Commit Graph

23 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
MarcoFalke
914bd78770 Merge #9972: Fix extended rpc tests broken by #9768
d055bd6 Fix extended rpc tests broken by 8910b4717e5bb946ee6988f7fe9fd461f53a5935 (John Newbery)

Tree-SHA512: 30e019bd7e17013143e419777491ac0efd9760dddac7232d320c9afe80bc2fb383acd331e20cd5b3e21df1177c0e4a5221c99f831e90cf869d3affca206b9728
2019-02-26 16:41:00 -06:00
MarcoFalke
dad8c67d38 Merge #9768: [qa] Add logging to test_framework.py
64c0800 Use logging in individual tests (John Newbery)
38ad281 Use logging in test_framework/comptool.py (John Newbery)
ff19073 Use logging in test_framework/blockstore.py (John Newbery)
2a9c7c7 Use logging in test_framework/util.py (John Newbery)
b0dec4a Remove manual debug settings in qa tests. (John Newbery)
af1363c Always enable debug log and microsecond logging for test nodes. (John Newbery)
6d0e325 Use logging in mininode.py (John Newbery)
553a976 Add logging to p2p-segwit.py (John Newbery)
0e6d23d Add logging to test_framework.py (John Newbery)

Tree-SHA512: 42ee2acbf444ec32d796f930f9f6e272da03c75e93d974a126d4ea9b2dbaa77cc57ab5e63ce3fd33d609049d884eb8d9f65272c08922d10f8db69d4a60ad05a3
2019-02-26 15:54:32 -06:00
PastaPastaPasta
07dcddb4ca Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597)
* Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers

a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun)

* Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction

eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron)

* remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code

* Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates

bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos)

* Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py

c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery)

* Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests

3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery)

* Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests

3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke)

* Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2

ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun)

* Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty.

dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm)

* Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32

30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille)

* Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable

864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky)

Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1

* Change back file params
2019-01-07 12:55:35 +03:00
Alexander Block
7322489ca2 Merge #9276: Some minor testing cleanups
30b620c remove obsolete run-bitcoind-for-test.sh (Alex Morcos)
2a99522 remove relaypriority from rpc tests (Alex Morcos)
e2184cc Reorder RPC tests for running time (Alex Morcos)

# Conflicts:
#	qa/pull-tester/rpc-tests.py
#	qa/pull-tester/run-bitcoind-for-test.sh.in
2018-01-17 17:31:12 +01:00
MarcoFalke
3a388d9c01 Merge #9097: [qa] Rework sync_* and preciousblock.py
fa97ccb [qa] util: Rework sync_*() (MarcoFalke)
fac1141 [qa] preciousblock: Use assert_equal and BitcoinTestFramework.__init__ (MarcoFalke)
2018-01-15 06:14:15 +01:00
MarcoFalke
bcecdcd8e9 Merge #8056: [qa] Remove hardcoded "4 nodes" from test_framework
fad68f7 [qa] Reduce node count for some tests (MarcoFalke)
fac9349 [qa] Remove hardcoded "4 nodes" from test_framework (MarcoFalke)
2017-12-21 18:50:13 +01:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
25147c9dc7 Merge #7814: [qa] Switch to py3
fa389d4 [qa] Switch to py3 (MarcoFalke)
2017-12-21 17:31:54 +01:00
UdjinM6
6af7a58d92 Merge remote-tracking branch 'bitcoin/0.12' into mergebtc12, fix/dashify
NOTE: .travis.yml was mostly preserved, probably needs additional attention
2016-08-26 04:09:20 +03:00
MarcoFalke
c0fe8b5c7d [qa] smartfees: Properly use ordered dict
Github-Pull: #7980
Rebased-From: fa17f93fbd2889c020849b941a94c5bd8a619a3c 43bbcd075355630544a530f3cc52014edb3787b2
2016-06-10 00:25:22 +02:00
MarcoFalke
ff9b436163 [qa] Bug fixes and refactor
Github-Pull: #7778
Rebased-From: fa524d9ddbad0a03f9eb974100fb3b6001045645 fa2cea163b49a97e2a18aa125e41170d60ce59cc faaa3c9b6546d9a64cece4ff0223f0b167feb6ff 444480649f08e6037f8ac178224b30a82e9ad72e
2016-04-05 11:55:07 +02:00
UdjinM6
31ff9c2ff8 Fix rpc-tests, relies on PRs #715-#719
Closes #720
2016-03-06 18:16:02 +01:00
Suhas Daftuar
6e8b07f5f3 Add rounding helper function to util.py 2015-12-01 11:03:37 +01:00
Alex Morcos
56106a3300 Expose RPC calls for estimatesmart functions
Also add testing for estimatesmartfee in smartfees.py
2015-11-16 15:42:31 -05:00
Jonas Schnelli
64937fe51a [QA] restructure rpc tests directory
* move non-test classes to subdir `test-framework`
2015-05-18 15:25:45 +02:00
Alex Morcos
b649e03954 Create new BlockPolicyEstimator for fee estimates
This class groups transactions that have been confirmed in blocks into buckets, based on either their fee or their priority.  Then for each bucket, the class calculates what percentage of the transactions were confirmed within various numbers of blocks.  It does this by keeping an exponentially decaying moving history for each bucket and confirm block count of the percentage of transactions in that bucket that were confirmed within that number of blocks.

-Eliminate txs which didn't have all inputs available at entry from fee/pri calcs

-Add dynamic breakpoints and tracking of confirmation delays in mempool transactions

-Remove old CMinerPolicyEstimator and CBlockAverage code

-New smartfees.py

-Pass a flag to the estimation code, using IsInitialBlockDownload as a proxy for when we are still catching up and we shouldn't be counting how many blocks it takes for transactions to be included.

-Add a policyestimator unit test
2015-05-13 10:36:24 -04:00
Pieter Wuille
6b04508e37 Introduce separate 'generate' RPC call 2015-04-01 11:47:10 -07:00
Suhas Daftuar
1eb1e65f09 Fix smartfees test for change to relay policy 2015-01-07 10:11:23 -05:00
Matt Corallo
e3f315a0a5 Fix python usage for arch's broken maintainers 2014-11-27 00:02:28 -05:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
b6c99efe9c
Merge pull request #5121
214091d Update license in pull-tester and rpc-tests (Michael Ford)
2014-10-27 13:48:45 +01:00
Daniel Kraft
dcb98466b4 Extend getchaintips RPC test.
Add the capability to simulate network splits to the RPC test framework
and use it to do more extensive testing of 'getchaintips'.
2014-10-24 08:53:04 +02:00
Michael Ford
214091d584 Update license in pull-tester and rpc-tests
Add missing copyright/license header where necessary
2014-10-23 09:48:19 +08:00
Gavin Andresen
e8097f7df1
Refactor common RPC test code to BitcoinTestFramework base class
Inspired by #3956, with a little more flexibility built in.

I didn't touch rpcbind_test.py, because it only runs on Linux.
2014-07-09 10:19:26 -04:00
Gavin Andresen
171ca7745e estimatefee / estimatepriority RPC methods
New RPC methods: return an estimate of the fee (or priority) a
transaction needs to be likely to confirm in a given number of
blocks.

Mike Hearn created the first version of this method for estimating fees.
It works as follows:

For transactions that took 1 to N (I picked N=25) blocks to confirm,
keep N buckets with at most 100 entries in each recording the
fees-per-kilobyte paid by those transactions.

(separate buckets are kept for transactions that confirmed because
they are high-priority)

The buckets are filled as blocks are found, and are saved/restored
in a new fee_estiamtes.dat file in the data directory.

A few variations on Mike's initial scheme:

To estimate the fee needed for a transaction to confirm in X buckets,
all of the samples in all of the buckets are used and a median of
all of the data is used to make the estimate. For example, imagine
25 buckets each containing the full 100 entries. Those 2,500 samples
are sorted, and the estimate of the fee needed to confirm in the very
next block is the 50'th-highest-fee-entry in that sorted list; the
estimate of the fee needed to confirm in the next two blocks is the
150'th-highest-fee-entry, etc.

That algorithm has the nice property that estimates of how much fee
you need to pay to get confirmed in block N will always be greater
than or equal to the estimate for block N+1. It would clearly be wrong
to say "pay 11 uBTC and you'll get confirmed in 3 blocks, but pay
12 uBTC and it will take LONGER".

A single block will not contribute more than 10 entries to any one
bucket, so a single miner and a large block cannot overwhelm
the estimates.
2014-06-06 10:44:57 -04:00