dash/test/functional/rpc_rawtransaction.py

425 lines
24 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test the rawtransaction RPCs.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
Test the following RPCs:
- createrawtransaction
- signrawtransactionwithwallet
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
- sendrawtransaction
- decoderawtransaction
- getrawtransaction
"""
from collections import OrderedDict
Merge #13054: tests: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. 68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift) Pull request description: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools. An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports. Before this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util $ ``` After this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 $ ``` Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
2018-08-13 14:24:43 +02:00
from decimal import Decimal
from io import BytesIO
from test_framework.messages import CTransaction, ToHex
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
Merge #16898: test: Remove connect_nodes_bi fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 test: Remove unused connect_nodes_bi (MarcoFalke) fa3b9ee8b2280af4bcbcfffff275aaf8dd125929 scripted-diff: test: Replace connect_nodes_bi with connect_nodes (MarcoFalke) faaee1e39a91b3f603881655d3980c29af09852b test: Use connect_nodes when connecting nodes in the test_framework (MarcoFalke) 1111bb91f517838e5b9f778bf6b5a9c8d561e857 test: Reformat python imports to aid scripted diff (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: By default all test nodes are connected in a chain. However, instead of just a single connection between each pair of nodes, we end up with up to four connections for a "middle" node (two outbound, two inbound, from each side). This is generally redundant (tx and block relay should succeed with just a single connection) and confusing. For example, test timeouts after a call to `sync_` may be racy and hard to reproduce. On top of that, the test `debug.log`s are hard to read because txs and block invs may be relayed on the same connection multiple times. Fix this by inlining `connect_nodes_bi` in the two tests that need it, and then replace it with a single `connect_nodes` in all other tests. Historic background: `connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 jonasschnelli: utACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 - more of less a cleanup PR. promag: Tested ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2, ran extended tests. Tree-SHA512: 2d027a8fd150749c071b64438a0a78ec922178628a7dbb89fd1212b0fa34febd451798c940101155d3617c0426c2c4865174147709894f1f1bb6cfa336aa7e24
2019-09-18 20:41:14 +02:00
from test_framework.util import (
assert_equal,
assert_raises_rpc_error,
hex_str_to_bytes,
)
class multidict(dict):
"""Dictionary that allows duplicate keys.
Constructed with a list of (key, value) tuples. When dumped by the json module,
will output invalid json with repeated keys, eg:
>>> json.dumps(multidict([(1,2),(1,2)])
'{"1": 2, "1": 2}'
Used to test calls to rpc methods with repeated keys in the json object."""
def __init__(self, x):
dict.__init__(self, x)
self.x = x
def items(self):
return self.x
# Create one-input, one-output, no-fee transaction:
class RawTransactionsTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.setup_clean_chain = True
self.num_nodes = 3
self.extra_args = [
["-txindex"],
["-txindex"],
["-txindex"],
]
self.supports_cli = False
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
def setup_network(self):
super().setup_network()
self.connect_nodes(0, 2)
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
def run_test(self):
self.log.info('prepare some coins for multiple *rawtransaction commands')
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[0].generate(101)
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(),1.5)
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(),1.0)
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(),5.0)
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[0].generate(5)
self.sync_all()
self.log.info('Test getrawtransaction on genesis block coinbase returns an error')
block = self.nodes[0].getblock(self.nodes[0].getblockhash(0))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "The genesis block coinbase is not considered an ordinary transaction", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, block['merkleroot'])
self.log.info('Check parameter types and required parameters of createrawtransaction')
# Test `createrawtransaction` required parameters
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "createrawtransaction", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "createrawtransaction", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [])
# Test `createrawtransaction` invalid extra parameters
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "createrawtransaction", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], {}, 0, False, 'foo')
# Test `createrawtransaction` invalid `inputs`
txid = '1d1d4e24ed99057e84c3f80fd8fbec79ed9e1acee37da269356ecea000000000'
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Expected type array", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, 'foo', {})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "JSON value is not an object as expected", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, ['foo'], {})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "JSON value is not a string as expected", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [{}], {})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be of length 64 (not 3, for 'foo')", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [{'txid': 'foo'}], {})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ7bb8b1697ea987f3b223ba7819250cae33efacb068d23dc24859824a77844')", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [{'txid': 'ZZZ7bb8b1697ea987f3b223ba7819250cae33efacb068d23dc24859824a77844'}], {})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, missing vout key", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [{'txid': txid}], {})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, missing vout key", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [{'txid': txid, 'vout': 'foo'}], {})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, vout cannot be negative", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [{'txid': txid, 'vout': -1}], {})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, sequence number is out of range", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [{'txid': txid, 'vout': 0, 'sequence': -1}], {})
# Test `createrawtransaction` invalid `outputs`
address = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
address2 = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "JSON value is not an array as expected", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], 'foo')
self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs=[], outputs={}) # Should not throw for backwards compatibility
self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs=[], outputs=[])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Data must be hexadecimal string", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], {'data': 'foo'})
2020-01-31 16:38:47 +01:00
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid Dash address", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], {'foo': 0})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Invalid amount", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], {address: 'foo'})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], {address: -1})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, duplicated address: %s" % address, self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], multidict([(address, 1), (address, 1)]))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, duplicated address: %s" % address, self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], [{address: 1}, {address: 1}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, duplicate key: data", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], [{"data": 'aa'}, {"data": "bb"}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, duplicate key: data", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], multidict([("data", 'aa'), ("data", "bb")]))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, key-value pair must contain exactly one key", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], [{'a': 1, 'b': 2}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, key-value pair not an object as expected", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], [['key-value pair1'], ['2']])
# Test `createrawtransaction` invalid `locktime`
assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Expected type number", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], {}, 'foo')
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, locktime out of range", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], {}, -1)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, locktime out of range", self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, [], {}, 4294967296)
self.log.info('Check that createrawtransaction accepts an array and object as outputs')
tx = CTransaction()
# One output
tx.deserialize(BytesIO(hex_str_to_bytes(self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs=[{'txid': txid, 'vout': 9}], outputs={address: 99}))))
assert_equal(len(tx.vout), 1)
assert_equal(
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
tx.serialize().hex(),
self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs=[{'txid': txid, 'vout': 9}], outputs=[{address: 99}]),
)
# Two outputs
tx.deserialize(BytesIO(hex_str_to_bytes(self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs=[{'txid': txid, 'vout': 9}], outputs=OrderedDict([(address, 99), (address2, 99)])))))
assert_equal(len(tx.vout), 2)
assert_equal(
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
tx.serialize().hex(),
self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs=[{'txid': txid, 'vout': 9}], outputs=[{address: 99}, {address2: 99}]),
)
# Multiple mixed outputs
tx.deserialize(BytesIO(hex_str_to_bytes(self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs=[{'txid': txid, 'vout': 9}], outputs=multidict([(address, 99), (address2, 99), ('data', '99')])))))
assert_equal(len(tx.vout), 3)
assert_equal(
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
tx.serialize().hex(),
self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs=[{'txid': txid, 'vout': 9}], outputs=[{address: 99}, {address2: 99}, {'data': '99'}]),
)
self.log.info('sendrawtransaction with missing input')
inputs = [ {'txid' : "1d1d4e24ed99057e84c3f80fd8fbec79ed9e1acee37da269356ecea000000000", 'vout' : 1}] #won't exists
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : 4.998 }
rawtx = self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
rawtx = self.nodes[2].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx)
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
# This will raise an exception since there are missing inputs
Merge #15921: validation: Tidy up ValidationState interface 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf [validation] Remove fMissingInputs from AcceptToMemoryPool() (John Newbery) c428622a5bb1e37b2e6ab2c52791ac05d9271238 [validation] Remove unused first_invalid parameter from ProcessNewBlockHeaders() (John Newbery) 7204c6434b944f6ad51b3c895837729d3aa56eea [validation] Remove useless ret parameter from Invalid() (John Newbery) 1a37de4b3174d19a6d8691ae07e92b32fdfaef11 [validation] Remove error() calls from Invalid() calls (John Newbery) 067981e49246822421a7bcc720491427e1dba8a3 [validation] Tidy Up ValidationResult class (John Newbery) a27a2957ed9afbe5a96caa5f0f4cbec730d27460 [validation] Add CValidationState subclasses (John Newbery) Pull request description: Carries out some remaining tidy-ups remaining after PR 15141: - split ValidationState into TxValidationState and BlockValidationState (commit from ajtowns) - various minor code style tidy-ups to the ValidationState class - remove the useless `ret` parameter from `ValidationState::Invalid()` - remove the now unused `first_invalid` parameter from `ProcessNewBlockHeaders()` - remove the `fMissingInputs` parameter from `AcceptToMemoryPool()`, and deal with missing inputs the same way as other errors by using the `TxValidationState` object. Tip for reviewers (thanks ryanofsky!): The first commit ("[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" ) is huge and can be easier to start reviewing if you revert the rote, mechanical changes: Substitute the commit hash of commit "[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" for <CommitHash> in the commands below. ```sh git checkout <CommitHash> git grep -l ValidationState | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationState\|TxValidationState/CValidationState/g' git grep -l ValidationResult | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationResult\|TxValidationResult/ValidationInvalidReason/g' git grep -l MaybePunish | xargs sed -i 's/MaybePunishNode\(ForBlock\|ForTx\)/MaybePunishNode/g' git diff HEAD^ ``` After that it's possible to easily see the mechanical changes with: ```sh git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=. <CommitHash> ``` ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf amitiuttarwar: code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf. Also built & ran tests locally. fjahr: Code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf . Only nit style change and pure virtual destructor added since my last review. ryanofsky: Code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf. Just whitespace change and pure virtual destructor added since last review. Tree-SHA512: 511de1fb380a18bec1944ea82b513b6192df632ee08bb16344a2df3c40811a88f3872f04df24bc93a41643c96c48f376a04551840fd804a961490d6c702c3d36
2019-10-30 15:27:22 +01:00
assert_raises_rpc_error(-25, "bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent", self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction, rawtx['hex'])
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
Merge #10275: [rpc] Allow fetching tx directly from specified block in getrawtransaction 434526a [test] Add tests for getrawtransaction with block hash. (Karl-Johan Alm) b167951 [rpc] Allow getrawtransaction to take optional blockhash to fetch transaction from a block directly. (Karl-Johan Alm) a5f5a2c [rpc] Fix fVerbose parsing (remove excess if cases). (Karl-Johan Alm) Pull request description: [Reviewer hint: use [?w=1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10275/files?w=1) to avoid seeing a bunch of indentation changes.] Presuming a user knows the block hash of the block containing a given transaction, this PR allows them to fetch the raw transaction, even without `-txindex`. It also enables support for getting transactions that are in orphaned blocks. Note that supplying a block hash will override mempool and txindex support in `GetTransaction`. The rationale behind this is that a transaction may be in multiple places (orphaned blocks) and if the user supplies an explicit block hash it should be adhered to. ```Bash $ # a41.. is a tx inside an orphan block ..3c6f.. -- first try getting it normally $ ./bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction a41e66ee1341aa9fb9475b98cfdc1fe1261faa56c0a49254f33065ec90f7cd79 1 error code: -5 error message: No such mempool transaction. Use -txindex to enable blockchain transaction queries. Use gettransaction for wallet transactions. $ # now try with block hash $ ./bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction a41e66ee1341aa9fb9475b98cfdc1fe1261faa56c0a49254f33065ec90f7cd79 1 0000000000000000003c6fe479122bfa4a9187493937af1734e1e5cd9f198ec7 { "hex": "01000000014e7e81144e42f6d65550e59b715d470c9301fd7ac189[...]90488ac00000000", "inMainChain": false, "txid": "a41e66ee1341aa9fb9475b98cfdc1fe1261faa56c0a49254f33065ec90f7cd79", "hash": "a41e66ee1341aa9fb9475b98cfdc1fe1261faa56c0a49254f33065ec90f7cd79", "size": 225, [...] } $ # another tx 6c66... in block 462000 $ ./bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction 6c66b98191e9d6cc671f6817142152ebf6c5cab2ef008397b5a71ac13255a735 1 00000000000000000217f2c12922e321f6d4aa933ce88005a9a493c503054a40 { "hex": "0200000004d157[...]88acaf0c0700", "inMainChain": true, "txid": "6c66b98191e9d6cc671f6817142152ebf6c5cab2ef008397b5a71ac13255a735", "hash": "6c66b98191e9d6cc671f6817142152ebf6c5cab2ef008397b5a71ac13255a735", "size": 666, [...] } $ ``` Tree-SHA512: 279be3818141edd3cc194a9ee65929331920afb30297ab2d6da07293a2d7311afee5c8b00c6457477d9f1f86e86786a9b56878ea3ee19fa2629b829d042d0cda
2017-12-06 12:10:16 +01:00
#####################################
# getrawtransaction with block hash #
#####################################
# make a tx by sending then generate 2 blocks; block1 has the tx in it
tx = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(), 1)
block1, block2 = self.nodes[2].generate(2)
self.sync_all()
# We should be able to get the raw transaction by providing the correct block
gottx = self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(tx, True, block1)
assert_equal(gottx['txid'], tx)
assert_equal(gottx['in_active_chain'], True)
# We should not have the 'in_active_chain' flag when we don't provide a block
gottx = self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(tx, True)
assert_equal(gottx['txid'], tx)
assert 'in_active_chain' not in gottx
# We should not get the tx if we provide an unrelated block
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "No such transaction found", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, tx, True, block2)
# An invalid block hash should raise the correct errors
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "JSON value is not a string as expected", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, tx, True, True)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "parameter 3 must be of length 64 (not 6, for 'foobar')", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, tx, True, "foobar")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "parameter 3 must be of length 64 (not 8, for 'abcd1234')", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, tx, True, "abcd1234")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "parameter 3 must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, tx, True, "ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block hash not found", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, tx, True, "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
# Undo the blocks and check in_active_chain
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(block1)
gottx = self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txid=tx, verbose=True, blockhash=block1)
assert_equal(gottx['in_active_chain'], False)
self.nodes[0].reconsiderblock(block1)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), block2)
Merge #10275: [rpc] Allow fetching tx directly from specified block in getrawtransaction 434526a [test] Add tests for getrawtransaction with block hash. (Karl-Johan Alm) b167951 [rpc] Allow getrawtransaction to take optional blockhash to fetch transaction from a block directly. (Karl-Johan Alm) a5f5a2c [rpc] Fix fVerbose parsing (remove excess if cases). (Karl-Johan Alm) Pull request description: [Reviewer hint: use [?w=1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10275/files?w=1) to avoid seeing a bunch of indentation changes.] Presuming a user knows the block hash of the block containing a given transaction, this PR allows them to fetch the raw transaction, even without `-txindex`. It also enables support for getting transactions that are in orphaned blocks. Note that supplying a block hash will override mempool and txindex support in `GetTransaction`. The rationale behind this is that a transaction may be in multiple places (orphaned blocks) and if the user supplies an explicit block hash it should be adhered to. ```Bash $ # a41.. is a tx inside an orphan block ..3c6f.. -- first try getting it normally $ ./bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction a41e66ee1341aa9fb9475b98cfdc1fe1261faa56c0a49254f33065ec90f7cd79 1 error code: -5 error message: No such mempool transaction. Use -txindex to enable blockchain transaction queries. Use gettransaction for wallet transactions. $ # now try with block hash $ ./bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction a41e66ee1341aa9fb9475b98cfdc1fe1261faa56c0a49254f33065ec90f7cd79 1 0000000000000000003c6fe479122bfa4a9187493937af1734e1e5cd9f198ec7 { "hex": "01000000014e7e81144e42f6d65550e59b715d470c9301fd7ac189[...]90488ac00000000", "inMainChain": false, "txid": "a41e66ee1341aa9fb9475b98cfdc1fe1261faa56c0a49254f33065ec90f7cd79", "hash": "a41e66ee1341aa9fb9475b98cfdc1fe1261faa56c0a49254f33065ec90f7cd79", "size": 225, [...] } $ # another tx 6c66... in block 462000 $ ./bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction 6c66b98191e9d6cc671f6817142152ebf6c5cab2ef008397b5a71ac13255a735 1 00000000000000000217f2c12922e321f6d4aa933ce88005a9a493c503054a40 { "hex": "0200000004d157[...]88acaf0c0700", "inMainChain": true, "txid": "6c66b98191e9d6cc671f6817142152ebf6c5cab2ef008397b5a71ac13255a735", "hash": "6c66b98191e9d6cc671f6817142152ebf6c5cab2ef008397b5a71ac13255a735", "size": 666, [...] } $ ``` Tree-SHA512: 279be3818141edd3cc194a9ee65929331920afb30297ab2d6da07293a2d7311afee5c8b00c6457477d9f1f86e86786a9b56878ea3ee19fa2629b829d042d0cda
2017-12-06 12:10:16 +01:00
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
#########################
# RAW TX MULTISIG TESTS #
#########################
# 2of2 test
addr1 = self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()
addr2 = self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
addr1Obj = self.nodes[2].getaddressinfo(addr1)
addr2Obj = self.nodes[2].getaddressinfo(addr2)
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
Merge bitcoin#11415: [RPC] Disallow using addresses in createmultisig (#3482) * Merge #11415: [RPC] Disallow using addresses in createmultisig 1df206f Disallow using addresses in createmultisig (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: This PR should be the last part of #7965. This PR makes createmultisig only accept public keys and marks the old functionality of accepting addresses as deprecated. It also splits `_createmultisig_redeemscript` into two functions, `_createmultisig_getpubkeys` and `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys`. `_createmultisig_getpubkeys` retrieves public keys from the RPC parameters and `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys` retrieves addresses' public keys from the wallet. `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys` requires the wallet and is only used by `addwitnessaddress` (except when `createmultisig` is used in deprecated mode). `addwitnessaddress`'s API is also changed. Instead of returning just an address, it now returns the same thing as `createmultisig`: a JSON object with two fields, address and redeemscript. Tree-SHA512: a5796e41935ad5e47d8165ff996a8b20d5112b5fc1a06a6d3c7f5513c13e7628a4fd37ec30fde05d8b15abfed51bc250710140f6834b13f64d0a0e47a3817969 * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Dashify Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-05-15 11:34:41 +02:00
# Tests for createmultisig and addmultisigaddress
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid public key", self.nodes[0].createmultisig, 1, ["01020304"])
self.nodes[0].createmultisig(2, [addr1Obj['pubkey'], addr2Obj['pubkey']]) # createmultisig can only take public keys
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Invalid public key", self.nodes[0].createmultisig, 2, [addr1Obj['pubkey'], addr1]) # addmultisigaddress can take both pubkeys and addresses so long as they are in the wallet, which is tested here.
mSigObj = self.nodes[2].addmultisigaddress(2, [addr1Obj['pubkey'], addr1])['address']
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
#use balance deltas instead of absolute values
bal = self.nodes[2].getbalance()
# send 1.2 BTC to msig adr
txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(mSigObj, 1.2)
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all()
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), bal+Decimal('1.20000000')) #node2 has both keys of the 2of2 ms addr., tx should affect the balance
# 2of3 test from different nodes
bal = self.nodes[2].getbalance()
addr1 = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
addr2 = self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()
addr3 = self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
addr1Obj = self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(addr1)
addr2Obj = self.nodes[2].getaddressinfo(addr2)
addr3Obj = self.nodes[2].getaddressinfo(addr3)
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
Merge bitcoin#11415: [RPC] Disallow using addresses in createmultisig (#3482) * Merge #11415: [RPC] Disallow using addresses in createmultisig 1df206f Disallow using addresses in createmultisig (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: This PR should be the last part of #7965. This PR makes createmultisig only accept public keys and marks the old functionality of accepting addresses as deprecated. It also splits `_createmultisig_redeemscript` into two functions, `_createmultisig_getpubkeys` and `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys`. `_createmultisig_getpubkeys` retrieves public keys from the RPC parameters and `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys` retrieves addresses' public keys from the wallet. `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys` requires the wallet and is only used by `addwitnessaddress` (except when `createmultisig` is used in deprecated mode). `addwitnessaddress`'s API is also changed. Instead of returning just an address, it now returns the same thing as `createmultisig`: a JSON object with two fields, address and redeemscript. Tree-SHA512: a5796e41935ad5e47d8165ff996a8b20d5112b5fc1a06a6d3c7f5513c13e7628a4fd37ec30fde05d8b15abfed51bc250710140f6834b13f64d0a0e47a3817969 * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Dashify Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-05-15 11:34:41 +02:00
mSigObj = self.nodes[2].addmultisigaddress(2, [addr1Obj['pubkey'], addr2Obj['pubkey'], addr3Obj['pubkey']])['address']
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(mSigObj, 2.2)
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
decTx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txId)
rawTx = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(decTx['hex'])
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all()
#THIS IS AN INCOMPLETE FEATURE
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
#NODE2 HAS TWO OF THREE KEY AND THE FUNDS SHOULD BE SPENDABLE AND COUNT AT BALANCE CALCULATION
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), bal) #for now, assume the funds of a 2of3 multisig tx are not marked as spendable
txDetails = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txId, True)
rawTx = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(txDetails['hex'])
vout = next(o for o in rawTx['vout'] if o['value'] == Decimal('2.20000000'))
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
bal = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
inputs = [{ "txid" : txId, "vout" : vout['n'], "scriptPubKey" : vout['scriptPubKey']['hex']}]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : 2.19 }
rawTx = self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
rawTxPartialSigned = self.nodes[1].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawTx, inputs)
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
assert_equal(rawTxPartialSigned['complete'], False) #node1 only has one key, can't comp. sign the tx
rawTxSigned = self.nodes[2].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawTx, inputs)
2015-04-01 15:08:00 +02:00
assert_equal(rawTxSigned['complete'], True) #node2 can sign the tx compl., own two of three keys
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(rawTxSigned['hex'])
rawTx = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(rawTxSigned['hex'])
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all()
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), bal+Decimal('500.00000000')+Decimal('2.19000000')) #block reward + tx
# 2of2 test for combining transactions
bal = self.nodes[2].getbalance()
addr1 = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
addr2 = self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
addr1Obj = self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(addr1)
addr2Obj = self.nodes[2].getaddressinfo(addr2)
Merge bitcoin#11415: [RPC] Disallow using addresses in createmultisig (#3482) * Merge #11415: [RPC] Disallow using addresses in createmultisig 1df206f Disallow using addresses in createmultisig (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: This PR should be the last part of #7965. This PR makes createmultisig only accept public keys and marks the old functionality of accepting addresses as deprecated. It also splits `_createmultisig_redeemscript` into two functions, `_createmultisig_getpubkeys` and `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys`. `_createmultisig_getpubkeys` retrieves public keys from the RPC parameters and `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys` retrieves addresses' public keys from the wallet. `_createmultisig_getaddr_pubkeys` requires the wallet and is only used by `addwitnessaddress` (except when `createmultisig` is used in deprecated mode). `addwitnessaddress`'s API is also changed. Instead of returning just an address, it now returns the same thing as `createmultisig`: a JSON object with two fields, address and redeemscript. Tree-SHA512: a5796e41935ad5e47d8165ff996a8b20d5112b5fc1a06a6d3c7f5513c13e7628a4fd37ec30fde05d8b15abfed51bc250710140f6834b13f64d0a0e47a3817969 * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix backport Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Dashify Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-05-15 11:34:41 +02:00
self.nodes[1].addmultisigaddress(2, [addr1Obj['pubkey'], addr2Obj['pubkey']])['address']
mSigObj = self.nodes[2].addmultisigaddress(2, [addr1Obj['pubkey'], addr2Obj['pubkey']])['address']
backport: bitcoin#10583 - [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (#3880) * [rpc] split wallet and non-wallet parts of DescribeAddressVisitor * [rpc] Move DescribeAddressVisitor to rpc/util * Create getaddressinfo RPC and deprecate parts of validateaddress Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which require the wallet as deprecated. Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo for the data that both share for right now. Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no longer used in libbitcoin_server. * scripted-diff: validateaddress to getaddressinfo in tests Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \; -END VERIFY SCRIPT- * wallet: Add missing description of "hdchainid" * Update src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-17 13:46:20 +01:00
mSigObjValid = self.nodes[2].getaddressinfo(mSigObj)
txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(mSigObj, 2.2)
decTx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txId)
rawTx2 = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(decTx['hex'])
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all()
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), bal) # the funds of a 2of2 multisig tx should not be marked as spendable
txDetails = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txId, True)
rawTx2 = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(txDetails['hex'])
vout = next(o for o in rawTx2['vout'] if o['value'] == Decimal('2.20000000'))
bal = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
inputs = [{ "txid" : txId, "vout" : vout['n'], "scriptPubKey" : vout['scriptPubKey']['hex'], "redeemScript" : mSigObjValid['hex']}]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : 2.19 }
rawTx2 = self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
rawTxPartialSigned1 = self.nodes[1].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawTx2, inputs)
self.log.debug(rawTxPartialSigned1)
assert_equal(rawTxPartialSigned1['complete'], False) #node1 only has one key, can't comp. sign the tx
rawTxPartialSigned2 = self.nodes[2].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawTx2, inputs)
self.log.debug(rawTxPartialSigned2)
assert_equal(rawTxPartialSigned2['complete'], False) #node2 only has one key, can't comp. sign the tx
rawTxComb = self.nodes[2].combinerawtransaction([rawTxPartialSigned1['hex'], rawTxPartialSigned2['hex']])
self.log.debug(rawTxComb)
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(rawTxComb)
rawTx2 = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(rawTxComb)
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_all()
2019-09-22 23:01:49 +02:00
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), bal+Decimal('500.00000000')+Decimal('2.19000000')) #block reward + tx
# getrawtransaction tests
# 1. valid parameters - only supply txid
txId = rawTx["txid"]
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txId), rawTxSigned['hex'])
# 2. valid parameters - supply txid and 0 for non-verbose
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txId, 0), rawTxSigned['hex'])
# 3. valid parameters - supply txid and False for non-verbose
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txId, False), rawTxSigned['hex'])
# 4. valid parameters - supply txid and 1 for verbose.
# We only check the "hex" field of the output so we don't need to update this test every time the output format changes.
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txId, 1)["hex"], rawTxSigned['hex'])
# 5. valid parameters - supply txid and True for non-verbose
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txId, True)["hex"], rawTxSigned['hex'])
# 6. invalid parameters - supply txid and string "Flase"
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "not a boolean", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, txId, "Flase")
# 7. invalid parameters - supply txid and empty array
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "not a boolean", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, txId, [])
# 8. invalid parameters - supply txid and empty dict
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "not a boolean", self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction, txId, {})
inputs = [ {'txid' : "1d1d4e24ed99057e84c3f80fd8fbec79ed9e1acee37da269356ecea000000000", 'vout' : 1, 'sequence' : 1000}]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : 1 }
rawtx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
decrawtx= self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(rawtx)
assert_equal(decrawtx['vin'][0]['sequence'], 1000)
# 9. invalid parameters - sequence number out of range
inputs = [ {'txid' : "1d1d4e24ed99057e84c3f80fd8fbec79ed9e1acee37da269356ecea000000000", 'vout' : 1, 'sequence' : -1}]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : 1 }
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, 'Invalid parameter, sequence number is out of range', self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, inputs, outputs)
# 10. invalid parameters - sequence number out of range
inputs = [ {'txid' : "1d1d4e24ed99057e84c3f80fd8fbec79ed9e1acee37da269356ecea000000000", 'vout' : 1, 'sequence' : 4294967296}]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : 1 }
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, 'Invalid parameter, sequence number is out of range', self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction, inputs, outputs)
inputs = [ {'txid' : "1d1d4e24ed99057e84c3f80fd8fbec79ed9e1acee37da269356ecea000000000", 'vout' : 1, 'sequence' : 4294967294}]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : 1 }
rawtx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
decrawtx= self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(rawtx)
assert_equal(decrawtx['vin'][0]['sequence'], 4294967294)
####################################
# TRANSACTION VERSION NUMBER TESTS #
####################################
# Test the minimum transaction version number that fits in a signed 16-bit integer.
# Note, this is different to bitcoin. Bitcoin has a 32 bit integer
# representing the version, we have 16 bits of version and 16 bits of
# type.
tx = CTransaction()
tx.nVersion = -0x8000
rawtx = ToHex(tx)
decrawtx = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(rawtx)
assert_equal(decrawtx['version'], -0x8000)
# Test the maximum transaction version number that fits in a signed 32-bit integer.
tx = CTransaction()
tx.nVersion = 0x7fff
rawtx = ToHex(tx)
decrawtx = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(rawtx)
assert_equal(decrawtx['version'], 0x7fff)
self.log.info('sendrawtransaction/testmempoolaccept with maxfeerate')
# Test a transaction with a small fee.
txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 1.0)
rawTx = self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txId, True)
vout = next(o for o in rawTx['vout'] if o['value'] == Decimal('1.00000000'))
self.sync_all()
inputs = [{ "txid" : txId, "vout" : vout['n'] }]
# Fee 10,000 satoshis, (1 - (10000 sat * 0.00000001 BTC/sat)) = 0.9999
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : Decimal("0.99990000") }
rawTx = self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
rawTxSigned = self.nodes[2].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawTx)
assert_equal(rawTxSigned['complete'], True)
# Fee 10,000 satoshis, ~200 b transaction, fee rate should land around 50 sat/byte = 0.00500000 BTC/kB
# Thus, testmempoolaccept should reject
testres = self.nodes[2].testmempoolaccept([rawTxSigned['hex']], 0.00001000)[0]
assert_equal(testres['allowed'], False)
Merge #17004: validation: Remove REJECT code from CValidationState 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery) 04a2f326ec0f06fb4fce1c4f93500752f05dede8 [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery) e9d5a59e34ff2d538d8f5315efd9908bf24d0fdc [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery) 0053e16714323c1694c834fdca74f064a1a33529 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery) a1a07cfe99fc8cee30ba5976dc36b47b1f6532ab [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery) Pull request description: We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set a REJECT code in the CValidationState object. Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`, then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it wasn't previously: - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`. - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`. Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in ATMP. This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579ba8cc7b684105c6a08263992b08d52. ACKs for top commit: ariard: ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits fjahr: ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments. ryanofsky: Code review ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
2019-10-24 10:43:02 +02:00
assert_equal(testres['reject-reason'], 'absurdly-high-fee')
# and sendrawtransaction should throw
assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "absurdly-high-fee", self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction, rawTxSigned['hex'], 0.00001000)
# and the following calls should both succeed
testres = self.nodes[2].testmempoolaccept(rawtxs=[rawTxSigned['hex']])[0]
assert_equal(testres['allowed'], True)
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(hexstring=rawTxSigned['hex'])
# Test a transaction with a large fee.
txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 1.0)
rawTx = self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txId, True)
vout = next(o for o in rawTx['vout'] if o['value'] == Decimal('1.00000000'))
self.sync_all()
inputs = [{ "txid" : txId, "vout" : vout['n'] }]
# Fee 2,000,000 satoshis, (1 - (2000000 sat * 0.00000001 BTC/sat)) = 0.98
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : Decimal("0.98000000") }
rawTx = self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
rawTxSigned = self.nodes[2].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawTx)
assert_equal(rawTxSigned['complete'], True)
# Fee 2,000,000 satoshis, ~100 b transaction, fee rate should land around 20,000 sat/byte = 0.20000000 BTC/kB
# Thus, testmempoolaccept should reject
testres = self.nodes[2].testmempoolaccept([rawTxSigned['hex']])[0]
assert_equal(testres['allowed'], False)
Merge #17004: validation: Remove REJECT code from CValidationState 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery) 04a2f326ec0f06fb4fce1c4f93500752f05dede8 [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery) e9d5a59e34ff2d538d8f5315efd9908bf24d0fdc [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery) 0053e16714323c1694c834fdca74f064a1a33529 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery) a1a07cfe99fc8cee30ba5976dc36b47b1f6532ab [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery) Pull request description: We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set a REJECT code in the CValidationState object. Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`, then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it wasn't previously: - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`. - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`. Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in ATMP. This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579ba8cc7b684105c6a08263992b08d52. ACKs for top commit: ariard: ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits fjahr: ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments. ryanofsky: Code review ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
2019-10-24 10:43:02 +02:00
assert_equal(testres['reject-reason'], 'absurdly-high-fee')
# and sendrawtransaction should throw
assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, "absurdly-high-fee", self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction, rawTxSigned['hex'])
# and the following calls should both succeed
testres = self.nodes[2].testmempoolaccept(rawtxs=[rawTxSigned['hex']], maxfeerate='0.20000000')[0]
assert_equal(testres['allowed'], True)
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(hexstring=rawTxSigned['hex'], maxfeerate='0.20000000')
if __name__ == '__main__':
RawTransactionsTest().main()