dash/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py

486 lines
25 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2015-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
"""Test CSV soft fork activation.
This soft fork will activate the following BIPS:
BIP 68 - nSequence relative lock times
BIP 112 - CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY
BIP 113 - MedianTimePast semantics for nLockTime
mine 83 blocks whose coinbases will be used to generate inputs for our tests
mine 344 blocks and seed block chain with the 83 inputs used for our tests at height 427
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
mine 2 blocks and verify soft fork not yet activated
mine 1 block and test that soft fork is activated (rules enforced for next block)
Test BIP 113 is enforced
Mine 4 blocks so next height is 580 and test BIP 68 is enforced for time and height
Mine 1 block so next height is 581 and test BIP 68 now passes time but not height
Mine 1 block so next height is 582 and test BIP 68 now passes time and height
Test that BIP 112 is enforced
Various transactions will be used to test that the BIPs rules are not enforced before the soft fork activates
And that after the soft fork activates transactions pass and fail as they should according to the rules.
For each BIP, transactions of versions 1 and 2 will be tested.
----------------
BIP 113:
bip113tx - modify the nLocktime variable
BIP 68:
bip68txs - 16 txs with nSequence relative locktime of 10 with various bits set as per the relative_locktimes below
BIP 112:
bip112txs_vary_nSequence - 16 txs with nSequence relative_locktimes of 10 evaluated against 10 OP_CSV OP_DROP
bip112txs_vary_nSequence_9 - 16 txs with nSequence relative_locktimes of 9 evaluated against 10 OP_CSV OP_DROP
bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV - 16 txs with nSequence = 10 evaluated against varying {relative_locktimes of 10} OP_CSV OP_DROP
bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9 - 16 txs with nSequence = 9 evaluated against varying {relative_locktimes of 10} OP_CSV OP_DROP
bip112tx_special - test negative argument to OP_CSV
bip112tx_emptystack - test empty stack (= no argument) OP_CSV
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""
from decimal import Decimal
from itertools import product
from io import BytesIO
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
from test_framework.blocktools import create_coinbase, create_block, create_transaction, TIME_GENESIS_BLOCK
Merge #13054: tests: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. 68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift) Pull request description: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools. An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports. Before this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util $ ``` After this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 $ ``` Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
2018-08-13 14:24:43 +02:00
from test_framework.messages import ToHex, CTransaction
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery) 5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery) 85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery) 9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery) Pull request description: New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize: - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces. - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'. For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references. ACKs for top commit: amitiuttarwar: ACK d5800da519 MarcoFalke: ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞 Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-15 20:35:29 +01:00
from test_framework.p2p import P2PDataStore
from test_framework.script import (
CScript,
OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY,
OP_DROP,
)
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import (
assert_equal,
hex_str_to_bytes,
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
softfork_active,
)
TESTING_TX_COUNT = 83 # Number of testing transactions: 1 BIP113 tx, 16 BIP68 txs, 66 BIP112 txs (see comments above)
COINBASE_BLOCK_COUNT = TESTING_TX_COUNT # Number of coinbase blocks we need to generate as inputs for our txs
BASE_RELATIVE_LOCKTIME = 10
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
CSV_ACTIVATION_HEIGHT = 432
SEQ_DISABLE_FLAG = 1 << 31
SEQ_RANDOM_HIGH_BIT = 1 << 25
SEQ_TYPE_FLAG = 1 << 22
SEQ_RANDOM_LOW_BIT = 1 << 18
def relative_locktime(sdf, srhb, stf, srlb):
"""Returns a locktime with certain bits set."""
locktime = BASE_RELATIVE_LOCKTIME
if sdf:
locktime |= SEQ_DISABLE_FLAG
if srhb:
locktime |= SEQ_RANDOM_HIGH_BIT
if stf:
locktime |= SEQ_TYPE_FLAG
if srlb:
locktime |= SEQ_RANDOM_LOW_BIT
return locktime
def all_rlt_txs(txs):
return [tx['tx'] for tx in txs]
def sign_transaction(node, unsignedtx):
rawtx = ToHex(unsignedtx)
signresult = node.signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx)
tx = CTransaction()
f = BytesIO(hex_str_to_bytes(signresult['hex']))
tx.deserialize(f)
return tx
def create_bip112special(node, input, txversion, address):
tx = create_transaction(node, input, address, amount=Decimal("499.98"))
tx.nVersion = txversion
signtx = sign_transaction(node, tx)
signtx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([-1, OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, OP_DROP] + list(CScript(signtx.vin[0].scriptSig)))
return signtx
def create_bip112emptystack(node, input, txversion, address):
tx = create_transaction(node, input, address, amount=Decimal("499.98"))
tx.nVersion = txversion
signtx = sign_transaction(node, tx)
signtx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY] + list(CScript(signtx.vin[0].scriptSig)))
return signtx
def send_generic_input_tx(node, coinbases, address):
return node.sendrawtransaction(ToHex(sign_transaction(node, create_transaction(node, node.getblock(coinbases.pop())['tx'][0], address, amount=Decimal("499.99")))))
def create_bip68txs(node, bip68inputs, txversion, address, locktime_delta=0):
"""Returns a list of bip68 transactions with different bits set."""
txs = []
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
assert len(bip68inputs) >= 16
for i, (sdf, srhb, stf, srlb) in enumerate(product(*[[True, False]] * 4)):
locktime = relative_locktime(sdf, srhb, stf, srlb)
tx = create_transaction(node, bip68inputs[i], address, amount=Decimal("499.98"))
tx.nVersion = txversion
tx.vin[0].nSequence = locktime + locktime_delta
tx = sign_transaction(node, tx)
tx.rehash()
txs.append({'tx': tx, 'sdf': sdf, 'stf': stf})
return txs
def create_bip112txs(node, bip112inputs, varyOP_CSV, txversion, address, locktime_delta=0):
"""Returns a list of bip68 transactions with different bits set."""
txs = []
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
assert len(bip112inputs) >= 16
for i, (sdf, srhb, stf, srlb) in enumerate(product(*[[True, False]] * 4)):
locktime = relative_locktime(sdf, srhb, stf, srlb)
tx = create_transaction(node, bip112inputs[i], address, amount=Decimal("499.98"))
if (varyOP_CSV): # if varying OP_CSV, nSequence is fixed
tx.vin[0].nSequence = BASE_RELATIVE_LOCKTIME + locktime_delta
else: # vary nSequence instead, OP_CSV is fixed
tx.vin[0].nSequence = locktime + locktime_delta
tx.nVersion = txversion
signtx = sign_transaction(node, tx)
if (varyOP_CSV):
signtx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([locktime, OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, OP_DROP] + list(CScript(signtx.vin[0].scriptSig)))
else:
signtx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([BASE_RELATIVE_LOCKTIME, OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, OP_DROP] + list(CScript(signtx.vin[0].scriptSig)))
tx.rehash()
txs.append({'tx': signtx, 'sdf': sdf, 'stf': stf})
return txs
class BIP68_112_113Test(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 1
self.setup_clean_chain = True
2019-06-21 15:44:29 +02:00
# Must also set '-maxtipage=600100' to allow syncing from very old blocks
# and '-dip3params=2000:2000' to create pre-dip3 blocks only
self.extra_args = [[
'-whitelist=noban@127.0.0.1',
'-maxtipage=600100', '-dip3params=2000:2000',
'-par=1', # Use only one script thread to get the exact reject reason for testing
]]
self.supports_cli = False
2019-06-21 15:44:29 +02:00
def setup_network(self):
self.setup_nodes()
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
def generate_blocks(self, number):
test_blocks = []
Merge #19674: refactor: test: use throwaway _ variable for unused loop counters dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase. The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used. Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked. ACKs for top commit: darosior: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 instagibbs: manual inspection ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19674/commits/dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 practicalswift: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :) Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
2020-08-11 02:50:34 +02:00
for _ in range(number):
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
block = self.create_test_block([])
test_blocks.append(block)
self.last_block_time += 600
self.tip = block.sha256
self.tipheight += 1
return test_blocks
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
def create_test_block(self, txs):
block = create_block(self.tip, create_coinbase(self.tipheight + 1), self.last_block_time + 600)
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
block.nVersion = 4
block.vtx.extend(txs)
block.hashMerkleRoot = block.calc_merkle_root()
block.rehash()
block.solve()
return block
def send_blocks(self, blocks, success=True, reject_reason=None):
"""Sends blocks to test node. Syncs and verifies that tip has advanced to most recent block.
Call with success = False if the tip shouldn't advance to the most recent block."""
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
self.helper_peer.send_blocks_and_test(blocks, self.nodes[0], success=success, reject_reason=reject_reason)
def run_test(self):
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
self.helper_peer = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PDataStore())
self.log.info("Generate blocks in the past for coinbase outputs.")
self.coinbase_blocks = self.nodes[0].generate(COINBASE_BLOCK_COUNT) # blocks generated for inputs
2018-04-18 13:48:59 +02:00
# set time so that there was enough time to build up to 1000 blocks 10 minutes apart on top of the last one
# without worrying about getting into the future
self.nodes[0].setmocktime(TIME_GENESIS_BLOCK + 600 * 1000 + 100)
self.tipheight = COINBASE_BLOCK_COUNT # height of the next block to build
self.last_block_time = TIME_GENESIS_BLOCK
self.tip = int(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), 16)
self.nodeaddress = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
# Activation height is hardcoded
test_blocks = self.generate_blocks(CSV_ACTIVATION_HEIGHT-5 - COINBASE_BLOCK_COUNT)
#test_blocks = self.generate_blocks(345)
self.send_blocks(test_blocks)
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
assert not softfork_active(self.nodes[0], 'csv')
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
# Inputs at height = 431
#
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
# Put inputs for all tests in the chain at height 431 (tip now = 430) (time increases by 600s per block)
# Note we reuse inputs for v1 and v2 txs so must test these separately
# 16 normal inputs
bip68inputs = []
Merge #19674: refactor: test: use throwaway _ variable for unused loop counters dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase. The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used. Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked. ACKs for top commit: darosior: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 instagibbs: manual inspection ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19674/commits/dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 practicalswift: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :) Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
2020-08-11 02:50:34 +02:00
for _ in range(16):
bip68inputs.append(send_generic_input_tx(self.nodes[0], self.coinbase_blocks, self.nodeaddress))
# 2 sets of 16 inputs with 10 OP_CSV OP_DROP (actually will be prepended to spending scriptSig)
bip112basicinputs = []
Merge #19674: refactor: test: use throwaway _ variable for unused loop counters dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase. The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used. Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked. ACKs for top commit: darosior: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 instagibbs: manual inspection ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19674/commits/dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 practicalswift: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :) Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
2020-08-11 02:50:34 +02:00
for _ in range(2):
inputs = []
Merge #19674: refactor: test: use throwaway _ variable for unused loop counters dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase. The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used. Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked. ACKs for top commit: darosior: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 instagibbs: manual inspection ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19674/commits/dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 practicalswift: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :) Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
2020-08-11 02:50:34 +02:00
for _ in range(16):
inputs.append(send_generic_input_tx(self.nodes[0], self.coinbase_blocks, self.nodeaddress))
bip112basicinputs.append(inputs)
# 2 sets of 16 varied inputs with (relative_lock_time) OP_CSV OP_DROP (actually will be prepended to spending scriptSig)
bip112diverseinputs = []
Merge #19674: refactor: test: use throwaway _ variable for unused loop counters dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase. The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used. Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked. ACKs for top commit: darosior: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 instagibbs: manual inspection ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19674/commits/dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 practicalswift: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :) Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
2020-08-11 02:50:34 +02:00
for _ in range(2):
inputs = []
Merge #19674: refactor: test: use throwaway _ variable for unused loop counters dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase. The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used. Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked. ACKs for top commit: darosior: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 instagibbs: manual inspection ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19674/commits/dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 practicalswift: ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :) Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
2020-08-11 02:50:34 +02:00
for _ in range(16):
inputs.append(send_generic_input_tx(self.nodes[0], self.coinbase_blocks, self.nodeaddress))
bip112diverseinputs.append(inputs)
# 1 special input with -1 OP_CSV OP_DROP (actually will be prepended to spending scriptSig)
bip112specialinput = send_generic_input_tx(self.nodes[0], self.coinbase_blocks, self.nodeaddress)
# 1 special input with (empty stack) OP_CSV (actually will be prepended to spending scriptSig)
bip112emptystackinput = send_generic_input_tx(self.nodes[0],self.coinbase_blocks, self.nodeaddress)
# 1 normal input
bip113input = send_generic_input_tx(self.nodes[0], self.coinbase_blocks, self.nodeaddress)
self.nodes[0].setmocktime(self.last_block_time + 600)
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
inputblockhash = self.nodes[0].generate(1)[0] # 1 block generated for inputs to be in chain at height 431
self.nodes[0].setmocktime(TIME_GENESIS_BLOCK + 600 * 1000 + 100)
self.tip = int(inputblockhash, 16)
self.tipheight += 1
self.last_block_time += 600
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getblock(inputblockhash, True)["tx"]), TESTING_TX_COUNT + 1)
# 2 more version 4 blocks
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
test_blocks = self.generate_blocks(2)
self.send_blocks(test_blocks)
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
assert_equal(self.tipheight, CSV_ACTIVATION_HEIGHT - 2)
self.log.info("Height = {}, CSV not yet active (will activate for block {}, not {})".format(self.tipheight, CSV_ACTIVATION_HEIGHT, CSV_ACTIVATION_HEIGHT - 1))
assert not softfork_active(self.nodes[0], 'csv')
# Test both version 1 and version 2 transactions for all tests
# BIP113 test transaction will be modified before each use to put in appropriate block time
bip113tx_v1 = create_transaction(self.nodes[0], bip113input, self.nodeaddress, amount=Decimal("499.98"))
bip113tx_v1.vin[0].nSequence = 0xFFFFFFFE
bip113tx_v1.nVersion = 1
bip113tx_v2 = create_transaction(self.nodes[0], bip113input, self.nodeaddress, amount=Decimal("499.98"))
bip113tx_v2.vin[0].nSequence = 0xFFFFFFFE
bip113tx_v2.nVersion = 2
# For BIP68 test all 16 relative sequence locktimes
bip68txs_v1 = create_bip68txs(self.nodes[0], bip68inputs, 1, self.nodeaddress)
bip68txs_v2 = create_bip68txs(self.nodes[0], bip68inputs, 2, self.nodeaddress)
# For BIP112 test:
# 16 relative sequence locktimes of 10 against 10 OP_CSV OP_DROP inputs
bip112txs_vary_nSequence_v1 = create_bip112txs(self.nodes[0], bip112basicinputs[0], False, 1, self.nodeaddress)
bip112txs_vary_nSequence_v2 = create_bip112txs(self.nodes[0], bip112basicinputs[0], False, 2, self.nodeaddress)
# 16 relative sequence locktimes of 9 against 10 OP_CSV OP_DROP inputs
bip112txs_vary_nSequence_9_v1 = create_bip112txs(self.nodes[0], bip112basicinputs[1], False, 1, self.nodeaddress, -1)
bip112txs_vary_nSequence_9_v2 = create_bip112txs(self.nodes[0], bip112basicinputs[1], False, 2, self.nodeaddress, -1)
# sequence lock time of 10 against 16 (relative_lock_time) OP_CSV OP_DROP inputs
bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v1 = create_bip112txs(self.nodes[0], bip112diverseinputs[0], True, 1, self.nodeaddress)
bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v2 = create_bip112txs(self.nodes[0], bip112diverseinputs[0], True, 2, self.nodeaddress)
# sequence lock time of 9 against 16 (relative_lock_time) OP_CSV OP_DROP inputs
bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9_v1 = create_bip112txs(self.nodes[0], bip112diverseinputs[1], True, 1, self.nodeaddress, -1)
bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9_v2 = create_bip112txs(self.nodes[0], bip112diverseinputs[1], True, 2, self.nodeaddress, -1)
# -1 OP_CSV OP_DROP input
bip112tx_special_v1 = create_bip112special(self.nodes[0], bip112specialinput, 1, self.nodeaddress)
bip112tx_special_v2 = create_bip112special(self.nodes[0], bip112specialinput, 2, self.nodeaddress)
# (empty stack) OP_CSV input
bip112tx_emptystack_v1 = create_bip112emptystack(self.nodes[0], bip112emptystackinput, 1, self.nodeaddress)
bip112tx_emptystack_v2 = create_bip112emptystack(self.nodes[0], bip112emptystackinput, 2, self.nodeaddress)
self.log.info("TESTING")
self.log.info("Pre-Soft Fork Tests. All txs should pass.")
self.log.info("Test version 1 txs")
success_txs = []
# BIP113 tx, -1 CSV tx and empty stack CSV tx should succeed
bip113tx_v1.nLockTime = self.last_block_time - 600 * 5 # = MTP of prior block (not <) but < time put on current block
bip113signed1 = sign_transaction(self.nodes[0], bip113tx_v1)
success_txs.append(bip113signed1)
success_txs.append(bip112tx_special_v1)
success_txs.append(bip112tx_emptystack_v1)
# add BIP 68 txs
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip68txs_v1))
# add BIP 112 with seq=10 txs
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_nSequence_v1))
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v1))
# try BIP 112 with seq=9 txs
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_nSequence_9_v1))
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9_v1))
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
self.log.info("Test version 2 txs")
success_txs = []
# BIP113 tx, -1 CSV tx and empty stack CSV tx should succeed
bip113tx_v2.nLockTime = self.last_block_time - 600 * 5 # = MTP of prior block (not <) but < time put on current block
bip113signed2 = sign_transaction(self.nodes[0], bip113tx_v2)
success_txs.append(bip113signed2)
success_txs.append(bip112tx_special_v2)
success_txs.append(bip112tx_emptystack_v2)
# add BIP 68 txs
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip68txs_v2))
# add BIP 112 with seq=10 txs
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_nSequence_v2))
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v2))
# try BIP 112 with seq=9 txs
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_nSequence_9_v2))
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9_v2))
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
# 1 more version 4 block to get us to height 432 so the fork should now be active for the next block
assert not softfork_active(self.nodes[0], 'csv')
test_blocks = self.generate_blocks(1)
self.send_blocks(test_blocks)
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
assert softfork_active(self.nodes[0], 'csv')
self.log.info("Post-Soft Fork Tests.")
self.log.info("BIP 113 tests")
# BIP 113 tests should now fail regardless of version number if nLockTime isn't satisfied by new rules
bip113tx_v1.nLockTime = self.last_block_time - 600 * 5 # = MTP of prior block (not <) but < time put on current block
bip113signed1 = sign_transaction(self.nodes[0], bip113tx_v1)
bip113tx_v2.nLockTime = self.last_block_time - 600 * 5 # = MTP of prior block (not <) but < time put on current block
bip113signed2 = sign_transaction(self.nodes[0], bip113tx_v2)
for bip113tx in [bip113signed1, bip113signed2]:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([bip113tx])], success=False, reject_reason='bad-txns-nonfinal')
# BIP 113 tests should now pass if the locktime is < MTP
bip113tx_v1.nLockTime = self.last_block_time - 600 * 5 - 1 # < MTP of prior block
bip113signed1 = sign_transaction(self.nodes[0], bip113tx_v1)
bip113tx_v2.nLockTime = self.last_block_time - 600 * 5 - 1 # < MTP of prior block
bip113signed2 = sign_transaction(self.nodes[0], bip113tx_v2)
for bip113tx in [bip113signed1, bip113signed2]:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([bip113tx])])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
# Next block height = 437 after 4 blocks of random version
test_blocks = self.generate_blocks(4)
self.send_blocks(test_blocks)
self.log.info("BIP 68 tests")
self.log.info("Test version 1 txs - all should still pass")
success_txs = []
success_txs.extend(all_rlt_txs(bip68txs_v1))
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
self.log.info("Test version 2 txs")
# All txs with SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_DISABLE_FLAG set pass
bip68success_txs = [tx['tx'] for tx in bip68txs_v2 if tx['sdf']]
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(bip68success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
# All txs without flag fail as we are at delta height = 8 < 10 and delta time = 8 * 600 < 10 * 512
bip68timetxs = [tx['tx'] for tx in bip68txs_v2 if not tx['sdf'] and tx['stf']]
for tx in bip68timetxs:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([tx])], success=False, reject_reason='bad-txns-nonfinal')
bip68heighttxs = [tx['tx'] for tx in bip68txs_v2 if not tx['sdf'] and not tx['stf']]
for tx in bip68heighttxs:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([tx])], success=False, reject_reason='bad-txns-nonfinal')
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
# Advance one block to 438
test_blocks = self.generate_blocks(1)
self.send_blocks(test_blocks)
# Height txs should fail and time txs should now pass 9 * 600 > 10 * 512
bip68success_txs.extend(bip68timetxs)
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(bip68success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
for tx in bip68heighttxs:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([tx])], success=False, reject_reason='bad-txns-nonfinal')
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
# Advance one block to 439
test_blocks = self.generate_blocks(1)
self.send_blocks(test_blocks)
# All BIP 68 txs should pass
bip68success_txs.extend(bip68heighttxs)
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(bip68success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
self.log.info("BIP 112 tests")
self.log.info("Test version 1 txs")
# -1 OP_CSV tx and (empty stack) OP_CSV tx should fail
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([bip112tx_special_v1])], success=False,
reject_reason='non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Negative locktime)')
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([bip112tx_emptystack_v1])], success=False,
reject_reason='non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Operation not valid with the current stack size)')
# If SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_DISABLE_FLAG is set in argument to OP_CSV, version 1 txs should still pass
success_txs = [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v1 if tx['sdf']]
success_txs += [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9_v1 if tx['sdf']]
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
# If SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_DISABLE_FLAG is unset in argument to OP_CSV, version 1 txs should now fail
fail_txs = all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_nSequence_v1)
fail_txs += all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_nSequence_9_v1)
fail_txs += [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v1 if not tx['sdf']]
fail_txs += [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9_v1 if not tx['sdf']]
for tx in fail_txs:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([tx])], success=False,
reject_reason='non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Locktime requirement not satisfied)')
self.log.info("Test version 2 txs")
# -1 OP_CSV tx and (empty stack) OP_CSV tx should fail
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([bip112tx_special_v2])], success=False,
reject_reason='non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Negative locktime)')
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([bip112tx_emptystack_v2])], success=False,
reject_reason='non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Operation not valid with the current stack size)')
# If SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_DISABLE_FLAG is set in argument to OP_CSV, version 2 txs should pass (all sequence locks are met)
success_txs = [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v2 if tx['sdf']]
success_txs += [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9_v2 if tx['sdf']]
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
# SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_DISABLE_FLAG is unset in argument to OP_CSV for all remaining txs ##
# All txs with nSequence 9 should fail either due to earlier mismatch or failing the CSV check
fail_txs = all_rlt_txs(bip112txs_vary_nSequence_9_v2)
fail_txs += [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_9_v2 if not tx['sdf']]
for tx in fail_txs:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([tx])], success=False,
reject_reason='non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Locktime requirement not satisfied)')
# If SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_DISABLE_FLAG is set in nSequence, tx should fail
fail_txs = [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_nSequence_v2 if tx['sdf']]
for tx in fail_txs:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([tx])], success=False,
reject_reason='non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Locktime requirement not satisfied)')
# If sequencelock types mismatch, tx should fail
fail_txs = [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_nSequence_v2 if not tx['sdf'] and tx['stf']]
fail_txs += [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v2 if not tx['sdf'] and tx['stf']]
for tx in fail_txs:
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block([tx])], success=False,
reject_reason='non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Locktime requirement not satisfied)')
# Remaining txs should pass, just test masking works properly
success_txs = [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_nSequence_v2 if not tx['sdf'] and not tx['stf']]
success_txs += [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v2 if not tx['sdf'] and not tx['stf']]
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(success_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
# Additional test, of checking that comparison of two time types works properly
time_txs = []
for tx in [tx['tx'] for tx in bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v2 if not tx['sdf'] and tx['stf']]:
tx.vin[0].nSequence = BASE_RELATIVE_LOCKTIME | SEQ_TYPE_FLAG
signtx = sign_transaction(self.nodes[0], tx)
time_txs.append(signtx)
self.send_blocks([self.create_test_block(time_txs)])
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
if __name__ == '__main__':
BIP68_112_113Test().main()