2018-11-01 16:17:12 +01:00
|
|
|
# JSON-RPC Interface
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The headless daemon `dashd` has the JSON-RPC API enabled by default, the GUI
|
|
|
|
`dash-qt` has it disabled by default. This can be changed with the `-server`
|
|
|
|
option. In the GUI it is possible to execute RPC methods in the Debug Console
|
|
|
|
Dialog.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 14:17:57 +01:00
|
|
|
## Security
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The RPC interface allows other programs to control Bitcoin Core,
|
|
|
|
including the ability to spend funds from your wallets, affect consensus
|
|
|
|
verification, read private data, and otherwise perform operations that
|
|
|
|
can cause loss of money, data, or privacy. This section suggests how
|
|
|
|
you should use and configure Bitcoin Core to reduce the risk that its
|
|
|
|
RPC interface will be abused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Securing the executable:** Anyone with physical or remote access to
|
|
|
|
the computer, container, or virtual machine running Bitcoin Core can
|
|
|
|
compromise either the whole program or just the RPC interface. This
|
|
|
|
includes being able to record any passphrases you enter for unlocking
|
|
|
|
your encrypted wallets or changing settings so that your Bitcoin Core
|
|
|
|
program tells you that certain transactions have multiple
|
|
|
|
confirmations even when they aren't part of the best block chain. For
|
|
|
|
this reason, you should not use Bitcoin Core for security sensitive
|
|
|
|
operations on systems you do not exclusively control, such as shared
|
|
|
|
computers or virtual private servers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Securing local network access:** By default, the RPC interface can
|
|
|
|
only be accessed by a client running on the same computer and only
|
|
|
|
after the client provides a valid authentication credential (username
|
|
|
|
and passphrase). Any program on your computer with access to the file
|
|
|
|
system and local network can obtain this level of access.
|
|
|
|
Additionally, other programs on your computer can attempt to provide
|
|
|
|
an RPC interface on the same port as used by Bitcoin Core in order to
|
|
|
|
trick you into revealing your authentication credentials. For this
|
|
|
|
reason, it is important to only use Bitcoin Core for
|
|
|
|
security-sensitive operations on a computer whose other programs you
|
|
|
|
trust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Securing remote network access:** You may optionally allow other
|
|
|
|
computers to remotely control Bitcoin Core by setting the `rpcallowip`
|
|
|
|
and `rpcbind` configuration parameters. These settings are only meant
|
|
|
|
for enabling connections over secure private networks or connections
|
|
|
|
that have been otherwise secured (e.g. using a VPN or port forwarding
|
|
|
|
with SSH or stunnel). **Do not enable RPC connections over the public
|
|
|
|
Internet.** Although Bitcoin Core's RPC interface does use
|
|
|
|
authentication, it does not use encryption, so your login credentials
|
|
|
|
are sent as clear text that can be read by anyone on your network
|
|
|
|
path. Additionally, the RPC interface has not been hardened to
|
|
|
|
withstand arbitrary Internet traffic, so changing the above settings
|
|
|
|
to expose it to the Internet (even using something like a Tor hidden
|
|
|
|
service) could expose you to unconsidered vulnerabilities. See
|
|
|
|
`bitcoind -help` for more information about these settings and other
|
|
|
|
settings described in this document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related, if you use Bitcoin Core inside a Docker container, you may
|
|
|
|
need to expose the RPC port to the host system. The default way to
|
|
|
|
do this in Docker also exposes the port to the public Internet.
|
|
|
|
Instead, expose it only on the host system's localhost, for example:
|
|
|
|
`-p 127.0.0.1:8332:8332`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Secure authentication:** By default, Bitcoin Core generates unique
|
|
|
|
login credentials each time it restarts and puts them into a file
|
|
|
|
readable only by the user that started Bitcoin Core, allowing any of
|
|
|
|
that user's RPC clients with read access to the file to login
|
|
|
|
automatically. The file is `.cookie` in the Bitcoin Core
|
|
|
|
configuration directory, and using these credentials is the preferred
|
|
|
|
RPC authentication method. If you need to generate static login
|
|
|
|
credentials for your programs, you can use the script in the
|
|
|
|
`share/rpcauth` directory in the Bitcoin Core source tree. As a final
|
|
|
|
fallback, you can directly use manually-chosen `rpcuser` and
|
|
|
|
`rpcpassword` configuration parameters---but you must ensure that you
|
|
|
|
choose a strong and unique passphrase (and still don't use insecure
|
|
|
|
networks, as mentioned above).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Secure string handling:** The RPC interface does not guarantee any
|
|
|
|
escaping of data beyond what's necessary to encode it as JSON,
|
|
|
|
although it does usually provide serialized data using a hex
|
|
|
|
representation of the bytes. If you use RPC data in your programs or
|
|
|
|
provide its data to other programs, you must ensure any problem
|
|
|
|
strings are properly escaped. For example, multiple websites have
|
|
|
|
been manipulated because they displayed decoded hex strings that
|
|
|
|
included HTML `<script>` tags. For this reason, and other
|
|
|
|
non-security reasons, it is recommended to display all serialized data
|
|
|
|
in hex form only.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-01 16:17:12 +01:00
|
|
|
## RPC consistency guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State that can be queried via RPCs is guaranteed to be at least up-to-date with
|
|
|
|
the chain state immediately prior to the call's execution. However, the state
|
|
|
|
returned by RPCs that reflect the mempool may not be up-to-date with the
|
|
|
|
current mempool state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Transaction Pool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mempool state returned via an RPC is consistent with itself and with the
|
|
|
|
chain state at the time of the call. Thus, the mempool state only encompasses
|
|
|
|
transactions that are considered mine-able by the node at the time of the RPC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mempool state returned via an RPC reflects all effects of mempool and chain
|
|
|
|
state related RPCs that returned prior to this call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Wallet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The wallet state returned via an RPC is consistent with itself and with the
|
|
|
|
chain state at the time of the call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wallet RPCs will return the latest chain state consistent with prior non-wallet
|
|
|
|
RPCs. The effects of all blocks (and transactions in blocks) at the time of the
|
|
|
|
call is reflected in the state of all wallet transactions. For example, if a
|
|
|
|
block contains transactions that conflicted with mempool transactions, the
|
|
|
|
wallet would reflect the removal of these mempool transactions in the state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, the wallet may not be up-to-date with the current state of the mempool
|
|
|
|
or the state of the mempool by an RPC that returned before this RPC.
|
2020-12-17 10:00:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a known issue in the JSON-RPC interface that can cause a node to crash if
|
|
|
|
too many http connections are being opened at the same time because the system runs
|
|
|
|
out of available file descriptors. To prevent this from happening you might
|
|
|
|
want to increase the number of maximum allowed file descriptors in your system
|
|
|
|
and try to prevent opening too many connections to your JSON-RPC interface at the
|
|
|
|
same time if this is under your control. It is hard to give general advice
|
|
|
|
since this depends on your system but if you make several hundred requests at
|
|
|
|
once you are definitely at risk of encountering this issue.
|