dash/src/node/transaction.h

62 lines
2.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) 2017-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
#ifndef BITCOIN_NODE_TRANSACTION_H
#define BITCOIN_NODE_TRANSACTION_H
#include <attributes.h>
Merge #17509: gui: save and load PSBT 764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964 [psbt] add file size limit (Sjors Provoost) 1cd8dc2556b847e11a238b9e69493cd8fbeecc6c [gui] load PSBT (Sjors Provoost) f6895301f768220f3ea70231d5cc5b45ecbf4488 [gui] save PSBT to file (Sjors Provoost) 1d05a9d80b1211b47af465ba6958b0ec5a8c33ab Move DEFAULT_MAX_RAW_TX_FEE_RATE to node/transaction.h (Sjors Provoost) 86e22d23bb90383971a68ead0666f225ddd632fb [util] GetFileSize (Sjors Provoost) 6ab3aad9a51cc5e97a8e2ae7dbd5082272163c30 [gui] send dialog: split on_sendButton_clicked (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: This adds: * a dialog after Create Unsigned, which lets you save a PSBT file in binary format, e.g. to an SD card * a "Load PSBT" menu entry lets you pick a PSBT file. We broadcast the transaction if complete ## Save flow <img width="482" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 20 39 34" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71765684-ba60d580-2f32-11ea-8dea-0c4398eb6e15.png"> <img width="287" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 20 40 35" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71765677-a0bf8e00-2f32-11ea-8172-12dfd34a89f3.png"> <img width="594" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 20 41 12" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71765681-aa48f600-2f32-11ea-8e2c-c4f6bf9f5309.png"> <img width="632" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 20 41 28" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71765691-d19fc300-2f32-11ea-97ff-70f5dd59987a.png"> By default the file name contains the destination address(es) and amount(s). We only use the binary format for files, in order to avoid compatibility hell. If we do want to add base64 file format support, we should use a different extension for that (`.psbt64`?). ## Load flow Select a file: <img width="649" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 21 08 57" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71766089-2ba28780-2f37-11ea-875d-074794b5707d.png"> Offer to send if complete: <img width="308" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 21 09 06" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71766088-2a715a80-2f37-11ea-807d-394c8b840c59.png"> Tell user if signatures are missing, offer to copy to clipboard: <img width="308" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 21 15 57" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71766115-702e2300-2f37-11ea-9f62-a6ede499c0fa.png"> Incomplete for another reason: <img width="309" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 21 07 51" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71766090-2c3b1e00-2f37-11ea-8a22-6188377b67a1.png"> ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17509/commits/764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964 achow101: ACK 764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964 jb55: Tested ACK 764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964 jonatack: ACK 764bfe4c promag: Code review ACK 764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964. Tree-SHA512: d284ed6895f3a271fb8ff879aac388ad217ddc13f72074725608e1c3d6d90650f6dc9e9e254479544dd71fc111516b02c8ff92158153208dc40fb2726b37d063
2020-04-23 00:38:35 +02:00
#include <policy/feerate.h>
#include <primitives/transaction.h>
#include <util/error.h>
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22528: refactor: move GetTransaction to node/transaction.cpp f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery) abc57e1f0882a1a2bb20474648419979af6e383d refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: ~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now). In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background. Relevant IRC log: ``` 17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it. 17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1 17:53 <stickies-v> agreed! 17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya 17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex 17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :) 17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex) 17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp) 17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things. 17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background 17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now ``` The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: Code review ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec rajarshimaitra: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22528/commits/f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec mjdietzx: crACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec LarryRuane: Code review, test ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
2021-07-28 18:19:38 +02:00
class CBlockIndex;
class CTxMemPool;
struct NodeContext;
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22528: refactor: move GetTransaction to node/transaction.cpp f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery) abc57e1f0882a1a2bb20474648419979af6e383d refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: ~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now). In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background. Relevant IRC log: ``` 17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it. 17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1 17:53 <stickies-v> agreed! 17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya 17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex 17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :) 17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex) 17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp) 17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things. 17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background 17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now ``` The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: Code review ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec rajarshimaitra: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22528/commits/f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec mjdietzx: crACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec LarryRuane: Code review, test ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
2021-07-28 18:19:38 +02:00
namespace Consensus {
struct Params;
}
Merge #17509: gui: save and load PSBT 764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964 [psbt] add file size limit (Sjors Provoost) 1cd8dc2556b847e11a238b9e69493cd8fbeecc6c [gui] load PSBT (Sjors Provoost) f6895301f768220f3ea70231d5cc5b45ecbf4488 [gui] save PSBT to file (Sjors Provoost) 1d05a9d80b1211b47af465ba6958b0ec5a8c33ab Move DEFAULT_MAX_RAW_TX_FEE_RATE to node/transaction.h (Sjors Provoost) 86e22d23bb90383971a68ead0666f225ddd632fb [util] GetFileSize (Sjors Provoost) 6ab3aad9a51cc5e97a8e2ae7dbd5082272163c30 [gui] send dialog: split on_sendButton_clicked (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: This adds: * a dialog after Create Unsigned, which lets you save a PSBT file in binary format, e.g. to an SD card * a "Load PSBT" menu entry lets you pick a PSBT file. We broadcast the transaction if complete ## Save flow <img width="482" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 20 39 34" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71765684-ba60d580-2f32-11ea-8dea-0c4398eb6e15.png"> <img width="287" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 20 40 35" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71765677-a0bf8e00-2f32-11ea-8172-12dfd34a89f3.png"> <img width="594" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 20 41 12" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71765681-aa48f600-2f32-11ea-8e2c-c4f6bf9f5309.png"> <img width="632" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 20 41 28" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71765691-d19fc300-2f32-11ea-97ff-70f5dd59987a.png"> By default the file name contains the destination address(es) and amount(s). We only use the binary format for files, in order to avoid compatibility hell. If we do want to add base64 file format support, we should use a different extension for that (`.psbt64`?). ## Load flow Select a file: <img width="649" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 21 08 57" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71766089-2ba28780-2f37-11ea-875d-074794b5707d.png"> Offer to send if complete: <img width="308" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 21 09 06" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71766088-2a715a80-2f37-11ea-807d-394c8b840c59.png"> Tell user if signatures are missing, offer to copy to clipboard: <img width="308" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 21 15 57" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71766115-702e2300-2f37-11ea-9f62-a6ede499c0fa.png"> Incomplete for another reason: <img width="309" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-01-04 om 21 07 51" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/71766090-2c3b1e00-2f37-11ea-8a22-6188377b67a1.png"> ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17509/commits/764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964 achow101: ACK 764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964 jb55: Tested ACK 764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964 jonatack: ACK 764bfe4c promag: Code review ACK 764bfe4cba35c24f7627cc425d9e7eba56e98964. Tree-SHA512: d284ed6895f3a271fb8ff879aac388ad217ddc13f72074725608e1c3d6d90650f6dc9e9e254479544dd71fc111516b02c8ff92158153208dc40fb2726b37d063
2020-04-23 00:38:35 +02:00
/** Maximum fee rate for sendrawtransaction and testmempoolaccept RPC calls.
* Also used by the GUI when broadcasting a completed PSBT.
* By default, a transaction with a fee rate higher than this will be rejected
* by these RPCs and the GUI. This can be overridden with the maxfeerate argument.
*/
static const CFeeRate DEFAULT_MAX_RAW_TX_FEE_RATE{COIN / 10};
/**
* Submit a transaction to the mempool and (optionally) relay it to all P2P peers.
*
* Mempool submission can be synchronous (will await mempool entry notification
* over the CValidationInterface) or asynchronous (will submit and not wait for
* notification), depending on the value of wait_callback. wait_callback MUST
* NOT be set while cs_main, cs_mempool or cs_wallet are held to avoid
* deadlock.
*
* @param[in] node reference to node context
* @param[in] tx the transaction to broadcast
* @param[out] err_string reference to std::string to fill with error string if available
* @param[in] max_tx_fee reject txs with fees higher than this (if 0, accept any fee)
* @param[in] relay flag if both mempool insertion and p2p relay are requested
* @param[in] wait_callback wait until callbacks have been processed to avoid stale result due to a sequentially RPC.
* return error
*/
[[nodiscard]] TransactionError BroadcastTransaction(NodeContext& node, CTransactionRef tx, std::string& err_string, const CAmount& highfee, bool relay, bool wait_callback, bool bypass_limits = false);
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22528: refactor: move GetTransaction to node/transaction.cpp f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery) abc57e1f0882a1a2bb20474648419979af6e383d refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: ~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now). In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background. Relevant IRC log: ``` 17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it. 17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1 17:53 <stickies-v> agreed! 17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya 17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex 17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :) 17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex) 17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp) 17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things. 17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background 17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now ``` The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: Code review ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec rajarshimaitra: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22528/commits/f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec mjdietzx: crACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec LarryRuane: Code review, test ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
2021-07-28 18:19:38 +02:00
/**
* Return transaction with a given hash.
* If mempool is provided and block_index is not provided, check it first for the tx.
* If -txindex is available, check it next for the tx.
* Finally, if block_index is provided, check for tx by reading entire block from disk.
*
* @param[in] block_index The block to read from disk, or nullptr
* @param[in] mempool If provided, check mempool for tx
* @param[in] hash The txid
* @param[in] consensusParams The params
* @param[out] hashBlock The block hash, if the tx was found via -txindex or block_index
* @returns The tx if found, otherwise nullptr
*/
CTransactionRef GetTransaction(const CBlockIndex* const block_index, const CTxMemPool* const mempool, const uint256& hash, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, uint256& hashBlock);
#endif // BITCOIN_NODE_TRANSACTION_H