dash/test/functional/p2p_unrequested_blocks.py

283 lines
12 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2015-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""Test processing of unrequested blocks.
Setup: two nodes, node0 + node1, not connected to each other. Node1 will have
nMinimumChainWork set to 0x10, so it won't process low-work unrequested blocks.
We have one P2PInterface connection to node0 called test_node, and one to node1
called min_work_node.
The test:
1. Generate one block on each node, to leave IBD.
2. Mine a new block on each tip, and deliver to each node from node's peer.
The tip should advance for node0, but node1 should skip processing due to
nMinimumChainWork.
Node1 is unused in tests 3-7:
3. Mine a block that forks from the genesis block, and deliver to test_node.
Node0 should not process this block (just accept the header), because it
is unrequested and doesn't have more or equal work to the tip.
4a,b. Send another two blocks that build on the forking block.
Node0 should process the second block but be stuck on the shorter chain,
because it's missing an intermediate block.
4c.Send 288 more blocks on the longer chain (the number of blocks ahead
we currently store).
Node0 should process all but the last block (too far ahead in height).
5. Send a duplicate of the block in #3 to Node0.
Node0 should not process the block because it is unrequested, and stay on
the shorter chain.
6. Send Node0 an inv for the height 3 block produced in #4 above.
Node0 should figure out that Node0 has the missing height 2 block and send a
getdata.
7. Send Node0 the missing block again.
Node0 should process and the tip should advance.
8. Create a fork which is invalid at a height longer than the current chain
(ie to which the node will try to reorg) but which has headers built on top
of the invalid block. Check that we get disconnected if we send more headers
on the chain the node now knows to be invalid.
9. Test Node1 is able to sync when connected to node0 (which should have sufficient
work on its chain).
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""
Merge #13054: tests: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. 68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift) Pull request description: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools. An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports. Before this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util $ ``` After this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 $ ``` Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
2018-08-13 14:24:43 +02:00
Merge #13669: Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations 44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott) 736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott) 157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott) Pull request description: There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other. This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149) 1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey 2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx 2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there. Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output. Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
2018-08-09 18:09:27 +02:00
from test_framework.blocktools import create_block, create_coinbase, create_tx_with_script
from test_framework.messages import CBlockHeader, CInv, MSG_BLOCK, msg_block, msg_headers, msg_inv
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery) 5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery) 85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery) 9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery) Pull request description: New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize: - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces. - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'. For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references. ACKs for top commit: amitiuttarwar: ACK d5800da519 MarcoFalke: ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞 Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-15 20:35:29 +01:00
from test_framework.p2p import p2p_lock, P2PInterface
Merge #13054: tests: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. 68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift) Pull request description: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports. Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools. An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports. Before this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util $ ``` After this commit: ``` $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10 $ ``` Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
2018-08-13 14:24:43 +02:00
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_raises_rpc_error
class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.setup_clean_chain = True
self.num_nodes = 2
self.extra_args = [[], ["-minimumchainwork=0x10"]]
def setup_network(self):
self.setup_nodes()
def run_test(self):
test_node = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
min_work_node = self.nodes[1].add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
# 1. Have nodes mine a block (leave IBD)
[self.generate(n, 1, sync_fun=self.no_op) for n in self.nodes]
tips = [int("0x" + n.getbestblockhash(), 0) for n in self.nodes]
# 2. Send one block that builds on each tip.
# This should be accepted by node0
blocks_h2 = [] # the height 2 blocks on each node's chain
2019-08-09 01:14:11 +02:00
block_time = self.mocktime + 1
for i in range(2):
2018-04-18 13:48:59 +02:00
blocks_h2.append(create_block(tips[i], create_coinbase(2), block_time + 1))
blocks_h2[i].solve()
block_time += 1
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(blocks_h2[0]))
min_work_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(blocks_h2[1]))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2)
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 1)
self.log.info("First height 2 block accepted by node0; correctly rejected by node1")
# 3. Send another block that builds on genesis.
block_h1f = create_block(int("0x" + self.nodes[0].getblockhash(0), 0), create_coinbase(1), block_time)
block_time += 1
block_h1f.solve()
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(block_h1f))
tip_entry_found = False
for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
if x['hash'] == block_h1f.hash:
assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only")
tip_entry_found = True
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
assert tip_entry_found
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not found on disk", self.nodes[0].getblock, block_h1f.hash)
# 4. Send another two block that build on the fork.
block_h2f = create_block(block_h1f.sha256, create_coinbase(2), block_time)
block_time += 1
block_h2f.solve()
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(block_h2f))
# Since the earlier block was not processed by node, the new block
# can't be fully validated.
tip_entry_found = False
for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
if x['hash'] == block_h2f.hash:
assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only")
tip_entry_found = True
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
assert tip_entry_found
# But this block should be accepted by node since it has equal work.
self.nodes[0].getblock(block_h2f.hash)
self.log.info("Second height 2 block accepted, but not reorg'ed to")
# 4b. Now send another block that builds on the forking chain.
block_h3 = create_block(block_h2f.sha256, create_coinbase(3), block_h2f.nTime+1)
block_h3.solve()
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(block_h3))
# Since the earlier block was not processed by node, the new block
# can't be fully validated.
tip_entry_found = False
for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
if x['hash'] == block_h3.hash:
assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only")
tip_entry_found = True
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
assert tip_entry_found
self.nodes[0].getblock(block_h3.hash)
# But this block should be accepted by node since it has more work.
self.nodes[0].getblock(block_h3.hash)
self.log.info("Unrequested more-work block accepted")
# 4c. Now mine 288 more blocks and deliver; all should be processed but
# the last (height-too-high) on node (as long as it is not missing any headers)
tip = block_h3
all_blocks = []
for i in range(288):
next_block = create_block(tip.sha256, create_coinbase(i + 4), tip.nTime+1)
next_block.solve()
all_blocks.append(next_block)
tip = next_block
# Now send the block at height 5 and check that it wasn't accepted (missing header)
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(all_blocks[1]))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].getblock, all_blocks[1].hash)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].getblockheader, all_blocks[1].hash)
# The block at height 5 should be accepted if we provide the missing header, though
headers_message = msg_headers()
headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(all_blocks[0]))
test_node.send_message(headers_message)
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(all_blocks[1]))
self.nodes[0].getblock(all_blocks[1].hash)
# Now send the blocks in all_blocks
for i in range(288):
test_node.send_message(msg_block(all_blocks[i]))
test_node.sync_with_ping()
# Blocks 1-287 should be accepted, block 288 should be ignored because it's too far ahead
for x in all_blocks[:-1]:
self.nodes[0].getblock(x.hash)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not found on disk", self.nodes[0].getblock, all_blocks[-1].hash)
# 5. Test handling of unrequested block on the node that didn't process
# Should still not be processed (even though it has a child that has more
# work).
# The node should have requested the blocks at some point, so
# disconnect/reconnect first
self.nodes[0].disconnect_p2ps()
self.nodes[1].disconnect_p2ps()
test_node = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(block_h1f))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2)
self.log.info("Unrequested block that would complete more-work chain was ignored")
# 6. Try to get node to request the missing block.
# Poke the node with an inv for block at height 3 and see if that
# triggers a getdata on block 2 (it should if block 2 is missing).
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery) 5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery) 85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery) 9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery) Pull request description: New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize: - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces. - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'. For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references. ACKs for top commit: amitiuttarwar: ACK d5800da519 MarcoFalke: ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞 Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-15 20:35:29 +01:00
with p2p_lock:
# Clear state so we can check the getdata request
test_node.last_message.pop("getdata", None)
test_node.send_message(msg_inv([CInv(MSG_BLOCK, block_h3.sha256)]))
2015-06-15 21:30:05 +02:00
test_node.sync_with_ping()
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery) 5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery) 85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery) 9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery) Pull request description: New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize: - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces. - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'. For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references. ACKs for top commit: amitiuttarwar: ACK d5800da519 MarcoFalke: ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞 Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-15 20:35:29 +01:00
with p2p_lock:
getdata = test_node.last_message["getdata"]
# Check that the getdata includes the right block
assert_equal(getdata.inv[0].hash, block_h1f.sha256)
self.log.info("Inv at tip triggered getdata for unprocessed block")
# 7. Send the missing block for the third time (now it is requested)
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(block_h1f))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 290)
self.nodes[0].getblock(all_blocks[286].hash)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), all_blocks[286].hash)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not found on disk", self.nodes[0].getblock, all_blocks[287].hash)
self.log.info("Successfully reorged to longer chain")
# 8. Create a chain which is invalid at a height longer than the
# current chain, but which has more blocks on top of that
block_289f = create_block(all_blocks[284].sha256, create_coinbase(289), all_blocks[284].nTime+1)
block_289f.solve()
block_290f = create_block(block_289f.sha256, create_coinbase(290), block_289f.nTime+1)
block_290f.solve()
block_291 = create_block(block_290f.sha256, create_coinbase(291), block_290f.nTime+1)
# block_291 spends a coinbase below maturity!
Merge #13669: Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations 44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott) 736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott) 157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott) Pull request description: There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other. This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149) 1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey 2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx 2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there. Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output. Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
2018-08-09 18:09:27 +02:00
block_291.vtx.append(create_tx_with_script(block_290f.vtx[0], 0, script_sig=b"42", amount=1))
block_291.hashMerkleRoot = block_291.calc_merkle_root()
block_291.solve()
block_292 = create_block(block_291.sha256, create_coinbase(292), block_291.nTime+1)
block_292.solve()
# Now send all the headers on the chain and enough blocks to trigger reorg
headers_message = msg_headers()
headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(block_289f))
headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(block_290f))
headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(block_291))
headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(block_292))
test_node.send_and_ping(headers_message)
tip_entry_found = False
for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
if x['hash'] == block_292.hash:
assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only")
tip_entry_found = True
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
assert tip_entry_found
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not found on disk", self.nodes[0].getblock, block_292.hash)
test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_289f))
test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(block_290f))
self.nodes[0].getblock(block_289f.hash)
self.nodes[0].getblock(block_290f.hash)
test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_291))
# At this point we've sent an obviously-bogus block, wait for full processing
# and assume disconnection
test_node.wait_for_disconnect()
self.nodes[0].disconnect_p2ps()
test_node = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
# We should have failed reorg and switched back to 290 (but have block 291)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 290)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), all_blocks[286].hash)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblock(block_291.hash)["confirmations"], -1)
# Now send a new header on the invalid chain, indicating we're forked off, and expect to get disconnected
block_293 = create_block(block_292.sha256, create_coinbase(293), block_292.nTime+1)
block_293.solve()
headers_message = msg_headers()
headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(block_293))
test_node.send_message(headers_message)
test_node.wait_for_disconnect()
# 9. Connect node1 to node0 and ensure it is able to sync
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
self.sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], self.nodes[1]])
self.log.info("Successfully synced nodes 1 and 0")
if __name__ == '__main__':
AcceptBlockTest().main()