dash/test/functional/feature_llmq_simplepose.py

164 lines
6.1 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2015-2021 The Dash Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
import time
from test_framework.test_framework import DashTestFramework
from test_framework.util import *
'''
Backport 11796 + 11774 (#3612) * Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention 5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns) 9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns) 7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns) 82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery) 1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery) Pull request description: Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes. Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80 * update violation count Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests 6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns) 3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns) 81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns) 61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns) 90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns) ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme: tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_... tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_... tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_... tests for wallet features are named wallet_... tests for mining features are named mining_... tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_... tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_... Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance. Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16 * rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> * ci: Fix excluded test names * rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
2020-07-17 01:44:20 +02:00
feature_llmq_simplepose.py
Checks simple PoSe system based on LLMQ commitments
'''
class LLMQSimplePoSeTest(DashTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.set_dash_test_params(6, 5, fast_dip3_enforcement=True)
self.set_dash_llmq_test_params(5, 3)
def run_test(self):
self.nodes[0].spork("SPORK_17_QUORUM_DKG_ENABLED", 0)
self.wait_for_sporks_same()
# check if mining quorums with all nodes being online succeeds without punishment/banning
self.test_no_banning()
# Now lets isolate MNs one by one and verify that punishment/banning happens
self.test_banning(self.isolate_mn, 1)
self.repair_masternodes(False)
self.nodes[0].spork("SPORK_21_QUORUM_ALL_CONNECTED", 0)
self.nodes[0].spork("SPORK_23_QUORUM_POSE", 0)
self.wait_for_sporks_same()
self.reset_probe_timeouts()
# Make sure no banning happens with spork21 enabled
self.test_no_banning()
# Lets restart masternodes with closed ports and verify that they get banned even though they are connected to other MNs (via outbound connections)
self.test_banning(self.close_mn_port, 3)
self.repair_masternodes(True)
self.reset_probe_timeouts()
self.test_banning(self.force_old_mn_proto, 3)
# With PoSe off there should be no punishing for non-reachable and outdated nodes
self.nodes[0].spork("SPORK_23_QUORUM_POSE", 4070908800)
self.wait_for_sporks_same()
self.repair_masternodes(True)
self.force_old_mn_proto(self.mninfo[0])
self.test_no_banning(3)
self.repair_masternodes(True)
self.close_mn_port(self.mninfo[0])
self.test_no_banning(3)
def isolate_mn(self, mn):
mn.node.setnetworkactive(False)
wait_until(lambda: mn.node.getconnectioncount() == 0)
return True
def close_mn_port(self, mn):
self.stop_node(mn.node.index)
self.start_masternode(mn, ["-listen=0", "-nobind"])
connect_nodes(mn.node, 0)
# Make sure the to-be-banned node is still connected well via outbound connections
for mn2 in self.mninfo:
if mn2 is not mn:
connect_nodes(mn.node, mn2.node.index)
self.reset_probe_timeouts()
return False
def force_old_mn_proto(self, mn):
self.stop_node(mn.node.index)
self.start_masternode(mn, ["-pushversion=70216"])
connect_nodes(mn.node, 0)
self.reset_probe_timeouts()
return False
def test_no_banning(self, expected_connections=None):
for i in range(3):
self.mine_quorum(expected_connections=expected_connections)
for mn in self.mninfo:
assert(not self.check_punished(mn) and not self.check_banned(mn))
def test_banning(self, invalidate_proc, expected_connections):
mninfos_online = self.mninfo.copy()
mninfos_valid = self.mninfo.copy()
expected_contributors = len(mninfos_online)
for i in range(2):
mn = mninfos_valid.pop()
went_offline = invalidate_proc(mn)
if went_offline:
mninfos_online.remove(mn)
expected_contributors -= 1
t = time.time()
while (not self.check_banned(mn)) and (time.time() - t) < 120:
self.reset_probe_timeouts()
self.mine_quorum(expected_connections=expected_connections, expected_members=expected_contributors, expected_contributions=expected_contributors, expected_complaints=expected_contributors-1, expected_commitments=expected_contributors, mninfos_online=mninfos_online, mninfos_valid=mninfos_valid)
assert(self.check_banned(mn))
if not went_offline:
# we do not include PoSe banned mns in quorums, so the next one should have 1 contributor less
expected_contributors -= 1
def repair_masternodes(self, restart):
# Repair all nodes
for mn in self.mninfo:
if self.check_banned(mn) or self.check_punished(mn):
addr = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(addr, 0.1)
self.nodes[0].protx('update_service', mn.proTxHash, '127.0.0.1:%d' % p2p_port(mn.node.index), mn.keyOperator, "", addr)
# Make sure this tx "safe" to mine even when InstantSend and ChainLocks are no longer functional
self.bump_mocktime(60 * 10 + 1)
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
assert(not self.check_banned(mn))
if restart:
self.stop_node(mn.node.index)
self.start_masternode(mn)
else:
mn.node.setnetworkactive(True)
connect_nodes(mn.node, 0)
self.sync_all()
# Isolate and re-connect all MNs (otherwise there might be open connections with no MNAUTH for MNs which were banned before)
for mn in self.mninfo:
mn.node.setnetworkactive(False)
wait_until(lambda: mn.node.getconnectioncount() == 0)
mn.node.setnetworkactive(True)
masternode|net|rpc: Improve masternode sync process (#3690) * masternode: Replace sync states INITIAL and WAITING with BLOCKCHAIN * masternode: Peer dependent "assume tip" timeout I would say its enough to only wait 1 tick if we have more than 3 peers before we move over to governance sync. * masternode: Notify the UI instantly if switched to governance sync Without this it takes one iteration more for the UI to receive the update. * masternode: Notify the UI about CMasternodeSync::Reset calls * masternode: Don't instantly reset the sync process Give it MASTERNODE_SYNC_RESET_SECONDS (600) seconds time after the last UpdateBlockTip call. * rpc: Don't switch to next asset in "mnsync reset" * rpc: Force the reset in "mnsync reset" * net: Make sure the sync gets a reset if required after network changes This will reset the sync process if its outdated in the following cases: - If the connections dropped to zero - If the connections went from zero to one - If the network has been enabled or disabled * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> * net: Only open masternode connections if the blockchain is synced In general it doesn't make sense to connect to masternodes before due to MNAUTH requires blockchain sync. This could lead to failing quorum connections/failing masternode probing.. if a just restarted node/a out of sync node would hit a dkg block.. Then they would not try to open those llmq/probing connections for the next 60s (nLLMQConnectionRetryTimeout). Thats basically what happens in tests right now and they fail without this commit. * test: Make sure nodes are synced when they get restored after isolation Their sync might be out of date otherwise due to bigger mocktime bumps Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-09-11 14:07:34 +02:00
force_finish_mnsync(mn.node)
connect_nodes(mn.node, 0)
def reset_probe_timeouts(self):
# Make sure all masternodes will reconnect/re-probe
self.bump_mocktime(50 * 60 + 1)
# Sleep a couple of seconds to let mn sync tick to happen
time.sleep(2)
def check_punished(self, mn):
info = self.nodes[0].protx('info', mn.proTxHash)
if info['state']['PoSePenalty'] > 0:
return True
return False
def check_banned(self, mn):
info = self.nodes[0].protx('info', mn.proTxHash)
if info['state']['PoSeBanHeight'] != -1:
return True
return False
if __name__ == '__main__':
LLMQSimplePoSeTest().main()