New languages:
- `af` Afrikaans
- `es_AR` Spanish (Argentina)
- `es_CO` Spanish (Colombia)
- `ro` Romanian
- `ta` Tamil
- `uz@Latn` Uzbek in Latin script
This removes the following executables from the binary gitian release:
- test_bitcoin-qt[.exe]
- bench_bitcoin[.exe]
@jonasschnelli and me discussed this on IRC a few days ago - unlike the
normal `bitcoin_tests` which is useful to see if it is safe to run
bitcoin on a certain OS/environment combination, there is no good reason
to include these. Better to leave them out to reduce the download
size.
Sizes from the 0.12 release:
```
2.4M bitcoin-0.12.0/bin/bench_bitcoin.exe
22M bitcoin-0.12.0/bin/test_bitcoin-qt.exe
```
Github-Pull: #7776
Rebased-From: f063863d1fc964aec80d8a0acfde623543573823
No longer consider coins which aren't in our mempool.
Add test for regression in abandonconflict.py
Github-Pull: #7715
Rebased-From: 68d4282774d6a60c609301cddad0b652f16df4d9
This RPC test will test both the activation mechanism of the first versionbits soft fork as well as testing many code branches of the consensus logic for BIP's 68, 112, and 113.
- Replace NOP3 with CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)
<nSequence> CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY -> <nSequence>
- Fails if txin.nSequence < nSequence, allowing funds of a txout to be locked for a number of blocks or a duration of time after its inclusion in a block.
- Pull most of CheckLockTime() out into VerifyLockTime(), a local function that will be reused for CheckSequence()
- Add bitwise AND operator to CScriptNum
- Enable CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY as a standard script verify flag
- Transactions that fail CSV verification will be rejected from the mempool, making it easy to test the feature. However blocks containing "invalid" CSV-using transactions will still be accepted; this is *not* the soft-fork required to actually enable CSV for production use.
SequenceLocks functions are used to evaluate sequence lock times or heights per BIP 68.
The majority of this code is copied from maaku in #6312
Further credit: btcdrak, sipa, NicolasDorier
"do not meet pay the minimum relay fee" ? I can understand English language quite well, but that I do not understand. So, if it's not an semantic nonsense, I would suggest to write it in more simple English.
b460004 release-notes: Minor corrections and clarifications re Priority (Luke Dashjr)
3450f4c release-notes: Significantly rewrite priority transactions section (Gregory Maxwell)
d0dbb6d release-notes: Remove suggestion to use 0.11 (Luke Dashjr)
73a0375 release-notes: Mention possibility of priority removal in 0.13, uncertainty of priority calculation being changed back, and request community input (Luke Dashjr)
4b8d2bc release-notes: Cover priority changes correctly, removing mentions of possible futures (Luke Dashjr)
