sikkienl/dash
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git synced 2024-12-26 12:32:48 +01:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
acf1315270
dash/test/lint/spelling.ignore-words.txt

22 lines
130 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Merge #20817: lint: update list of spelling linter false positives, bump to codespell 2.0.0 f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter (Sebastian Falbesoner) da289a6c4a0a5e110e301f34f1db57b6d31bcdcc lint: update list of spelling linter false positives (Sebastian Falbesoner) a0022f1cfbb3d8f1f8f3ff135f854be0cb89643f test: bump codespell linter version to 2.0.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This small patch updates the ignore list for the spelling linter script (which uses `codespell`), both removing false-positives that are not relevant anymore and adding new ones. As [suggested by jonatack](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762#issuecomment-750889701)~~, whose last name is now also part of the list :)~~. Also changed the linter script to not check the gitian keys file, as [suggested by hebasto](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#discussion_r550763409). The codespell version used is bumped to most recent version 2.0.0, which is more aware of some terms that were previously needed in the ignorelist for v1.17.1, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#issuecomment-753428669. Running spelling linter on master branch (repeated findings in the same file are removed to keep the output short): ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh contrib/gitian-keys/keys.txt:16: Atack ==> Attack doc/developer-notes.md:1284: inout ==> input, in out doc/psbt.md:122: Asend ==> Ascend, as end src/bench/verify_script.cpp:27: Keypair ==> Key pair src/blockencodings.h:30: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/compressor.h:65: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/index/disktxpos.h:21: blockIn ==> blocking src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/primitives/transaction.h:35: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp:101: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/blockchain.cpp:2150: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/misc.cpp:198: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp:81: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.h:63: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.cpp:1279: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.h:222: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.cpp:17: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.h:39: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/serialize.h:181: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/signet.cpp:142: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/base32_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/script_tests.cpp:1509: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/sighash_tests.cpp:27: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/undo.h:36: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/validation.cpp:1403: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/validation.h:255: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1532: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted test/functional/wallet_upgradewallet.py:36: fpr ==> for, far, fps ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` Running spelling linter on PR branch: ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` This list of remaining findings doesn't contain false positives anymore -- the typos are fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762. Happy new year! 🍾 ACKs for top commit: hebasto: re-ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#pullrequestreview-560632881) review. jonatack: ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df I don't know if there are any particular issues with bumping codespell to v2.0.0, but locally running the spelling linter and the cirrus job at https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5004066998714368 both LGTM. Thanks for also verifying and removing the unused words from the ignore list. Tree-SHA512: e92ae6f16c01d4ff3d54f8c3a0ee95e12741f7bfe031d307a785f5cfd8a80525b16b34275f413b914c4a318f5166f9887399c21f2dad9cc7e9be41647042ef37
2021-01-04 04:52:08 +01:00
asend
(partial) Merge #24203: doc: Fix typos pointed out by lint-spelling
2023-11-10 08:09:11 +01:00
ba
Merge #20817: lint: update list of spelling linter false positives, bump to codespell 2.0.0 f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter (Sebastian Falbesoner) da289a6c4a0a5e110e301f34f1db57b6d31bcdcc lint: update list of spelling linter false positives (Sebastian Falbesoner) a0022f1cfbb3d8f1f8f3ff135f854be0cb89643f test: bump codespell linter version to 2.0.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This small patch updates the ignore list for the spelling linter script (which uses `codespell`), both removing false-positives that are not relevant anymore and adding new ones. As [suggested by jonatack](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762#issuecomment-750889701)~~, whose last name is now also part of the list :)~~. Also changed the linter script to not check the gitian keys file, as [suggested by hebasto](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#discussion_r550763409). The codespell version used is bumped to most recent version 2.0.0, which is more aware of some terms that were previously needed in the ignorelist for v1.17.1, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#issuecomment-753428669. Running spelling linter on master branch (repeated findings in the same file are removed to keep the output short): ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh contrib/gitian-keys/keys.txt:16: Atack ==> Attack doc/developer-notes.md:1284: inout ==> input, in out doc/psbt.md:122: Asend ==> Ascend, as end src/bench/verify_script.cpp:27: Keypair ==> Key pair src/blockencodings.h:30: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/compressor.h:65: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/index/disktxpos.h:21: blockIn ==> blocking src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/primitives/transaction.h:35: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp:101: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/blockchain.cpp:2150: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/misc.cpp:198: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp:81: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.h:63: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.cpp:1279: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.h:222: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.cpp:17: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.h:39: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/serialize.h:181: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/signet.cpp:142: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/base32_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/script_tests.cpp:1509: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/sighash_tests.cpp:27: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/undo.h:36: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/validation.cpp:1403: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/validation.h:255: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1532: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted test/functional/wallet_upgradewallet.py:36: fpr ==> for, far, fps ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` Running spelling linter on PR branch: ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` This list of remaining findings doesn't contain false positives anymore -- the typos are fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762. Happy new year! 🍾 ACKs for top commit: hebasto: re-ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#pullrequestreview-560632881) review. jonatack: ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df I don't know if there are any particular issues with bumping codespell to v2.0.0, but locally running the spelling linter and the cirrus job at https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5004066998714368 both LGTM. Thanks for also verifying and removing the unused words from the ignore list. Tree-SHA512: e92ae6f16c01d4ff3d54f8c3a0ee95e12741f7bfe031d307a785f5cfd8a80525b16b34275f413b914c4a318f5166f9887399c21f2dad9cc7e9be41647042ef37
2021-01-04 04:52:08 +01:00
blockin
Merge #16186: doc/lint: Fix spelling errors identified by codespell 1.15.0 b748bf6f50dda6bb57eadf697edc320b2695e01a Fix spelling errors identified by codespell 1.15.0 (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: Note all changes are to comments / documentation. After this commit, the only remaining output is: ``` $ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` Note: * I ignore several valid alternative spellings ~, but changed homogenous to homogeneous as the latter is a more specific term according to the Google dictionary definitions I found~ * homogenous is present in tinyformat, hence should be addressed upstream * process' is correct only if there are plural processes ACKs for commit b748bf: practicalswift: ACK b748bf6f50dda6bb57eadf697edc320b2695e01a fanquake: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16186/commits/b748bf6f50dda6bb57eadf697edc320b2695e01a Tree-SHA512: 9add7044643ce015e0a44d8b27a3f300d72c485ffff550fb6491a17f14528085289ec5caddfe02f291ea9b2cded38a0dd3079652a054e2d7fe2ff4f7b53db5d7
2019-06-16 03:33:20 +02:00
cachable
Merge #20817: lint: update list of spelling linter false positives, bump to codespell 2.0.0 f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter (Sebastian Falbesoner) da289a6c4a0a5e110e301f34f1db57b6d31bcdcc lint: update list of spelling linter false positives (Sebastian Falbesoner) a0022f1cfbb3d8f1f8f3ff135f854be0cb89643f test: bump codespell linter version to 2.0.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This small patch updates the ignore list for the spelling linter script (which uses `codespell`), both removing false-positives that are not relevant anymore and adding new ones. As [suggested by jonatack](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762#issuecomment-750889701)~~, whose last name is now also part of the list :)~~. Also changed the linter script to not check the gitian keys file, as [suggested by hebasto](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#discussion_r550763409). The codespell version used is bumped to most recent version 2.0.0, which is more aware of some terms that were previously needed in the ignorelist for v1.17.1, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#issuecomment-753428669. Running spelling linter on master branch (repeated findings in the same file are removed to keep the output short): ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh contrib/gitian-keys/keys.txt:16: Atack ==> Attack doc/developer-notes.md:1284: inout ==> input, in out doc/psbt.md:122: Asend ==> Ascend, as end src/bench/verify_script.cpp:27: Keypair ==> Key pair src/blockencodings.h:30: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/compressor.h:65: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/index/disktxpos.h:21: blockIn ==> blocking src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/primitives/transaction.h:35: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp:101: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/blockchain.cpp:2150: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/misc.cpp:198: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp:81: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.h:63: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.cpp:1279: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.h:222: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.cpp:17: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.h:39: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/serialize.h:181: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/signet.cpp:142: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/base32_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/script_tests.cpp:1509: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/sighash_tests.cpp:27: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/undo.h:36: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/validation.cpp:1403: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/validation.h:255: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1532: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted test/functional/wallet_upgradewallet.py:36: fpr ==> for, far, fps ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` Running spelling linter on PR branch: ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` This list of remaining findings doesn't contain false positives anymore -- the typos are fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762. Happy new year! 🍾 ACKs for top commit: hebasto: re-ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#pullrequestreview-560632881) review. jonatack: ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df I don't know if there are any particular issues with bumping codespell to v2.0.0, but locally running the spelling linter and the cirrus job at https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5004066998714368 both LGTM. Thanks for also verifying and removing the unused words from the ignore list. Tree-SHA512: e92ae6f16c01d4ff3d54f8c3a0ee95e12741f7bfe031d307a785f5cfd8a80525b16b34275f413b914c4a318f5166f9887399c21f2dad9cc7e9be41647042ef37
2021-01-04 04:52:08 +01:00
creat
lint: Fix typos flagged by codespell (#4639)
2021-12-28 22:45:54 +01:00
crypted
fo
Merge #20817: lint: update list of spelling linter false positives, bump to codespell 2.0.0 f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter (Sebastian Falbesoner) da289a6c4a0a5e110e301f34f1db57b6d31bcdcc lint: update list of spelling linter false positives (Sebastian Falbesoner) a0022f1cfbb3d8f1f8f3ff135f854be0cb89643f test: bump codespell linter version to 2.0.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This small patch updates the ignore list for the spelling linter script (which uses `codespell`), both removing false-positives that are not relevant anymore and adding new ones. As [suggested by jonatack](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762#issuecomment-750889701)~~, whose last name is now also part of the list :)~~. Also changed the linter script to not check the gitian keys file, as [suggested by hebasto](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#discussion_r550763409). The codespell version used is bumped to most recent version 2.0.0, which is more aware of some terms that were previously needed in the ignorelist for v1.17.1, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#issuecomment-753428669. Running spelling linter on master branch (repeated findings in the same file are removed to keep the output short): ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh contrib/gitian-keys/keys.txt:16: Atack ==> Attack doc/developer-notes.md:1284: inout ==> input, in out doc/psbt.md:122: Asend ==> Ascend, as end src/bench/verify_script.cpp:27: Keypair ==> Key pair src/blockencodings.h:30: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/compressor.h:65: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/index/disktxpos.h:21: blockIn ==> blocking src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/primitives/transaction.h:35: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp:101: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/blockchain.cpp:2150: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/misc.cpp:198: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp:81: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.h:63: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.cpp:1279: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.h:222: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.cpp:17: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.h:39: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/serialize.h:181: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/signet.cpp:142: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/base32_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/script_tests.cpp:1509: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/sighash_tests.cpp:27: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/undo.h:36: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/validation.cpp:1403: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/validation.h:255: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1532: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted test/functional/wallet_upgradewallet.py:36: fpr ==> for, far, fps ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` Running spelling linter on PR branch: ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` This list of remaining findings doesn't contain false positives anymore -- the typos are fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762. Happy new year! 🍾 ACKs for top commit: hebasto: re-ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#pullrequestreview-560632881) review. jonatack: ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df I don't know if there are any particular issues with bumping codespell to v2.0.0, but locally running the spelling linter and the cirrus job at https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5004066998714368 both LGTM. Thanks for also verifying and removing the unused words from the ignore list. Tree-SHA512: e92ae6f16c01d4ff3d54f8c3a0ee95e12741f7bfe031d307a785f5cfd8a80525b16b34275f413b914c4a318f5166f9887399c21f2dad9cc7e9be41647042ef37
2021-01-04 04:52:08 +01:00
fpr
hights
Merge #17351: doc: Fix some misspellings
2022-03-22 05:23:10 +01:00
hist
Merge #20817: lint: update list of spelling linter false positives, bump to codespell 2.0.0 f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter (Sebastian Falbesoner) da289a6c4a0a5e110e301f34f1db57b6d31bcdcc lint: update list of spelling linter false positives (Sebastian Falbesoner) a0022f1cfbb3d8f1f8f3ff135f854be0cb89643f test: bump codespell linter version to 2.0.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This small patch updates the ignore list for the spelling linter script (which uses `codespell`), both removing false-positives that are not relevant anymore and adding new ones. As [suggested by jonatack](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762#issuecomment-750889701)~~, whose last name is now also part of the list :)~~. Also changed the linter script to not check the gitian keys file, as [suggested by hebasto](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#discussion_r550763409). The codespell version used is bumped to most recent version 2.0.0, which is more aware of some terms that were previously needed in the ignorelist for v1.17.1, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#issuecomment-753428669. Running spelling linter on master branch (repeated findings in the same file are removed to keep the output short): ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh contrib/gitian-keys/keys.txt:16: Atack ==> Attack doc/developer-notes.md:1284: inout ==> input, in out doc/psbt.md:122: Asend ==> Ascend, as end src/bench/verify_script.cpp:27: Keypair ==> Key pair src/blockencodings.h:30: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/compressor.h:65: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/index/disktxpos.h:21: blockIn ==> blocking src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/primitives/transaction.h:35: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp:101: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/blockchain.cpp:2150: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/misc.cpp:198: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp:81: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.h:63: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.cpp:1279: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.h:222: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.cpp:17: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.h:39: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/serialize.h:181: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/signet.cpp:142: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/base32_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/script_tests.cpp:1509: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/sighash_tests.cpp:27: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/undo.h:36: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/validation.cpp:1403: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/validation.h:255: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1532: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted test/functional/wallet_upgradewallet.py:36: fpr ==> for, far, fps ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` Running spelling linter on PR branch: ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` This list of remaining findings doesn't contain false positives anymore -- the typos are fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762. Happy new year! 🍾 ACKs for top commit: hebasto: re-ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#pullrequestreview-560632881) review. jonatack: ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df I don't know if there are any particular issues with bumping codespell to v2.0.0, but locally running the spelling linter and the cirrus job at https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5004066998714368 both LGTM. Thanks for also verifying and removing the unused words from the ignore list. Tree-SHA512: e92ae6f16c01d4ff3d54f8c3a0ee95e12741f7bfe031d307a785f5cfd8a80525b16b34275f413b914c4a318f5166f9887399c21f2dad9cc7e9be41647042ef37
2021-01-04 04:52:08 +01:00
inout
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22138: script: fix spelling linter raising spuriously on "invokable" 8050eb43bf15501e33ec5312918d926e47e4fc8d script: fix spelling linter raising spuriously on "invokable" (Jon Atack) Pull request description: "invokable" is a valid word that means to be callable, but the linter is raising on it: ``` $ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh contrib/guix/guix-attest:18: invokable ==> invocable contrib/guix/guix-clean:18: invokable ==> invocable contrib/guix/guix-verify:18: invokable ==> invocable ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: cr ACK 8050eb43bf15501e33ec5312918d926e47e4fc8d Tree-SHA512: 43f8dc7b7adb00ae563ccfe04a64a7ceb50237f24ff87209062bf57b2564b4d38a409df80e0183aa4f40ab306b5e07d7a5fad1600d41705bd3c443ed66a6d1c1
2021-06-03 14:36:37 +02:00
invokable
Merge #20817: lint: update list of spelling linter false positives, bump to codespell 2.0.0 f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter (Sebastian Falbesoner) da289a6c4a0a5e110e301f34f1db57b6d31bcdcc lint: update list of spelling linter false positives (Sebastian Falbesoner) a0022f1cfbb3d8f1f8f3ff135f854be0cb89643f test: bump codespell linter version to 2.0.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This small patch updates the ignore list for the spelling linter script (which uses `codespell`), both removing false-positives that are not relevant anymore and adding new ones. As [suggested by jonatack](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762#issuecomment-750889701)~~, whose last name is now also part of the list :)~~. Also changed the linter script to not check the gitian keys file, as [suggested by hebasto](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#discussion_r550763409). The codespell version used is bumped to most recent version 2.0.0, which is more aware of some terms that were previously needed in the ignorelist for v1.17.1, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#issuecomment-753428669. Running spelling linter on master branch (repeated findings in the same file are removed to keep the output short): ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh contrib/gitian-keys/keys.txt:16: Atack ==> Attack doc/developer-notes.md:1284: inout ==> input, in out doc/psbt.md:122: Asend ==> Ascend, as end src/bench/verify_script.cpp:27: Keypair ==> Key pair src/blockencodings.h:30: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/compressor.h:65: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/index/disktxpos.h:21: blockIn ==> blocking src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/primitives/transaction.h:35: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp:101: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/blockchain.cpp:2150: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/misc.cpp:198: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp:81: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.h:63: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.cpp:1279: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.h:222: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.cpp:17: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.h:39: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/serialize.h:181: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/signet.cpp:142: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/base32_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/script_tests.cpp:1509: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/sighash_tests.cpp:27: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/undo.h:36: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/validation.cpp:1403: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/validation.h:255: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1532: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted test/functional/wallet_upgradewallet.py:36: fpr ==> for, far, fps ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` Running spelling linter on PR branch: ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` This list of remaining findings doesn't contain false positives anymore -- the typos are fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762. Happy new year! 🍾 ACKs for top commit: hebasto: re-ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#pullrequestreview-560632881) review. jonatack: ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df I don't know if there are any particular issues with bumping codespell to v2.0.0, but locally running the spelling linter and the cirrus job at https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5004066998714368 both LGTM. Thanks for also verifying and removing the unused words from the ignore list. Tree-SHA512: e92ae6f16c01d4ff3d54f8c3a0ee95e12741f7bfe031d307a785f5cfd8a80525b16b34275f413b914c4a318f5166f9887399c21f2dad9cc7e9be41647042ef37
2021-01-04 04:52:08 +01:00
mor
nin
Merge #18253: doc: Correct spelling errors in comments 9b0e16226e6c1fb6a3550d635339f1bbb49a852f doc: Correct spelling errors in comments (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: And ci script output. Identified via test/lint/lint-spelling Before: ``` $ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh ci/test/05_before_script.sh:29: explicitely ==> explicitly src/compressor.h:43: Ser ==> Set src/compressor.h:78: Ser ==> Set src/logging/timer.h:88: outputing ==> outputting src/node/psbt.cpp:87: minumum ==> minimum src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:372: UnSelect ==> deselect src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:443: unselect ==> deselect src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:448: UnSelect ==> deselect src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:699: UnSelect ==> deselect src/serialize.h:211: Ser ==> Set src/serialize.h:213: Ser ==> Set src/serialize.h:228: Ser ==> Set src/serialize.h:246: Ser ==> Set src/serialize.h:484: Ser ==> Set src/serialize.h:490: Ser ==> Set src/serialize.h:510: Ser ==> Set src/serialize.h:622: Ser ==> Set src/serialize.h:740: Ser ==> Set src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for src/txmempool.h:756: incomaptible ==> incompatible src/undo.h:26: Ser ==> Set src/wallet/coincontrol.h:74: UnSelect ==> deselect test/functional/feature_backwards_compatibility.py:116: Abondon ==> Abandon test/functional/rpc_getaddressinfo_label_deprecation.py:7: superceded ==> superseded test/lint/lint-shell.sh:44: desriptor ==> descriptor ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` After: ``` $ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for test/functional/rpc_getaddressinfo_label_deprecation.py:7: superceded ==> superseded ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: ACK 9b0e16226e6c1fb6a3550d635339f1bbb49a852f MarcoFalke: ACK 9b0e16226e6c1fb6a3550d635339f1bbb49a852f Tree-SHA512: 9ce203700b11596e4b920b3c5b04f59bc7784fe5b495868d43423608180a9a553ec7efcc5ad70384f3ce462b036c2a682260efebce493c5e6a3d48716b268179
2020-03-04 04:39:49 +01:00
ser
Merge #20817: lint: update list of spelling linter false positives, bump to codespell 2.0.0 f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter (Sebastian Falbesoner) da289a6c4a0a5e110e301f34f1db57b6d31bcdcc lint: update list of spelling linter false positives (Sebastian Falbesoner) a0022f1cfbb3d8f1f8f3ff135f854be0cb89643f test: bump codespell linter version to 2.0.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This small patch updates the ignore list for the spelling linter script (which uses `codespell`), both removing false-positives that are not relevant anymore and adding new ones. As [suggested by jonatack](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762#issuecomment-750889701)~~, whose last name is now also part of the list :)~~. Also changed the linter script to not check the gitian keys file, as [suggested by hebasto](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#discussion_r550763409). The codespell version used is bumped to most recent version 2.0.0, which is more aware of some terms that were previously needed in the ignorelist for v1.17.1, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#issuecomment-753428669. Running spelling linter on master branch (repeated findings in the same file are removed to keep the output short): ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh contrib/gitian-keys/keys.txt:16: Atack ==> Attack doc/developer-notes.md:1284: inout ==> input, in out doc/psbt.md:122: Asend ==> Ascend, as end src/bench/verify_script.cpp:27: Keypair ==> Key pair src/blockencodings.h:30: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/compressor.h:65: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/index/disktxpos.h:21: blockIn ==> blocking src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/primitives/transaction.h:35: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp:101: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/blockchain.cpp:2150: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/rpc/misc.cpp:198: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp:81: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/bitcoinconsensus.h:63: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.cpp:1279: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/interpreter.h:222: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.cpp:17: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/script/sign.h:39: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/serialize.h:181: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/signet.cpp:142: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/base32_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for src/test/script_tests.cpp:1509: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/sighash_tests.cpp:27: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/undo.h:36: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user src/validation.cpp:1403: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/validation.h:255: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1532: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted test/functional/wallet_upgradewallet.py:36: fpr ==> for, far, fps ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` Running spelling linter on PR branch: ``` $ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt ``` This list of remaining findings doesn't contain false positives anymore -- the typos are fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762. Happy new year! 🍾 ACKs for top commit: hebasto: re-ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#pullrequestreview-560632881) review. jonatack: ACK f3ba916e8b5b5ee2a381cef38882671eadb231df I don't know if there are any particular issues with bumping codespell to v2.0.0, but locally running the spelling linter and the cirrus job at https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5004066998714368 both LGTM. Thanks for also verifying and removing the unused words from the ignore list. Tree-SHA512: e92ae6f16c01d4ff3d54f8c3a0ee95e12741f7bfe031d307a785f5cfd8a80525b16b34275f413b914c4a318f5166f9887399c21f2dad9cc7e9be41647042ef37
2021-01-04 04:52:08 +01:00
setban
stoll
unparseable
unser
useable
wit
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink