micro-benchmarking framework; API mostly matches a subset of the Google Benchmark
|
||||
// framework (see https://github.com/google/benchmark)
|
||||
// Wny not use the Google Benchmark framework? Because adding Yet Another Dependency
|
||||
// Why not use the Google Benchmark framework? Because adding Yet Another Dependency
|
||||
// (that uses cmake as its build system and has lots of features we don't need) isn't
|
||||
// worth it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ ReadStatus PartiallyDownloadedBlock::InitData(const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs& c
|
||||
// request it.
|
||||
// This should be rare enough that the extra bandwidth doesn't matter,
|
||||
// but eating a round-trip due to FillBlock failure would be annoying
|
||||
// Note that we dont want duplication between extra_txn and mempool to
|
||||
// Note that we don't want duplication between extra_txn and mempool to
|
||||
// trigger this case, so we compare hashes first
|
||||
if (txn_available[idit->second] &&
|
||||
txn_available[idit->second]->GetHash() != extra_txn[i].second->GetHash()) {
|
||||
|
@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ void SubstituteFonts(const QString& language)
|
||||
/* 10.10 or later system */
|
||||
if (language == "zh_CN" || language == "zh_TW" || language == "zh_HK") // traditional or simplified Chinese
|
||||
QFont::insertSubstitution(".Helvetica Neue DeskInterface", "Heiti SC");
|
||||
else if (language == "ja") // Japanesee
|
||||
else if (language == "ja") // Japanese
|
||||
QFont::insertSubstitution(".Helvetica Neue DeskInterface", "Songti SC");
|
||||
else
|
||||
QFont::insertSubstitution(".Helvetica Neue DeskInterface", "Lucida Grande");
|
||||
|
@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ void PaymentServerTests::paymentServerTests()
|
||||
byteArray = QByteArray((const char*)&data[0], data.size());
|
||||
r.paymentRequest.parse(byteArray);
|
||||
// Ensure the request is initialized, because network "main" is default, even for
|
||||
// uninizialized payment requests and that will fail our test here.
|
||||
// uninitialized payment requests and that will fail our test here.
|
||||
QVERIFY(r.paymentRequest.IsInitialized());
|
||||
QCOMPARE(PaymentServer::verifyNetwork(r.paymentRequest.getDetails()), false);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_getaddr)
|
||||
size_t percent23 = (addrman.size() * 23) / 100;
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == percent23);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == 461);
|
||||
// (Addrman.size() < number of addresses added) due to address collisons.
|
||||
// (Addrman.size() < number of addresses added) due to address collisions.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2007);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_CheckQueue_UniqueCheck)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Test that blocks which might allocate lots of memory free their memory agressively.
|
||||
// Test that blocks which might allocate lots of memory free their memory aggressively.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This test attempts to catch a pathological case where by lazily freeing
|
||||
// checks might mean leaving a check un-swapped out, and decreasing by 1 each
|
||||
|
@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ void test_cache_generations()
|
||||
// Loose Check that hit rate is above min_hit_rate
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(hit > min_hit_rate);
|
||||
// Tighter check, count number of times we are less than tight_hit_rate
|
||||
// (and implicityly, greater than min_hit_rate)
|
||||
// (and implicitly, greater than min_hit_rate)
|
||||
out_of_tight_tolerance += hit < tight_hit_rate;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Check that being out of tolerance happens less than
|
||||
|
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(merkle_test)
|
||||
// If no mutation was done (once for every ntx value), try up to 16 branches.
|
||||
if (mutate == 0) {
|
||||
for (int loop = 0; loop < std::min(ntx, 16); loop++) {
|
||||
// If ntx <= 16, try all branches. Otherise, try 16 random ones.
|
||||
// If ntx <= 16, try all branches. Otherwise, try 16 random ones.
|
||||
int mtx = loop;
|
||||
if (ntx > 16) {
|
||||
mtx = insecure_rand() % ntx;
|
||||
|
@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(rpc_ban)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(banned_until.get_int64() > now);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(banned_until.get_int64()-now <= 200);
|
||||
|
||||
// must throw an exception because 127.0.0.1 is in already banned suubnet range
|
||||
// must throw an exception because 127.0.0.1 is in already banned subnet range
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(r = CallRPC(std::string("setban 127.0.0.1 add")), std::runtime_error);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW(CallRPC(std::string("setban 127.0.0.0/24 remove")));
|
||||
|
@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_seed_insecure_rand)
|
||||
for (int mod=2;mod<11;mod++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int mask = 1;
|
||||
// Really rough binomal confidence approximation.
|
||||
// Really rough binomial confidence approximation.
|
||||
int err = 30*10000./mod*sqrt((1./mod*(1-1./mod))/10000.);
|
||||
//mask is 2^ceil(log2(mod))-1
|
||||
while(mask<mod-1)mask=(mask<<1)+1;
|
||||
|
@ -3555,7 +3555,7 @@ static bool AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, CValidation
|
||||
bool fTooFarAhead = (pindex->nHeight > int(chainActive.Height() + MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP));
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Decouple this function from the block download logic by removing fRequested
|
||||
// This requires some new chain datastructure to efficiently look up if a
|
||||
// This requires some new chain data structure to efficiently look up if a
|
||||
// block is in a chain leading to a candidate for best tip, despite not
|
||||
// being such a candidate itself.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user