dash/test/functional/p2p_invalid_tx.py

211 lines
9.5 KiB
Python
Raw Permalink Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2015-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""Test node responses to invalid transactions.
In this test we connect to one node over p2p, and test tx requests."""
from test_framework.blocktools import create_block, create_coinbase
Merge #13054: tests: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. 68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift) Pull request description: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools. An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports. Before this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util $ ``` After this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 $ ``` Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
2018-08-13 14:24:43 +02:00
from test_framework.messages import (
COIN,
COutPoint,
CTransaction,
CTxIn,
CTxOut,
)
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery) 5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery) 85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery) 9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery) Pull request description: New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize: - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces. - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'. For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references. ACKs for top commit: amitiuttarwar: ACK d5800da519 MarcoFalke: ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞 Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-15 20:35:29 +01:00
from test_framework.p2p import P2PDataStore
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import (
assert_equal,
)
from data import invalid_txs
Merge bitcoin#13134: net: Add option `-enablebip61` to configure sending of BIP61 notifications (#3414) * Merge #13134: net: Add option `-enablebip61` to configure sending of BIP61 notifications 87fe292d897e09e176ac7e254144466c319cc9ac doc: Mention disabling BIP61 in bips.md (Wladimir J. van der Laan) fe16dd8226d924f44432c5b5014aa49ff45c82ff net: Add option `-enablebip61` to configure sending of BIP61 notifications (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: This commit adds a boolean option `-peersendreject`, defaulting to `1`, that can be used to disable the sending of [BIP61](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0061.mediawiki) `reject` messages. This functionality has been requested for various reasons: - security (DoS): reject messages can reveal internal state that can be used to target certain resources such as the mempool more easily. - bandwidth: a typical node sends lots of reject messages; this counts against upstream bandwidth. Also the reject messages tend to be larger than the message that was rejected. On the other hand, reject messages can be useful while developing client software (I found them indispensable while creating bitcoin-submittx), as well as for our own test cases, so whatever the default becomes on the long run, IMO the functionality should be retained as option. But that's a discussion for later, for now it's simply a node operator decision. Also adds a RPC test that checks the functionality. Tree-SHA512: 9488cc53e13cd8e5c6f8eb472a44309572673405c1d1438c3488f627fae622c95e2198bde5ed7d29e56b948e2918bf1920239e9f865889f4c37c097c37a4d7a9 * 0.17 -> 0.16 Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * tx1 -> base_ tx fixing 13134 Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * move added bip61 message checking up Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Dash specific code, only send reject messages if bip61 is enabled Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Fix invalidtxrequest.py Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-04-19 13:04:31 +02:00
class InvalidTxRequestTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 1
self.extra_args = [[
"-acceptnonstdtxn=1",
"-maxorphantxsize=1",
]]
self.setup_clean_chain = True
def bootstrap_p2p(self, *, num_connections=1):
"""Add a P2P connection to the node.
Helper to connect and wait for version handshake."""
for _ in range(num_connections):
self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PDataStore())
def reconnect_p2p(self, **kwargs):
"""Tear down and bootstrap the P2P connection to the node.
The node gets disconnected several times in this test. This helper
method reconnects the p2p and restarts the network thread."""
self.nodes[0].disconnect_p2ps()
self.bootstrap_p2p(**kwargs)
def run_test(self):
node = self.nodes[0] # convenience reference to the node
self.bootstrap_p2p() # Add one p2p connection to the node
best_block = self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash()
tip = int(best_block, 16)
best_block_time = self.nodes[0].getblock(best_block)['time']
block_time = best_block_time + 1
self.log.info("Create a new block with an anyone-can-spend coinbase.")
height = 1
block = create_block(tip, create_coinbase(height), block_time)
block.solve()
# Save the coinbase for later
block1 = block
tip = block.sha256
# Create a second one to test orphan resolution via block receival
height += 1
block_time += 1
block = create_block(tip, create_coinbase(height), block_time)
block.solve()
# Save the coinbase for later
block2 = block
tip = block.sha256
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
node.p2ps[0].send_blocks_and_test([block1, block2], node, success=True)
self.log.info("Mature the block.")
self.generatetoaddress(self.nodes[0], 100, self.nodes[0].get_deterministic_priv_key().address)
# Iterate through a list of known invalid transaction types, ensuring each is
# rejected. Some are consensus invalid and some just violate policy.
for BadTxTemplate in invalid_txs.iter_all_templates():
self.log.info("Testing invalid transaction: %s", BadTxTemplate.__name__)
template = BadTxTemplate(spend_block=block1)
tx = template.get_tx()
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
node.p2ps[0].send_txs_and_test(
[tx], node, success=False,
expect_disconnect=template.expect_disconnect,
reject_reason=template.reject_reason,
)
if template.expect_disconnect:
self.log.info("Reconnecting to peer")
self.reconnect_p2p()
# Make two p2p connections to provide the node with orphans
# * p2ps[0] will send valid orphan txs (one with low fee)
# * p2ps[1] will send an invalid orphan tx (and is later disconnected for that)
self.reconnect_p2p(num_connections=2)
self.log.info('Test orphan transaction handling ... ')
self.test_orphan_tx_handling(block1.vtx[0].sha256, False)
Merge bitcoin#13134: net: Add option `-enablebip61` to configure sending of BIP61 notifications (#3414) * Merge #13134: net: Add option `-enablebip61` to configure sending of BIP61 notifications 87fe292d897e09e176ac7e254144466c319cc9ac doc: Mention disabling BIP61 in bips.md (Wladimir J. van der Laan) fe16dd8226d924f44432c5b5014aa49ff45c82ff net: Add option `-enablebip61` to configure sending of BIP61 notifications (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: This commit adds a boolean option `-peersendreject`, defaulting to `1`, that can be used to disable the sending of [BIP61](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0061.mediawiki) `reject` messages. This functionality has been requested for various reasons: - security (DoS): reject messages can reveal internal state that can be used to target certain resources such as the mempool more easily. - bandwidth: a typical node sends lots of reject messages; this counts against upstream bandwidth. Also the reject messages tend to be larger than the message that was rejected. On the other hand, reject messages can be useful while developing client software (I found them indispensable while creating bitcoin-submittx), as well as for our own test cases, so whatever the default becomes on the long run, IMO the functionality should be retained as option. But that's a discussion for later, for now it's simply a node operator decision. Also adds a RPC test that checks the functionality. Tree-SHA512: 9488cc53e13cd8e5c6f8eb472a44309572673405c1d1438c3488f627fae622c95e2198bde5ed7d29e56b948e2918bf1920239e9f865889f4c37c097c37a4d7a9 * 0.17 -> 0.16 Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * tx1 -> base_ tx fixing 13134 Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * move added bip61 message checking up Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Dash specific code, only send reject messages if bip61 is enabled Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Fix invalidtxrequest.py Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-04-19 13:04:31 +02:00
self.log.info('Test orphan transaction handling, resolve via block')
self.restart_node(0, ["-acceptnonstdtxn=1", '-persistmempool=0', '-maxorphantxsize=1'])
self.reconnect_p2p(num_connections=2)
self.test_orphan_tx_handling(block2.vtx[0].sha256, True)
def test_orphan_tx_handling(self, base_tx, resolve_via_block):
node = self.nodes[0] # convenience reference to the node
2021-07-19 12:39:22 +02:00
# Create a root transaction that we withhold until all dependent transactions
# are sent out and in the orphan cache
SCRIPT_PUB_KEY_OP_TRUE = b'\x51\x75' * 15 + b'\x51'
tx_withhold = CTransaction()
tx_withhold.vin.append(CTxIn(outpoint=COutPoint(base_tx, 0)))
tx_withhold.vout.append(CTxOut(nValue=50 * COIN - 12000, scriptPubKey=SCRIPT_PUB_KEY_OP_TRUE))
tx_withhold.calc_sha256()
# Our first orphan tx with some outputs to create further orphan txs
tx_orphan_1 = CTransaction()
tx_orphan_1.vin.append(CTxIn(outpoint=COutPoint(tx_withhold.sha256, 0)))
tx_orphan_1.vout = [CTxOut(nValue=10 * COIN, scriptPubKey=SCRIPT_PUB_KEY_OP_TRUE)] * 3
tx_orphan_1.calc_sha256()
# A valid transaction with low fee
tx_orphan_2_no_fee = CTransaction()
tx_orphan_2_no_fee.vin.append(CTxIn(outpoint=COutPoint(tx_orphan_1.sha256, 0)))
tx_orphan_2_no_fee.vout.append(CTxOut(nValue=10 * COIN, scriptPubKey=SCRIPT_PUB_KEY_OP_TRUE))
# A valid transaction with sufficient fee
tx_orphan_2_valid = CTransaction()
tx_orphan_2_valid.vin.append(CTxIn(outpoint=COutPoint(tx_orphan_1.sha256, 1)))
tx_orphan_2_valid.vout.append(CTxOut(nValue=10 * COIN - 12000, scriptPubKey=SCRIPT_PUB_KEY_OP_TRUE))
tx_orphan_2_valid.calc_sha256()
# An invalid transaction with negative fee
tx_orphan_2_invalid = CTransaction()
tx_orphan_2_invalid.vin.append(CTxIn(outpoint=COutPoint(tx_orphan_1.sha256, 2)))
tx_orphan_2_invalid.vout.append(CTxOut(nValue=11 * COIN, scriptPubKey=SCRIPT_PUB_KEY_OP_TRUE))
tx_orphan_2_invalid.calc_sha256()
self.log.info('Send the orphans ... ')
# Send valid orphan txs from p2ps[0]
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
node.p2ps[0].send_txs_and_test([tx_orphan_1, tx_orphan_2_no_fee, tx_orphan_2_valid], node, success=False)
# Send invalid tx from p2ps[1]
node.p2ps[1].send_txs_and_test([tx_orphan_2_invalid], node, success=False)
assert_equal(0, node.getmempoolinfo()['size']) # Mempool should be empty
assert_equal(2, len(node.getpeerinfo())) # p2ps[1] is still connected
self.log.info('Send the withhold tx ... ')
if resolve_via_block:
# Test orphan handling/resolution by publishing the withhold TX via a mined block
prev_block = node.getblockheader(node.getbestblockhash())
block = create_block(int(prev_block['hash'], 16), create_coinbase(prev_block['height'] + 1), prev_block["time"] + 1)
block.vtx.append(tx_withhold)
block.hashMerkleRoot = block.calc_merkle_root()
block.solve()
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
node.p2ps[0].send_blocks_and_test([block], node, success=True)
else:
with node.assert_debug_log(expected_msgs=["bad-txns-in-belowout"]):
# Test orphan handling/resolution by publishing the withhold TX via the mempool
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
node.p2ps[0].send_txs_and_test([tx_withhold], node, success=True)
# Transactions that should end up in the mempool
expected_mempool = {
t.hash
for t in [
tx_withhold, # The transaction that is the root for all orphans
tx_orphan_1, # The orphan transaction that splits the coins
tx_orphan_2_valid, # The valid transaction (with sufficient fee)
]
}
# Transactions that do not end up in the mempool:
# tx_orphan_2_no_fee, because it has too low fee (p2ps[0] is not disconnected for relaying that tx)
# tx_orphan_2_invalid, because it has negative fee (p2ps[1] is disconnected for relaying that tx)
if resolve_via_block:
# This TX has appeared in a block instead of being broadcasted via the mempool
expected_mempool.remove(tx_withhold.hash)
self.wait_until(lambda: 1 == len(node.getpeerinfo()), timeout=12) # p2ps[1] is no longer connected
assert_equal(expected_mempool, set(node.getrawmempool()))
self.log.info('Test orphan pool overflow')
# this test is different with bitcoin due to dashpay/dash#3121
# we have a limit based on size in megabytes, not by amount of txes
# one tx is 91byte; 1Mb / 4451byte = 224; need to send at least 225
orphan_tx_pool = [CTransaction() for _ in range(225)]
for i in range(len(orphan_tx_pool)):
orphan_tx_pool[i].vin.append(CTxIn(outpoint=COutPoint(i, 333)))
for j in range(110):
orphan_tx_pool[i].vout.append(CTxOut(nValue=COIN // 10, scriptPubKey=SCRIPT_PUB_KEY_OP_TRUE))
with node.assert_debug_log(['orphanage overflow, removed 1 tx']):
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
node.p2ps[0].send_txs_and_test(orphan_tx_pool, node, success=False)
rejected_parent = CTransaction()
rejected_parent.vin.append(CTxIn(outpoint=COutPoint(tx_orphan_2_invalid.sha256, 0)))
rejected_parent.vout.append(CTxOut(nValue=11 * COIN, scriptPubKey=SCRIPT_PUB_KEY_OP_TRUE))
rejected_parent.rehash()
# TODO: somehow it fails on `block` stage without 'not keeping orphan'
#with node.assert_debug_log(['not keeping orphan with rejected parents {}'.format(rejected_parent.hash)]):
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
node.p2ps[0].send_txs_and_test([rejected_parent], node, success=False)
if __name__ == '__main__':
InvalidTxRequestTest().main()