sikkienl/dash
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git synced 2024-12-27 13:03:17 +01:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
5cadf3eb60
dash/src/test/scriptnum_tests.cpp

203 lines
7.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
// Copyright (c) 2012-2014 The Bitcoin Core developers
Remove references to X11 licence
2014-12-13 05:09:33 +01:00
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
#include "scriptnum10.h"
Move CScript class and dependencies to script/script
2014-08-20 17:37:40 +02:00
#include "script/script.h"
tests: add a BasicTestingSetup and apply to all tests Make sure that chainparams and logging is properly initialized. Doing this for every test may be overkill, but this initialization is so simple that that does not matter. This should fix the travis issues.
2015-03-12 09:34:42 +01:00
#include "test/test_bitcoin.h"
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
#include <limits.h>
#include <stdint.h>
tests: add a BasicTestingSetup and apply to all tests Make sure that chainparams and logging is properly initialized. Doing this for every test may be overkill, but this initialization is so simple that that does not matter. This should fix the travis issues.
2015-03-12 09:34:42 +01:00
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(scriptnum_tests, BasicTestingSetup)
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
static const int64_t values[] = \
{ 0, 1, CHAR_MIN, CHAR_MAX, UCHAR_MAX, SHRT_MIN, USHRT_MAX, INT_MIN, INT_MAX, UINT_MAX, LONG_MIN, LONG_MAX };
static const int64_t offsets[] = { 1, 0x79, 0x80, 0x81, 0xFF, 0x7FFF, 0x8000, 0xFFFF, 0x10000};
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
static bool verify(const CScriptNum10& bignum, const CScriptNum& scriptnum)
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
{
return bignum.getvch() == scriptnum.getvch() && bignum.getint() == scriptnum.getint();
}
static void CheckCreateVch(const int64_t& num)
{
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
CScriptNum10 bignum(num);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
CScriptNum scriptnum(num);
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum, scriptnum));
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
std::vector<unsigned char> vch = bignum.getvch();
CScriptNum10 bignum2(bignum.getvch(), false);
vch = scriptnum.getvch();
Add SCRIPT_VERIFY_MINIMALDATA (BIP62 rules 3 and 4) Also use the new flag as a standard rule, and replace the IsCanonicalPush standardness check with it (as it is more complete).
2014-10-09 03:48:59 +02:00
CScriptNum scriptnum2(scriptnum.getvch(), false);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum2, scriptnum2));
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
CScriptNum10 bignum3(scriptnum2.getvch(), false);
Add SCRIPT_VERIFY_MINIMALDATA (BIP62 rules 3 and 4) Also use the new flag as a standard rule, and replace the IsCanonicalPush standardness check with it (as it is more complete).
2014-10-09 03:48:59 +02:00
CScriptNum scriptnum3(bignum2.getvch(), false);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum3, scriptnum3));
}
static void CheckCreateInt(const int64_t& num)
{
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
CScriptNum10 bignum(num);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
CScriptNum scriptnum(num);
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum, scriptnum));
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK(verify(CScriptNum10(bignum.getint()), CScriptNum(scriptnum.getint())));
BOOST_CHECK(verify(CScriptNum10(scriptnum.getint()), CScriptNum(bignum.getint())));
BOOST_CHECK(verify(CScriptNum10(CScriptNum10(scriptnum.getint()).getint()), CScriptNum(CScriptNum(bignum.getint()).getint())));
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
}
static void CheckAdd(const int64_t& num1, const int64_t& num2)
{
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
const CScriptNum10 bignum1(num1);
const CScriptNum10 bignum2(num2);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
const CScriptNum scriptnum1(num1);
const CScriptNum scriptnum2(num2);
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
CScriptNum10 bignum3(num1);
CScriptNum10 bignum4(num1);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
CScriptNum scriptnum3(num1);
CScriptNum scriptnum4(num1);
// int64_t overflow is undefined.
bool invalid = (((num2 > 0) && (num1 > (std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max() - num2))) ||
((num2 < 0) && (num1 < (std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min() - num2))));
if (!invalid)
{
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum1 + bignum2, scriptnum1 + scriptnum2));
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum1 + bignum2, scriptnum1 + num2));
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum1 + bignum2, scriptnum2 + num1));
}
}
static void CheckNegate(const int64_t& num)
{
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
const CScriptNum10 bignum(num);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
const CScriptNum scriptnum(num);
// -INT64_MIN is undefined
if (num != std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min())
BOOST_CHECK(verify(-bignum, -scriptnum));
}
static void CheckSubtract(const int64_t& num1, const int64_t& num2)
{
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
const CScriptNum10 bignum1(num1);
const CScriptNum10 bignum2(num2);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
const CScriptNum scriptnum1(num1);
const CScriptNum scriptnum2(num2);
bool invalid = false;
// int64_t overflow is undefined.
invalid = ((num2 > 0 && num1 < std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min() + num2) ||
(num2 < 0 && num1 > std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max() + num2));
if (!invalid)
{
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum1 - bignum2, scriptnum1 - scriptnum2));
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum1 - bignum2, scriptnum1 - num2));
}
invalid = ((num1 > 0 && num2 < std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min() + num1) ||
(num1 < 0 && num2 > std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max() + num1));
if (!invalid)
{
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum2 - bignum1, scriptnum2 - scriptnum1));
BOOST_CHECK(verify(bignum2 - bignum1, scriptnum2 - num1));
}
}
static void CheckCompare(const int64_t& num1, const int64_t& num2)
{
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
const CScriptNum10 bignum1(num1);
const CScriptNum10 bignum2(num2);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
const CScriptNum scriptnum1(num1);
const CScriptNum scriptnum2(num2);
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 == bignum1) == (scriptnum1 == scriptnum1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 != bignum1) == (scriptnum1 != scriptnum1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 < bignum1) == (scriptnum1 < scriptnum1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 > bignum1) == (scriptnum1 > scriptnum1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 >= bignum1) == (scriptnum1 >= scriptnum1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 <= bignum1) == (scriptnum1 <= scriptnum1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 == bignum1) == (scriptnum1 == num1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 != bignum1) == (scriptnum1 != num1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 < bignum1) == (scriptnum1 < num1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 > bignum1) == (scriptnum1 > num1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 >= bignum1) == (scriptnum1 >= num1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 <= bignum1) == (scriptnum1 <= num1));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 == bignum2) == (scriptnum1 == scriptnum2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 != bignum2) == (scriptnum1 != scriptnum2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 < bignum2) == (scriptnum1 < scriptnum2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 > bignum2) == (scriptnum1 > scriptnum2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 >= bignum2) == (scriptnum1 >= scriptnum2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 <= bignum2) == (scriptnum1 <= scriptnum2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 == bignum2) == (scriptnum1 == num2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 != bignum2) == (scriptnum1 != num2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 < bignum2) == (scriptnum1 < num2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 > bignum2) == (scriptnum1 > num2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 >= bignum2) == (scriptnum1 >= num2));
BOOST_CHECK((bignum1 <= bignum2) == (scriptnum1 <= num2));
}
static void RunCreate(const int64_t& num)
{
CheckCreateInt(num);
CScriptNum scriptnum(num);
Make CScriptNum() take nMaxNumSize as an argument While the existing numeric opcodes are all limited to 4-byte bignum arguments, new opcodes will need different limits.
2014-09-29 07:00:01 +02:00
if (scriptnum.getvch().size() <= CScriptNum::nDefaultMaxNumSize)
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
CheckCreateVch(num);
else
{
Replace scriptnum_test's normative ScriptNum implementation Compare against the scriptnum from Bitcoin Core 0.10 instead of OpenSSL. Closes #7086.
2015-11-25 13:19:48 +01:00
BOOST_CHECK_THROW (CheckCreateVch(num), scriptnum10_error);
script: Add test for CScriptNum Because this class replaces some usages of CBigNum, tests have been added to verify that they function the same way. The only difference in their usage is the handling of out-of-range numbers. While operands are constrained to [-0x7FFFFFFF,0x7FFFFFFF], the results may overflow. The overflowing result is technically unbounded, but in practice it can be no bigger than the result of an operation on two operands. This implementation limits them to the size of an int64. CBigNum was unaware of this constraint, so it allowed for unbounded results, which were then checked before use. CScriptNum asserts if an arithmetic operation will overflow an int64_t, since scripts are not able to reach those numbers anyway. Additionally, CScriptNum will throw an exception when constructed from a vector containing more than 4 bytes This mimics the previous CastToBigNum behavior.
2014-04-22 06:11:39 +02:00
}
}
static void RunOperators(const int64_t& num1, const int64_t& num2)
{
CheckAdd(num1, num2);
CheckSubtract(num1, num2);
CheckNegate(num1);
CheckCompare(num1, num2);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(creation)
{
for(size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(values) / sizeof(values[0]); ++i)
{
for(size_t j = 0; j < sizeof(offsets) / sizeof(offsets[0]); ++j)
{
RunCreate(values[i]);
RunCreate(values[i] + offsets[j]);
RunCreate(values[i] - offsets[j]);
}
}
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(operators)
{
for(size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(values) / sizeof(values[0]); ++i)
{
for(size_t j = 0; j < sizeof(offsets) / sizeof(offsets[0]); ++j)
{
RunOperators(values[i], values[i]);
RunOperators(values[i], -values[i]);
RunOperators(values[i], values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i], -values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i] + values[j], values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i] + values[j], -values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i] - values[j], values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i] - values[j], -values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i] + values[j], values[i] + values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i] + values[j], values[i] - values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i] - values[j], values[i] + values[j]);
RunOperators(values[i] - values[j], values[i] - values[j]);
}
}
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink