dash/test/functional/wallet_basic.py

656 lines
32 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2019 The Bitcoin Core developers
2014-12-13 05:09:33 +01:00
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""Test the wallet."""
from decimal import Decimal
2019-08-09 01:21:11 +02:00
from test_framework.blocktools import COINBASE_MATURITY
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import (
assert_array_result,
assert_equal,
assert_fee_amount,
assert_raises_rpc_error,
count_bytes,
)
Merge #17578: rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1 doc: update release notes (Jon Atack) 8bb405bbadf11391ccba7b334b4cfe66dc85b390 test: getaddressinfo labels purpose deprecation test (Jon Atack) 60aba1f2f11529add115d963d05599130288ae28 rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior (Jon Atack) 7851f14ccf2bcd1e9b2ad48e5e08881be06d9d21 rpc: incorporate review feedback from PR 17283 (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR builds on #17283 (now merged) and is followed by #17585. It modifies the value returned by rpc getaddressinfo `labels` to an array of label name strings and deprecates the previous behavior of returning an array of JSON hash structures containing label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs. before ``` "labels": [ { "name": "DOUBLE SPEND", "purpose": "receive" } ``` after ``` "labels": [ "DOUBLE SPEND" ] ``` The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose`. For context, see: - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001 - http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-13.html#l-425 (lines 425-427) - http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622 Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo help text and `labels` output. Next steps: deprecate the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field (EDIT: done in #17585) and add support for multiple labels per address. This PR will unblock those. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: reACK 8925df8 promag: Code review ACK 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1. meshcollider: Code review ACK 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1 Tree-SHA512: c2b717209996da32b6484de7bb8800e7048410f9ce6afdb3e02a6866bd4a8f2c730f905fca27b10b877b91cf407f546e69e8c4feb9cd934325a6c71c166bd438
2020-01-07 23:23:58 +01:00
from test_framework.wallet_util import test_address
class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 4
self.extra_args = [[
"-acceptnonstdtxn=1",
'-usehd={:d}'.format(i%2==0),
] for i in range(self.num_nodes)]
self.setup_clean_chain = True
self.supports_cli = False
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
def setup_network(self):
self.setup_nodes()
# Only need nodes 0-2 running at start of test
self.stop_node(3)
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
self.connect_nodes(1, 2)
self.connect_nodes(0, 2)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
def check_fee_amount(self, curr_balance, balance_with_fee, fee_per_byte, tx_size):
"""Return curr_balance after asserting the fee was in range"""
fee = balance_with_fee - curr_balance
assert_fee_amount(fee, tx_size, fee_per_byte * 1000)
return curr_balance
def run_test(self):
# Check that there's no UTXO on none of the nodes
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listunspent()), 0)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].listunspent()), 0)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[2].listunspent()), 0)
self.log.info("Mining blocks...")
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
2014-12-25 08:57:16 +01:00
walletinfo = self.nodes[0].getwalletinfo()
assert_equal(walletinfo['immature_balance'], 500)
2014-12-25 08:57:16 +01:00
assert_equal(walletinfo['balance'], 0)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
self.nodes[1].generate(COINBASE_MATURITY + 1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), 500)
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), 500)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), 0)
# Check that only first and second nodes have UTXOs
utxos = self.nodes[0].listunspent()
assert_equal(len(utxos), 1)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].listunspent()), 1)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[2].listunspent()), 0)
self.log.info("test gettxout")
confirmed_txid, confirmed_index = utxos[0]["txid"], utxos[0]["vout"]
# First, outputs that are unspent both in the chain and in the
# mempool should appear with or without include_mempool
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(txid=confirmed_txid, n=confirmed_index, include_mempool=False)
assert_equal(txout['value'], 500)
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(txid=confirmed_txid, n=confirmed_index, include_mempool=True)
assert_equal(txout['value'], 500)
# Send 210 DASH from 0 to 2 using sendtoaddress call.
# Second transaction will be child of first, and will require a fee
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 110)
mempool_txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 100)
self.log.info("test gettxout (second part)")
# utxo spent in mempool should be visible if you exclude mempool
# but invisible if you include mempool
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(confirmed_txid, confirmed_index, False)
assert_equal(txout['value'], 500)
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(confirmed_txid, confirmed_index, True)
assert txout is None
# new utxo from mempool should be invisible if you exclude mempool
# but visible if you include mempool
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(mempool_txid, 0, False)
assert txout is None
txout1 = self.nodes[0].gettxout(mempool_txid, 0, True)
txout2 = self.nodes[0].gettxout(mempool_txid, 1, True)
# note the mempool tx will have randomly assigned indices
# but 10 will go to node2 and the rest will go to node0
balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(set([txout1['value'], txout2['value']]), set([100, balance]))
2014-12-25 08:57:16 +01:00
walletinfo = self.nodes[0].getwalletinfo()
assert_equal(walletinfo['immature_balance'], 0)
2015-04-28 16:48:28 +02:00
# Have node0 mine a block, thus it will collect its own fee.
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
# Exercise locking of unspent outputs
unspent_0 = self.nodes[2].listunspent()[0]
unspent_0 = {"txid": unspent_0["txid"], "vout": unspent_0["vout"]}
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, expected locked output", self.nodes[2].lockunspent, True, [unspent_0])
self.nodes[2].lockunspent(False, [unspent_0])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, output already locked", self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False, [unspent_0])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Insufficient funds", self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress, self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 200)
assert_equal([unspent_0], self.nodes[2].listlockunspent())
self.nodes[2].lockunspent(True, [unspent_0])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[2].listlockunspent()), 0)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be of length 64 (not 34, for '0000000000000000000000000000000000')",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "0000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, unknown transaction",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, vout index out of bounds",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": unspent_0["txid"], "vout": 999}])
# An output should be unlocked when spent
unspent_0 = self.nodes[1].listunspent()[0]
self.nodes[1].lockunspent(False, [unspent_0])
tx = self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction([unspent_0], { self.nodes[1].getnewaddress() : 1 })
tx = self.nodes[1].fundrawtransaction(tx)['hex']
tx = self.nodes[1].signrawtransactionwithwallet(tx)["hex"]
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(tx)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].listlockunspent()), 0)
# Have node1 generate 100 blocks (so node0 can recover the fee)
self.nodes[1].generate(COINBASE_MATURITY)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
# node0 should end up with 1000 DASH in block rewards plus fees, but
# minus the 210 plus fees sent to node2
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), 1000 - 210)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), 210)
# Node0 should have two unspent outputs.
# Create a couple of transactions to send them to node2, submit them through
# node1, and make sure both node0 and node2 pick them up properly:
node0utxos = self.nodes[0].listunspent(1)
assert_equal(len(node0utxos), 2)
fee_per_input = Decimal('0.00001')
totalfee = 0
# create both transactions
txns_to_send = []
for utxo in node0utxos:
inputs = []
outputs = {}
inputs.append({"txid": utxo["txid"], "vout": utxo["vout"]})
outputs[self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()] = utxo["amount"] - fee_per_input
raw_tx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
txns_to_send.append(self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(raw_tx))
totalfee += fee_per_input
# Have node 1 (miner) send the transactions
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(hexstring=txns_to_send[0]["hex"], maxfeerate=0)
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(hexstring=txns_to_send[1]["hex"], maxfeerate=0)
# Have node1 mine a block to confirm transactions:
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), 0)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), 1000 - totalfee)
# Verify that a spent output cannot be locked anymore
spent_0 = {"txid": node0utxos[0]["txid"], "vout": node0utxos[0]["vout"]}
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, expected unspent output", self.nodes[0].lockunspent, False, [spent_0])
# Send 100 DASH normal
address = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress("test")
fee_per_byte = Decimal('0.00001') / 1000
self.nodes[2].settxfee(fee_per_byte * 1000)
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(address, 100, "", "", False)
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), Decimal('900') - totalfee, fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), Decimal('100'))
# Send 100 DASH with subtract fee from amount
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(address, 100, "", "", True)
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal -= Decimal('100')
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
node_0_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), Decimal('200'), fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
# Sendmany 100 DASH
txid = self.nodes[2].sendmany('', {address: 100}, 0, False, "", [])
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_0_bal += Decimal('100')
node_2_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal - Decimal('100'), fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), node_0_bal)
# Sendmany 100 DASH with subtract fee from amount
txid = self.nodes[2].sendmany('', {address: 100}, 0, False, "", [address])
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal -= Decimal('100')
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
node_0_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), node_0_bal + Decimal('100'), fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
self.start_node(3)
self.connect_nodes(0, 3)
Merge #11413: [wallet] [rpc] sendtoaddress/sendmany: Add explicit feerate option 25dac9fa65243ca8db02df22f484039c08114401 doc: add release notes for explicit fee estimators and bumpfee change (Karl-Johan Alm) 05227a35545d7656450874b3668bf418c73813fb tests for bumpfee / estimate_modes (Karl-Johan Alm) 3404c1b753432c4859a4ca245f01c240610a00cb policy: optional FeeEstimateMode param to CFeeRate::ToString (Karl-Johan Alm) 6fcf4484302d13bd7739b617470d8c8e31974908 rpc/wallet: add two explicit modes to estimate_mode (Karl-Johan Alm) b188d80c2de9ebb114da5ceea78baa46bde7dff6 MOVEONLY: Make FeeEstimateMode available to CFeeRate (Karl-Johan Alm) 5d1a411eb12fc700804ffe5d6e205234d30edd5f fees: add FeeModes doc helper function (Karl-Johan Alm) 91f6d2bc8ff4d4cd1b86daa370ec9d2d9662394d rpc/wallet: add conf_target as alias to confTarget in bumpfee (Karl-Johan Alm) 69158b41fc488e4f220559da17a475eff5923a95 added CURRENCY_ATOM to express minimum indivisible unit (Karl-Johan Alm) Pull request description: This lets users pick their own fees when using `sendtoaddress`/`sendmany` if they prefer this over the estimators. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-utACK 25dac9fa65: rebased, more fancy C++, jonatack: ACK 25dac9fa65243ca8db02df2 I think this should be merged after all this time, even though it looks to me like there are needed follow-ups, fixes and test coverage to be added (see further down), which I don't mind helping out with, if wanted. fjahr: Code review ACK 25dac9fa65243ca8db02df22f484039c08114401 Tree-SHA512: f31177e6cabf3187a43cdfe93477144f8e8385c7344613743cbbd16e8490d53ff5144aec7b9de6c9a65eb855b55e0f99d7f164dee4b6bf3cfea4dce51cf11d33
2020-06-25 19:25:46 +02:00
# Sendmany with explicit fee (DASH/kB)
# Throw if no conf_target provided
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Selected estimate_mode requires a fee rate",
self.nodes[2].sendmany,
amounts={ address: 10 },
estimate_mode='dash/kB')
# Throw if negative feerate
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range",
self.nodes[2].sendmany,
amounts={ address: 10 },
conf_target=-1,
estimate_mode='dash/kB')
fee_per_kb = 0.0002500
explicit_fee_per_byte = Decimal(fee_per_kb) / 1000
txid = self.nodes[2].sendmany(
amounts={ address: 10 },
conf_target=fee_per_kb,
estimate_mode='dash/kB',
)
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal - Decimal('10'), explicit_fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
node_0_bal += Decimal('10')
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), node_0_bal)
# Sendmany with explicit fee (DUFF/B)
# Throw if no conf_target provided
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Selected estimate_mode requires a fee rate",
self.nodes[2].sendmany,
amounts={ address: 10 },
estimate_mode='duff/b')
# Throw if negative feerate
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range",
self.nodes[2].sendmany,
amounts={ address: 10 },
conf_target=-1,
estimate_mode='duff/b')
fee_duff_per_b = 2
fee_per_kb = fee_duff_per_b / 100000.0
explicit_fee_per_byte = Decimal(fee_per_kb) / 1000
txid = self.nodes[2].sendmany(
amounts={ address: 10 },
conf_target=fee_duff_per_b,
estimate_mode='duff/b',
)
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
balance = self.nodes[2].getbalance()
node_2_bal = self.check_fee_amount(balance, node_2_bal - Decimal('10'), explicit_fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
assert_equal(balance, node_2_bal)
node_0_bal += Decimal('10')
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), node_0_bal)
# check if we can list zero value tx as available coins
# 1. create raw_tx
# 2. hex-changed one output to 0.0
# 3. sign and send
# 4. check if recipient (node0) can list the zero value tx
usp = self.nodes[1].listunspent(query_options={'minimumAmount': '499.998'})[0]
inputs = [{"txid": usp['txid'], "vout": usp['vout']}]
outputs = {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(): 499.998, self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): 11.11}
raw_tx = self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs).replace("c0833842", "00000000") # replace 11.11 with 0.0 (int32)
signed_raw_tx = self.nodes[1].signrawtransactionwithwallet(raw_tx)
decoded_raw_tx = self.nodes[1].decoderawtransaction(signed_raw_tx['hex'])
zero_value_txid = decoded_raw_tx['txid']
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signed_raw_tx['hex'])
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[1].generate(1) # mine a block
self.sync_all()
unspent_txs = self.nodes[0].listunspent() # zero value tx must be in listunspents output
found = False
for uTx in unspent_txs:
if uTx['txid'] == zero_value_txid:
found = True
assert_equal(uTx['amount'], Decimal('0'))
assert found
# do some -walletbroadcast tests
self.stop_nodes()
self.start_node(0, ["-walletbroadcast=0"])
self.start_node(1, ["-walletbroadcast=0"])
self.start_node(2, ["-walletbroadcast=0"])
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
self.connect_nodes(1, 2)
self.connect_nodes(0, 2)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
txid_not_broadcast = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 2)
tx_obj_not_broadcast = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid_not_broadcast)
self.nodes[1].generate(1) # mine a block, tx should not be in there
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal) # should not be changed because tx was not broadcasted
# now broadcast from another node, mine a block, sync, and check the balance
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(tx_obj_not_broadcast['hex'])
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal += 2
tx_obj_not_broadcast = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid_not_broadcast)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
# create another tx
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 2)
# restart the nodes with -walletbroadcast=1
self.stop_nodes()
self.start_node(0)
self.start_node(1)
self.start_node(2)
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
self.connect_nodes(1, 2)
self.connect_nodes(0, 2)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:3])
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal += 2
# tx should be added to balance because after restarting the nodes tx should be broadcast
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
# send a tx with value in a string (PR#6380 +)
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "2")
tx_obj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert_equal(tx_obj['amount'], Decimal('-2'))
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "0.0001")
tx_obj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert_equal(tx_obj['amount'], Decimal('-0.0001'))
# check if JSON parser can handle scientific notation in strings
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "1e-4")
tx_obj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert_equal(tx_obj['amount'], Decimal('-0.0001'))
# General checks for errors from incorrect inputs
# This will raise an exception because the amount type is wrong
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Invalid amount", self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress, self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "1f-4")
# This will raise an exception since generate does not accept a string
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "not an integer", self.nodes[0].generate, "2")
# This will raise an exception for the invalid private key format
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid private key encoding", self.nodes[0].importprivkey, "invalid")
# This will raise an exception for importing an address with the PS2H flag
temp_address = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Cannot use the p2sh flag with an address - use a script instead", self.nodes[0].importaddress, temp_address, "label", False, True)
# This will raise an exception for attempting to dump the private key of an address you do not own
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Private key for address %s is not known" % temp_address, self.nodes[0].dumpprivkey, temp_address)
# This will raise an exception for attempting to get the private key of an invalid Dash address
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid Dash address", self.nodes[0].dumpprivkey, "invalid")
# This will raise an exception for attempting to set a label for an invalid Dash address
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid Dash address", self.nodes[0].setlabel, "invalid address", "label")
# This will raise an exception for importing an invalid address
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid Dash address or script", self.nodes[0].importaddress, "invalid")
# This will raise an exception for attempting to import a pubkey that isn't in hex
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Pubkey must be a hex string", self.nodes[0].importpubkey, "not hex")
# This will raise an exception for importing an invalid pubkey
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Pubkey is not a valid public key", self.nodes[0].importpubkey, "5361746f736869204e616b616d6f746f")
# Import address and private key to check correct behavior of spendable unspents
# 1. Send some coins to generate new UTXO
address_to_import = self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(address_to_import, 1)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
Merge #11413: [wallet] [rpc] sendtoaddress/sendmany: Add explicit feerate option 25dac9fa65243ca8db02df22f484039c08114401 doc: add release notes for explicit fee estimators and bumpfee change (Karl-Johan Alm) 05227a35545d7656450874b3668bf418c73813fb tests for bumpfee / estimate_modes (Karl-Johan Alm) 3404c1b753432c4859a4ca245f01c240610a00cb policy: optional FeeEstimateMode param to CFeeRate::ToString (Karl-Johan Alm) 6fcf4484302d13bd7739b617470d8c8e31974908 rpc/wallet: add two explicit modes to estimate_mode (Karl-Johan Alm) b188d80c2de9ebb114da5ceea78baa46bde7dff6 MOVEONLY: Make FeeEstimateMode available to CFeeRate (Karl-Johan Alm) 5d1a411eb12fc700804ffe5d6e205234d30edd5f fees: add FeeModes doc helper function (Karl-Johan Alm) 91f6d2bc8ff4d4cd1b86daa370ec9d2d9662394d rpc/wallet: add conf_target as alias to confTarget in bumpfee (Karl-Johan Alm) 69158b41fc488e4f220559da17a475eff5923a95 added CURRENCY_ATOM to express minimum indivisible unit (Karl-Johan Alm) Pull request description: This lets users pick their own fees when using `sendtoaddress`/`sendmany` if they prefer this over the estimators. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-utACK 25dac9fa65: rebased, more fancy C++, jonatack: ACK 25dac9fa65243ca8db02df2 I think this should be merged after all this time, even though it looks to me like there are needed follow-ups, fixes and test coverage to be added (see further down), which I don't mind helping out with, if wanted. fjahr: Code review ACK 25dac9fa65243ca8db02df22f484039c08114401 Tree-SHA512: f31177e6cabf3187a43cdfe93477144f8e8385c7344613743cbbd16e8490d53ff5144aec7b9de6c9a65eb855b55e0f99d7f164dee4b6bf3cfea4dce51cf11d33
2020-06-25 19:25:46 +02:00
# send with explicit dash/kb fee
self.log.info("test explicit fee (sendtoaddress as dash/kb)")
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
prebalance = self.nodes[2].getbalance()
assert prebalance > 2
address = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
# Throw if no conf_target provided
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Selected estimate_mode requires a fee rate",
self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress,
address=address,
amount=1.0,
estimate_mode='dash/Kb')
# Throw if negative feerate
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range",
self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress,
address=address,
amount=1.0,
conf_target=-1,
estimate_mode='dash/kb')
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(
address=address,
amount=1.0,
conf_target=0.00002500,
estimate_mode='dash/kb',
)
tx_size = count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex'])
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
postbalance = self.nodes[2].getbalance()
fee = prebalance - postbalance - Decimal('1')
assert_fee_amount(fee, tx_size, Decimal('0.00002500'))
# send with explicit duff/b fee
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
self.log.info("test explicit fee (sendtoaddress as duff/b)")
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
prebalance = self.nodes[2].getbalance()
assert prebalance > 2
address = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
# Throw if no conf_target provided
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Selected estimate_mode requires a fee rate",
self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress,
address=address,
amount=1.0,
estimate_mode='duff/b')
# Throw if negative feerate
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range",
self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress,
address=address,
amount=1.0,
conf_target=-1,
estimate_mode='duff/b')
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(
address=address,
amount=1.0,
conf_target=2,
estimate_mode='duff/B',
)
tx_size = count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex'])
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
postbalance = self.nodes[2].getbalance()
fee = prebalance - postbalance - Decimal('1')
assert_fee_amount(fee, tx_size, Decimal('0.00002000'))
# 2. Import address from node2 to node1
self.nodes[1].importaddress(address_to_import)
# 3. Validate that the imported address is watch-only on node1
assert self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(address_to_import)["iswatchonly"]
# 4. Check that the unspents after import are not spendable
assert_array_result(self.nodes[1].listunspent(),
{"address": address_to_import},
{"spendable": False})
# 5. Import private key of the previously imported address on node1
priv_key = self.nodes[2].dumpprivkey(address_to_import)
self.nodes[1].importprivkey(priv_key)
# 6. Check that the unspents are now spendable on node1
assert_array_result(self.nodes[1].listunspent(),
{"address": address_to_import},
{"spendable": True})
# Mine a block from node0 to an address from node1
coinbase_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
block_hash = self.nodes[0].generatetoaddress(1, coinbase_addr)[0]
coinbase_txid = self.nodes[0].getblock(block_hash)['tx'][0]
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
# Check that the txid and balance is found by node1
self.nodes[1].gettransaction(coinbase_txid)
# check if wallet or blockchain maintenance changes the balance
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
blocks = self.nodes[0].generate(2)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
balance_nodes = [self.nodes[i].getbalance() for i in range(3)]
block_count = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
2016-04-28 15:18:01 +02:00
# Check modes:
# - True: unicode escaped as \u....
# - False: unicode directly as UTF-8
for mode in [True, False]:
self.nodes[0].rpc.ensure_ascii = mode
2016-04-28 15:18:01 +02:00
# unicode check: Basic Multilingual Plane, Supplementary Plane respectively
for label in [u'рыба', u'𝅘𝅥𝅯']:
addr = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
self.nodes[0].setlabel(addr, label)
2020-02-02 09:35:24 +01:00
test_address(self.nodes[0], addr, labels=[label])
assert label in self.nodes[0].listlabels()
self.nodes[0].rpc.ensure_ascii = True # restore to default
2016-04-28 15:18:01 +02:00
# maintenance tests
maintenance = [
'-rescan',
'-reindex',
]
chainlimit = 6
for m in maintenance:
self.log.info("check " + m)
self.stop_nodes()
# set lower ancestor limit for later
self.start_node(0, [m, "-limitancestorcount=" + str(chainlimit)])
self.start_node(1, [m, "-limitancestorcount=" + str(chainlimit)])
self.start_node(2, [m, "-limitancestorcount=" + str(chainlimit)])
if m == '-reindex':
# reindex will leave rpc warm up "early"; Wait for it to finish
self.wait_until(lambda: [block_count] * 3 == [self.nodes[i].getblockcount() for i in range(3)])
assert_equal(balance_nodes, [self.nodes[i].getbalance() for i in range(3)])
# Exercise listsinceblock with the last two blocks
coinbase_tx_1 = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blocks[0])
assert_equal(coinbase_tx_1["lastblock"], blocks[1])
assert_equal(len(coinbase_tx_1["transactions"]), 1)
assert_equal(coinbase_tx_1["transactions"][0]["blockhash"], blocks[1])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blocks[1])["transactions"]), 0)
# ==Check that wallet prefers to use coins that don't exceed mempool limits =====
# Get all non-zero utxos together
chain_addrs = [self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()]
singletxid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(chain_addrs[0], self.nodes[0].getbalance(), "", "", True)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
node0_balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
# Split into two chains
rawtx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction([{"txid": singletxid, "vout": 0}], {chain_addrs[0]: node0_balance / 2 - Decimal('0.01'), chain_addrs[1]: node0_balance / 2 - Decimal('0.01')})
signedtx = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx)
singletxid = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(hexstring=signedtx["hex"], maxfeerate=0)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
# Make a long chain of unconfirmed payments without hitting mempool limit
# Each tx we make leaves only one output of change on a chain 1 longer
# Since the amount to send is always much less than the outputs, we only ever need one output
# So we should be able to generate exactly chainlimit txs for each original output
sending_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid_list = []
Merge #19674: refactor: test: use throwaway _ variable for unused loop counters dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase. The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used. Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked. ACKs for top commit: darosior: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 instagibbs: manual inspection ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19674/commits/dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 practicalswift: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :) Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
2020-08-11 02:50:34 +02:00
for _ in range(chainlimit * 2):
txid_list.append(self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(sending_addr, Decimal('0.0001')))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['size'], chainlimit * 2)
assert_equal(len(txid_list), chainlimit * 2)
# Without walletrejectlongchains, we will still generate a txid
# The tx will be stored in the wallet but not accepted to the mempool
extra_txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(sending_addr, Decimal('0.0001'))
assert extra_txid not in self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()
assert extra_txid in [tx["txid"] for tx in self.nodes[0].listtransactions()]
self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(extra_txid)
total_txs = len(self.nodes[0].listtransactions("*", 99999))
# Try with walletrejectlongchains
# Double chain limit but require combining inputs, so we pass SelectCoinsMinConf
self.restart_node(0, extra_args=["-walletrejectlongchains", "-limitancestorcount=" + str(2 * chainlimit)])
# wait until the wallet has submitted all transactions to the mempool
self.wait_until(lambda: len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()) == chainlimit * 2)
# Prevent potential race condition when calling wallet RPCs right after restart
self.nodes[0].syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue()
node0_balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
# With walletrejectlongchains we will not create the tx and store it in our wallet.
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Transaction has too long of a mempool chain", self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress, sending_addr, node0_balance - Decimal('0.01'))
# Verify nothing new in wallet
assert_equal(total_txs, len(self.nodes[0].listtransactions("*", 99999)))
# Test getaddressinfo on external address. Note that these addresses are taken from disablewallet.py
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid address", self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo, "3J98t1WpEZ73CNmQviecrnyiWrnqRhWNLy")
address_info = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo("yjQ5gLvGRtmq1cwc4kePLCrzQ8GVCh9Gaz")
assert_equal(address_info['address'], "yjQ5gLvGRtmq1cwc4kePLCrzQ8GVCh9Gaz")
assert_equal(address_info["scriptPubKey"], "76a914fd2b4d101724a76374fccbc5b6df7670a75d7cd088ac")
assert not address_info["ismine"]
assert not address_info["iswatchonly"]
assert not address_info["isscript"]
assert not address_info["ischange"]
# Test getaddressinfo 'ischange' field on change address.
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
destination = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(destination, 0.123)
tx = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)['hex'])
output_addresses = [vout['scriptPubKey']['addresses'][0] for vout in tx["vout"]]
assert len(output_addresses) > 1
for address in output_addresses:
ischange = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(address)['ischange']
assert_equal(ischange, address != destination)
if ischange:
change = address
self.nodes[0].setlabel(change, 'foobar')
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(change)['ischange'], False)
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
Merge #16873: rpc: fix regression in gettransaction 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b test: improve gettransaction test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f34f54888f680bfbe7a29ac278636d7178a99bb rpc: fix regression in gettransaction (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Closes #16872. PR #16866 renamed the `decode` argument in gettransaction to `verbose` to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction. However, it inadvertently overloaded the "details" field when `verbose` is passed. The result is that the original "details" field is no longer returned correctly, which seems to be a breaking API change. This PR: - takes the simplest path to restoring the "details" field by renaming the decoded one back to "decoded" while leaving the `verbose` argument for API consistency, which was the main intent of #16866, - addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) by mentioning in the RPC help that the new decoded field is equivalent to decoderawtransaction, and - updates the help, functional test, and release note. Reviewers, to test this manually, build and run `bitcoin-cli help gettransaction` and `bitcoin-cli gettransaction <wallet txid> false true`, and verify that the command returns both `details` and `decoded` fields. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: tACK 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b Tree-SHA512: 287edd5db7ed58fe8b548975aba58628bd45ed708b28f40174f10a35a455d89f796fbf27430aa881fc376f47aabda8803f74d4d100683bd86577a02279091cf3
2019-09-15 23:44:06 +02:00
# Test gettransaction response with different arguments.
self.log.info("Testing gettransaction response with different arguments...")
self.nodes[0].setlabel(change, 'baz')
baz = self.nodes[0].listtransactions(label="baz", count=1)[0]
expected_receive_vout = {"label": "baz",
"address": baz["address"],
"amount": baz["amount"],
"category": baz["category"],
"vout": baz["vout"]}
expected_fields = frozenset({'amount', 'chainlock', 'confirmations', 'details', 'fee',
'instantlock', 'instantlock_internal',
'hex', 'timereceived', 'time', 'trusted', 'txid', 'walletconflicts'})
verbose_field = "decoded"
expected_verbose_fields = expected_fields | {verbose_field}
self.log.debug("Testing gettransaction response without verbose")
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid=txid)
assert_equal(set([*tx]), expected_fields)
assert_array_result(tx["details"], {"category": "receive"}, expected_receive_vout)
self.log.debug("Testing gettransaction response with verbose set to False")
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid=txid, verbose=False)
assert_equal(set([*tx]), expected_fields)
assert_array_result(tx["details"], {"category": "receive"}, expected_receive_vout)
self.log.debug("Testing gettransaction response with verbose set to True")
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid=txid, verbose=True)
Merge #16873: rpc: fix regression in gettransaction 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b test: improve gettransaction test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f34f54888f680bfbe7a29ac278636d7178a99bb rpc: fix regression in gettransaction (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Closes #16872. PR #16866 renamed the `decode` argument in gettransaction to `verbose` to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction. However, it inadvertently overloaded the "details" field when `verbose` is passed. The result is that the original "details" field is no longer returned correctly, which seems to be a breaking API change. This PR: - takes the simplest path to restoring the "details" field by renaming the decoded one back to "decoded" while leaving the `verbose` argument for API consistency, which was the main intent of #16866, - addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) by mentioning in the RPC help that the new decoded field is equivalent to decoderawtransaction, and - updates the help, functional test, and release note. Reviewers, to test this manually, build and run `bitcoin-cli help gettransaction` and `bitcoin-cli gettransaction <wallet txid> false true`, and verify that the command returns both `details` and `decoded` fields. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: tACK 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b Tree-SHA512: 287edd5db7ed58fe8b548975aba58628bd45ed708b28f40174f10a35a455d89f796fbf27430aa881fc376f47aabda8803f74d4d100683bd86577a02279091cf3
2019-09-15 23:44:06 +02:00
assert_equal(set([*tx]), expected_verbose_fields)
assert_array_result(tx["details"], {"category": "receive"}, expected_receive_vout)
assert_equal(tx[verbose_field], self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(tx["hex"]))
if __name__ == '__main__':
WalletTest().main()