dash/test/functional/rpc_blockchain.py

447 lines
18 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""Test RPCs related to blockchainstate.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
Test the following RPCs:
Merge #11258: [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo 11413646b [trivial] (whitespace only) fix getblockchaininfo alignment (John Newbery) bd9c18171 [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo (John Newbery) Pull request description: Exposing whether the node is in IBD would help for testing, and may be useful in general, particularly for developers. First discussed in #10357 here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357#pullrequestreview-59963870 > ... we could simplify this (and possibly other) tests by just adding a way to know if a node is in IBD. I'd like to do that, but I'm not sure it makes sense to complicate this PR with discussion over how that information should be made available. Eg it's not clear to me that the notion of being in IBD is worth exposing to the casual user, versus a hidden rpc call or something, since the definition has changed over time, and may continue to change in the future. But I still do agree that at least for testing purposes it would be far simpler to expose the field somehow... This PR currently implements the simplest way of doing this: adding an `initialblockdownload` field to `getblockchaininfo`. Other approaches we could take: 1. add a new debug RPC method that exposes `IBD` and potentially other information. 2. add a parameter to `getblockchaininfo`, eg `debug_info`, which would cause it to return debug information including IBD 3. add a query string to the url `?debug=true` which would cause RPCs to return additional debug information. I quite like the idea of (3). Feedback on these and other approaches very much welcomed! @sdaftuar @laanwj Tree-SHA512: a6dedd47f8c9bd38769cc597524466250041136feb33500644b9c48d0ffe4e3eeeb2587b5bbc6420364ebdd2667df807fbb50416f9a7913bbf11a14ea86dc0d4
2017-11-10 21:48:00 +01:00
- getblockchaininfo
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
- gettxoutsetinfo
- getdifficulty
- getbestblockhash
- getblockhash
- getblockheader
- getchaintxstats
- getnetworkhashps
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
- verifychain
Tests correspond to code in rpc/blockchain.cpp.
"""
from decimal import Decimal
import http.client
import os
import subprocess
from test_framework.blocktools import (
create_block,
create_coinbase,
TIME_GENESIS_BLOCK,
)
from test_framework.messages import (
CBlockHeader,
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22257: test: refactor: various (de)serialization helpers cleanups/improvements bdb8b9a347e68f80a2e8d44ce5590a2e8214b6bb test: doc: improve doc for `from_hex` helper (mention `to_hex` alternative) (Sebastian Falbesoner) 191405420815d49ab50184513717a303fc2744d6 scripted-diff: test: rename `FromHex` to `from_hex` (Sebastian Falbesoner) a79396fe5f8f81c78cf84117a87074c6ff6c9d95 test: remove `ToHex` helper, use .serialize().hex() instead (Sebastian Falbesoner) 2ce7b47958c4a10ba20dc86c011d71cda4b070a5 test: introduce `tx_from_hex` helper for tx deserialization (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: There are still many functional tests that perform conversions from a hex-string to a message object (deserialization) manually. This PR identifies all those instances and replaces them with a newly introduced helper `tx_from_hex`. Instances were found via * `git grep "deserialize.*BytesIO"` and some of them manually, when it were not one-liners. Further, the helper `ToHex` was removed and simply replaced by `.serialize().hex()`, since now both variants are in use (sometimes even within the same test) and using the helper doesn't really have an advantage in readability. (see discussion https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22257#discussion_r652404782) ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review re-ACK bdb8b9a347e68f80a2e8d44ce5590a2e8214b6bb 😁 Tree-SHA512: e25d7dc85918de1d6755a5cea65471b07a743204c20ad1c2f71ff07ef48cc1b9ad3fe5f515c1efaba2b2e3d89384e7980380c5d81895f9826e2046808cd3266e
2021-06-24 12:47:04 +02:00
from_hex,
msg_block,
)
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery) 5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery) 85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery) 9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery) Pull request description: New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize: - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces. - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'. For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references. ACKs for top commit: amitiuttarwar: ACK d5800da519 MarcoFalke: ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞 Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-15 20:35:29 +01:00
from test_framework.p2p import P2PInterface
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import (
assert_equal,
assert_greater_than,
assert_greater_than_or_equal,
assert_raises,
assert_raises_rpc_error,
assert_is_hex_string,
assert_is_hash_string,
get_datadir_path,
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery) 5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery) 85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery) 9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery) Pull request description: New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize: - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces. - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'. For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references. ACKs for top commit: amitiuttarwar: ACK d5800da519 MarcoFalke: ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞 Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-15 20:35:29 +01:00
set_node_times,
)
from test_framework.wallet import MiniWallet
class BlockchainTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.setup_clean_chain = True
self.num_nodes = 1
self.supports_cli = False
def run_test(self):
self.mine_chain()
self.restart_node(0, extra_args=['-stopatheight=207', '-prune=1', '-txindex=0']) # Set extra args with pruning after rescan is complete
# Actual tests
self._test_getblockchaininfo()
self._test_getchaintxstats()
self._test_gettxoutsetinfo()
self._test_getblockheader()
self._test_getdifficulty()
self._test_getnetworkhashps()
self._test_stopatheight()
self._test_waitforblockheight()
self._test_getblock()
assert self.nodes[0].verifychain(4, 0)
def mine_chain(self):
self.log.info('Create some old blocks')
address = self.nodes[0].get_deterministic_priv_key().address
for t in range(TIME_GENESIS_BLOCK, TIME_GENESIS_BLOCK + 200 * 156, 156):
# 156 sec steps from genesis block time
set_node_times(self.nodes, t)
self.nodes[0].generatetoaddress(1, address)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockchaininfo()['blocks'], 200)
def _test_getblockchaininfo(self):
self.log.info("Test getblockchaininfo")
keys = [
'bestblockhash',
'blocks',
'chain',
'chainwork',
'difficulty',
'headers',
Merge #11258: [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo 11413646b [trivial] (whitespace only) fix getblockchaininfo alignment (John Newbery) bd9c18171 [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo (John Newbery) Pull request description: Exposing whether the node is in IBD would help for testing, and may be useful in general, particularly for developers. First discussed in #10357 here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357#pullrequestreview-59963870 > ... we could simplify this (and possibly other) tests by just adding a way to know if a node is in IBD. I'd like to do that, but I'm not sure it makes sense to complicate this PR with discussion over how that information should be made available. Eg it's not clear to me that the notion of being in IBD is worth exposing to the casual user, versus a hidden rpc call or something, since the definition has changed over time, and may continue to change in the future. But I still do agree that at least for testing purposes it would be far simpler to expose the field somehow... This PR currently implements the simplest way of doing this: adding an `initialblockdownload` field to `getblockchaininfo`. Other approaches we could take: 1. add a new debug RPC method that exposes `IBD` and potentially other information. 2. add a parameter to `getblockchaininfo`, eg `debug_info`, which would cause it to return debug information including IBD 3. add a query string to the url `?debug=true` which would cause RPCs to return additional debug information. I quite like the idea of (3). Feedback on these and other approaches very much welcomed! @sdaftuar @laanwj Tree-SHA512: a6dedd47f8c9bd38769cc597524466250041136feb33500644b9c48d0ffe4e3eeeb2587b5bbc6420364ebdd2667df807fbb50416f9a7913bbf11a14ea86dc0d4
2017-11-10 21:48:00 +01:00
'initialblockdownload',
'mediantime',
'pruned',
'size_on_disk',
'softforks',
'time',
'verificationprogress',
'warnings',
]
res = self.nodes[0].getblockchaininfo()
assert isinstance(res['time'], int)
# result should have these additional pruning keys if manual pruning is enabled
assert_equal(sorted(res.keys()), sorted(['pruneheight', 'automatic_pruning'] + keys))
# size_on_disk should be > 0
assert_greater_than(res['size_on_disk'], 0)
# pruneheight should be greater or equal to 0
assert_greater_than_or_equal(res['pruneheight'], 0)
# check other pruning fields given that prune=1
assert res['pruned']
assert not res['automatic_pruning']
self.restart_node(0, ['-stopatheight=207', '-txindex=0'], expected_stderr='Warning: You are starting with governance validation disabled. This is expected because you are running a pruned node.')
res = self.nodes[0].getblockchaininfo()
# should have exact keys
assert_equal(sorted(res.keys()), keys)
self.restart_node(0, ['-stopatheight=207', '-prune=550', '-txindex=0'])
res = self.nodes[0].getblockchaininfo()
# result should have these additional pruning keys if prune=550
assert_equal(sorted(res.keys()), sorted(['pruneheight', 'automatic_pruning', 'prune_target_size'] + keys))
# check related fields
assert res['pruned']
assert_equal(res['pruneheight'], 0)
assert res['automatic_pruning']
assert_equal(res['prune_target_size'], 576716800)
assert_greater_than(res['size_on_disk'], 0)
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
assert_equal(res['softforks'], {
'bip34': {'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 500},
'bip66': {'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 1251},
'bip65': {'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 1351},
'bip147': { 'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 432},
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
'csv': {'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 432},
'dip0001': { 'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 2000},
'dip0003': { 'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 432},
'dip0008': { 'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 432},
'dip0020': { 'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 300},
'dip0024': { 'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 900},
'realloc': { 'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 2500},
'v19': { 'type': 'buried', 'active': False, 'height': 900},
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
'v20': {
'type': 'bip9',
'bip9': {
'status': 'defined',
'start_time': 0,
'timeout': 9223372036854775807,
feat: auto generation EHF and spork+EHF activation for MN_RR (#5597) Implementation EHF mechanism, part 4. Previous changes are: - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/4577 - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5505 - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469 ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented Currently MN_RR is activated automatically by soft-fork activation after v20 is activated. It is not flexible enough, because platform may not be released by that time yet or in opposite it can be too long to wait. Also, any signal of EHF requires manual actions from MN owners to sign EHF signal - it is automated here. ## What was done? New spork `SPORK_24_MN_RR_READY`; new EHF manager that sign EHF signals semi-automatically without manual actions; and send transaction with EHF signal when signal is signed to network. Updated rpc `getblockchaininfo` to return information about of EHF activated forks. Fixed function `IsTxSafeForMining` in chainlock's handler to skip transactions without inputs (empty `vin`). ## How Has This Been Tested? Run unit/functional tests. Some tests have been updated due to new way of MN_RR activation: `feature_asset_locks.py`, `feature_mnehf.py`, `feature_llmq_evo.py` and unit test `block_reward_reallocation_tests`. ## Breaking Changes New way of MN_RR activation. ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ --------- Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 05:31:40 +02:00
'since': 0,
'ehf': False,
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
}, 'active': False},
'mn_rr': {
'type': 'bip9',
'bip9': {
'status': 'defined',
'start_time': 0,
'timeout': 9223372036854775807,
feat: auto generation EHF and spork+EHF activation for MN_RR (#5597) Implementation EHF mechanism, part 4. Previous changes are: - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/4577 - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5505 - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469 ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented Currently MN_RR is activated automatically by soft-fork activation after v20 is activated. It is not flexible enough, because platform may not be released by that time yet or in opposite it can be too long to wait. Also, any signal of EHF requires manual actions from MN owners to sign EHF signal - it is automated here. ## What was done? New spork `SPORK_24_MN_RR_READY`; new EHF manager that sign EHF signals semi-automatically without manual actions; and send transaction with EHF signal when signal is signed to network. Updated rpc `getblockchaininfo` to return information about of EHF activated forks. Fixed function `IsTxSafeForMining` in chainlock's handler to skip transactions without inputs (empty `vin`). ## How Has This Been Tested? Run unit/functional tests. Some tests have been updated due to new way of MN_RR activation: `feature_asset_locks.py`, `feature_mnehf.py`, `feature_llmq_evo.py` and unit test `block_reward_reallocation_tests`. ## Breaking Changes New way of MN_RR activation. ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ --------- Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 05:31:40 +02:00
'since': 0,
'ehf': True,
},
'active': False},
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
'testdummy': {
'type': 'bip9',
'bip9': {
'status': 'started',
'bit': 28,
'start_time': 0,
'timeout': 9223372036854775807, # testdummy does not have a timeout so is set to the max int64 value
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
'since': 144,
'statistics': {
'period': 144,
'threshold': 108,
'elapsed': 57,
'count': 57,
'possible': True,
},
'ehf': False,
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery) 8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne) 0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery) 1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery) 3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery) Pull request description: This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66. CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt. This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work ariard: ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected. MarcoFalke: ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now) Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 22:02:02 +02:00
},
'active': False},
})
def _test_getchaintxstats(self):
self.log.info("Test getchaintxstats")
# Test `getchaintxstats` invalid extra parameters
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, 'getchaintxstats', self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, 0, '', 0)
# Test `getchaintxstats` invalid `nblocks`
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "JSON value is not an integer as expected", self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, '')
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid block count: should be between 0 and the block's height - 1", self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, -1)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid block count: should be between 0 and the block's height - 1", self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, self.nodes[0].getblockcount())
# Test `getchaintxstats` invalid `blockhash`
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "JSON value is not a string as expected", self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, blockhash=0)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be of length 64 (not 1, for '0')", self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, blockhash='0')
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, blockhash='ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, blockhash='0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')
blockhash = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(200)
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(blockhash)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Block is not in main chain", self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats, blockhash=blockhash)
self.nodes[0].reconsiderblock(blockhash)
chaintxstats = self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats(nblocks=1)
# 200 txs plus genesis tx
assert_equal(chaintxstats['txcount'], 201)
2019-07-04 17:15:52 +02:00
# tx rate should be 1 per ~2.6 minutes (156 seconds), or 1/156
# we have to round because of binary math
2019-07-04 17:15:52 +02:00
assert_equal(round(chaintxstats['txrate'] * 156, 10), Decimal(1))
b1_hash = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(1)
b1 = self.nodes[0].getblock(b1_hash)
b200_hash = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(200)
b200 = self.nodes[0].getblock(b200_hash)
time_diff = b200['mediantime'] - b1['mediantime']
chaintxstats = self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats()
assert_equal(chaintxstats['time'], b200['time'])
assert_equal(chaintxstats['txcount'], 201)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['window_final_block_hash'], b200_hash)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['window_final_block_height'], 200)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['window_block_count'], 199)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['window_tx_count'], 199)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['window_interval'], time_diff)
assert_equal(round(chaintxstats['txrate'] * time_diff, 10), Decimal(199))
chaintxstats = self.nodes[0].getchaintxstats(blockhash=b1_hash)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['time'], b1['time'])
assert_equal(chaintxstats['txcount'], 2)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['window_final_block_hash'], b1_hash)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['window_final_block_height'], 1)
assert_equal(chaintxstats['window_block_count'], 0)
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
assert 'window_tx_count' not in chaintxstats
assert 'window_interval' not in chaintxstats
assert 'txrate' not in chaintxstats
def _test_gettxoutsetinfo(self):
node = self.nodes[0]
res = node.gettxoutsetinfo()
assert_equal(res['total_amount'], Decimal('98214.28571450'))
assert_equal(res['transactions'], 200)
assert_equal(res['height'], 200)
assert_equal(res['txouts'], 200)
assert_equal(res['bogosize'], 15000),
Merge #10195: Switch chainstate db and cache to per-txout model 589827975 scripted-diff: various renames for per-utxo consistency (Pieter Wuille) a5e02bc7f Increase travis unit test timeout (Pieter Wuille) 73de2c1ff Rename CCoinsCacheEntry::coins to coin (Pieter Wuille) 119e552f7 Merge CCoinsViewCache's GetOutputFor and AccessCoin (Pieter Wuille) 580b02309 [MOVEONLY] Move old CCoins class to txdb.cpp (Pieter Wuille) 8b25d2c0c Upgrade from per-tx database to per-txout (Pieter Wuille) b2af357f3 Reduce reserved memory space for flushing (Pieter Wuille) 41aa5b79a Pack Coin more tightly (Pieter Wuille) 97072d668 Remove unused CCoins methods (Pieter Wuille) ce23efaa5 Extend coins_tests (Pieter Wuille) 508307968 Switch CCoinsView and chainstate db from per-txid to per-txout (Pieter Wuille) 4ec0d9e79 Refactor GetUTXOStats in preparation for per-COutPoint iteration (Pieter Wuille) 13870b56f Replace CCoins-based CTxMemPool::pruneSpent with isSpent (Pieter Wuille) 05293f3cb Remove ModifyCoins/ModifyNewCoins (Pieter Wuille) 961e48397 Switch tests from ModifyCoins to AddCoin/SpendCoin (Pieter Wuille) 8b3868c1b Switch CScriptCheck to use Coin instead of CCoins (Pieter Wuille) c87b957a3 Only pass things committed to by tx's witness hash to CScriptCheck (Matt Corallo) f68cdfe92 Switch from per-tx to per-txout CCoinsViewCache methods in some places (Pieter Wuille) 000391132 Introduce new per-txout CCoinsViewCache functions (Pieter Wuille) bd83111a0 Optimization: Coin&& to ApplyTxInUndo (Pieter Wuille) cb2c7fdac Replace CTxInUndo with Coin (Pieter Wuille) 422634e2f Introduce Coin, a single unspent output (Pieter Wuille) 7d991b55d Store/allow tx metadata in all undo records (Pieter Wuille) c3aa0c119 Report on-disk size in gettxoutsetinfo (Pieter Wuille) d34242430 Remove/ignore tx version in utxo and undo (Pieter Wuille) 7e0032290 Add specialization of SipHash for 256 + 32 bit data (Pieter Wuille) e484652fc Introduce CHashVerifier to hash read data (Pieter Wuille) f54580e7e error() in disconnect for disk corruption, not inconsistency (Pieter Wuille) e66dbde6d Add SizeEstimate to CDBBatch (Pieter Wuille) Tree-SHA512: ce1fb1e40c77d38915cd02189fab7a8b125c7f44d425c85579d872c3bede3a437760997907c99d7b3017ced1c2de54b2ac7223d99d83a6658fe5ef61edef1de3
2017-06-02 00:47:58 +02:00
size = res['disk_size']
assert size > 6400
assert size < 64000
assert_equal(len(res['bestblock']), 64)
assert_equal(len(res['hash_serialized_2']), 64)
self.log.info("Test that gettxoutsetinfo() works for blockchain with just the genesis block")
b1hash = node.getblockhash(1)
node.invalidateblock(b1hash)
res2 = node.gettxoutsetinfo()
assert_equal(res2['transactions'], 0)
assert_equal(res2['total_amount'], Decimal('0'))
assert_equal(res2['height'], 0)
assert_equal(res2['txouts'], 0)
assert_equal(res2['bogosize'], 0),
assert_equal(res2['bestblock'], node.getblockhash(0))
Merge #10195: Switch chainstate db and cache to per-txout model 589827975 scripted-diff: various renames for per-utxo consistency (Pieter Wuille) a5e02bc7f Increase travis unit test timeout (Pieter Wuille) 73de2c1ff Rename CCoinsCacheEntry::coins to coin (Pieter Wuille) 119e552f7 Merge CCoinsViewCache's GetOutputFor and AccessCoin (Pieter Wuille) 580b02309 [MOVEONLY] Move old CCoins class to txdb.cpp (Pieter Wuille) 8b25d2c0c Upgrade from per-tx database to per-txout (Pieter Wuille) b2af357f3 Reduce reserved memory space for flushing (Pieter Wuille) 41aa5b79a Pack Coin more tightly (Pieter Wuille) 97072d668 Remove unused CCoins methods (Pieter Wuille) ce23efaa5 Extend coins_tests (Pieter Wuille) 508307968 Switch CCoinsView and chainstate db from per-txid to per-txout (Pieter Wuille) 4ec0d9e79 Refactor GetUTXOStats in preparation for per-COutPoint iteration (Pieter Wuille) 13870b56f Replace CCoins-based CTxMemPool::pruneSpent with isSpent (Pieter Wuille) 05293f3cb Remove ModifyCoins/ModifyNewCoins (Pieter Wuille) 961e48397 Switch tests from ModifyCoins to AddCoin/SpendCoin (Pieter Wuille) 8b3868c1b Switch CScriptCheck to use Coin instead of CCoins (Pieter Wuille) c87b957a3 Only pass things committed to by tx's witness hash to CScriptCheck (Matt Corallo) f68cdfe92 Switch from per-tx to per-txout CCoinsViewCache methods in some places (Pieter Wuille) 000391132 Introduce new per-txout CCoinsViewCache functions (Pieter Wuille) bd83111a0 Optimization: Coin&& to ApplyTxInUndo (Pieter Wuille) cb2c7fdac Replace CTxInUndo with Coin (Pieter Wuille) 422634e2f Introduce Coin, a single unspent output (Pieter Wuille) 7d991b55d Store/allow tx metadata in all undo records (Pieter Wuille) c3aa0c119 Report on-disk size in gettxoutsetinfo (Pieter Wuille) d34242430 Remove/ignore tx version in utxo and undo (Pieter Wuille) 7e0032290 Add specialization of SipHash for 256 + 32 bit data (Pieter Wuille) e484652fc Introduce CHashVerifier to hash read data (Pieter Wuille) f54580e7e error() in disconnect for disk corruption, not inconsistency (Pieter Wuille) e66dbde6d Add SizeEstimate to CDBBatch (Pieter Wuille) Tree-SHA512: ce1fb1e40c77d38915cd02189fab7a8b125c7f44d425c85579d872c3bede3a437760997907c99d7b3017ced1c2de54b2ac7223d99d83a6658fe5ef61edef1de3
2017-06-02 00:47:58 +02:00
assert_equal(len(res2['hash_serialized_2']), 64)
self.log.info("Test that gettxoutsetinfo() returns the same result after invalidate/reconsider block")
node.reconsiderblock(b1hash)
res3 = node.gettxoutsetinfo()
# The field 'disk_size' is non-deterministic and can thus not be
# compared between res and res3. Everything else should be the same.
del res['disk_size'], res3['disk_size']
assert_equal(res, res3)
self.log.info("Test hash_type option for gettxoutsetinfo()")
# Adding hash_type 'hash_serialized_2', which is the default, should
# not change the result.
res4 = node.gettxoutsetinfo(hash_type='hash_serialized_2')
del res4['disk_size']
assert_equal(res, res4)
# hash_type none should not return a UTXO set hash.
res5 = node.gettxoutsetinfo(hash_type='none')
assert 'hash_serialized_2' not in res5
# hash_type muhash should return a different UTXO set hash.
res6 = node.gettxoutsetinfo(hash_type='muhash')
assert 'muhash' in res6
assert(res['hash_serialized_2'] != res6['muhash'])
# muhash should not be returned unless requested.
for r in [res, res2, res3, res4, res5]:
assert 'muhash' not in r
# Unknown hash_type raises an error
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "foohash is not a valid hash_type", node.gettxoutsetinfo, "foohash")
def _test_getblockheader(self):
node = self.nodes[0]
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "hash must be of length 64 (not 8, for 'nonsense')", node.getblockheader, "nonsense")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "hash must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ7bb8b1697ea987f3b223ba7819250cae33efacb068d23dc24859824a77844')", node.getblockheader, "ZZZ7bb8b1697ea987f3b223ba7819250cae33efacb068d23dc24859824a77844")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", node.getblockheader, "0cf7bb8b1697ea987f3b223ba7819250cae33efacb068d23dc24859824a77844")
besthash = node.getbestblockhash()
secondbesthash = node.getblockhash(199)
header = node.getblockheader(blockhash=besthash)
assert_equal(header['hash'], besthash)
assert_equal(header['height'], 200)
assert_equal(header['confirmations'], 1)
assert_equal(header['previousblockhash'], secondbesthash)
assert_is_hex_string(header['chainwork'])
Merge #13451: rpc: expose CBlockIndex::nTx in getblock(header) 86edf4a2a502416ba8d6cebbce61030992f7ff6f expose CBlockIndex::nTx in getblock(header) (Gregory Sanders) Pull request description: Recent publication of a weakness in Bitcoin's merkle tree construction demonstrates many SPV applications vulnerable to an expensive to pull off yet still plausible attack: https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2018/06/09/leaf-node-weakness-in-bitcoin-merkle-tree-design/ Including the coinbase in the txoutproof seems the most effective fix, however results in a significant efficiency downgrade. Transactors will not even know a priori what the size of their proof will be within a couple orders of magnitude, unless they use the mid-state of SHA2 as detailed in the blog post. Some applications, like Elements blockchain platform that take SPV-style proofs have optional access to a bitcoind to verify these proofs of inclusion and check depth in the chain. Returning `CBlockIndex::nTx` would allow an extremely easy and compact way of checking the depth of the tree, with no additional overhead to the codebase, and works with pruned nodes. `getblockheader` is arguably not the place for it, but as mentioned before, is a natural workflow for us checking depth of a block in a possibly pruned node. We should also ensure that `verifytxoutproof` ends up validating this depth fact as well, but left this for another PR. Tree-SHA512: af4cf48e704c6088f8da06a477fda1aaa6f8770cee9b876c4465d1075966d6a95831a88817673fe5a0d6bbcdc1ffcbc1892e2be0d838c60fc6958d33eacdcc14
2018-06-14 19:38:19 +02:00
assert_equal(header['nTx'], 1)
assert_is_hash_string(header['hash'])
assert_is_hash_string(header['previousblockhash'])
assert_is_hash_string(header['merkleroot'])
assert_is_hash_string(header['bits'], length=None)
assert isinstance(header['time'], int)
assert isinstance(header['mediantime'], int)
assert isinstance(header['nonce'], int)
assert isinstance(header['version'], int)
assert isinstance(int(header['versionHex'], 16), int)
assert isinstance(header['difficulty'], Decimal)
# Test with verbose=False, which should return the header as hex.
header_hex = node.getblockheader(blockhash=besthash, verbose=False)
assert_is_hex_string(header_hex)
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22257: test: refactor: various (de)serialization helpers cleanups/improvements bdb8b9a347e68f80a2e8d44ce5590a2e8214b6bb test: doc: improve doc for `from_hex` helper (mention `to_hex` alternative) (Sebastian Falbesoner) 191405420815d49ab50184513717a303fc2744d6 scripted-diff: test: rename `FromHex` to `from_hex` (Sebastian Falbesoner) a79396fe5f8f81c78cf84117a87074c6ff6c9d95 test: remove `ToHex` helper, use .serialize().hex() instead (Sebastian Falbesoner) 2ce7b47958c4a10ba20dc86c011d71cda4b070a5 test: introduce `tx_from_hex` helper for tx deserialization (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: There are still many functional tests that perform conversions from a hex-string to a message object (deserialization) manually. This PR identifies all those instances and replaces them with a newly introduced helper `tx_from_hex`. Instances were found via * `git grep "deserialize.*BytesIO"` and some of them manually, when it were not one-liners. Further, the helper `ToHex` was removed and simply replaced by `.serialize().hex()`, since now both variants are in use (sometimes even within the same test) and using the helper doesn't really have an advantage in readability. (see discussion https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22257#discussion_r652404782) ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review re-ACK bdb8b9a347e68f80a2e8d44ce5590a2e8214b6bb 😁 Tree-SHA512: e25d7dc85918de1d6755a5cea65471b07a743204c20ad1c2f71ff07ef48cc1b9ad3fe5f515c1efaba2b2e3d89384e7980380c5d81895f9826e2046808cd3266e
2021-06-24 12:47:04 +02:00
header = from_hex(CBlockHeader(), header_hex)
header.calc_sha256()
assert_equal(header.hash, besthash)
assert 'previousblockhash' not in node.getblockheader(node.getblockhash(0))
assert 'nextblockhash' not in node.getblockheader(node.getbestblockhash())
def _test_getdifficulty(self):
difficulty = self.nodes[0].getdifficulty()
# 1 hash in 2 should be valid, so difficulty should be 1/2**31
# binary => decimal => binary math is why we do this check
assert abs(difficulty * 2**31 - 1) < 0.0001
def _test_getnetworkhashps(self):
hashes_per_second = self.nodes[0].getnetworkhashps()
# This should be 2 hashes every 2.6 minutes (156 seconds) or 1/78
assert abs(hashes_per_second * 78 - 1) < 0.0001
def _test_stopatheight(self):
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 200)
self.nodes[0].generatetoaddress(6, self.nodes[0].get_deterministic_priv_key().address)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 206)
self.log.debug('Node should not stop at this height')
Merge #10711: [tests] Introduce TestNode 789733891 [tests] Introduce TestNode (John Newbery) Pull request description: Continues #10082 TestNode is a class responsible for all state related to a bitcoind node under test. It stores local state, is responsible for tracking the bitcoind process and delegates unrecognised messages to the RPC connection. This commit changes start_nodes and stop_nodes to start and stop the bitcoind nodes in parallel, making test setup and teardown much faster. On my vm, this changeset reduces total test_runner runtime for the base set of tests (including building the cache) from 263s to 195s (a 25% speedup). Note that the time reported by test_runner does not include time spent building the cache: *with TestNode*: ``` → date +"%T" ; ./test_runner.py -q ; date +"%T" 12:48:04 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. TEST | STATUS | DURATION abandonconflict.py | ✓ Passed | 12 s bip68-112-113-p2p.py | ✓ Passed | 19 s blockchain.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s bumpfee.py | ✓ Passed | 13 s decodescript.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s disablewallet.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s disconnect_ban.py | ✓ Passed | 6 s fundrawtransaction.py | ✓ Passed | 37 s getchaintips.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s httpbasics.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s import-rescan.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s importmulti.py | ✓ Passed | 6 s importprunedfunds.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s invalidblockrequest.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s invalidtxrequest.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s keypool.py | ✓ Passed | 7 s listsinceblock.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s listtransactions.py | ✓ Passed | 33 s mempool_limit.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s mempool_persist.py | ✓ Passed | 15 s mempool_reorg.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s mempool_resurrect_test.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s mempool_spendcoinbase.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s merkle_blocks.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s multi_rpc.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s net.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s nulldummy.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s p2p-compactblocks.py | ✓ Passed | 28 s p2p-fullblocktest.py | ✓ Passed | 126 s p2p-leaktests.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s p2p-mempool.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s p2p-segwit.py | ✓ Passed | 59 s p2p-versionbits-warning.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s preciousblock.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s prioritise_transaction.py | ✓ Passed | 5 s proxy_test.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s rawtransactions.py | ✓ Passed | 9 s receivedby.py | ✓ Passed | 19 s reindex.py | ✓ Passed | 12 s rest.py | ✓ Passed | 9 s rpcnamedargs.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s segwit.py | ✓ Passed | 7 s sendheaders.py | ✓ Passed | 24 s signmessages.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s signrawtransactions.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s txn_clone.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s txn_doublespend.py --mineblock | ✓ Passed | 4 s uptime.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s wallet-accounts.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s wallet-dump.py | ✓ Passed | 7 s wallet-encryption.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s wallet-hd.py | ✓ Passed | 15 s wallet.py | ✓ Passed | 31 s walletbackup.py | ✓ Passed | 104 s zapwallettxes.py | ✓ Passed | 9 s zmq_test.py | ○ Skipped | 0 s ALL | ✓ Passed | 735 s (accumulated) Runtime: 189 s 12:51:19 ``` *master*: ``` → date +"%T" ; ./test_runner.py -q ; date +"%T" 12:40:13 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... TEST | STATUS | DURATION abandonconflict.py | ✓ Passed | 15 s bip68-112-113-p2p.py | ✓ Passed | 19 s blockchain.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s bumpfee.py | ✓ Passed | 20 s decodescript.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s disablewallet.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s disconnect_ban.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s fundrawtransaction.py | ✓ Passed | 36 s getchaintips.py | ✓ Passed | 11 s httpbasics.py | ✓ Passed | 7 s import-rescan.py | ✓ Passed | 16 s importmulti.py | ✓ Passed | 10 s importprunedfunds.py | ✓ Passed | 5 s invalidblockrequest.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s invalidtxrequest.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s keypool.py | ✓ Passed | 7 s listsinceblock.py | ✓ Passed | 11 s listtransactions.py | ✓ Passed | 37 s mempool_limit.py | ✓ Passed | 4 s mempool_persist.py | ✓ Passed | 23 s mempool_reorg.py | ✓ Passed | 7 s mempool_resurrect_test.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s mempool_spendcoinbase.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s merkle_blocks.py | ✓ Passed | 10 s multi_rpc.py | ✓ Passed | 6 s net.py | ✓ Passed | 6 s nulldummy.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s p2p-compactblocks.py | ✓ Passed | 30 s p2p-fullblocktest.py | ✓ Passed | 126 s p2p-leaktests.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s p2p-mempool.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s p2p-segwit.py | ✓ Passed | 62 s p2p-versionbits-warning.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s preciousblock.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s prioritise_transaction.py | ✓ Passed | 7 s proxy_test.py | ✓ Passed | 10 s rawtransactions.py | ✓ Passed | 15 s receivedby.py | ✓ Passed | 28 s reindex.py | ✓ Passed | 12 s rest.py | ✓ Passed | 12 s rpcnamedargs.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s segwit.py | ✓ Passed | 12 s sendheaders.py | ✓ Passed | 26 s signmessages.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s signrawtransactions.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s txn_clone.py | ✓ Passed | 10 s txn_doublespend.py --mineblock | ✓ Passed | 10 s uptime.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s wallet-accounts.py | ✓ Passed | 3 s wallet-dump.py | ✓ Passed | 6 s wallet-encryption.py | ✓ Passed | 8 s wallet-hd.py | ✓ Passed | 18 s wallet.py | ✓ Passed | 69 s walletbackup.py | ✓ Passed | 130 s zapwallettxes.py | ✓ Passed | 15 s zmq_test.py | ○ Skipped | 0 s ALL | ✓ Passed | 936 s (accumulated) Runtime: 242 s 12:44:36 ``` Tree-SHA512: 6dfc4c11fd0caf7de6954c93679cf22c3df0acc6f432e616d1151062a61f456faa8ae2fe670b427868af55bb564802df84c8fd76e90b4b338750dbc23f46ad88
2017-08-15 23:34:07 +02:00
assert_raises(subprocess.TimeoutExpired, lambda: self.nodes[0].process.wait(timeout=3))
try:
self.nodes[0].generatetoaddress(1, self.nodes[0].get_deterministic_priv_key().address)
except (ConnectionError, http.client.BadStatusLine):
pass # The node already shut down before response
self.log.debug('Node should stop at this height...')
self.nodes[0].wait_until_stopped()
self.start_node(0, ['-txindex=0'])
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 207)
def _test_waitforblockheight(self):
self.log.info("Test waitforblockheight")
node = self.nodes[0]
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
peer = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
current_height = node.getblock(node.getbestblockhash())['height']
# Create a fork somewhere below our current height, invalidate the tip
# of that fork, and then ensure that waitforblockheight still
# works as expected.
#
# (Previously this was broken based on setting
# `rpc/blockchain.cpp:latestblock` incorrectly.)
#
b20hash = node.getblockhash(20)
b20 = node.getblock(b20hash)
def solve_and_send_block(prevhash, height, time):
b = create_block(prevhash, create_coinbase(height), time)
b.solve()
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-25 14:18:21 +02:00
peer.send_and_ping(msg_block(b))
return b
b21f = solve_and_send_block(int(b20hash, 16), 21, b20['time'] + 1)
b22f = solve_and_send_block(b21f.sha256, 22, b21f.nTime + 1)
node.invalidateblock(b22f.hash)
def assert_waitforheight(height, timeout=2):
assert_equal(
node.waitforblockheight(height=height, timeout=timeout)['height'],
current_height)
assert_waitforheight(0)
assert_waitforheight(current_height - 1)
assert_waitforheight(current_height)
assert_waitforheight(current_height + 1)
def _test_getblock(self):
node = self.nodes[0]
miniwallet = MiniWallet(node)
miniwallet.generate(5)
node.generate(100)
fee_per_byte = Decimal('0.00000010')
fee_per_kb = 1000 * fee_per_byte
miniwallet.send_self_transfer(fee_rate=fee_per_kb, from_node=node)
blockhash = node.generate(1)[0]
self.log.info("Test that getblock with verbosity 1 doesn't include fee")
block = node.getblock(blockhash, 1)
assert 'fee' not in block['tx'][1]
self.log.info('Test that getblock with verbosity 2 includes expected fee')
block = node.getblock(blockhash, 2)
tx = block['tx'][1]
assert 'fee' in tx
assert_equal(tx['fee'], tx['size'] * fee_per_byte)
self.log.info("Test that getblock with verbosity 2 still works with pruned Undo data")
datadir = get_datadir_path(self.options.tmpdir, 0)
def move_block_file(old, new):
old_path = os.path.join(datadir, self.chain, 'blocks', old)
new_path = os.path.join(datadir, self.chain, 'blocks', new)
os.rename(old_path, new_path)
# Move instead of deleting so we can restore chain state afterwards
move_block_file('rev00000.dat', 'rev_wrong')
block = node.getblock(blockhash, 2)
assert 'fee' not in block['tx'][1]
# Restore chain state
move_block_file('rev_wrong', 'rev00000.dat')
if __name__ == '__main__':
BlockchainTest().main()