dash/ci/test/00_setup_env_native_fuzz_with_valgrind.sh

18 lines
725 B
Bash
Raw Permalink Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env bash
#
# Copyright (c) 2019-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
export LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
export CONTAINER_NAME=ci_native_fuzz_valgrind
Merge #21205: build: actually fail when Boost is missing c5da2749e2f7375e292fb0982e8e252ae1adbce3 build: actually stop configure if Boost isn't available (fanquake) cad8b527eaf7a93877e2249960866fd4db2d1c14 build: explicitly install libboost-dev package (fanquake) Pull request description: If Boost is not found via AX_BOOST_BASE, we don't actually stop configuring, only a warning is emitted: ```bash checking for boostlib >= 1.58.0 (105800)... configure: We could not detect the boost libraries (version MINIMUM_REQUIRED_BOOST or higher). If you have a staged boost library (still not installed) please specify $BOOST_ROOT in your environment and do not give a PATH to --with-boost option. If you are sure you have boost installed, then check your version number looking in <boost/version.hpp>. See http://randspringer.de/boost for more documentation. ``` Instead we usually fail when one of the other AX_BOOST_* macros fails to find a library. These macros are slowly being removed, and in any case, it makes more sense to fail earlier if Boost is missing. If Boost is unavailable, the failure now looks like: ```bash checking for boostlib >= 1.58.0 (105800)... configure: We could not detect the boost libraries (version 1.58.0 or higher). If you have a staged boost library (still not installed) please specify $BOOST_ROOT in your environment and do not give a PATH to --with-boost option. If you are sure you have boost installed, then check your version number looking in <boost/version.hpp>. See http://randspringer.de/boost for more documentation. configure: error: Boost is not available! ``` Note that we now just pass the version into AX_BOOST_BASE, which fixes it's display in the output (rather than showing `MINIMUM_REQUIRED_BOOST`). This PR also has a commit that adds `libboost-dev` to our install instructions and CI. This package is currently installed as a side-effect of installing our other libboost-*-dev packages. However as those continue to disappear, it makes sense to install boost-dev explicitly. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK c5da2749e2f7375e292fb0982e8e252ae1adbce3 MarcoFalke: Concept ACK c5da2749e2f7375e292fb0982e8e252ae1adbce3 Tree-SHA512: f866062f9d7d3a2316b6c887f17c664b9cfff41fdc0cb99ca79d641240fb01a5ae0d34140e515bc465219e1b43d5ca84f7c55f48b9c5b45a80ff2795dafd072b
2021-02-19 09:47:54 +01:00
export PACKAGES="clang llvm python3 libevent-dev bsdmainutils libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-test-dev valgrind"
export NO_DEPENDS=1
export RUN_UNIT_TESTS=false
export RUN_FUNCTIONAL_TESTS=false
export RUN_FUZZ_TESTS=true
Merge #18162: util: Avoid potential uninitialized read in FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t) by checking gmtime_s/gmtime_r return value 12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041 util: Avoid potential uninitialized read in FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t nTime) by checking gmtime_s/gmtime_r return value (practicalswift) Pull request description: Avoid potential uninitialized read in `FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t)` by checking `gmtime_s`/`gmtime_r` return value. Before this patch `FormatISO8601DateTime(67768036191676800)` resulted in: ``` ==5930== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==5930== at 0x4F44C0A: std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::_M_insert_int<long>(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, long) const (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25) ==5930== by 0x4F511A4: std::ostream& std::ostream::_M_insert<long>(long) (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25) ==5930== by 0x4037C3: void tinyformat::formatValue<int>(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int, int const&) (tinyformat.h:358) ==5930== by 0x403725: void tinyformat::detail::FormatArg::formatImpl<int>(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int, void const*) (tinyformat.h:543) ==5930== by 0x402E02: tinyformat::detail::FormatArg::format(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int) const (tinyformat.h:528) ==5930== by 0x401B16: tinyformat::detail::formatImpl(std::ostream&, char const*, tinyformat::detail::FormatArg const*, int) (tinyformat.h:907) ==5930== by 0x4017AE: tinyformat::vformat(std::ostream&, char const*, tinyformat::FormatList const&) (tinyformat.h:1054) ==5930== by 0x401765: void tinyformat::format<int, int, int, int, int, int>(std::ostream&, char const*, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&) (tinyformat.h:1064) ==5930== by 0x401656: std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > tinyformat::format<int, int, int, int, int, int>(char const*, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&) (tinyformat.h:1073) ==5930== by 0x4014CC: FormatISO8601DateTime[abi:cxx11](long) (…) ``` The same goes for other very large positive and negative arguments. Fix by simply checking the `gmtime_s`/`gmtime_r` return value :) ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041 theStack: re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041 elichai: re ACK 12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041 Tree-SHA512: 066142670d9bf0944d41fa3f3c702b1a460b5471b93e76a619b1e818ff9bb9c09fe14c4c37e9536a04c99533f7f21d1b08ac141e1b829ff87ee54c80d0e61d48
2020-02-25 02:51:13 +01:00
export FUZZ_TESTS_CONFIG="--valgrind"
export GOAL="install"
2024-02-10 12:47:41 +01:00
export BITCOIN_CONFIG="--enable-fuzz --with-sanitizers=fuzzer --enable-suppress-external-warnings CC=clang-16 CXX=clang++-16"