2021-04-26 13:51:15 +02:00
|
|
|
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
2023-12-31 01:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2021-2023 The Dash Core developers
|
2021-04-26 13:51:15 +02:00
|
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import DashTestFramework
|
feat: new rpc `gettxchainlocks' to get transaction statuses by batch (#5578)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Requested by @QuantumExplorer for platform needs
## What was done?
New rpc `gettransactionsarelocked` that returns list of txes.
it does less heavy calculations and transfer less data by gRPC.
## How Has This Been Tested?
```
$ src/dash-cli gettransactionsarelocked '["e469de7994b9c1da8efd262fee8843efd7bdcab80c700dc1059c98b28f7c5c1b", "0d9fdf00c9568ff9103742b64e6b8287794633072f8824fa2c475f59e71dbace","0d3f48eebead54d640a7fc5692ddfcba619d8b49347d9a7c04586057c02dec9f"]'
[
{
"height": 907801,
"chainlock": true
},
{
"height": 101,
"chainlock": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false
}
]
```
Limiter tested by this call:
```
src/dash-cli gettransactionsarelocked '["", "","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]' | wc
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-20 16:07:24 +02:00
|
|
|
from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_raises_rpc_error
|
2021-04-26 13:51:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
|
|
rpc_verifychainlock.py
|
|
|
|
|
feat: new rpc `gettxchainlocks' to get transaction statuses by batch (#5578)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Requested by @QuantumExplorer for platform needs
## What was done?
New rpc `gettransactionsarelocked` that returns list of txes.
it does less heavy calculations and transfer less data by gRPC.
## How Has This Been Tested?
```
$ src/dash-cli gettransactionsarelocked '["e469de7994b9c1da8efd262fee8843efd7bdcab80c700dc1059c98b28f7c5c1b", "0d9fdf00c9568ff9103742b64e6b8287794633072f8824fa2c475f59e71dbace","0d3f48eebead54d640a7fc5692ddfcba619d8b49347d9a7c04586057c02dec9f"]'
[
{
"height": 907801,
"chainlock": true
},
{
"height": 101,
"chainlock": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false
}
]
```
Limiter tested by this call:
```
src/dash-cli gettransactionsarelocked '["", "","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]' | wc
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-20 16:07:24 +02:00
|
|
|
Test the following RPC:
|
|
|
|
- gettxchainlocks
|
|
|
|
- verifychainlock
|
2021-04-26 13:51:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class RPCVerifyChainLockTest(DashTestFramework):
|
|
|
|
def set_test_params(self):
|
|
|
|
# -whitelist is needed to avoid the trickling logic on node0
|
|
|
|
self.set_dash_test_params(5, 3, [["-whitelist=127.0.0.1"], [], [], [], []], fast_dip3_enforcement=True)
|
|
|
|
self.set_dash_llmq_test_params(3, 2)
|
|
|
|
|
feat(rpc): `gettxchainlocks` should return `mempool=false` when tx not in mempool (#5742)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform (in the scope of Withdrawals) need to be aware if a tx isn't in
mempool when requesting status of a tx using RPC `gettxchainlocks`.
cc @markin-io
## What was done?
- mempool is passed to `GetTransaction` and saving the result for
checking latter.
- If the returned tx_ref is nullptr, then the RPC returns null for the
corresponding tx in the array.
Example:
`tx1` is mined and chainlocked, `tx2` is in mempool and `tx3` doesn't
exist.
The result now is:
`[
{
"height": 830,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": false
}
]`
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-12-24 18:58:14 +01:00
|
|
|
def cl_helper(self, height, chainlock, mempool):
|
|
|
|
return {'height': height, 'chainlock': chainlock, 'mempool': mempool}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-26 13:51:15 +02:00
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
|
|
|
node0 = self.nodes[0]
|
|
|
|
node1 = self.nodes[1]
|
2022-06-18 18:52:45 +02:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].sporkupdate("SPORK_17_QUORUM_DKG_ENABLED", 0)
|
2021-04-26 13:51:15 +02:00
|
|
|
self.wait_for_sporks_same()
|
|
|
|
self.mine_quorum()
|
|
|
|
self.wait_for_chainlocked_block(node0, node0.generate(1)[0])
|
|
|
|
chainlock = node0.getbestchainlock()
|
|
|
|
block_hash = chainlock["blockhash"]
|
|
|
|
height = chainlock["height"]
|
|
|
|
chainlock_signature = chainlock["signature"]
|
|
|
|
# No "blockHeight"
|
|
|
|
assert node0.verifychainlock(block_hash, chainlock_signature)
|
|
|
|
# Invalid "blockHeight"
|
|
|
|
assert not node0.verifychainlock(block_hash, chainlock_signature, 0)
|
|
|
|
# Valid "blockHeight"
|
|
|
|
assert node0.verifychainlock(block_hash, chainlock_signature, height)
|
|
|
|
# Invalid "blockHash"
|
|
|
|
assert not node0.verifychainlock(node0.getblockhash(0), chainlock_signature, height)
|
2021-05-11 18:55:40 +02:00
|
|
|
self.wait_for_chainlocked_block_all_nodes(block_hash)
|
2021-04-26 13:51:15 +02:00
|
|
|
# Isolate node1, mine a block on node0 and wait for its ChainLock
|
|
|
|
node1.setnetworkactive(False)
|
|
|
|
node0.generate(1)
|
|
|
|
self.wait_for_chainlocked_block(node0, node0.generate(1)[0])
|
|
|
|
chainlock = node0.getbestchainlock()
|
|
|
|
assert chainlock != node1.getbestchainlock()
|
|
|
|
block_hash = chainlock["blockhash"]
|
|
|
|
height = chainlock["height"]
|
|
|
|
chainlock_signature = chainlock["signature"]
|
|
|
|
# Now it should verify on node0 without "blockHeight" but fail on node1
|
|
|
|
assert node0.verifychainlock(block_hash, chainlock_signature)
|
|
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-32603, "blockHash not found", node1.verifychainlock, block_hash, chainlock_signature)
|
|
|
|
# But they should still both verify with the height provided
|
|
|
|
assert node0.verifychainlock(block_hash, chainlock_signature, height)
|
|
|
|
assert node1.verifychainlock(block_hash, chainlock_signature, height)
|
|
|
|
|
feat: new rpc `gettxchainlocks' to get transaction statuses by batch (#5578)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Requested by @QuantumExplorer for platform needs
## What was done?
New rpc `gettransactionsarelocked` that returns list of txes.
it does less heavy calculations and transfer less data by gRPC.
## How Has This Been Tested?
```
$ src/dash-cli gettransactionsarelocked '["e469de7994b9c1da8efd262fee8843efd7bdcab80c700dc1059c98b28f7c5c1b", "0d9fdf00c9568ff9103742b64e6b8287794633072f8824fa2c475f59e71dbace","0d3f48eebead54d640a7fc5692ddfcba619d8b49347d9a7c04586057c02dec9f"]'
[
{
"height": 907801,
"chainlock": true
},
{
"height": 101,
"chainlock": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false
}
]
```
Limiter tested by this call:
```
src/dash-cli gettransactionsarelocked '["", "","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]' | wc
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-20 16:07:24 +02:00
|
|
|
node1.generate(1)
|
|
|
|
height1 = node1.getblockcount()
|
|
|
|
tx0 = node0.getblock(node0.getbestblockhash())['tx'][0]
|
|
|
|
tx1 = node1.getblock(node1.getbestblockhash())['tx'][0]
|
feat(rpc): `gettxchainlocks` should return `mempool=false` when tx not in mempool (#5742)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform (in the scope of Withdrawals) need to be aware if a tx isn't in
mempool when requesting status of a tx using RPC `gettxchainlocks`.
cc @markin-io
## What was done?
- mempool is passed to `GetTransaction` and saving the result for
checking latter.
- If the returned tx_ref is nullptr, then the RPC returns null for the
corresponding tx in the array.
Example:
`tx1` is mined and chainlocked, `tx2` is in mempool and `tx3` doesn't
exist.
The result now is:
`[
{
"height": 830,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": false
}
]`
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-12-24 18:58:14 +01:00
|
|
|
tx2 = node0.sendtoaddress(node0.getnewaddress(), 1)
|
|
|
|
locks0 = node0.gettxchainlocks([tx0, tx1, tx2])
|
|
|
|
locks1 = node1.gettxchainlocks([tx0, tx1, tx2])
|
|
|
|
unknown_cl_helper = self.cl_helper(-1, False, False)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(locks0, [self.cl_helper(height, True, False), unknown_cl_helper, self.cl_helper(-1, False, True)])
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(locks1, [unknown_cl_helper, self.cl_helper(height1, False, False), unknown_cl_helper])
|
2021-04-26 13:51:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
|
|
RPCVerifyChainLockTest().main()
|