2014-09-03 02:20:09 +02:00
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Satoshi Nakamoto
|
2019-12-31 18:35:41 +01:00
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2009-2019 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
2014-09-29 08:22:03 +02:00
|
|
|
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
2014-09-03 02:20:09 +02:00
|
|
|
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-19 23:46:56 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <chain.h>
|
2014-09-03 02:20:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
refactor: re-order headers and forward declarations to improve compile time (#5693)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Some headers include other heavy headers, such as `logging.h`,
`tinyformat.h`, `iostream`. These headers are heavy and increase
compilation time on scale of whole project drastically because can be
used in many other headers.
## What was done?
Moved many heavy includes from headers to cpp files to optimize
compilation time.
In some places added forward declarations if it is reasonable.
As side effect removed 2 circular dependencies:
```
"llmq/debug -> llmq/dkgsessionhandler -> llmq/debug"
"llmq/debug -> llmq/dkgsessionhandler -> llmq/dkgsession -> llmq/debug"
```
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run build 2 times before refactoring and after refactoring: `make clean
&& sleep 10s; time make -j18`
Before refactoring:
```
real 5m37,826s
user 77m12,075s
sys 6m20,547s
real 5m32,626s
user 76m51,143s
sys 6m24,511s
```
After refactoring:
```
real 5m18,509s
user 73m32,133s
sys 6m21,590s
real 5m14,466s
user 73m20,942s
sys 6m17,868s
```
~5% of improvement for compilation time. That's not huge, but that's
worth to get merged
There're several more refactorings TODO but better to do them later by
backports:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#27636
- bitcoin/bitcoin#26286
- bitcoin/bitcoin#27238
- and maybe this one: bitcoin/bitcoin#28200
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-11-17 17:04:18 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <tinyformat.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string CBlockIndex::ToString() const
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return strprintf("CBlockIndex(pprev=%p, nHeight=%d, merkle=%s, hashBlock=%s)",
|
2022-07-16 13:22:46 +02:00
|
|
|
pprev, nHeight, hashMerkleRoot.ToString(), GetBlockHash().ToString());
|
refactor: re-order headers and forward declarations to improve compile time (#5693)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Some headers include other heavy headers, such as `logging.h`,
`tinyformat.h`, `iostream`. These headers are heavy and increase
compilation time on scale of whole project drastically because can be
used in many other headers.
## What was done?
Moved many heavy includes from headers to cpp files to optimize
compilation time.
In some places added forward declarations if it is reasonable.
As side effect removed 2 circular dependencies:
```
"llmq/debug -> llmq/dkgsessionhandler -> llmq/debug"
"llmq/debug -> llmq/dkgsessionhandler -> llmq/dkgsession -> llmq/debug"
```
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run build 2 times before refactoring and after refactoring: `make clean
&& sleep 10s; time make -j18`
Before refactoring:
```
real 5m37,826s
user 77m12,075s
sys 6m20,547s
real 5m32,626s
user 76m51,143s
sys 6m24,511s
```
After refactoring:
```
real 5m18,509s
user 73m32,133s
sys 6m21,590s
real 5m14,466s
user 73m20,942s
sys 6m17,868s
```
~5% of improvement for compilation time. That's not huge, but that's
worth to get merged
There're several more refactorings TODO but better to do them later by
backports:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#27636
- bitcoin/bitcoin#26286
- bitcoin/bitcoin#27238
- and maybe this one: bitcoin/bitcoin#28200
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-11-17 17:04:18 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-25 10:46:54 +02:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* CChain implementation
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-10-20 03:41:37 +02:00
|
|
|
void CChain::SetTip(CBlockIndex *pindex) {
|
2019-08-06 05:08:33 +02:00
|
|
|
if (pindex == nullptr) {
|
2014-09-03 02:20:09 +02:00
|
|
|
vChain.clear();
|
2014-10-20 03:41:37 +02:00
|
|
|
return;
|
2014-09-03 02:20:09 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
vChain.resize(pindex->nHeight + 1);
|
|
|
|
while (pindex && vChain[pindex->nHeight] != pindex) {
|
|
|
|
vChain[pindex->nHeight] = pindex;
|
|
|
|
pindex = pindex->pprev;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBlockLocator CChain::GetLocator(const CBlockIndex *pindex) const {
|
|
|
|
int nStep = 1;
|
|
|
|
std::vector<uint256> vHave;
|
|
|
|
vHave.reserve(32);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pindex)
|
|
|
|
pindex = Tip();
|
|
|
|
while (pindex) {
|
|
|
|
vHave.push_back(pindex->GetBlockHash());
|
|
|
|
// Stop when we have added the genesis block.
|
|
|
|
if (pindex->nHeight == 0)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
// Exponentially larger steps back, plus the genesis block.
|
|
|
|
int nHeight = std::max(pindex->nHeight - nStep, 0);
|
|
|
|
if (Contains(pindex)) {
|
|
|
|
// Use O(1) CChain index if possible.
|
|
|
|
pindex = (*this)[nHeight];
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, use O(log n) skiplist.
|
|
|
|
pindex = pindex->GetAncestor(nHeight);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (vHave.size() > 10)
|
|
|
|
nStep *= 2;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return CBlockLocator(vHave);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const CBlockIndex *CChain::FindFork(const CBlockIndex *pindex) const {
|
2019-08-06 05:08:33 +02:00
|
|
|
if (pindex == nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
return nullptr;
|
2014-11-18 22:16:32 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-09-03 02:20:09 +02:00
|
|
|
if (pindex->nHeight > Height())
|
|
|
|
pindex = pindex->GetAncestor(Height());
|
|
|
|
while (pindex && !Contains(pindex))
|
|
|
|
pindex = pindex->pprev;
|
|
|
|
return pindex;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-19 17:59:56 +02:00
|
|
|
CBlockIndex* CChain::FindEarliestAtLeast(int64_t nTime, int height) const
|
2016-10-20 09:04:18 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-04-19 17:59:56 +02:00
|
|
|
std::pair<int64_t, int> blockparams = std::make_pair(nTime, height);
|
|
|
|
std::vector<CBlockIndex*>::const_iterator lower = std::lower_bound(vChain.begin(), vChain.end(), blockparams,
|
|
|
|
[](CBlockIndex* pBlock, const std::pair<int64_t, int>& blockparams) -> bool { return pBlock->GetBlockTimeMax() < blockparams.first || pBlock->nHeight < blockparams.second; });
|
2019-08-06 05:08:33 +02:00
|
|
|
return (lower == vChain.end() ? nullptr : *lower);
|
2016-10-20 09:04:18 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
/** Turn the lowest '1' bit in the binary representation of a number into a '0'. */
|
|
|
|
int static inline InvertLowestOne(int n) { return n & (n - 1); }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Compute what height to jump back to with the CBlockIndex::pskip pointer. */
|
|
|
|
int static inline GetSkipHeight(int height) {
|
|
|
|
if (height < 2)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Determine which height to jump back to. Any number strictly lower than height is acceptable,
|
|
|
|
// but the following expression seems to perform well in simulations (max 110 steps to go back
|
|
|
|
// up to 2**18 blocks).
|
|
|
|
return (height & 1) ? InvertLowestOne(InvertLowestOne(height - 1)) + 1 : InvertLowestOne(height);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-01 15:17:25 +01:00
|
|
|
const CBlockIndex* CBlockIndex::GetAncestor(int height) const
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-12-01 15:17:25 +01:00
|
|
|
if (height > nHeight || height < 0) {
|
2019-08-06 05:08:33 +02:00
|
|
|
return nullptr;
|
2017-12-01 15:17:25 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-01 15:17:25 +01:00
|
|
|
const CBlockIndex* pindexWalk = this;
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
int heightWalk = nHeight;
|
|
|
|
while (heightWalk > height) {
|
|
|
|
int heightSkip = GetSkipHeight(heightWalk);
|
|
|
|
int heightSkipPrev = GetSkipHeight(heightWalk - 1);
|
2019-08-06 05:08:33 +02:00
|
|
|
if (pindexWalk->pskip != nullptr &&
|
2015-03-19 13:34:06 +01:00
|
|
|
(heightSkip == height ||
|
|
|
|
(heightSkip > height && !(heightSkipPrev < heightSkip - 2 &&
|
|
|
|
heightSkipPrev >= height)))) {
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
// Only follow pskip if pprev->pskip isn't better than pskip->pprev.
|
|
|
|
pindexWalk = pindexWalk->pskip;
|
|
|
|
heightWalk = heightSkip;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2016-04-26 14:34:40 +02:00
|
|
|
assert(pindexWalk->pprev);
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
pindexWalk = pindexWalk->pprev;
|
|
|
|
heightWalk--;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return pindexWalk;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-01 15:17:25 +01:00
|
|
|
CBlockIndex* CBlockIndex::GetAncestor(int height)
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-12-01 15:17:25 +01:00
|
|
|
return const_cast<CBlockIndex*>(static_cast<const CBlockIndex*>(this)->GetAncestor(height));
|
2014-11-23 14:07:38 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void CBlockIndex::BuildSkip()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (pprev)
|
|
|
|
pskip = pprev->GetAncestor(GetSkipHeight(nHeight));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-02-02 14:15:36 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arith_uint256 GetBlockProof(const CBlockIndex& block)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
arith_uint256 bnTarget;
|
|
|
|
bool fNegative;
|
|
|
|
bool fOverflow;
|
|
|
|
bnTarget.SetCompact(block.nBits, &fNegative, &fOverflow);
|
|
|
|
if (fNegative || fOverflow || bnTarget == 0)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
// We need to compute 2**256 / (bnTarget+1), but we can't represent 2**256
|
2017-06-22 20:36:16 +02:00
|
|
|
// as it's too large for an arith_uint256. However, as 2**256 is at least as large
|
2016-02-02 14:15:36 +01:00
|
|
|
// as bnTarget+1, it is equal to ((2**256 - bnTarget - 1) / (bnTarget+1)) + 1,
|
2017-10-10 08:56:08 +02:00
|
|
|
// or ~bnTarget / (bnTarget+1) + 1.
|
2016-02-02 14:15:36 +01:00
|
|
|
return (~bnTarget / (bnTarget + 1)) + 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int64_t GetBlockProofEquivalentTime(const CBlockIndex& to, const CBlockIndex& from, const CBlockIndex& tip, const Consensus::Params& params)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
arith_uint256 r;
|
|
|
|
int sign = 1;
|
|
|
|
if (to.nChainWork > from.nChainWork) {
|
|
|
|
r = to.nChainWork - from.nChainWork;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
r = from.nChainWork - to.nChainWork;
|
|
|
|
sign = -1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r = r * arith_uint256(params.nPowTargetSpacing) / GetBlockProof(tip);
|
|
|
|
if (r.bits() > 63) {
|
|
|
|
return sign * std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return sign * r.GetLow64();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-06-28 18:24:32 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Find the last common ancestor two blocks have.
|
2019-08-06 05:08:33 +02:00
|
|
|
* Both pa and pb must be non-nullptr. */
|
2017-06-28 18:24:32 +02:00
|
|
|
const CBlockIndex* LastCommonAncestor(const CBlockIndex* pa, const CBlockIndex* pb) {
|
|
|
|
if (pa->nHeight > pb->nHeight) {
|
|
|
|
pa = pa->GetAncestor(pb->nHeight);
|
|
|
|
} else if (pb->nHeight > pa->nHeight) {
|
|
|
|
pb = pb->GetAncestor(pa->nHeight);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (pa != pb && pa && pb) {
|
|
|
|
pa = pa->pprev;
|
|
|
|
pb = pb->pprev;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Eventually all chain branches meet at the genesis block.
|
|
|
|
assert(pa == pb);
|
|
|
|
return pa;
|
|
|
|
}
|