dash/test/functional/wallet_basic.py

534 lines
27 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2019 The Bitcoin Core developers
2014-12-13 05:09:33 +01:00
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""Test the wallet."""
from decimal import Decimal
2019-08-09 01:21:11 +02:00
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import (
assert_array_result,
assert_equal,
assert_fee_amount,
assert_raises_rpc_error,
count_bytes,
wait_until,
)
class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 4
self.extra_args = [[
"-acceptnonstdtxn=1",
'-usehd={:d}'.format(i%2==0),
] for i in range(self.num_nodes)]
self.setup_clean_chain = True
self.supports_cli = False
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
def setup_network(self):
self.setup_nodes()
# Only need nodes 0-2 running at start of test
self.stop_node(3)
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
self.connect_nodes(1, 2)
self.connect_nodes(0, 2)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
def check_fee_amount(self, curr_balance, balance_with_fee, fee_per_byte, tx_size):
"""Return curr_balance after asserting the fee was in range"""
fee = balance_with_fee - curr_balance
assert_fee_amount(fee, tx_size, fee_per_byte * 1000)
return curr_balance
def run_test(self):
# Check that there's no UTXO on none of the nodes
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listunspent()), 0)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].listunspent()), 0)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[2].listunspent()), 0)
self.log.info("Mining blocks...")
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
2014-12-25 08:57:16 +01:00
walletinfo = self.nodes[0].getwalletinfo()
assert_equal(walletinfo['immature_balance'], 500)
2014-12-25 08:57:16 +01:00
assert_equal(walletinfo['balance'], 0)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[1].generate(101)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), 500)
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), 500)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), 0)
# Check that only first and second nodes have UTXOs
utxos = self.nodes[0].listunspent()
assert_equal(len(utxos), 1)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].listunspent()), 1)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[2].listunspent()), 0)
self.log.info("test gettxout")
confirmed_txid, confirmed_index = utxos[0]["txid"], utxos[0]["vout"]
# First, outputs that are unspent both in the chain and in the
# mempool should appear with or without include_mempool
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(txid=confirmed_txid, n=confirmed_index, include_mempool=False)
assert_equal(txout['value'], 500)
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(txid=confirmed_txid, n=confirmed_index, include_mempool=True)
assert_equal(txout['value'], 500)
# Send 210 DASH from 0 to 2 using sendtoaddress call.
# Second transaction will be child of first, and will require a fee
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 110)
mempool_txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 100)
self.log.info("test gettxout (second part)")
# utxo spent in mempool should be visible if you exclude mempool
# but invisible if you include mempool
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(confirmed_txid, confirmed_index, False)
assert_equal(txout['value'], 500)
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(confirmed_txid, confirmed_index, True)
assert txout is None
# new utxo from mempool should be invisible if you exclude mempool
# but visible if you include mempool
txout = self.nodes[0].gettxout(mempool_txid, 0, False)
assert txout is None
txout1 = self.nodes[0].gettxout(mempool_txid, 0, True)
txout2 = self.nodes[0].gettxout(mempool_txid, 1, True)
# note the mempool tx will have randomly assigned indices
# but 10 will go to node2 and the rest will go to node0
balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(set([txout1['value'], txout2['value']]), set([100, balance]))
2014-12-25 08:57:16 +01:00
walletinfo = self.nodes[0].getwalletinfo()
assert_equal(walletinfo['immature_balance'], 0)
2015-04-28 16:48:28 +02:00
# Have node0 mine a block, thus it will collect its own fee.
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
# Exercise locking of unspent outputs
unspent_0 = self.nodes[2].listunspent()[0]
unspent_0 = {"txid": unspent_0["txid"], "vout": unspent_0["vout"]}
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, expected locked output", self.nodes[2].lockunspent, True, [unspent_0])
self.nodes[2].lockunspent(False, [unspent_0])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, output already locked", self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False, [unspent_0])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Insufficient funds", self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress, self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 200)
assert_equal([unspent_0], self.nodes[2].listlockunspent())
self.nodes[2].lockunspent(True, [unspent_0])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[2].listlockunspent()), 0)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be of length 64 (not 34, for '0000000000000000000000000000000000')",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "0000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, unknown transaction",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, vout index out of bounds",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": unspent_0["txid"], "vout": 999}])
# An output should be unlocked when spent
unspent_0 = self.nodes[1].listunspent()[0]
self.nodes[1].lockunspent(False, [unspent_0])
tx = self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction([unspent_0], { self.nodes[1].getnewaddress() : 1 })
tx = self.nodes[1].fundrawtransaction(tx)['hex']
tx = self.nodes[1].signrawtransactionwithwallet(tx)["hex"]
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(tx)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].listlockunspent()), 0)
# Have node1 generate 100 blocks (so node0 can recover the fee)
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[1].generate(100)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
# node0 should end up with 1000 DASH in block rewards plus fees, but
# minus the 210 plus fees sent to node2
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), 1000 - 210)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), 210)
# Node0 should have two unspent outputs.
# Create a couple of transactions to send them to node2, submit them through
# node1, and make sure both node0 and node2 pick them up properly:
node0utxos = self.nodes[0].listunspent(1)
assert_equal(len(node0utxos), 2)
fee_per_input = Decimal('0.00001')
totalfee = 0
# create both transactions
txns_to_send = []
for utxo in node0utxos:
inputs = []
outputs = {}
inputs.append({"txid": utxo["txid"], "vout": utxo["vout"]})
outputs[self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()] = utxo["amount"] - fee_per_input
raw_tx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
txns_to_send.append(self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(raw_tx))
totalfee += fee_per_input
# Have node 1 (miner) send the transactions
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(hexstring=txns_to_send[0]["hex"], maxfeerate=0)
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(hexstring=txns_to_send[1]["hex"], maxfeerate=0)
# Have node1 mine a block to confirm transactions:
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), 0)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), 1000 - totalfee)
# Verify that a spent output cannot be locked anymore
spent_0 = {"txid": node0utxos[0]["txid"], "vout": node0utxos[0]["vout"]}
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, expected unspent output", self.nodes[0].lockunspent, False, [spent_0])
# Send 100 DASH normal
address = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress("test")
fee_per_byte = Decimal('0.00001') / 1000
self.nodes[2].settxfee(fee_per_byte * 1000)
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(address, 100, "", "", False)
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), Decimal('900') - totalfee, fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), Decimal('100'))
# Send 100 DASH with subtract fee from amount
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(address, 100, "", "", True)
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal -= Decimal('100')
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
node_0_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), Decimal('200'), fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
# Sendmany 100 DASH
txid = self.nodes[2].sendmany('', {address: 100}, 0, False, "", [])
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_0_bal += Decimal('100')
node_2_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal - Decimal('100'), fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), node_0_bal)
# Sendmany 100 DASH with subtract fee from amount
txid = self.nodes[2].sendmany('', {address: 100}, 0, False, "", [address])
2015-04-01 05:28:28 +02:00
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal -= Decimal('100')
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
node_0_bal = self.check_fee_amount(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), node_0_bal + Decimal('100'), fee_per_byte, count_bytes(self.nodes[2].gettransaction(txid)['hex']))
self.start_node(3)
self.connect_nodes(0, 3)
self.sync_all()
# check if we can list zero value tx as available coins
# 1. create raw_tx
# 2. hex-changed one output to 0.0
# 3. sign and send
# 4. check if recipient (node0) can list the zero value tx
usp = self.nodes[1].listunspent(query_options={'minimumAmount': '499.998'})[0]
inputs = [{"txid": usp['txid'], "vout": usp['vout']}]
outputs = {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(): 499.998, self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): 11.11}
raw_tx = self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs).replace("c0833842", "00000000") # replace 11.11 with 0.0 (int32)
signed_raw_tx = self.nodes[1].signrawtransactionwithwallet(raw_tx)
decoded_raw_tx = self.nodes[1].decoderawtransaction(signed_raw_tx['hex'])
zero_value_txid = decoded_raw_tx['txid']
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signed_raw_tx['hex'])
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[1].generate(1) # mine a block
self.sync_all()
unspent_txs = self.nodes[0].listunspent() # zero value tx must be in listunspents output
found = False
for uTx in unspent_txs:
if uTx['txid'] == zero_value_txid:
found = True
assert_equal(uTx['amount'], Decimal('0'))
assert found
# do some -walletbroadcast tests
self.stop_nodes()
self.start_node(0, ["-walletbroadcast=0"])
self.start_node(1, ["-walletbroadcast=0"])
self.start_node(2, ["-walletbroadcast=0"])
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
self.connect_nodes(1, 2)
self.connect_nodes(0, 2)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
txid_not_broadcast = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 2)
tx_obj_not_broadcast = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid_not_broadcast)
self.nodes[1].generate(1) # mine a block, tx should not be in there
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal) # should not be changed because tx was not broadcasted
# now broadcast from another node, mine a block, sync, and check the balance
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(tx_obj_not_broadcast['hex'])
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal += 2
tx_obj_not_broadcast = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid_not_broadcast)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
# create another tx
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 2)
# restart the nodes with -walletbroadcast=1
self.stop_nodes()
self.start_node(0)
self.start_node(1)
self.start_node(2)
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
self.connect_nodes(1, 2)
self.connect_nodes(0, 2)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:3])
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:3])
node_2_bal += 2
# tx should be added to balance because after restarting the nodes tx should be broadcast
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), node_2_bal)
# send a tx with value in a string (PR#6380 +)
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "2")
tx_obj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert_equal(tx_obj['amount'], Decimal('-2'))
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "0.0001")
tx_obj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert_equal(tx_obj['amount'], Decimal('-0.0001'))
# check if JSON parser can handle scientific notation in strings
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "1e-4")
tx_obj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert_equal(tx_obj['amount'], Decimal('-0.0001'))
# General checks for errors from incorrect inputs
# This will raise an exception because the amount type is wrong
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Invalid amount", self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress, self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "1f-4")
# This will raise an exception since generate does not accept a string
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "not an integer", self.nodes[0].generate, "2")
# This will raise an exception for the invalid private key format
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid private key encoding", self.nodes[0].importprivkey, "invalid")
# This will raise an exception for importing an address with the PS2H flag
temp_address = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Cannot use the p2sh flag with an address - use a script instead", self.nodes[0].importaddress, temp_address, "label", False, True)
# This will raise an exception for attempting to dump the private key of an address you do not own
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Private key for address %s is not known" % temp_address, self.nodes[0].dumpprivkey, temp_address)
# This will raise an exception for attempting to get the private key of an invalid Dash address
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid Dash address", self.nodes[0].dumpprivkey, "invalid")
# This will raise an exception for attempting to set a label for an invalid Dash address
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid Dash address", self.nodes[0].setlabel, "invalid address", "label")
# This will raise an exception for importing an invalid address
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid Dash address or script", self.nodes[0].importaddress, "invalid")
# This will raise an exception for attempting to import a pubkey that isn't in hex
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Pubkey must be a hex string", self.nodes[0].importpubkey, "not hex")
# This will raise an exception for importing an invalid pubkey
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Pubkey is not a valid public key", self.nodes[0].importpubkey, "5361746f736869204e616b616d6f746f")
# Import address and private key to check correct behavior of spendable unspents
# 1. Send some coins to generate new UTXO
address_to_import = self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(address_to_import, 1)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
# 2. Import address from node2 to node1
self.nodes[1].importaddress(address_to_import)
# 3. Validate that the imported address is watch-only on node1
assert self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(address_to_import)["iswatchonly"]
# 4. Check that the unspents after import are not spendable
assert_array_result(self.nodes[1].listunspent(),
{"address": address_to_import},
{"spendable": False})
# 5. Import private key of the previously imported address on node1
priv_key = self.nodes[2].dumpprivkey(address_to_import)
self.nodes[1].importprivkey(priv_key)
# 6. Check that the unspents are now spendable on node1
assert_array_result(self.nodes[1].listunspent(),
{"address": address_to_import},
{"spendable": True})
# Mine a block from node0 to an address from node1
coinbase_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
block_hash = self.nodes[0].generatetoaddress(1, coinbase_addr)[0]
coinbase_txid = self.nodes[0].getblock(block_hash)['tx'][0]
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
# Check that the txid and balance is found by node1
self.nodes[1].gettransaction(coinbase_txid)
# check if wallet or blockchain maintenance changes the balance
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
blocks = self.nodes[0].generate(2)
self.sync_all(self.nodes[0:3])
balance_nodes = [self.nodes[i].getbalance() for i in range(3)]
block_count = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
2016-04-28 15:18:01 +02:00
# Check modes:
# - True: unicode escaped as \u....
# - False: unicode directly as UTF-8
for mode in [True, False]:
self.nodes[0].rpc.ensure_ascii = mode
2016-04-28 15:18:01 +02:00
# unicode check: Basic Multilingual Plane, Supplementary Plane respectively
for label in [u'рыба', u'𝅘𝅥𝅯']:
addr = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
self.nodes[0].setlabel(addr, label)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(addr)['label'], label)
assert label in self.nodes[0].listlabels()
self.nodes[0].rpc.ensure_ascii = True # restore to default
2016-04-28 15:18:01 +02:00
# maintenance tests
maintenance = [
'-rescan',
'-reindex',
]
chainlimit = 6
for m in maintenance:
self.log.info("check " + m)
self.stop_nodes()
# set lower ancestor limit for later
self.start_node(0, [m, "-limitancestorcount=" + str(chainlimit)])
self.start_node(1, [m, "-limitancestorcount=" + str(chainlimit)])
self.start_node(2, [m, "-limitancestorcount=" + str(chainlimit)])
if m == '-reindex':
# reindex will leave rpc warm up "early"; Wait for it to finish
wait_until(lambda: [block_count] * 3 == [self.nodes[i].getblockcount() for i in range(3)])
assert_equal(balance_nodes, [self.nodes[i].getbalance() for i in range(3)])
# Exercise listsinceblock with the last two blocks
coinbase_tx_1 = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blocks[0])
assert_equal(coinbase_tx_1["lastblock"], blocks[1])
assert_equal(len(coinbase_tx_1["transactions"]), 1)
assert_equal(coinbase_tx_1["transactions"][0]["blockhash"], blocks[1])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blocks[1])["transactions"]), 0)
# ==Check that wallet prefers to use coins that don't exceed mempool limits =====
# Get all non-zero utxos together
chain_addrs = [self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()]
singletxid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(chain_addrs[0], self.nodes[0].getbalance(), "", "", True)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
node0_balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
# Split into two chains
rawtx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction([{"txid": singletxid, "vout": 0}], {chain_addrs[0]: node0_balance / 2 - Decimal('0.01'), chain_addrs[1]: node0_balance / 2 - Decimal('0.01')})
signedtx = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx)
singletxid = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(hexstring=signedtx["hex"], maxfeerate=0)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
# Make a long chain of unconfirmed payments without hitting mempool limit
# Each tx we make leaves only one output of change on a chain 1 longer
# Since the amount to send is always much less than the outputs, we only ever need one output
# So we should be able to generate exactly chainlimit txs for each original output
sending_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid_list = []
for i in range(chainlimit * 2):
txid_list.append(self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(sending_addr, Decimal('0.0001')))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['size'], chainlimit * 2)
assert_equal(len(txid_list), chainlimit * 2)
# Without walletrejectlongchains, we will still generate a txid
# The tx will be stored in the wallet but not accepted to the mempool
extra_txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(sending_addr, Decimal('0.0001'))
assert extra_txid not in self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()
assert extra_txid in [tx["txid"] for tx in self.nodes[0].listtransactions()]
self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(extra_txid)
total_txs = len(self.nodes[0].listtransactions("*", 99999))
# Try with walletrejectlongchains
# Double chain limit but require combining inputs, so we pass SelectCoinsMinConf
self.restart_node(0, extra_args=["-walletrejectlongchains", "-limitancestorcount=" + str(2 * chainlimit)])
# wait until the wallet has submitted all transactions to the mempool
wait_until(lambda: len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()) == chainlimit * 2)
# Prevent potential race condition when calling wallet RPCs right after restart
self.nodes[0].syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue()
node0_balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
# With walletrejectlongchains we will not create the tx and store it in our wallet.
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Transaction has too long of a mempool chain", self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress, sending_addr, node0_balance - Decimal('0.01'))
# Verify nothing new in wallet
assert_equal(total_txs, len(self.nodes[0].listtransactions("*", 99999)))
# Test getaddressinfo on external address. Note that these addresses are taken from disablewallet.py
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid address", self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo, "3J98t1WpEZ73CNmQviecrnyiWrnqRhWNLy")
address_info = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo("yjQ5gLvGRtmq1cwc4kePLCrzQ8GVCh9Gaz")
assert_equal(address_info['address'], "yjQ5gLvGRtmq1cwc4kePLCrzQ8GVCh9Gaz")
assert_equal(address_info["scriptPubKey"], "76a914fd2b4d101724a76374fccbc5b6df7670a75d7cd088ac")
assert not address_info["ismine"]
assert not address_info["iswatchonly"]
assert not address_info["isscript"]
assert not address_info["ischange"]
# Test getaddressinfo 'ischange' field on change address.
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
destination = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(destination, 0.123)
tx = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)['hex'])
output_addresses = [vout['scriptPubKey']['addresses'][0] for vout in tx["vout"]]
assert len(output_addresses) > 1
for address in output_addresses:
ischange = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(address)['ischange']
assert_equal(ischange, address != destination)
if ischange:
change = address
self.nodes[0].setlabel(change, 'foobar')
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(change)['ischange'], False)
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
Merge #16873: rpc: fix regression in gettransaction 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b test: improve gettransaction test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f34f54888f680bfbe7a29ac278636d7178a99bb rpc: fix regression in gettransaction (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Closes #16872. PR #16866 renamed the `decode` argument in gettransaction to `verbose` to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction. However, it inadvertently overloaded the "details" field when `verbose` is passed. The result is that the original "details" field is no longer returned correctly, which seems to be a breaking API change. This PR: - takes the simplest path to restoring the "details" field by renaming the decoded one back to "decoded" while leaving the `verbose` argument for API consistency, which was the main intent of #16866, - addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) by mentioning in the RPC help that the new decoded field is equivalent to decoderawtransaction, and - updates the help, functional test, and release note. Reviewers, to test this manually, build and run `bitcoin-cli help gettransaction` and `bitcoin-cli gettransaction <wallet txid> false true`, and verify that the command returns both `details` and `decoded` fields. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: tACK 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b Tree-SHA512: 287edd5db7ed58fe8b548975aba58628bd45ed708b28f40174f10a35a455d89f796fbf27430aa881fc376f47aabda8803f74d4d100683bd86577a02279091cf3
2019-09-15 23:44:06 +02:00
# Test gettransaction response with different arguments.
self.log.info("Testing gettransaction response with different arguments...")
self.nodes[0].setlabel(change, 'baz')
baz = self.nodes[0].listtransactions(label="baz", count=1)[0]
expected_receive_vout = {"label": "baz",
"address": baz["address"],
"amount": baz["amount"],
"category": baz["category"],
"vout": baz["vout"]}
expected_fields = frozenset({'amount', 'chainlock', 'confirmations', 'details', 'fee',
'instantlock', 'instantlock_internal',
'hex', 'timereceived', 'time', 'trusted', 'txid', 'walletconflicts'})
verbose_field = "decoded"
expected_verbose_fields = expected_fields | {verbose_field}
self.log.debug("Testing gettransaction response without verbose")
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid=txid)
assert_equal(set([*tx]), expected_fields)
assert_array_result(tx["details"], {"category": "receive"}, expected_receive_vout)
self.log.debug("Testing gettransaction response with verbose set to False")
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid=txid, verbose=False)
assert_equal(set([*tx]), expected_fields)
assert_array_result(tx["details"], {"category": "receive"}, expected_receive_vout)
self.log.debug("Testing gettransaction response with verbose set to True")
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid=txid, verbose=True)
Merge #16873: rpc: fix regression in gettransaction 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b test: improve gettransaction test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f34f54888f680bfbe7a29ac278636d7178a99bb rpc: fix regression in gettransaction (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Closes #16872. PR #16866 renamed the `decode` argument in gettransaction to `verbose` to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction. However, it inadvertently overloaded the "details" field when `verbose` is passed. The result is that the original "details" field is no longer returned correctly, which seems to be a breaking API change. This PR: - takes the simplest path to restoring the "details" field by renaming the decoded one back to "decoded" while leaving the `verbose` argument for API consistency, which was the main intent of #16866, - addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) by mentioning in the RPC help that the new decoded field is equivalent to decoderawtransaction, and - updates the help, functional test, and release note. Reviewers, to test this manually, build and run `bitcoin-cli help gettransaction` and `bitcoin-cli gettransaction <wallet txid> false true`, and verify that the command returns both `details` and `decoded` fields. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: tACK 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b Tree-SHA512: 287edd5db7ed58fe8b548975aba58628bd45ed708b28f40174f10a35a455d89f796fbf27430aa881fc376f47aabda8803f74d4d100683bd86577a02279091cf3
2019-09-15 23:44:06 +02:00
assert_equal(set([*tx]), expected_verbose_fields)
assert_array_result(tx["details"], {"category": "receive"}, expected_receive_vout)
assert_equal(tx[verbose_field], self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(tx["hex"]))
if __name__ == '__main__':
WalletTest().main()