dash/contrib/valgrind.supp

44 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

# Valgrind suppressions file for Dash.
Merge #11035: [contrib] Add Valgrind suppressions file 4a426d8 Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.md (practicalswift) 84e2462 contrib: Add Valgrind suppressions file (practicalswift) Pull request description: Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree. Example use: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \ --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite ``` Running with the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10769== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10769== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== suppressed: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ``` Running without the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10724== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==10724== at 0x4C2DBF6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) ==10724== by 0x6F74EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==10724== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) ==10724== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) ==10724== by 0x2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006D2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006E8: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006FF: ??? ==10724== ==10724== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10724== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==10724== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ``` Tree-SHA512: 9c92079fc61313ea678deb6aaa16a3a71c3154c757459793eb9ca0d90a9a74c6faebfb04c9135e1b398ca34224fb7f03bd9c488ea0e8debf6894f69f030a31d3
2017-11-13 14:59:29 +01:00
#
# Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed
# in-tree.
#
# Example use:
# $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_dash
Merge #11035: [contrib] Add Valgrind suppressions file 4a426d8 Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.md (practicalswift) 84e2462 contrib: Add Valgrind suppressions file (practicalswift) Pull request description: Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree. Example use: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \ --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite ``` Running with the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10769== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10769== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== suppressed: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ``` Running without the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10724== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==10724== at 0x4C2DBF6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) ==10724== by 0x6F74EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==10724== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) ==10724== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) ==10724== by 0x2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006D2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006E8: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006FF: ??? ==10724== ==10724== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10724== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==10724== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ``` Tree-SHA512: 9c92079fc61313ea678deb6aaa16a3a71c3154c757459793eb9ca0d90a9a74c6faebfb04c9135e1b398ca34224fb7f03bd9c488ea0e8debf6894f69f030a31d3
2017-11-13 14:59:29 +01:00
# $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \
# --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_dash --log_level=test_suite
Merge #11035: [contrib] Add Valgrind suppressions file 4a426d8 Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.md (practicalswift) 84e2462 contrib: Add Valgrind suppressions file (practicalswift) Pull request description: Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree. Example use: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \ --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite ``` Running with the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10769== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10769== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== suppressed: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ``` Running without the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10724== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==10724== at 0x4C2DBF6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) ==10724== by 0x6F74EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==10724== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) ==10724== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) ==10724== by 0x2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006D2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006E8: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006FF: ??? ==10724== ==10724== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10724== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==10724== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ``` Tree-SHA512: 9c92079fc61313ea678deb6aaa16a3a71c3154c757459793eb9ca0d90a9a74c6faebfb04c9135e1b398ca34224fb7f03bd9c488ea0e8debf6894f69f030a31d3
2017-11-13 14:59:29 +01:00
{
Suppress libstdc++ warning - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65434
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:malloc
obj:*/libstdc++.*
fun:call_init.part.0
fun:call_init
fun:_dl_init
obj:*/ld-*.so
}
{
Suppress libdb warning - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662917
Memcheck:Cond
obj:*/libdb_cxx-*.so
fun:__log_put
obj:*/libdb_cxx-*.so
fun:__log_put_record
}
{
Suppress leveldb warning (leveldb::InitModule()) - https://github.com/google/leveldb/issues/113
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:_Znwm
fun:_ZN7leveldbL10InitModuleEv
}
{
Suppress leveldb warning (leveldb::Env::Default()) - https://github.com/google/leveldb/issues/113
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:_Znwm
...
fun:_ZN7leveldbL14InitDefaultEnvEv
}