dash/contrib/valgrind.supp

126 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

# Valgrind suppressions file for Dash.
Merge #11035: [contrib] Add Valgrind suppressions file 4a426d8 Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.md (practicalswift) 84e2462 contrib: Add Valgrind suppressions file (practicalswift) Pull request description: Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree. Example use: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \ --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite ``` Running with the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10769== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10769== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== suppressed: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ``` Running without the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10724== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==10724== at 0x4C2DBF6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) ==10724== by 0x6F74EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==10724== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) ==10724== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) ==10724== by 0x2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006D2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006E8: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006FF: ??? ==10724== ==10724== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10724== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==10724== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ``` Tree-SHA512: 9c92079fc61313ea678deb6aaa16a3a71c3154c757459793eb9ca0d90a9a74c6faebfb04c9135e1b398ca34224fb7f03bd9c488ea0e8debf6894f69f030a31d3
2017-11-13 14:59:29 +01:00
#
# Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed
# in-tree.
#
# Example use:
# $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_dash
Merge #11035: [contrib] Add Valgrind suppressions file 4a426d8 Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.md (practicalswift) 84e2462 contrib: Add Valgrind suppressions file (practicalswift) Pull request description: Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree. Example use: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \ --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite ``` Running with the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10769== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10769== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== suppressed: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ``` Running without the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10724== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==10724== at 0x4C2DBF6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) ==10724== by 0x6F74EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==10724== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) ==10724== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) ==10724== by 0x2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006D2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006E8: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006FF: ??? ==10724== ==10724== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10724== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==10724== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ``` Tree-SHA512: 9c92079fc61313ea678deb6aaa16a3a71c3154c757459793eb9ca0d90a9a74c6faebfb04c9135e1b398ca34224fb7f03bd9c488ea0e8debf6894f69f030a31d3
2017-11-13 14:59:29 +01:00
# $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \
# --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_dash
#
# To create suppressions for found issues, use the --gen-suppressions=all option:
# $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \
# --show-leak-kinds=all --gen-suppressions=all --show-reachable=yes \
# --error-limit=no src/test/test_dash
#
# Note that suppressions may depend on OS and/or library versions.
Merge #11035: [contrib] Add Valgrind suppressions file 4a426d8 Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.md (practicalswift) 84e2462 contrib: Add Valgrind suppressions file (practicalswift) Pull request description: Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree. Example use: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \ --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite ``` Running with the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10769== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10769== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== suppressed: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ``` Running without the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10724== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==10724== at 0x4C2DBF6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) ==10724== by 0x6F74EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==10724== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) ==10724== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) ==10724== by 0x2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006D2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006E8: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006FF: ??? ==10724== ==10724== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10724== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==10724== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ``` Tree-SHA512: 9c92079fc61313ea678deb6aaa16a3a71c3154c757459793eb9ca0d90a9a74c6faebfb04c9135e1b398ca34224fb7f03bd9c488ea0e8debf6894f69f030a31d3
2017-11-13 14:59:29 +01:00
{
Suppress libstdc++ warning - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65434
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:malloc
obj:*/libstdc++.*
fun:call_init.part.0
fun:call_init
fun:_dl_init
obj:*/ld-*.so
}
{
Suppress libdb warning - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662917
Memcheck:Cond
obj:*/libdb_cxx-*.so
fun:__log_put
obj:*/libdb_cxx-*.so
fun:__log_put_record
}
{
Suppress libdb warning
Memcheck:Param
pwrite64(buf)
fun:pwrite
fun:__os_io
obj:*/libdb_cxx-*.so
}
Merge #11035: [contrib] Add Valgrind suppressions file 4a426d8 Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.md (practicalswift) 84e2462 contrib: Add Valgrind suppressions file (practicalswift) Pull request description: Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree. Example use: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \ --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite ``` Running with the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10769== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10769== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== suppressed: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ``` Running without the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10724== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==10724== at 0x4C2DBF6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) ==10724== by 0x6F74EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==10724== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) ==10724== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) ==10724== by 0x2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006D2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006E8: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006FF: ??? ==10724== ==10724== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10724== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==10724== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ``` Tree-SHA512: 9c92079fc61313ea678deb6aaa16a3a71c3154c757459793eb9ca0d90a9a74c6faebfb04c9135e1b398ca34224fb7f03bd9c488ea0e8debf6894f69f030a31d3
2017-11-13 14:59:29 +01:00
{
Suppress leveldb warning (leveldb::InitModule()) - https://github.com/google/leveldb/issues/113
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:_Znwm
fun:_ZN7leveldbL10InitModuleEv
}
{
Suppress leveldb warning (leveldb::Env::Default()) - https://github.com/google/leveldb/issues/113
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:_Znwm
...
fun:_ZN7leveldbL14InitDefaultEnvEv
}
{
Suppress wcsnrtombs glibc SSE4 warning (could be related: https://stroika.atlassian.net/browse/STK-626)
Memcheck:Addr16
fun:__wcsnlen_sse4_1
fun:wcsnrtombs
}
{
Suppress boost::filesystem warning (fixed in boost 1.70: https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/commit/bbe9d1771e5d679b3f10c42a58fc81f7e8c024a9)
Memcheck:Cond
fun:_ZN5boost10filesystem6detail28directory_iterator_incrementERNS0_18directory_iteratorEPNS_6system10error_codeE
fun:_ZN5boost10filesystem6detail28directory_iterator_constructERNS0_18directory_iteratorERKNS0_4pathEPNS_6system10error_codeE
obj:*/libboost_filesystem.so.*
}
{
Suppress boost::filesystem warning (could be related: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9830182/function-boostfilesystemcomplete-being-reported-as-possible-memory-leak-by-v)
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:_Znwm
fun:_ZN5boost10filesystem8absoluteERKNS0_4pathES3_
}
{
Suppress boost still reachable memory warning
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:_Znwm
...
fun:_M_construct_aux<char*>
fun:_M_construct<char*>
fun:basic_string
fun:path
}
{
Suppress LogInstance still reachable memory warning
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:_Znwm
fun:_Z11LogInstancev
}
{
Suppress secp256k1_context_create still reachable memory warning
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:malloc
...
fun:secp256k1_context_create
}
{
Suppress BCLog::Logger::StartLogging() still reachable memory warning
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:malloc
...
fun:_ZN5BCLog6Logger12StartLoggingEv
}
{
Suppress BCLog::Logger::StartLogging() still reachable memory warning
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: reachable
fun:malloc
...
fun:_ZN5BCLog6Logger12StartLoggingEv
}
{
Suppress rest_blockhash_by_height Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
Memcheck:Cond
fun:_ZL24rest_blockhash_by_heightP11HTTPRequestRKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE
}