dash/contrib/guix/guix-attest

264 lines
7.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env bash
export LC_ALL=C
set -e -o pipefail
# Source the common prelude, which:
2023-03-31 12:01:55 +02:00
# 1. Checks if we're at the top directory of the Dash Core repository
# 2. Defines a few common functions and variables
#
# shellcheck source=libexec/prelude.bash
source "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/libexec/prelude.bash"
###################
## Sanity Checks ##
###################
################
# Required non-builtin commands should be invokable
################
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21711: guix: Add full installation and usage documentation fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 doc/release-process: Add torrent creation details (Carl Dong) 5d24cc3d82dad6812f8370c3ccc7c2b5a6c12c11 guix/INSTALL: Guix installs init scripts in libdir (Carl Dong) 5da2ee49d5b44de803b671aedbdd14e5c1d71ea9 guix/INSTALL: Add coreutils/inotify-dir-recreate troubleshooting (Carl Dong) 318c60700b7bbb7ec09a29bf037e7c2787646be6 guix: Adapt release-process.md to new Guix process (Carl Dong) fcab35b2292f9221eaba521740e8b3b2511a8b78 guix-attest: Produce and sign normalized documents (Carl Dong) c2541fd0ca99481a5a792a8f2772925d64fb0491 guix: Overhaul README (Carl Dong) 46ce6ce3782dfbd8f9d26dc2ba0f284755e75f2d tree-wide: Rename gitian-keys to builder-keys (Carl Dong) fc4f8449f34e32b0b9ac9d218d6c3264b02467ba guix: Update various check_tools lists (Carl Dong) 263220a85c1df218431fafbda07c8b23ccc4ce4d guix: Check for a sane services database (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #21462 Keeping the README in one file so that it's easy to search through. Will add more jumping links later so navigation is easier. Current TODOs: - [x] Shell installer option: prompt user to re-login for `/etc/profile.d` entry to be picked up - [x] Binary tarball option: prompt user to create `/etc/profile.d` entry and re-login - [x] Fanquake docker option: complete section - [x] Arch Linux AUR option: prompt to start `guix-daemon-latest` unit after finishing "optional setup" section - [x] Building from source option: Insert dependency tree diagram that I made - [x] Building from source option: redo sectioning, kind of a mess right now - [x] Optional setup: make clear which parts are only needed if building from source - [x] Workaround 1 for GnuTLS: perhaps mention how to remove Guix build farm's key - [x] Overall (after everything): Make the links work. Note to self: wherever possible, tell user how to check that something is true rather than branching by installation option. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 - going to go ahead and merge this now. It's a lot of documentation, and could probably be nit-picked / improved further, however, that can continue over the next few weeks. I'm sure more (backportable) improvements / clarifications will be made while we progress through RCs towards a new release. Tree-SHA512: dc46c0ecdfc67c7c7743ca26e4a603eb3f54adbf81be2f4c1f4c20577ebb84b5250b9c9ec89c0e9860337ab1c7cff94d7963c603287267deecfe1cd987fa070a
2021-07-20 05:07:18 +02:00
check_tools cat env basename mkdir diff sort
if [ -z "$NO_SIGN" ]; then
# make it possible to override the gpg binary
GPG=${GPG:-gpg}
# $GPG can contain extra arguments passed to the binary
# so let's check only the existence of arg[0]
# shellcheck disable=SC2206
GPG_ARRAY=($GPG)
check_tools "${GPG_ARRAY[0]}"
fi
################
# Required env vars should be non-empty
################
cmd_usage() {
cat <<EOF
Synopsis:
env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=<path/to/guix.sigs> \\
SIGNER=GPG_KEY_NAME[=SIGNER_NAME] \\
[ NO_SIGN=1 ]
./contrib/guix/guix-attest
Example w/o overriding signing name:
env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs \\
SIGNER=achow101 \\
./contrib/guix/guix-attest
Example overriding signing name:
env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/dongcarl/guix.sigs \\
SIGNER=0x96AB007F1A7ED999=dongcarl \\
./contrib/guix/guix-attest
Example w/o signing, just creating SHA256SUMS:
env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs \\
SIGNER=achow101 \\
NO_SIGN=1 \\
./contrib/guix/guix-attest
EOF
}
if [ -z "$GUIX_SIGS_REPO" ] || [ -z "$SIGNER" ]; then
cmd_usage
exit 1
fi
################
# GUIX_SIGS_REPO should exist as a directory
################
if [ ! -d "$GUIX_SIGS_REPO" ]; then
cat << EOF
ERR: The specified GUIX_SIGS_REPO is not an existent directory:
'$GUIX_SIGS_REPO'
Hint: Please clone the guix.sigs repository and point to it with the
GUIX_SIGS_REPO environment variable.
EOF
cmd_usage
exit 1
fi
################
# The key specified in SIGNER should be usable
################
IFS='=' read -r gpg_key_name signer_name <<< "$SIGNER"
if [ -z "${signer_name}" ]; then
signer_name="$gpg_key_name"
fi
if [ -z "$NO_SIGN" ] && ! ${GPG} --dry-run --list-secret-keys "${gpg_key_name}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "ERR: GPG can't seem to find any key named '${gpg_key_name}'"
exit 1
fi
################
# We should be able to find at least one output
################
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "Looking for build output SHA256SUMS fragments in ${OUTDIR_BASE}"
shopt -s nullglob
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
sha256sum_fragments=( "$OUTDIR_BASE"/*/SHA256SUMS.part ) # This expands to an array of directories...
shopt -u nullglob
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
noncodesigned_fragments=()
codesigned_fragments=()
if (( ${#sha256sum_fragments[@]} )); then
echo "Found build output SHA256SUMS fragments:"
for outdir in "${sha256sum_fragments[@]}"; do
echo " '$outdir'"
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
case "$outdir" in
"$OUTDIR_BASE"/*-codesigned/SHA256SUMS.part)
codesigned_fragments+=("$outdir")
;;
*)
noncodesigned_fragments+=("$outdir")
;;
esac
done
echo
else
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "ERR: Could not find any build output SHA256SUMS fragments in ${OUTDIR_BASE}"
exit 1
fi
##############
## Attest ##
##############
# Usage: out_name $outdir
#
# HOST: The output directory being attested
#
out_name() {
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
basename "$(dirname "$1")"
}
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
shasum_already_exists() {
cat <<EOF
--
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
ERR: An ${1} file already exists for '${VERSION}' and attests
differently. You likely previously attested to a partial build (e.g. one
where you specified the HOST environment variable).
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
See the diff above for more context.
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
Hint: You may wish to remove the existing attestations and their signatures by
invoking:
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
rm '${PWD}/${1}'{,.asc}
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
Then try running this script again.
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
EOF
}
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "Attesting to build outputs for version: '${VERSION}'"
echo ""
# Given a SHA256SUMS file as stdin that has lines like:
# 0ba536819b221a91d3d42e978be016aac918f40984754d74058aa0c921cd3ea6 a/b/d/c/d/s/bitcoin-22.0rc2-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
# ...
#
# Replace each line's file name with its basename:
# 0ba536819b221a91d3d42e978be016aac918f40984754d74058aa0c921cd3ea6 bitcoin-22.0rc2-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
# ...
#
basenameify_SHA256SUMS() {
sed -E 's@(^[[:xdigit:]]{64}[[:space:]]+).+/([^/]+$)@\1\2@'
}
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
outsigdir="$GUIX_SIGS_REPO/$VERSION/$signer_name"
mkdir -p "$outsigdir"
(
cd "$outsigdir"
temp_noncodesigned="$(mktemp)"
trap 'rm -rf -- "$temp_noncodesigned"' EXIT
if (( ${#noncodesigned_fragments[@]} )); then
cat "${noncodesigned_fragments[@]}" \
| sort -u \
| sort -k2 \
| basenameify_SHA256SUMS \
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21711: guix: Add full installation and usage documentation fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 doc/release-process: Add torrent creation details (Carl Dong) 5d24cc3d82dad6812f8370c3ccc7c2b5a6c12c11 guix/INSTALL: Guix installs init scripts in libdir (Carl Dong) 5da2ee49d5b44de803b671aedbdd14e5c1d71ea9 guix/INSTALL: Add coreutils/inotify-dir-recreate troubleshooting (Carl Dong) 318c60700b7bbb7ec09a29bf037e7c2787646be6 guix: Adapt release-process.md to new Guix process (Carl Dong) fcab35b2292f9221eaba521740e8b3b2511a8b78 guix-attest: Produce and sign normalized documents (Carl Dong) c2541fd0ca99481a5a792a8f2772925d64fb0491 guix: Overhaul README (Carl Dong) 46ce6ce3782dfbd8f9d26dc2ba0f284755e75f2d tree-wide: Rename gitian-keys to builder-keys (Carl Dong) fc4f8449f34e32b0b9ac9d218d6c3264b02467ba guix: Update various check_tools lists (Carl Dong) 263220a85c1df218431fafbda07c8b23ccc4ce4d guix: Check for a sane services database (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #21462 Keeping the README in one file so that it's easy to search through. Will add more jumping links later so navigation is easier. Current TODOs: - [x] Shell installer option: prompt user to re-login for `/etc/profile.d` entry to be picked up - [x] Binary tarball option: prompt user to create `/etc/profile.d` entry and re-login - [x] Fanquake docker option: complete section - [x] Arch Linux AUR option: prompt to start `guix-daemon-latest` unit after finishing "optional setup" section - [x] Building from source option: Insert dependency tree diagram that I made - [x] Building from source option: redo sectioning, kind of a mess right now - [x] Optional setup: make clear which parts are only needed if building from source - [x] Workaround 1 for GnuTLS: perhaps mention how to remove Guix build farm's key - [x] Overall (after everything): Make the links work. Note to self: wherever possible, tell user how to check that something is true rather than branching by installation option. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 - going to go ahead and merge this now. It's a lot of documentation, and could probably be nit-picked / improved further, however, that can continue over the next few weeks. I'm sure more (backportable) improvements / clarifications will be made while we progress through RCs towards a new release. Tree-SHA512: dc46c0ecdfc67c7c7743ca26e4a603eb3f54adbf81be2f4c1f4c20577ebb84b5250b9c9ec89c0e9860337ab1c7cff94d7963c603287267deecfe1cd987fa070a
2021-07-20 05:07:18 +02:00
> "$temp_noncodesigned"
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
if [ -e noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS ]; then
# The SHA256SUMS already exists, make sure it's exactly what we
# expect, error out if not
if diff -u noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS "$temp_noncodesigned"; then
echo "A noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS file already exists for '${VERSION}' and is up-to-date."
else
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
shasum_already_exists noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS
exit 1
fi
else
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
mv "$temp_noncodesigned" noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS
fi
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
else
echo "ERR: No noncodesigned outputs found for '${VERSION}', exiting..."
exit 1
fi
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22531: guix: Fixes to guix-{attest,verify} 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e guix: Ensure EPOCH_SOURCE_DATE does not include GPG information (Andrew Chow) 43225f0a2a517ccd79dc49279b979ffd2eca6b85 guix: Remove extra \r from all.SHA256SUMS line ending (Andrew Chow) d080c27066449f76bc8709fc50e422757971d2cf guix, doc: Add a note that codesigners need to rebuild after tagging (Andrew Chow) 4a466388a0092fbdf5f8969c6bfb65bf8cc962e1 guix: Allow changing the base manifest in guix-verify (Andrew Chow) 33455c76964b9e27b33e970d9722cc47657b291b guix: Make all.SHA256SUMS rather than codesigned.SHA256SUMS (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: `guix-verify` expects `all.SHA256SUMS` but `guix-attest` produces `codesigned.SHA256SUMS`. Since `all.SHA256SUMS` makes more sense (as the file contains all the sha256sums, not just the codesigned ones), `guix-attest` has been changed to output a file of that name. As a quality of life improvement, `guix-verify` can take `SIGNER` and use the signer's manifest as the base to compare against. This makes it easier to compare a single person's attestations with everyone else's and can make it more obvious when one builder is clearly mismatching with everyone else. Lastly `release-process.md` is updated with a note about a gotcha that can cause a mismatch in the codesigned attestation. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e Tree-SHA512: 0d60627def38288dbd3059ad1e72cad224f9205da11b1a561c082ef28250a074df5cc5f2797c91a7be027bc486a3fda3319c2e496a8724e5b539337236c6f990
2021-07-29 05:11:55 +02:00
temp_all="$(mktemp)"
trap 'rm -rf -- "$temp_all"' EXIT
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
if (( ${#codesigned_fragments[@]} )); then
# Note: all.SHA256SUMS attests to all of $sha256sum_fragments, but is
# not needed if there are no $codesigned_fragments
cat "${sha256sum_fragments[@]}" \
| sort -u \
| sort -k2 \
| basenameify_SHA256SUMS \
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22531: guix: Fixes to guix-{attest,verify} 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e guix: Ensure EPOCH_SOURCE_DATE does not include GPG information (Andrew Chow) 43225f0a2a517ccd79dc49279b979ffd2eca6b85 guix: Remove extra \r from all.SHA256SUMS line ending (Andrew Chow) d080c27066449f76bc8709fc50e422757971d2cf guix, doc: Add a note that codesigners need to rebuild after tagging (Andrew Chow) 4a466388a0092fbdf5f8969c6bfb65bf8cc962e1 guix: Allow changing the base manifest in guix-verify (Andrew Chow) 33455c76964b9e27b33e970d9722cc47657b291b guix: Make all.SHA256SUMS rather than codesigned.SHA256SUMS (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: `guix-verify` expects `all.SHA256SUMS` but `guix-attest` produces `codesigned.SHA256SUMS`. Since `all.SHA256SUMS` makes more sense (as the file contains all the sha256sums, not just the codesigned ones), `guix-attest` has been changed to output a file of that name. As a quality of life improvement, `guix-verify` can take `SIGNER` and use the signer's manifest as the base to compare against. This makes it easier to compare a single person's attestations with everyone else's and can make it more obvious when one builder is clearly mismatching with everyone else. Lastly `release-process.md` is updated with a note about a gotcha that can cause a mismatch in the codesigned attestation. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e Tree-SHA512: 0d60627def38288dbd3059ad1e72cad224f9205da11b1a561c082ef28250a074df5cc5f2797c91a7be027bc486a3fda3319c2e496a8724e5b539337236c6f990
2021-07-29 05:11:55 +02:00
> "$temp_all"
if [ -e all.SHA256SUMS ]; then
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
# The SHA256SUMS already exists, make sure it's exactly what we
# expect, error out if not
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22531: guix: Fixes to guix-{attest,verify} 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e guix: Ensure EPOCH_SOURCE_DATE does not include GPG information (Andrew Chow) 43225f0a2a517ccd79dc49279b979ffd2eca6b85 guix: Remove extra \r from all.SHA256SUMS line ending (Andrew Chow) d080c27066449f76bc8709fc50e422757971d2cf guix, doc: Add a note that codesigners need to rebuild after tagging (Andrew Chow) 4a466388a0092fbdf5f8969c6bfb65bf8cc962e1 guix: Allow changing the base manifest in guix-verify (Andrew Chow) 33455c76964b9e27b33e970d9722cc47657b291b guix: Make all.SHA256SUMS rather than codesigned.SHA256SUMS (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: `guix-verify` expects `all.SHA256SUMS` but `guix-attest` produces `codesigned.SHA256SUMS`. Since `all.SHA256SUMS` makes more sense (as the file contains all the sha256sums, not just the codesigned ones), `guix-attest` has been changed to output a file of that name. As a quality of life improvement, `guix-verify` can take `SIGNER` and use the signer's manifest as the base to compare against. This makes it easier to compare a single person's attestations with everyone else's and can make it more obvious when one builder is clearly mismatching with everyone else. Lastly `release-process.md` is updated with a note about a gotcha that can cause a mismatch in the codesigned attestation. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e Tree-SHA512: 0d60627def38288dbd3059ad1e72cad224f9205da11b1a561c082ef28250a074df5cc5f2797c91a7be027bc486a3fda3319c2e496a8724e5b539337236c6f990
2021-07-29 05:11:55 +02:00
if diff -u all.SHA256SUMS "$temp_all"; then
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
echo "An all.SHA256SUMS file already exists for '${VERSION}' and is up-to-date."
else
shasum_already_exists all.SHA256SUMS
exit 1
fi
else
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22531: guix: Fixes to guix-{attest,verify} 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e guix: Ensure EPOCH_SOURCE_DATE does not include GPG information (Andrew Chow) 43225f0a2a517ccd79dc49279b979ffd2eca6b85 guix: Remove extra \r from all.SHA256SUMS line ending (Andrew Chow) d080c27066449f76bc8709fc50e422757971d2cf guix, doc: Add a note that codesigners need to rebuild after tagging (Andrew Chow) 4a466388a0092fbdf5f8969c6bfb65bf8cc962e1 guix: Allow changing the base manifest in guix-verify (Andrew Chow) 33455c76964b9e27b33e970d9722cc47657b291b guix: Make all.SHA256SUMS rather than codesigned.SHA256SUMS (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: `guix-verify` expects `all.SHA256SUMS` but `guix-attest` produces `codesigned.SHA256SUMS`. Since `all.SHA256SUMS` makes more sense (as the file contains all the sha256sums, not just the codesigned ones), `guix-attest` has been changed to output a file of that name. As a quality of life improvement, `guix-verify` can take `SIGNER` and use the signer's manifest as the base to compare against. This makes it easier to compare a single person's attestations with everyone else's and can make it more obvious when one builder is clearly mismatching with everyone else. Lastly `release-process.md` is updated with a note about a gotcha that can cause a mismatch in the codesigned attestation. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e Tree-SHA512: 0d60627def38288dbd3059ad1e72cad224f9205da11b1a561c082ef28250a074df5cc5f2797c91a7be027bc486a3fda3319c2e496a8724e5b539337236c6f990
2021-07-29 05:11:55 +02:00
mv "$temp_all" all.SHA256SUMS
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
fi
else
# It is fine to have the codesigned outputs be missing (perhaps the
# detached codesigs have not been published yet), just print a log
# message instead of erroring out
echo "INFO: No codesigned outputs found for '${VERSION}', skipping..."
fi
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
if [ -z "$NO_SIGN" ]; then
echo "Signing SHA256SUMS to produce SHA256SUMS.asc"
for i in *.SHA256SUMS; do
if [ ! -e "$i".asc ]; then
${GPG} --detach-sign \
--digest-algo sha256 \
--local-user "$gpg_key_name" \
--armor \
--output "$i".asc "$i"
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
else
echo "Signature already there"
fi
done
else
echo "Not signing SHA256SUMS as \$NO_SIGN is not empty"
fi
echo ""
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong) 4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong) 28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Based on: #22075 Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me: 1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents 2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting 3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var) 4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server. For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work: 1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest` 2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine 3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files: ```bash for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,} done ``` 5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs` ----- After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build: ``` output └── x86_64-w64-mingw32 ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz └── SHA256SUMS.part ``` These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like: ``` 3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip 643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip ``` Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create: 1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and 3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy: ``` 4e069f7589da/ └── dongcarl ├── all.SHA256SUMS ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 hebasto: ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only. Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2021-06-17 07:10:29 +02:00
)