dash/contrib/guix/guix-verify

149 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env bash
export LC_ALL=C
set -e -o pipefail
# Source the common prelude, which:
# 1. Checks if we're at the top directory of the Bitcoin Core repository
# 2. Defines a few common functions and variables
#
# shellcheck source=libexec/prelude.bash
source "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/libexec/prelude.bash"
###################
## Sanity Checks ##
###################
################
# Required non-builtin commands should be invokable
################
check_tools cat diff gpg
################
# Required env vars should be non-empty
################
cmd_usage() {
cat <<EOF
Synopsis:
env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=<path/to/guix.sigs> ./contrib/guix/guix-verify
EOF
}
if [ -z "$GUIX_SIGS_REPO" ]; then
cmd_usage
exit 1
fi
################
# GUIX_SIGS_REPO should exist as a directory
################
if [ ! -d "$GUIX_SIGS_REPO" ]; then
cat << EOF
ERR: The specified GUIX_SIGS_REPO is not an existent directory:
'$GUIX_SIGS_REPO'
Hint: Please clone the guix.sigs repository and point to it with the
GUIX_SIGS_REPO environment variable.
EOF
cmd_usage
exit 1
fi
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
##############
## Verify ##
##############
OUTSIGDIR_BASE="${GUIX_SIGS_REPO}/${VERSION}"
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "Looking for signature directories in '${OUTSIGDIR_BASE}'"
echo ""
# Usage: verify compare_manifest current_manifest
verify() {
local compare_manifest="$1"
local current_manifest="$2"
if ! gpg --quiet --batch --verify "$current_manifest".asc "$current_manifest" 1>&2; then
echo "ERR: Failed to verify GPG signature in '${current_manifest}'"
echo ""
echo "Hint: Either the signature is invalid or the public key is missing"
echo ""
failure=1
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
elif ! diff --report-identical "$compare_manifest" "$current_manifest" 1>&2; then
echo "ERR: The SHA256SUMS attestation in these two directories differ:"
echo " '${compare_manifest}'"
echo " '${current_manifest}'"
echo ""
failure=1
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
else
echo "Verified: '${current_manifest}'"
echo ""
fi
}
shopt -s nullglob
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
all_noncodesigned=( "$OUTSIGDIR_BASE"/*/noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS )
shopt -u nullglob
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "--------------------"
echo ""
if (( ${#all_noncodesigned[@]} )); then
compare_noncodesigned="${all_noncodesigned[0]}"
for current_manifest in "${all_noncodesigned[@]}"; do
verify "$compare_noncodesigned" "$current_manifest"
done
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "DONE: Checking output signatures for noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS"
echo ""
else
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "WARN: No signature directories with noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS found"
echo ""
fi
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
shopt -s nullglob
all_all=( "$OUTSIGDIR_BASE"/*/all.SHA256SUMS )
shopt -u nullglob
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "--------------------"
echo ""
if (( ${#all_all[@]} )); then
compare_all="${all_all[0]}"
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
for current_manifest in "${all_all[@]}"; do
verify "$compare_all" "$current_manifest"
done
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
# Sanity check: there should be no entries that exist in
# noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS that doesn't exist in all.SHA256SUMS
if [[ "$(comm -23 <(sort "$compare_noncodesigned") <(sort "$compare_all") | wc -c)" -ne 0 ]]; then
echo "ERR: There are unique lines in noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS which"
echo " do not exist in all.SHA256SUMS, something went very wrong."
exit 1
fi
echo "DONE: Checking output signatures for all.SHA256SUMS"
echo ""
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
else
echo "WARN: No signature directories with all.SHA256SUMS found"
echo ""
fi
echo "===================="
echo ""
if (( ${#all_noncodesigned[@]} + ${#all_all[@]} == 0 )); then
echo "ERR: Unable to perform any verifications as no signature directories"
echo " were found"
echo ""
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
exit 1
fi
if [ -n "$failure" ]; then
exit 1
fi