dash/test/functional/feature_pruning.py

456 lines
21 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""Test the pruning code.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
WARNING:
This test uses 4GB of disk space.
This test takes 30 mins or more (up to 2 hours)
"""
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import *
import os
import sys
MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP = 288
# Rescans start at the earliest block up to 2 hours before a key timestamp, so
# the manual prune RPC avoids pruning blocks in the same window to be
# compatible with pruning based on key creation time.
TIMESTAMP_WINDOW = 2 * 60 * 60
def calc_usage(blockdir):
return sum(os.path.getsize(blockdir+f) for f in os.listdir(blockdir) if os.path.isfile(os.path.join(blockdir, f))) / (1024. * 1024.)
class PruneTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.setup_clean_chain = True
self.num_nodes = 6
# Create nodes 0 and 1 to mine.
# Create node 2 to test pruning.
self.full_node_default_args = ["-maxreceivebuffer=20000","-blockmaxsize=999000", "-checkblocks=5", "-limitdescendantcount=100", "-limitdescendantsize=5000", "-limitancestorcount=100", "-limitancestorsize=5000" ]
# Create nodes 3 and 4 to test manual pruning (they will be re-started with manual pruning later)
# Create nodes 5 to test wallet in prune mode, but do not connect
self.extra_args = [self.full_node_default_args,
self.full_node_default_args,
["-disablegovernance","-txindex=0","-maxreceivebuffer=20000","-prune=550"],
["-disablegovernance","-txindex=0","-maxreceivebuffer=20000","-blockmaxsize=999000"],
["-disablegovernance","-txindex=0","-maxreceivebuffer=20000","-blockmaxsize=999000"],
["-disablegovernance","-txindex=0","-prune=550"]]
def setup_network(self):
self.setup_nodes()
self.prunedir = os.path.join(self.nodes[2].datadir, self.chain, 'blocks', '')
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
connect_nodes(self.nodes[1], 2)
connect_nodes(self.nodes[2], 0)
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 3)
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 4)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:5])
def setup_nodes(self):
self.add_nodes(self.num_nodes, self.extra_args, timewait=900, stderr=sys.stdout)
self.start_nodes()
def create_big_chain(self):
# Start by creating some coinbases we can spend later
self.nodes[1].generate(200)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:2])
self.nodes[0].generate(150)
# Then mine enough full blocks to create more than 550MiB of data
for i in range(645):
mine_large_block(self.nodes[0], self.utxo_cache_0)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:5])
def test_height_min(self):
if not os.path.isfile(os.path.join(self.prunedir, "blk00000.dat")):
raise AssertionError("blk00000.dat is missing, pruning too early")
self.log.info("Success")
self.log.info("Though we're already using more than 550MiB, current usage: %d" % calc_usage(self.prunedir))
self.log.info("Mining 25 more blocks should cause the first block file to be pruned")
# Pruning doesn't run until we're allocating another chunk, 20 full blocks past the height cutoff will ensure this
for i in range(25):
mine_large_block(self.nodes[0], self.utxo_cache_0)
# Wait for blk00000.dat to be pruned
wait_until(lambda: not os.path.isfile(os.path.join(self.prunedir, "blk00000.dat")), timeout=30)
self.log.info("Success")
usage = calc_usage(self.prunedir)
self.log.info("Usage should be below target: %d" % usage)
if (usage > 550):
raise AssertionError("Pruning target not being met")
def create_chain_with_staleblocks(self):
# Create stale blocks in manageable sized chunks
self.log.info("Mine 24 (stale) blocks on Node 1, followed by 25 (main chain) block reorg from Node 0, for 12 rounds")
for j in range(12):
# Disconnect node 0 so it can mine a longer reorg chain without knowing about node 1's soon-to-be-stale chain
# Node 2 stays connected, so it hears about the stale blocks and then reorg's when node0 reconnects
# Stopping node 0 also clears its mempool, so it doesn't have node1's transactions to accidentally mine
self.stop_node(0)
self.start_node(0, extra_args=self.full_node_default_args)
# Mine 24 blocks in node 1
for i in range(24):
if j == 0:
mine_large_block(self.nodes[1], self.utxo_cache_1)
else:
# Add node1's wallet transactions back to the mempool, to
# avoid the mined blocks from being too small.
self.nodes[1].resendwallettransactions()
self.nodes[1].generate(1) #tx's already in mempool from previous disconnects
# Reorg back with 25 block chain from node 0
for i in range(25):
mine_large_block(self.nodes[0], self.utxo_cache_0)
# Create connections in the order so both nodes can see the reorg at the same time
connect_nodes(self.nodes[1], 0)
connect_nodes(self.nodes[2], 0)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:3])
self.log.info("Usage can be over target because of high stale rate: %d" % calc_usage(self.prunedir))
def reorg_test(self):
# Node 1 will mine a 300 block chain starting 287 blocks back from Node 0 and Node 2's tip
# This will cause Node 2 to do a reorg requiring 288 blocks of undo data to the reorg_test chain
# Reboot node 1 to clear its mempool (hopefully make the invalidate faster)
# Lower the block max size so we don't keep mining all our big mempool transactions (from disconnected blocks)
self.stop_node(1)
Merge #13090: Remove Safe mode (achow101) d8e9a2a Remove "rpc" category from GetWarnings (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 7da3b0a rpc: Move RPC_FORBIDDEN_BY_SAFE_MODE code to reserved section (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 2ae705d Remove Safe mode (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Rebase of #10563. Safe mode was [disabled by default and deprecated in 0.16](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.16.0.md#safe-mode-disabled-by-default), so probably should be removed for 0.17. > Rationale: > > Safe mode is useless. It only disables some RPC commands when large work forks are detected. Nothing else is affected by safe mode. It seems that very few people would be affected by safe mode. The people who use Core as a wallet are primarily using it through the GUI, which safe mode does not effect. In the GUI, transactions will still be made as normal; only a warning is displayed. > > I also don't think that we should be disabling RPC commands or any functionality in general. If we do, it should be done consistently, which safe mode is not. If we want to keep the idea of a safe mode around, I think that the current system needs to go first before a new system can be implemented. Tree-SHA512: 067938f47ca6e879fb6c3c4e21f9946fd7c5da3cde67ef436f1666798c78d049225b9111dc97064f42b3bc549d3915229fa19ad5a634588f381e34fc65d64044 Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> # Conflicts: # src/Makefile.am # src/rpc/protocol.h # src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp # src/wallet/rpcdump.cpp # src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp # test/functional/pruning.py
2018-04-27 17:03:33 +02:00
self.start_node(1, extra_args=["-maxreceivebuffer=20000","-blockmaxsize=5000", "-checkblocks=5"])
height = self.nodes[1].getblockcount()
self.log.info("Current block height: %d" % height)
invalidheight = height-287
badhash = self.nodes[1].getblockhash(invalidheight)
self.log.info("Invalidating block %s at height %d" % (badhash,invalidheight))
self.nodes[1].invalidateblock(badhash)
# We've now switched to our previously mined-24 block fork on node 1, but that's not what we want
# So invalidate that fork as well, until we're on the same chain as node 0/2 (but at an ancestor 288 blocks ago)
mainchainhash = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(invalidheight - 1)
curhash = self.nodes[1].getblockhash(invalidheight - 1)
while curhash != mainchainhash:
self.nodes[1].invalidateblock(curhash)
curhash = self.nodes[1].getblockhash(invalidheight - 1)
assert(self.nodes[1].getblockcount() == invalidheight - 1)
self.log.info("New best height: %d" % self.nodes[1].getblockcount())
# Reboot node1 to clear those giant tx's from mempool
self.stop_node(1)
Merge #13090: Remove Safe mode (achow101) d8e9a2a Remove "rpc" category from GetWarnings (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 7da3b0a rpc: Move RPC_FORBIDDEN_BY_SAFE_MODE code to reserved section (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 2ae705d Remove Safe mode (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Rebase of #10563. Safe mode was [disabled by default and deprecated in 0.16](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.16.0.md#safe-mode-disabled-by-default), so probably should be removed for 0.17. > Rationale: > > Safe mode is useless. It only disables some RPC commands when large work forks are detected. Nothing else is affected by safe mode. It seems that very few people would be affected by safe mode. The people who use Core as a wallet are primarily using it through the GUI, which safe mode does not effect. In the GUI, transactions will still be made as normal; only a warning is displayed. > > I also don't think that we should be disabling RPC commands or any functionality in general. If we do, it should be done consistently, which safe mode is not. If we want to keep the idea of a safe mode around, I think that the current system needs to go first before a new system can be implemented. Tree-SHA512: 067938f47ca6e879fb6c3c4e21f9946fd7c5da3cde67ef436f1666798c78d049225b9111dc97064f42b3bc549d3915229fa19ad5a634588f381e34fc65d64044 Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> # Conflicts: # src/Makefile.am # src/rpc/protocol.h # src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp # src/wallet/rpcdump.cpp # src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp # test/functional/pruning.py
2018-04-27 17:03:33 +02:00
self.start_node(1, extra_args=["-maxreceivebuffer=20000","-blockmaxsize=5000", "-checkblocks=5"])
self.log.info("Generating new longer chain of 300 more blocks")
self.nodes[1].generate(300)
self.log.info("Reconnect nodes")
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
connect_nodes(self.nodes[2], 1)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:3], timeout=120)
self.log.info("Verify height on node 2: %d" % self.nodes[2].getblockcount())
self.log.info("Usage possibly still high bc of stale blocks in block files: %d" % calc_usage(self.prunedir))
self.log.info("Mine 220 more blocks so we have requisite history (some blocks will be big and cause pruning of previous chain)")
# Get node0's wallet transactions back in its mempool, to avoid the
# mined blocks from being too small.
self.nodes[0].resendwallettransactions()
for i in range(22):
# This can be slow, so do this in multiple RPC calls to avoid
# RPC timeouts.
self.nodes[0].generate(10) #node 0 has many large tx's in its mempool from the disconnects
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:3], timeout=300)
usage = calc_usage(self.prunedir)
self.log.info("Usage should be below target: %d" % usage)
if (usage > 550):
raise AssertionError("Pruning target not being met")
return invalidheight,badhash
def reorg_back(self):
# Verify that a block on the old main chain fork has been pruned away
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not available (pruned data)", self.nodes[2].getblock, self.forkhash)
self.log.info("Will need to redownload block %d" % self.forkheight)
# Verify that we have enough history to reorg back to the fork point
# Although this is more than 288 blocks, because this chain was written more recently
# and only its other 299 small and 220 large blocks are in the block files after it,
# it is expected to still be retained
self.nodes[2].getblock(self.nodes[2].getblockhash(self.forkheight))
first_reorg_height = self.nodes[2].getblockcount()
curchainhash = self.nodes[2].getblockhash(self.mainchainheight)
self.nodes[2].invalidateblock(curchainhash)
goalbestheight = self.mainchainheight
goalbesthash = self.mainchainhash2
# As of 0.10 the current block download logic is not able to reorg to the original chain created in
# create_chain_with_stale_blocks because it doesn't know of any peer that's on that chain from which to
# redownload its missing blocks.
# Invalidate the reorg_test chain in node 0 as well, it can successfully switch to the original chain
# because it has all the block data.
# However it must mine enough blocks to have a more work chain than the reorg_test chain in order
# to trigger node 2's block download logic.
# At this point node 2 is within 288 blocks of the fork point so it will preserve its ability to reorg
if self.nodes[2].getblockcount() < self.mainchainheight:
blocks_to_mine = first_reorg_height + 1 - self.mainchainheight
self.log.info("Rewind node 0 to prev main chain to mine longer chain to trigger redownload. Blocks needed: %d" % blocks_to_mine)
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(curchainhash)
assert(self.nodes[0].getblockcount() == self.mainchainheight)
assert(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash() == self.mainchainhash2)
goalbesthash = self.nodes[0].generate(blocks_to_mine)[-1]
goalbestheight = first_reorg_height + 1
self.log.info("Verify node 2 reorged back to the main chain, some blocks of which it had to redownload")
# Wait for Node 2 to reorg to proper height
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[2].getblockcount() >= goalbestheight, timeout=900)
assert(self.nodes[2].getbestblockhash() == goalbesthash)
# Verify we can now have the data for a block previously pruned
assert(self.nodes[2].getblock(self.forkhash)["height"] == self.forkheight)
def manual_test(self, node_number, use_timestamp):
# at this point, node has 995 blocks and has not yet run in prune mode
self.start_node(node_number, extra_args=["-disablegovernance", "-txindex=0"])
node = self.nodes[node_number]
assert_equal(node.getblockcount(), 995)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "not in prune mode", node.pruneblockchain, 500)
# now re-start in manual pruning mode
self.stop_node(node_number)
self.start_node(node_number, extra_args=["-disablegovernance", "-txindex=0", "-prune=1"])
node = self.nodes[node_number]
assert_equal(node.getblockcount(), 995)
def height(index):
if use_timestamp:
return node.getblockheader(node.getblockhash(index))["time"] + TIMESTAMP_WINDOW
else:
return index
def prune(index, expected_ret=None):
ret = node.pruneblockchain(height(index))
# Check the return value. When use_timestamp is True, just check
# that the return value is less than or equal to the expected
# value, because when more than one block is generated per second,
# a timestamp will not be granular enough to uniquely identify an
# individual block.
if expected_ret is None:
expected_ret = index
if use_timestamp:
assert_greater_than(ret, 0)
assert_greater_than(expected_ret + 1, ret)
else:
assert_equal(ret, expected_ret)
def has_block(index):
return os.path.isfile(os.path.join(self.nodes[node_number].datadir, self.chain, "blocks", "blk{:05}.dat".format(index)))
# should not prune because chain tip of node 3 (995) < PruneAfterHeight (1000)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Blockchain is too short for pruning", node.pruneblockchain, height(500))
Merge #13451: rpc: expose CBlockIndex::nTx in getblock(header) 86edf4a2a502416ba8d6cebbce61030992f7ff6f expose CBlockIndex::nTx in getblock(header) (Gregory Sanders) Pull request description: Recent publication of a weakness in Bitcoin's merkle tree construction demonstrates many SPV applications vulnerable to an expensive to pull off yet still plausible attack: https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2018/06/09/leaf-node-weakness-in-bitcoin-merkle-tree-design/ Including the coinbase in the txoutproof seems the most effective fix, however results in a significant efficiency downgrade. Transactors will not even know a priori what the size of their proof will be within a couple orders of magnitude, unless they use the mid-state of SHA2 as detailed in the blog post. Some applications, like Elements blockchain platform that take SPV-style proofs have optional access to a bitcoind to verify these proofs of inclusion and check depth in the chain. Returning `CBlockIndex::nTx` would allow an extremely easy and compact way of checking the depth of the tree, with no additional overhead to the codebase, and works with pruned nodes. `getblockheader` is arguably not the place for it, but as mentioned before, is a natural workflow for us checking depth of a block in a possibly pruned node. We should also ensure that `verifytxoutproof` ends up validating this depth fact as well, but left this for another PR. Tree-SHA512: af4cf48e704c6088f8da06a477fda1aaa6f8770cee9b876c4465d1075966d6a95831a88817673fe5a0d6bbcdc1ffcbc1892e2be0d838c60fc6958d33eacdcc14
2018-06-14 19:38:19 +02:00
# Save block transaction count before pruning, assert value
block1_details = node.getblock(node.getblockhash(1))
assert_equal(block1_details["nTx"], len(block1_details["tx"]))
# mine 6 blocks so we are at height 1001 (i.e., above PruneAfterHeight)
node.generate(6)
assert_equal(node.getblockchaininfo()["blocks"], 1001)
Merge #13451: rpc: expose CBlockIndex::nTx in getblock(header) 86edf4a2a502416ba8d6cebbce61030992f7ff6f expose CBlockIndex::nTx in getblock(header) (Gregory Sanders) Pull request description: Recent publication of a weakness in Bitcoin's merkle tree construction demonstrates many SPV applications vulnerable to an expensive to pull off yet still plausible attack: https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2018/06/09/leaf-node-weakness-in-bitcoin-merkle-tree-design/ Including the coinbase in the txoutproof seems the most effective fix, however results in a significant efficiency downgrade. Transactors will not even know a priori what the size of their proof will be within a couple orders of magnitude, unless they use the mid-state of SHA2 as detailed in the blog post. Some applications, like Elements blockchain platform that take SPV-style proofs have optional access to a bitcoind to verify these proofs of inclusion and check depth in the chain. Returning `CBlockIndex::nTx` would allow an extremely easy and compact way of checking the depth of the tree, with no additional overhead to the codebase, and works with pruned nodes. `getblockheader` is arguably not the place for it, but as mentioned before, is a natural workflow for us checking depth of a block in a possibly pruned node. We should also ensure that `verifytxoutproof` ends up validating this depth fact as well, but left this for another PR. Tree-SHA512: af4cf48e704c6088f8da06a477fda1aaa6f8770cee9b876c4465d1075966d6a95831a88817673fe5a0d6bbcdc1ffcbc1892e2be0d838c60fc6958d33eacdcc14
2018-06-14 19:38:19 +02:00
# Pruned block should still know the number of transactions
assert_equal(node.getblockheader(node.getblockhash(1))["nTx"], block1_details["nTx"])
# negative heights should raise an exception
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Negative", node.pruneblockchain, -10)
# height=100 too low to prune first block file so this is a no-op
prune(100)
if not has_block(0):
raise AssertionError("blk00000.dat is missing when should still be there")
# Does nothing
node.pruneblockchain(height(0))
if not has_block(0):
raise AssertionError("blk00000.dat is missing when should still be there")
# height=500 should prune first file
prune(500)
if has_block(0):
raise AssertionError("blk00000.dat is still there, should be pruned by now")
if not has_block(1):
raise AssertionError("blk00001.dat is missing when should still be there")
# height=650 should prune second file
prune(650)
if has_block(1):
raise AssertionError("blk00001.dat is still there, should be pruned by now")
# height=1000 should not prune anything more, because tip-288 is in blk00002.dat.
prune(1000, 1001 - MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP)
if not has_block(2):
raise AssertionError("blk00002.dat is still there, should be pruned by now")
# advance the tip so blk00002.dat and blk00003.dat can be pruned (the last 288 blocks should now be in blk00004.dat)
node.generate(288)
prune(1000)
if has_block(2):
raise AssertionError("blk00002.dat is still there, should be pruned by now")
if has_block(3):
raise AssertionError("blk00003.dat is still there, should be pruned by now")
# stop node, start back up with auto-prune at 550MB, make sure still runs
self.stop_node(node_number)
self.start_node(node_number, extra_args=["-disablegovernance", "-txindex=0", "-prune=550"])
self.log.info("Success")
def wallet_test(self):
# check that the pruning node's wallet is still in good shape
self.log.info("Stop and start pruning node to trigger wallet rescan")
self.stop_node(2)
self.start_node(2, extra_args=["-disablegovernance", "-txindex=0", "-prune=550"])
self.log.info("Success")
# check that wallet loads successfully when restarting a pruned node after IBD.
# this was reported to fail in #7494.
self.log.info("Syncing node 5 to test wallet")
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 5)
nds = [self.nodes[0], self.nodes[5]]
self.sync_blocks(nds, wait=5, timeout=300)
self.stop_node(5) #stop and start to trigger rescan
self.start_node(5, extra_args=["-disablegovernance", "-txindex=0", "-prune=550"])
self.log.info("Success")
def run_test(self):
self.log.info("Warning! This test requires 4GB of disk space and takes over 30 mins (up to 2 hours)")
self.log.info("Mining a big blockchain of 995 blocks")
# Determine default relay fee
self.relayfee = self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()["relayfee"]
# Cache for utxos, as the listunspent may take a long time later in the test
self.utxo_cache_0 = []
self.utxo_cache_1 = []
self.create_big_chain()
# Chain diagram key:
# * blocks on main chain
# +,&,$,@ blocks on other forks
# X invalidated block
# N1 Node 1
#
# Start by mining a simple chain that all nodes have
# N0=N1=N2 **...*(995)
# stop manual-pruning node with 995 blocks
self.stop_node(3)
self.stop_node(4)
self.log.info("Check that we haven't started pruning yet because we're below PruneAfterHeight")
self.test_height_min()
# Extend this chain past the PruneAfterHeight
# N0=N1=N2 **...*(1020)
self.log.info("Check that we'll exceed disk space target if we have a very high stale block rate")
self.create_chain_with_staleblocks()
# Disconnect N0
# And mine a 24 block chain on N1 and a separate 25 block chain on N0
# N1=N2 **...*+...+(1044)
# N0 **...**...**(1045)
#
# reconnect nodes causing reorg on N1 and N2
# N1=N2 **...*(1020) *...**(1045)
# \
# +...+(1044)
#
# repeat this process until you have 12 stale forks hanging off the
# main chain on N1 and N2
# N0 *************************...***************************(1320)
#
# N1=N2 **...*(1020) *...**(1045) *.. ..**(1295) *...**(1320)
# \ \ \
# +...+(1044) &.. $...$(1319)
# Save some current chain state for later use
self.mainchainheight = self.nodes[2].getblockcount() #1320
self.mainchainhash2 = self.nodes[2].getblockhash(self.mainchainheight)
self.log.info("Check that we can survive a 288 block reorg still")
(self.forkheight,self.forkhash) = self.reorg_test() #(1033, )
# Now create a 288 block reorg by mining a longer chain on N1
# First disconnect N1
# Then invalidate 1033 on main chain and 1032 on fork so height is 1032 on main chain
# N1 **...*(1020) **...**(1032)X..
# \
# ++...+(1031)X..
#
# Now mine 300 more blocks on N1
# N1 **...*(1020) **...**(1032) @@...@(1332)
# \ \
# \ X...
# \ \
# ++...+(1031)X.. ..
#
# Reconnect nodes and mine 220 more blocks on N1
# N1 **...*(1020) **...**(1032) @@...@@@(1552)
# \ \
# \ X...
# \ \
# ++...+(1031)X.. ..
#
# N2 **...*(1020) **...**(1032) @@...@@@(1552)
# \ \
# \ *...**(1320)
# \ \
# ++...++(1044) ..
#
# N0 ********************(1032) @@...@@@(1552)
# \
# *...**(1320)
self.log.info("Test that we can rerequest a block we previously pruned if needed for a reorg")
self.reorg_back()
# Verify that N2 still has block 1033 on current chain (@), but not on main chain (*)
# Invalidate 1033 on current chain (@) on N2 and we should be able to reorg to
# original main chain (*), but will require redownload of some blocks
# In order to have a peer we think we can download from, must also perform this invalidation
# on N0 and mine a new longest chain to trigger.
# Final result:
# N0 ********************(1032) **...****(1553)
# \
# X@...@@@(1552)
#
# N2 **...*(1020) **...**(1032) **...****(1553)
# \ \
# \ X@...@@@(1552)
# \
# +..
#
# N1 doesn't change because 1033 on main chain (*) is invalid
self.log.info("Test manual pruning with block indices")
self.manual_test(3, use_timestamp=False)
self.log.info("Test manual pruning with timestamps")
self.manual_test(4, use_timestamp=True)
self.log.info("Test wallet re-scan")
self.wallet_test()
self.log.info("Done")
if __name__ == '__main__':
PruneTest().main()