dash/test/functional/wallet_importmulti.py

720 lines
35 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
partial Merge #14454: Add SegWit support to importmulti (#4440) * partial Merge #14454: Add SegWit support to importmulti c11875c5908a17314bb38caa911507dc6401ec49 Add segwit address tests for importmulti (MeshCollider) 201451b1ca3c6db3b13f9491a81db5b120b864bb Make getaddressinfo return solvability (MeshCollider) 1753d217ead7e2de35b3df6cd6573a1c9a068f84 Add release notes for importmulti segwit change (MeshCollider) 353c064596fc2e2c149987ac3b3c11b4c90c4d5f Fix typo in test_framework/blocktools (MeshCollider) f6ed748cf045d7f0d9a49e15cc0c0001610b9231 Add SegWit support to importmulti with some ProcessImport cleanup (MeshCollider) Pull request description: Add support for segwit to importmulti, supports P2WSH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WSH. Adds a new `witnessscript` parameter which must be used for the witness scripts in the relevant situations. Also includes some tests for the various import types. ~Also makes the change in #14019 redundant, but cherry-picks the test from that PR to test the behavior (@achow101).~ Fixes #12253, also addresses the second point in #12703, and fixes #14407 Tree-SHA512: 775a755c524d1c387a99acddd772f677d2073876b72403dcfb92c59f9b405ae13ceedcf4dbd2ee1d7a8db91c494f67ca137161032ee3a2071282eeb411be090a # Conflicts: # src/wallet/rpcdump.cpp # test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py # test/functional/wallet_importmulti.py * make linter happy Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Fixes: trivial + linter + add missing consistency check + more/redo 14679 Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-09-28 21:48:33 +02:00
# Copyright (c) 2014-2018 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test the importmulti RPC.
Test importmulti by generating keys on node0, importing the scriptPubKeys and
addresses on node1 and then testing the address info for the different address
variants.
- `get_key()` and `get_multisig()` are called to generate keys on node0 and
return the privkeys, pubkeys and all variants of scriptPubKey and address.
- `test_importmulti()` is called to send an importmulti call to node1, test
success, and (if unsuccessful) test the error code and error message returned.
- `test_address()` is called to call getaddressinfo for an address on node1
and test the values returned."""
from test_framework.blocktools import COINBASE_MATURITY
from test_framework.script import (
CScript,
OP_NOP,
)
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.descriptors import descsum_create
from test_framework.util import (
assert_equal,
assert_greater_than,
assert_raises_rpc_error,
)
from test_framework.wallet_util import (
get_key,
get_multisig,
test_address,
)
class ImportMultiTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 2
self.setup_clean_chain = True
Merge #14021: Import key origin data through descriptors in importmulti (+ changes from PRs partially merged earlier: 15368, 15749) cb3511b9d Add release notes for importing key origin info change (Andrew Chow) 4c75a69f3 Test importing descriptors with key origin information (Andrew Chow) 02d6586d7 Import KeyOriginData when importing descriptors (Andrew Chow) 3d235dff5 Implement a function to add KeyOriginInfo to a wallet (Andrew Chow) eab63bc26 Store key origin info in key metadata (Andrew Chow) 345bff601 Remove hdmasterkeyid (Andrew Chow) bac8c676a Add a method to CWallet to write just CKeyMetadata (Andrew Chow) e7652d3f6 Add WriteHDKeypath function and move *HDKeypath to util/bip32.{h,cpp} (Andrew Chow) c45415f73 Refactor keymetadata writing to a separate method (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: This PR allows for key origin data as defined by the descriptors document to be imported to the wallet when importing a descriptor using `importmulti`. This allows the `walletprocesspsbt` to include the BIP 32 derivation paths for keys that it is watching that are from a different HD wallet. In order to make this easier to use, a new field `hdmasterkeyfingerprint` has been added to `getaddressinfo`. Additionally I have removed `hdmasterkeyid` as was planned. I think that this API change is fine since it was going to be removed in 0.18 anyways. `CKeyMetadata` has also been extended to store key origin info to facilitate this. Tree-SHA512: 9c7794f3c793da57e23c5abbdc3d58779ee9dea3d53168bb86c0643a4ad5a11a446264961e2f772f35eea645048cb60954ed58050002caee4e43cd9f51215097
2019-02-15 00:10:52 +01:00
self.extra_args = [['-usehd=1']] * self.num_nodes
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
def setup_network(self):
self.setup_nodes()
Merge #16726: tests: Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable dict/list:s are used as default parameter values e4f4ea47ebf7774fb6f445adde7bf7ea71fa05a1 lint: Catch use of [] or {} as default parameter values in Python functions (practicalswift) 25dd86715039586d92176eee16e9c6644d2547f0 Avoid using mutable default parameter values (practicalswift) Pull request description: Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable `dict`/`list`:s are used as default parameter values. Examples of this gotcha caught during review: * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16673#discussion_r317415261 * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14565#discussion_r241942304 Perhaps surprisingly this is how mutable list and dictionary default parameter values behave in Python: ``` >>> def f(i, j=[], k={}): ... j.append(i) ... k[i] = True ... return j, k ... >>> f(1) ([1], {1: True}) >>> f(1) ([1, 1], {1: True}) >>> f(2) ([1, 1, 2], {1: True, 2: True}) ``` In contrast to: ``` >>> def f(i, j=None, k=None): ... if j is None: ... j = [] ... if k is None: ... k = {} ... j.append(i) ... k[i] = True ... return j, k ... >>> f(1) ([1], {1: True}) >>> f(1) ([1], {1: True}) >>> f(2) ([2], {2: True}) ``` The latter is typically the intended behaviour. This PR fixes two instances of this and adds a check guarding against this gotcha going forward :-) ACKs for top commit: Sjors: Oh Python... ACK e4f4ea47ebf7774fb6f445adde7bf7ea71fa05a1. Testing tip: swap the two commits. Tree-SHA512: 56e14d24fc866211a20185c9fdb274ed046c3aed2dc0e07699e58b6f9fa3b79f6d0c880fb02d72b7fe5cc5eb7c0ff6da0ead33123344e1a872209370c2e49e3f
2019-08-28 19:34:22 +02:00
def test_importmulti(self, req, success, error_code=None, error_message=None, warnings=None):
"""Run importmulti and assert success"""
Merge #16726: tests: Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable dict/list:s are used as default parameter values e4f4ea47ebf7774fb6f445adde7bf7ea71fa05a1 lint: Catch use of [] or {} as default parameter values in Python functions (practicalswift) 25dd86715039586d92176eee16e9c6644d2547f0 Avoid using mutable default parameter values (practicalswift) Pull request description: Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable `dict`/`list`:s are used as default parameter values. Examples of this gotcha caught during review: * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16673#discussion_r317415261 * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14565#discussion_r241942304 Perhaps surprisingly this is how mutable list and dictionary default parameter values behave in Python: ``` >>> def f(i, j=[], k={}): ... j.append(i) ... k[i] = True ... return j, k ... >>> f(1) ([1], {1: True}) >>> f(1) ([1, 1], {1: True}) >>> f(2) ([1, 1, 2], {1: True, 2: True}) ``` In contrast to: ``` >>> def f(i, j=None, k=None): ... if j is None: ... j = [] ... if k is None: ... k = {} ... j.append(i) ... k[i] = True ... return j, k ... >>> f(1) ([1], {1: True}) >>> f(1) ([1], {1: True}) >>> f(2) ([2], {2: True}) ``` The latter is typically the intended behaviour. This PR fixes two instances of this and adds a check guarding against this gotcha going forward :-) ACKs for top commit: Sjors: Oh Python... ACK e4f4ea47ebf7774fb6f445adde7bf7ea71fa05a1. Testing tip: swap the two commits. Tree-SHA512: 56e14d24fc866211a20185c9fdb274ed046c3aed2dc0e07699e58b6f9fa3b79f6d0c880fb02d72b7fe5cc5eb7c0ff6da0ead33123344e1a872209370c2e49e3f
2019-08-28 19:34:22 +02:00
if warnings is None:
warnings = []
result = self.nodes[1].importmulti([req])
observed_warnings = []
if 'warnings' in result[0]:
observed_warnings = result[0]['warnings']
assert_equal("\n".join(sorted(warnings)), "\n".join(sorted(observed_warnings)))
assert_equal(result[0]['success'], success)
if error_code is not None:
assert_equal(result[0]['error']['code'], error_code)
assert_equal(result[0]['error']['message'], error_message)
def run_test(self):
self.log.info("Mining blocks...")
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
timestamp = self.nodes[1].getblock(self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash())['mediantime']
self.nodes[1].syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue() # Sync the timestamp to the wallet, so that importmulti works
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
node0_address1 = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress())
# Check only one address
assert_equal(node0_address1['ismine'], True)
# Node 1 sync test
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 1)
# Address Test - before import
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
address_info = self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(node0_address1['address'])
assert_equal(address_info['iswatchonly'], False)
assert_equal(address_info['ismine'], False)
# RPC importmulti -----------------------------------------------
# Bitcoin Address (implicit non-internal)
self.log.info("Should import an address")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": key.p2pkh_addr},
"timestamp": "now"},
success=True)
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
timestamp=timestamp,
ischange=False)
watchonly_address = key.p2pkh_addr
watchonly_timestamp = timestamp
self.log.info("Should not import an invalid address")
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": "not valid address"},
"timestamp": "now"},
success=False,
error_code=-5,
error_message='Invalid address \"not valid address\"')
# ScriptPubKey + internal
self.log.info("Should import a scriptPubKey with internal flag")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": key.p2pkh_script,
"timestamp": "now",
"internal": True},
success=True)
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
timestamp=timestamp,
ischange=True)
partial Merge #14454: Add SegWit support to importmulti (#4440) * partial Merge #14454: Add SegWit support to importmulti c11875c5908a17314bb38caa911507dc6401ec49 Add segwit address tests for importmulti (MeshCollider) 201451b1ca3c6db3b13f9491a81db5b120b864bb Make getaddressinfo return solvability (MeshCollider) 1753d217ead7e2de35b3df6cd6573a1c9a068f84 Add release notes for importmulti segwit change (MeshCollider) 353c064596fc2e2c149987ac3b3c11b4c90c4d5f Fix typo in test_framework/blocktools (MeshCollider) f6ed748cf045d7f0d9a49e15cc0c0001610b9231 Add SegWit support to importmulti with some ProcessImport cleanup (MeshCollider) Pull request description: Add support for segwit to importmulti, supports P2WSH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WSH. Adds a new `witnessscript` parameter which must be used for the witness scripts in the relevant situations. Also includes some tests for the various import types. ~Also makes the change in #14019 redundant, but cherry-picks the test from that PR to test the behavior (@achow101).~ Fixes #12253, also addresses the second point in #12703, and fixes #14407 Tree-SHA512: 775a755c524d1c387a99acddd772f677d2073876b72403dcfb92c59f9b405ae13ceedcf4dbd2ee1d7a8db91c494f67ca137161032ee3a2071282eeb411be090a # Conflicts: # src/wallet/rpcdump.cpp # test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py # test/functional/wallet_importmulti.py * make linter happy Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Fixes: trivial + linter + add missing consistency check + more/redo 14679 Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-09-28 21:48:33 +02:00
# ScriptPubKey + internal + label
self.log.info("Should not allow a label to be specified when internal is true")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": key.p2pkh_script,
"timestamp": "now",
"internal": True,
Merge #17283: rpc: improve getaddressinfo test coverage, help, code docs 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 test: add rpc getaddressinfo labels test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f3539ac6d772fc646b5f184fa1efe77bf632f6a test: add listlabels test in wallet_labels.py (Jon Atack) 1388de83900eaced906d369fe9e8887ae74b2dcf rpc: add getaddressinfo code documentation (Jon Atack) 2ee0cb3330ccf70f0540cb42370796e32eff1569 rpc: update getaddressinfo RPCExamples to bech32 (Jon Atack) 8d1ed0c263f8cdff7189f02040b5d02238d93da0 rpc: clarify label vs labels in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman (Jon Atack) 5a0ed850700dfb19167d40b38f80313bd5e427ca rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content (Jon Atack) 70cda342cd20d0e0cd9f28405457544036968f2d rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman formatting (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR is a continuation of the work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12892. Main motivations: - There is currently no test coverage for the getaddressinfo `labels` response. Coverage here is a prerequisite before deprecating the `label` response or adding multiple labels per address. - `bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` returns a few content errors, difficult-to-read formatting, and no explanation why it returns both `label` and `labels` and how they relate, which can be confusing for application developers. Changes by order of commits: - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman layout formatting - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content - [x] clarify the `label` and `labels` fields in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman - [x] update getaddressinfo RPCExamples addresses to bech32 - [x] add getaddressinfo code docs - [x] add a `listlabels` test assertion in wallet_labels.py - [x] add missing getaddressinfo `labels` test coverage and improve the existing `label` tests Here are gists of the CLI help output: [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` before this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/022af5221a85c069780359a22643c810) [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` after this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/4ee5f6abc62a3d99269570206a5f90ba) It seems we ought to begin a deprecation process for the getaddressinfo `label` field? If yes, I have a follow-up ready. _--> EDIT: Deprecation follow-ups #17578 and #17585 now build on this PR._ ACKs for top commit: fjahr: Re-ACK 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 jnewbery: ACK 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151. Tree-SHA512: a001aa863090ec2566a31059477945b1c303ebeb430b33472f8b150e420fa5742fc33bca9d95571746395b607f43f6078dd5b53e238ac1f3fc648b51c8f79a07
2019-11-26 16:57:23 +01:00
"label": "Unsuccessful labelling for internal addresses"},
success=False,
error_code=-8,
error_message='Internal addresses should not have a label')
partial Merge #14454: Add SegWit support to importmulti (#4440) * partial Merge #14454: Add SegWit support to importmulti c11875c5908a17314bb38caa911507dc6401ec49 Add segwit address tests for importmulti (MeshCollider) 201451b1ca3c6db3b13f9491a81db5b120b864bb Make getaddressinfo return solvability (MeshCollider) 1753d217ead7e2de35b3df6cd6573a1c9a068f84 Add release notes for importmulti segwit change (MeshCollider) 353c064596fc2e2c149987ac3b3c11b4c90c4d5f Fix typo in test_framework/blocktools (MeshCollider) f6ed748cf045d7f0d9a49e15cc0c0001610b9231 Add SegWit support to importmulti with some ProcessImport cleanup (MeshCollider) Pull request description: Add support for segwit to importmulti, supports P2WSH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WSH. Adds a new `witnessscript` parameter which must be used for the witness scripts in the relevant situations. Also includes some tests for the various import types. ~Also makes the change in #14019 redundant, but cherry-picks the test from that PR to test the behavior (@achow101).~ Fixes #12253, also addresses the second point in #12703, and fixes #14407 Tree-SHA512: 775a755c524d1c387a99acddd772f677d2073876b72403dcfb92c59f9b405ae13ceedcf4dbd2ee1d7a8db91c494f67ca137161032ee3a2071282eeb411be090a # Conflicts: # src/wallet/rpcdump.cpp # test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py # test/functional/wallet_importmulti.py * make linter happy Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Fixes: trivial + linter + add missing consistency check + more/redo 14679 Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-09-28 21:48:33 +02:00
# Nonstandard scriptPubKey + !internal
self.log.info("Should not import a nonstandard scriptPubKey without internal flag")
nonstandardScriptPubKey = key.p2pkh_script + CScript([OP_NOP]).hex()
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": nonstandardScriptPubKey,
"timestamp": "now"},
success=False,
error_code=-8,
error_message='Internal must be set to true for nonstandard scriptPubKey imports.')
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=False,
ismine=False,
timestamp=None)
# Address + Public key + !Internal(explicit)
self.log.info("Should import an address with public key")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": key.p2pkh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"pubkeys": [key.pubkey],
"internal": False},
success=True,
warnings=["Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
timestamp=timestamp)
# ScriptPubKey + Public key + internal
self.log.info("Should import a scriptPubKey with internal and with public key")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": key.p2pkh_script,
"timestamp": "now",
"pubkeys": [key.pubkey],
"internal": True},
success=True,
warnings=["Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
timestamp=timestamp)
# Nonstandard scriptPubKey + Public key + !internal
self.log.info("Should not import a nonstandard scriptPubKey without internal and with public key")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": nonstandardScriptPubKey,
"timestamp": "now",
"pubkeys": [key.pubkey]},
success=False,
error_code=-8,
error_message='Internal must be set to true for nonstandard scriptPubKey imports.')
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=False,
ismine=False,
timestamp=None)
# Address + Private key + !watchonly
self.log.info("Should import an address with private key")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": key.p2pkh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"keys": [key.privkey]},
success=True)
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=False,
ismine=True,
timestamp=timestamp)
Merge #11483: Fix importmulti bug when importing an already imported key a44a21517 Fix importmulti bug when importing an already imported key (Pedro Branco) Pull request description: This PR fixes a bug in `importmulti` RPC call where it returns an invalid response when importing an already imported key. Before: ```sh ❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]' [{ "success": true }] ❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]' '{ "rescan": false }' [ false ] ❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]' '{ "rescan": true }' error code: -1 error message: JSON value is not a boolean as expected ``` After this fix: ```sh ❯ bitcoin-cli -rpcuser=u -rpcpassword=p -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655139 }]' [{ "success": true }] ❯ bitcoin-cli -rpcuser=u -rpcpassword=p -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655139 }]' [{ "success": false, "error": { "code": -4, "message": "The wallet already contains the private key for this address or script" } }] ``` Tree-SHA512: 4acebdfb7d0ebd7cd48e943b93ed1cec072db1ace5c42b3f5cc225603764b6e804e4b823b0710965826aafc2f0c615c53d5aefcfdb9bc9c379f5221b798a318c
2017-10-17 21:40:48 +02:00
self.log.info("Should not import an address with private key if is already imported")
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": key.p2pkh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"keys": [key.privkey]},
success=False,
error_code=-4,
error_message='The wallet already contains the private key for this address or script ("' + key.p2pkh_script + '")')
Merge #11483: Fix importmulti bug when importing an already imported key a44a21517 Fix importmulti bug when importing an already imported key (Pedro Branco) Pull request description: This PR fixes a bug in `importmulti` RPC call where it returns an invalid response when importing an already imported key. Before: ```sh ❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]' [{ "success": true }] ❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]' '{ "rescan": false }' [ false ] ❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]' '{ "rescan": true }' error code: -1 error message: JSON value is not a boolean as expected ``` After this fix: ```sh ❯ bitcoin-cli -rpcuser=u -rpcpassword=p -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655139 }]' [{ "success": true }] ❯ bitcoin-cli -rpcuser=u -rpcpassword=p -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655139 }]' [{ "success": false, "error": { "code": -4, "message": "The wallet already contains the private key for this address or script" } }] ``` Tree-SHA512: 4acebdfb7d0ebd7cd48e943b93ed1cec072db1ace5c42b3f5cc225603764b6e804e4b823b0710965826aafc2f0c615c53d5aefcfdb9bc9c379f5221b798a318c
2017-10-17 21:40:48 +02:00
# Address + Private key + watchonly
self.log.info("Should import an address with private key and with watchonly")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": key.p2pkh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"keys": [key.privkey],
"watchonly": True},
success=True,
warnings=["All private keys are provided, outputs will be considered spendable. If this is intentional, do not specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=False,
ismine=True,
timestamp=timestamp)
# ScriptPubKey + Private key + internal
self.log.info("Should import a scriptPubKey with internal and with private key")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": key.p2pkh_script,
"timestamp": "now",
"keys": [key.privkey],
"internal": True},
success=True)
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=False,
ismine=True,
timestamp=timestamp)
# Nonstandard scriptPubKey + Private key + !internal
self.log.info("Should not import a nonstandard scriptPubKey without internal and with private key")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": nonstandardScriptPubKey,
"timestamp": "now",
"keys": [key.privkey]},
success=False,
error_code=-8,
error_message='Internal must be set to true for nonstandard scriptPubKey imports.')
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=False,
ismine=False,
timestamp=None)
# P2SH address
multisig = get_multisig(self.nodes[0])
self.nodes[1].generate(COINBASE_MATURITY)
self.nodes[1].sendtoaddress(multisig.p2sh_addr, 10.00)
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
timestamp = self.nodes[1].getblock(self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash())['mediantime']
self.nodes[1].syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue()
self.log.info("Should import a p2sh")
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": multisig.p2sh_addr},
"timestamp": "now"},
success=True)
test_address(self.nodes[1],
multisig.p2sh_addr,
isscript=True,
iswatchonly=True,
timestamp=timestamp)
p2shunspent = self.nodes[1].listunspent(0, 999999, [multisig.p2sh_addr])[0]
assert_equal(p2shunspent['spendable'], False)
assert_equal(p2shunspent['solvable'], False)
# P2SH + Redeem script
multisig = get_multisig(self.nodes[0])
self.nodes[1].generate(COINBASE_MATURITY)
self.nodes[1].sendtoaddress(multisig.p2sh_addr, 10.00)
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
timestamp = self.nodes[1].getblock(self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash())['mediantime']
self.nodes[1].syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue()
self.log.info("Should import a p2sh with respective redeem script")
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": multisig.p2sh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"redeemscript": multisig.redeem_script},
success=True,
warnings=["Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
multisig.p2sh_addr, timestamp=timestamp, iswatchonly=True, ismine=False, solvable=True)
p2shunspent = self.nodes[1].listunspent(0, 999999, [multisig.p2sh_addr])[0]
assert_equal(p2shunspent['spendable'], False)
assert_equal(p2shunspent['solvable'], True)
# P2SH + Redeem script + Private Keys + !Watchonly
multisig = get_multisig(self.nodes[0])
self.nodes[1].generate(COINBASE_MATURITY)
self.nodes[1].sendtoaddress(multisig.p2sh_addr, 10.00)
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
timestamp = self.nodes[1].getblock(self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash())['mediantime']
self.nodes[1].syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue()
self.log.info("Should import a p2sh with respective redeem script and private keys")
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": multisig.p2sh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"redeemscript": multisig.redeem_script,
"keys": multisig.privkeys[0:2]},
success=True,
warnings=["Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
multisig.p2sh_addr,
timestamp=timestamp,
ismine=False,
iswatchonly=True,
solvable=True)
p2shunspent = self.nodes[1].listunspent(0, 999999, [multisig.p2sh_addr])[0]
assert_equal(p2shunspent['spendable'], False)
assert_equal(p2shunspent['solvable'], True)
# P2SH + Redeem script + Private Keys + Watchonly
multisig = get_multisig(self.nodes[0])
self.nodes[1].generate(COINBASE_MATURITY)
self.nodes[1].sendtoaddress(multisig.p2sh_addr, 10.00)
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
timestamp = self.nodes[1].getblock(self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash())['mediantime']
self.nodes[1].syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue()
self.log.info("Should import a p2sh with respective redeem script and private keys")
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": multisig.p2sh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"redeemscript": multisig.redeem_script,
"keys": multisig.privkeys[0:2],
"watchonly": True},
success=True)
test_address(self.nodes[1],
multisig.p2sh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
solvable=True,
timestamp=timestamp)
# Address + Public key + !Internal + Wrong pubkey
self.log.info("Should not import an address with the wrong public key as non-solvable")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
wrong_key = get_key(self.nodes[0]).pubkey
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": key.p2pkh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"pubkeys": [wrong_key]},
success=True,
warnings=["Importing as non-solvable: some required keys are missing. If this is intentional, don't provide any keys, pubkeys, or redeemscript.", "Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
solvable=False,
timestamp=timestamp)
# ScriptPubKey + Public key + internal + Wrong pubkey
self.log.info("Should import a scriptPubKey with internal and with a wrong public key as non-solvable")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
wrong_key = get_key(self.nodes[0]).pubkey
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": key.p2pkh_script,
"timestamp": "now",
"pubkeys": [wrong_key],
"internal": True},
success=True,
warnings=["Importing as non-solvable: some required keys are missing. If this is intentional, don't provide any keys, pubkeys, or redeemscript.", "Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
solvable=False,
timestamp=timestamp)
# Address + Private key + !watchonly + Wrong private key
self.log.info("Should import an address with a wrong private key as non-solvable")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
wrong_privkey = get_key(self.nodes[0]).privkey
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": key.p2pkh_addr},
"timestamp": "now",
"keys": [wrong_privkey]},
success=True,
warnings=["Importing as non-solvable: some required keys are missing. If this is intentional, don't provide any keys, pubkeys, or redeemscript.", "Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
solvable=False,
timestamp=timestamp)
# ScriptPubKey + Private key + internal + Wrong private key
self.log.info("Should import a scriptPubKey with internal and with a wrong private key as non-solvable")
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
wrong_privkey = get_key(self.nodes[0]).privkey
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": key.p2pkh_script,
"timestamp": "now",
"keys": [wrong_privkey],
"internal": True},
success=True,
warnings=["Importing as non-solvable: some required keys are missing. If this is intentional, don't provide any keys, pubkeys, or redeemscript.", "Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
solvable=False,
timestamp=timestamp)
# Importing existing watch only address with new timestamp should replace saved timestamp.
assert_greater_than(timestamp, watchonly_timestamp)
self.log.info("Should replace previously saved watch only timestamp.")
self.test_importmulti({"scriptPubKey": {"address": watchonly_address},
"timestamp": "now"},
success=True)
test_address(self.nodes[1],
watchonly_address,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
timestamp=timestamp)
watchonly_timestamp = timestamp
# restart nodes to check for proper serialization/deserialization of watch only address
self.stop_nodes()
self.start_nodes()
test_address(self.nodes[1],
watchonly_address,
iswatchonly=True,
ismine=False,
timestamp=watchonly_timestamp)
# Bad or missing timestamps
self.log.info("Should throw on invalid or missing timestamp values")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, 'Missing required timestamp field for key',
self.nodes[1].importmulti, [{"scriptPubKey": key.p2pkh_script}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, 'Expected number or "now" timestamp value for key. got type string',
self.nodes[1].importmulti, [{
"scriptPubKey": key.p2pkh_script,
"timestamp": ""
}])
# Test ranged descriptor fails if range is not specified
xpriv = "tprv8ZgxMBicQKsPeuVhWwi6wuMQGfPKi9Li5GtX35jVNknACgqe3CY4g5xgkfDDJcmtF7o1QnxWDRYw4H5P26PXq7sbcUkEqeR4fg3Kxp2tigg"
desc = "sh(pkh(" + xpriv + "/0'/0'/*'" + "))"
self.log.info("Ranged descriptor import should fail without a specified range")
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create(desc),
"timestamp": "now"},
success=False,
error_code=-8,
error_message='Descriptor is ranged, please specify the range')
# Test importing of a ranged descriptor with xpriv
self.log.info("Should import the ranged descriptor with specified range as solvable")
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create(desc),
"timestamp": "now",
Merge #15497: rpc: Consistent range arguments in scantxoutset/importmulti/deriveaddresses ca253f6ebf Make deriveaddresses use stop/[start,stop] notation for ranges (Pieter Wuille) 1675b7ce55 Use stop/[start,stop] notation in importmulti desc range (Pieter Wuille) 4566011631 Add support for stop/[start,stop] ranges to scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille) 6b9f45e81b Support ranges arguments in RPC help (Pieter Wuille) 7aa6a8aefb Add ParseRange function to parse args of the form int/[int,int] (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This introduces a consistent notation for RPC arguments in `scantxoutset`, `importmulti`, and `deriveaddresses`, either: * `"range" : int` to just specify the end of the range * `"range" : [int,int]` to specify both the begin and the end of the range. For `scantxoutset`, this is a backward compatible new feature. For the two other RPCs, it's an incompatible change, but neither of them has been in a release so far. Because of that non-released reason, this only makes sense in 0.18, in my opinion. I suggest this as an alternative to #15496, which only makes `deriveaddresses` compatible with `importmulti`, but not with the existing `scantxoutset` RPC. I also think `[int,int]` is more convenient than `{"start":int,"stop":int}`. I realize this is technically a feature added to `scantxoutset` after the feature freeze. If desired, I'll drop the `scantxoutset` changes. Tree-SHA512: 1cbebb90cf34f106786dbcec7afbf3f43fb8b7e46cc7e6763faf1bc1babf12375a1b3c3cf86ee83c21ed2171d99b5a2f60331850bc613db25538c38b6a056676
2019-03-01 15:13:05 +01:00
"range": 1},
success=True)
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create(desc), "timestamp": "now", "range": -1},
success=False, error_code=-8, error_message='End of range is too high')
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create(desc), "timestamp": "now", "range": [-1, 10]},
success=False, error_code=-8, error_message='Range should be greater or equal than 0')
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create(desc), "timestamp": "now", "range": [(2 << 31 + 1) - 1000000, (2 << 31 + 1)]},
success=False, error_code=-8, error_message='End of range is too high')
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create(desc), "timestamp": "now", "range": [2, 1]},
success=False, error_code=-8, error_message='Range specified as [begin,end] must not have begin after end')
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create(desc), "timestamp": "now", "range": [0, 1000001]},
success=False, error_code=-8, error_message='Range is too large')
# Test importing a descriptor containing a WIF private key
wif_priv = "cTT3BvHnd51YJf8fkdr2XvZTQRRUZruWhRvRyQY1raVFg5Lvam2A"
address = "ySWABbcNKyHUgBb1ffhpuETuis9jsdR3aq"
desc = "sh(pkh(" + wif_priv + "))"
self.log.info("Should import a descriptor with a WIF private key as spendable")
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create(desc),
"timestamp": "now"},
success=True)
test_address(self.nodes[1],
address,
solvable=True,
ismine=True)
# dump the private key to ensure it matches what was imported
privkey = self.nodes[1].dumpprivkey(address)
assert_equal(privkey, wif_priv)
# Test importing of a P2PKH address via descriptor
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
Merge #17283: rpc: improve getaddressinfo test coverage, help, code docs 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 test: add rpc getaddressinfo labels test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f3539ac6d772fc646b5f184fa1efe77bf632f6a test: add listlabels test in wallet_labels.py (Jon Atack) 1388de83900eaced906d369fe9e8887ae74b2dcf rpc: add getaddressinfo code documentation (Jon Atack) 2ee0cb3330ccf70f0540cb42370796e32eff1569 rpc: update getaddressinfo RPCExamples to bech32 (Jon Atack) 8d1ed0c263f8cdff7189f02040b5d02238d93da0 rpc: clarify label vs labels in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman (Jon Atack) 5a0ed850700dfb19167d40b38f80313bd5e427ca rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content (Jon Atack) 70cda342cd20d0e0cd9f28405457544036968f2d rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman formatting (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR is a continuation of the work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12892. Main motivations: - There is currently no test coverage for the getaddressinfo `labels` response. Coverage here is a prerequisite before deprecating the `label` response or adding multiple labels per address. - `bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` returns a few content errors, difficult-to-read formatting, and no explanation why it returns both `label` and `labels` and how they relate, which can be confusing for application developers. Changes by order of commits: - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman layout formatting - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content - [x] clarify the `label` and `labels` fields in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman - [x] update getaddressinfo RPCExamples addresses to bech32 - [x] add getaddressinfo code docs - [x] add a `listlabels` test assertion in wallet_labels.py - [x] add missing getaddressinfo `labels` test coverage and improve the existing `label` tests Here are gists of the CLI help output: [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` before this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/022af5221a85c069780359a22643c810) [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` after this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/4ee5f6abc62a3d99269570206a5f90ba) It seems we ought to begin a deprecation process for the getaddressinfo `label` field? If yes, I have a follow-up ready. _--> EDIT: Deprecation follow-ups #17578 and #17585 now build on this PR._ ACKs for top commit: fjahr: Re-ACK 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 jnewbery: ACK 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151. Tree-SHA512: a001aa863090ec2566a31059477945b1c303ebeb430b33472f8b150e420fa5742fc33bca9d95571746395b607f43f6078dd5b53e238ac1f3fc648b51c8f79a07
2019-11-26 16:57:23 +01:00
p2pkh_label = "P2PKH descriptor import"
self.log.info("Should import a p2pkh address from descriptor")
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create("pkh(" + key.pubkey + ")"),
"timestamp": "now",
Merge #17283: rpc: improve getaddressinfo test coverage, help, code docs 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 test: add rpc getaddressinfo labels test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f3539ac6d772fc646b5f184fa1efe77bf632f6a test: add listlabels test in wallet_labels.py (Jon Atack) 1388de83900eaced906d369fe9e8887ae74b2dcf rpc: add getaddressinfo code documentation (Jon Atack) 2ee0cb3330ccf70f0540cb42370796e32eff1569 rpc: update getaddressinfo RPCExamples to bech32 (Jon Atack) 8d1ed0c263f8cdff7189f02040b5d02238d93da0 rpc: clarify label vs labels in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman (Jon Atack) 5a0ed850700dfb19167d40b38f80313bd5e427ca rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content (Jon Atack) 70cda342cd20d0e0cd9f28405457544036968f2d rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman formatting (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR is a continuation of the work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12892. Main motivations: - There is currently no test coverage for the getaddressinfo `labels` response. Coverage here is a prerequisite before deprecating the `label` response or adding multiple labels per address. - `bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` returns a few content errors, difficult-to-read formatting, and no explanation why it returns both `label` and `labels` and how they relate, which can be confusing for application developers. Changes by order of commits: - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman layout formatting - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content - [x] clarify the `label` and `labels` fields in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman - [x] update getaddressinfo RPCExamples addresses to bech32 - [x] add getaddressinfo code docs - [x] add a `listlabels` test assertion in wallet_labels.py - [x] add missing getaddressinfo `labels` test coverage and improve the existing `label` tests Here are gists of the CLI help output: [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` before this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/022af5221a85c069780359a22643c810) [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` after this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/4ee5f6abc62a3d99269570206a5f90ba) It seems we ought to begin a deprecation process for the getaddressinfo `label` field? If yes, I have a follow-up ready. _--> EDIT: Deprecation follow-ups #17578 and #17585 now build on this PR._ ACKs for top commit: fjahr: Re-ACK 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 jnewbery: ACK 33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151. Tree-SHA512: a001aa863090ec2566a31059477945b1c303ebeb430b33472f8b150e420fa5742fc33bca9d95571746395b607f43f6078dd5b53e238ac1f3fc648b51c8f79a07
2019-11-26 16:57:23 +01:00
"label": p2pkh_label},
success=True,
warnings=["Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key.p2pkh_addr,
solvable=True,
ismine=False,
Merge #17578: rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1 doc: update release notes (Jon Atack) 8bb405bbadf11391ccba7b334b4cfe66dc85b390 test: getaddressinfo labels purpose deprecation test (Jon Atack) 60aba1f2f11529add115d963d05599130288ae28 rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior (Jon Atack) 7851f14ccf2bcd1e9b2ad48e5e08881be06d9d21 rpc: incorporate review feedback from PR 17283 (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR builds on #17283 (now merged) and is followed by #17585. It modifies the value returned by rpc getaddressinfo `labels` to an array of label name strings and deprecates the previous behavior of returning an array of JSON hash structures containing label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs. before ``` "labels": [ { "name": "DOUBLE SPEND", "purpose": "receive" } ``` after ``` "labels": [ "DOUBLE SPEND" ] ``` The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose`. For context, see: - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001 - http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-13.html#l-425 (lines 425-427) - http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622 Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo help text and `labels` output. Next steps: deprecate the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field (EDIT: done in #17585) and add support for multiple labels per address. This PR will unblock those. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: reACK 8925df8 promag: Code review ACK 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1. meshcollider: Code review ACK 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1 Tree-SHA512: c2b717209996da32b6484de7bb8800e7048410f9ce6afdb3e02a6866bd4a8f2c730f905fca27b10b877b91cf407f546e69e8c4feb9cd934325a6c71c166bd438
2020-01-07 23:23:58 +01:00
labels=[p2pkh_label])
# Test import fails if both desc and scriptPubKey are provided
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.log.info("Import should fail if both scriptPubKey and desc are provided")
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create("pkh(" + key.pubkey + ")"),
"scriptPubKey": {"address": key.p2pkh_addr},
"timestamp": "now"},
success=False,
error_code=-8,
error_message='Both a descriptor and a scriptPubKey should not be provided.')
# Test import fails if neither desc nor scriptPubKey are present
key = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.log.info("Import should fail if neither a descriptor nor a scriptPubKey are provided")
self.test_importmulti({"timestamp": "now"},
success=False,
error_code=-8,
error_message='Either a descriptor or scriptPubKey must be provided.')
# Test importing of a multisig via descriptor
key1 = get_key(self.nodes[0])
key2 = get_key(self.nodes[0])
self.log.info("Should import a 1-of-2 bare multisig from descriptor")
self.test_importmulti({"desc": descsum_create("multi(1," + key1.pubkey + "," + key2.pubkey + ")"),
"timestamp": "now"},
Merge #14021: Import key origin data through descriptors in importmulti (+ changes from PRs partially merged earlier: 15368, 15749) cb3511b9d Add release notes for importing key origin info change (Andrew Chow) 4c75a69f3 Test importing descriptors with key origin information (Andrew Chow) 02d6586d7 Import KeyOriginData when importing descriptors (Andrew Chow) 3d235dff5 Implement a function to add KeyOriginInfo to a wallet (Andrew Chow) eab63bc26 Store key origin info in key metadata (Andrew Chow) 345bff601 Remove hdmasterkeyid (Andrew Chow) bac8c676a Add a method to CWallet to write just CKeyMetadata (Andrew Chow) e7652d3f6 Add WriteHDKeypath function and move *HDKeypath to util/bip32.{h,cpp} (Andrew Chow) c45415f73 Refactor keymetadata writing to a separate method (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: This PR allows for key origin data as defined by the descriptors document to be imported to the wallet when importing a descriptor using `importmulti`. This allows the `walletprocesspsbt` to include the BIP 32 derivation paths for keys that it is watching that are from a different HD wallet. In order to make this easier to use, a new field `hdmasterkeyfingerprint` has been added to `getaddressinfo`. Additionally I have removed `hdmasterkeyid` as was planned. I think that this API change is fine since it was going to be removed in 0.18 anyways. `CKeyMetadata` has also been extended to store key origin info to facilitate this. Tree-SHA512: 9c7794f3c793da57e23c5abbdc3d58779ee9dea3d53168bb86c0643a4ad5a11a446264961e2f772f35eea645048cb60954ed58050002caee4e43cd9f51215097
2019-02-15 00:10:52 +01:00
True,
warnings=["Some private keys are missing, outputs will be considered watchonly. If this is intentional, specify the watchonly flag."])
self.log.info("Should not treat individual keys from the imported bare multisig as watchonly")
test_address(self.nodes[1],
key1.p2pkh_addr,
ismine=False,
iswatchonly=False)
Merge #14021: Import key origin data through descriptors in importmulti (+ changes from PRs partially merged earlier: 15368, 15749) cb3511b9d Add release notes for importing key origin info change (Andrew Chow) 4c75a69f3 Test importing descriptors with key origin information (Andrew Chow) 02d6586d7 Import KeyOriginData when importing descriptors (Andrew Chow) 3d235dff5 Implement a function to add KeyOriginInfo to a wallet (Andrew Chow) eab63bc26 Store key origin info in key metadata (Andrew Chow) 345bff601 Remove hdmasterkeyid (Andrew Chow) bac8c676a Add a method to CWallet to write just CKeyMetadata (Andrew Chow) e7652d3f6 Add WriteHDKeypath function and move *HDKeypath to util/bip32.{h,cpp} (Andrew Chow) c45415f73 Refactor keymetadata writing to a separate method (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: This PR allows for key origin data as defined by the descriptors document to be imported to the wallet when importing a descriptor using `importmulti`. This allows the `walletprocesspsbt` to include the BIP 32 derivation paths for keys that it is watching that are from a different HD wallet. In order to make this easier to use, a new field `hdmasterkeyfingerprint` has been added to `getaddressinfo`. Additionally I have removed `hdmasterkeyid` as was planned. I think that this API change is fine since it was going to be removed in 0.18 anyways. `CKeyMetadata` has also been extended to store key origin info to facilitate this. Tree-SHA512: 9c7794f3c793da57e23c5abbdc3d58779ee9dea3d53168bb86c0643a4ad5a11a446264961e2f772f35eea645048cb60954ed58050002caee4e43cd9f51215097
2019-02-15 00:10:52 +01:00
# Import pubkeys with key origin info
self.log.info("Addresses should have hd keypath and master key id after import with key origin")
pub_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
pub_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
info = self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(pub_addr)
pub = info['pubkey']
pub_keypath = info['hdkeypath']
pub_fpr = info['hdmasterfingerprint']
result = self.nodes[0].importmulti(
[{
'desc' : descsum_create("pkh([" + pub_fpr + pub_keypath[1:] +"]" + pub + ")"),
"timestamp": "now",
}]
)
assert result[0]['success']
pub_import_info = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(pub_addr)
assert_equal(pub_import_info['hdmasterfingerprint'], pub_fpr)
assert_equal(pub_import_info['pubkey'], pub)
assert_equal(pub_import_info['hdkeypath'], pub_keypath)
# Import privkeys with key origin info
priv_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
info = self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(priv_addr)
priv = self.nodes[1].dumpprivkey(priv_addr)
priv_keypath = info['hdkeypath']
priv_fpr = info['hdmasterfingerprint']
result = self.nodes[0].importmulti(
[{
'desc' : descsum_create("pkh([" + priv_fpr + priv_keypath[1:] + "]" + priv + ")"),
"timestamp": "now",
}]
)
assert result[0]['success']
priv_import_info = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(priv_addr)
assert_equal(priv_import_info['hdmasterfingerprint'], priv_fpr)
assert_equal(priv_import_info['hdkeypath'], priv_keypath)
# Make sure the key origin info are still there after a restart
self.stop_nodes()
self.start_nodes()
import_info = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(pub_addr)
assert_equal(import_info['hdmasterfingerprint'], pub_fpr)
assert_equal(import_info['hdkeypath'], pub_keypath)
import_info = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(priv_addr)
assert_equal(import_info['hdmasterfingerprint'], priv_fpr)
assert_equal(import_info['hdkeypath'], priv_keypath)
# Check legacy import does not import key origin info
self.log.info("Legacy imports don't have key origin info")
pub_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
info = self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(pub_addr)
pub = info['pubkey']
result = self.nodes[0].importmulti(
[{
'scriptPubKey': {'address': pub_addr},
'pubkeys': [pub],
"timestamp": "now",
}]
)
assert result[0]['success']
pub_import_info = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(pub_addr)
assert_equal(pub_import_info['pubkey'], pub)
assert 'hdmasterfingerprint' not in pub_import_info
assert 'hdkeypath' not in pub_import_info
# Import some public keys to the keypool of a no privkey wallet
self.log.info("Adding pubkey to keypool of disableprivkey wallet")
self.nodes[1].createwallet(wallet_name="noprivkeys", disable_private_keys=True)
wrpc = self.nodes[1].get_wallet_rpc("noprivkeys")
addr1 = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
addr2 = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
pub1 = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(addr1)['pubkey']
pub2 = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(addr2)['pubkey']
result = wrpc.importmulti(
[{
'desc': descsum_create('pkh(' + pub1 + ')'),
'keypool': True,
"timestamp": "now",
},
{
'desc': descsum_create('pkh(' + pub2 + ')'),
'keypool': True,
"timestamp": "now",
}]
)
assert result[0]['success']
assert result[1]['success']
assert_equal(wrpc.getwalletinfo()["keypoolsize"], 2)
newaddr1 = wrpc.getnewaddress()
assert_equal(addr1, newaddr1)
newaddr2 = wrpc.getnewaddress()
assert_equal(addr2, newaddr2)
# Import some public keys to the internal keypool of a no privkey wallet
self.log.info("Adding pubkey to internal keypool of disableprivkey wallet")
addr1 = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
addr2 = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
pub1 = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(addr1)['pubkey']
pub2 = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(addr2)['pubkey']
result = wrpc.importmulti(
[{
'desc': descsum_create('pkh(' + pub1 + ')'),
'keypool': True,
'internal': True,
"timestamp": "now",
},
{
'desc': descsum_create('pkh(' + pub2 + ')'),
'keypool': True,
'internal': True,
"timestamp": "now",
}]
)
assert result[0]['success']
assert result[1]['success']
assert_equal(wrpc.getwalletinfo()["keypoolsize_hd_internal"], 2)
newaddr1 = wrpc.getrawchangeaddress()
assert_equal(addr1, newaddr1)
newaddr2 = wrpc.getrawchangeaddress()
assert_equal(addr2, newaddr2)
# Import a multisig and make sure the keys don't go into the keypool
self.log.info('Imported scripts with pubkeys should not have their pubkeys go into the keypool')
addr1 = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
addr2 = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
pub1 = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(addr1)['pubkey']
pub2 = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(addr2)['pubkey']
result = wrpc.importmulti(
[{
'desc': descsum_create('sh(multi(2,' + pub1 + ',' + pub2 + '))'),
'keypool': True,
"timestamp": "now",
}]
)
assert result[0]['success']
assert_equal(wrpc.getwalletinfo()["keypoolsize"], 0)
# Cannot import those pubkeys to keypool of wallet with privkeys
self.log.info("Pubkeys cannot be added to the keypool of a wallet with private keys")
wrpc = self.nodes[1].get_wallet_rpc(self.default_wallet_name)
assert wrpc.getwalletinfo()['private_keys_enabled']
result = wrpc.importmulti(
[{
'desc': descsum_create('pkh(' + pub1 + ')'),
'keypool': True,
"timestamp": "now",
}]
)
assert_equal(result[0]['error']['code'], -8)
assert_equal(result[0]['error']['message'], "Keys can only be imported to the keypool when private keys are disabled")
# Make sure ranged imports import keys in order
self.log.info('Key ranges should be imported in order')
wrpc = self.nodes[1].get_wallet_rpc("noprivkeys")
assert_equal(wrpc.getwalletinfo()["keypoolsize"], 0)
assert_equal(wrpc.getwalletinfo()["private_keys_enabled"], False)
xpub = "tpubDAXcJ7s7ZwicqjprRaEWdPoHKrCS215qxGYxpusRLLmJuT69ZSicuGdSfyvyKpvUNYBW1s2U3NSrT6vrCYB9e6nZUEvrqnwXPF8ArTCRXMY"
addresses = [
'yUxX4qnzWntXhEGrYB92v7ez4EZBnUjB1y', # m/0'/0'/0
'yRhTPsPd2qYgYbFFCqY2nuPHJQBjTnMQxg', # m/0'/0'/1
'yUyn3UV9rBdWfw6yJJ6eAoKuzDJ8RVLP1o', # m/0'/0'/2
'yi8GEkfLBgK85wGmBFsMFdSbEvPPNCSnVx', # m/0'/0'/3
'yYB4whdY8APWoCez6ryNdMBrrDjwzFbqMi', # m/0'/0'/4
]
result = wrpc.importmulti(
[{
'desc': descsum_create('pkh([80002067/0h/0h]' + xpub + '/*)'),
'keypool': True,
'timestamp': 'now',
'range' : [0, 4],
}]
)
for i in range(0, 5):
addr = wrpc.getnewaddress('')
assert_equal(addr, addresses[i])
if __name__ == '__main__':
ImportMultiTest().main()