dash/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py

193 lines
6.6 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2015-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
Backports 0.15 pr2 (#2597) * Merge #9815: Trivial: use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers a87d02a use EXIT_ codes instead of magic numbers (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9801: Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction eaea2bb Removed redundant parameter from mempool.PrioritiseTransaction (gubatron) * remove extra parameter (see 3a3745bb) in dash specific code * Merge #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates bc8fd12 Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (Alex Morcos) * Merge #9766: Add --exclude option to rpc-tests.py c578408 Add exclude option to rpc-tests.py (John Newbery) * Merge #9577: Fix docstrings in qa tests 3f95a80 Fix docstrings in qa tests (John Newbery) * Merge #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests 3333ad0 qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (MarcoFalke) * Merge #9833: Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 ef9f495 Trivial: fix comments referencing AppInit2 (Marko Bencun) * Merge #9612: [trivial] Rephrase the definition of difficulty. dc222f8 Trivial: Rephrase the definition of difficulty in the code. (Karl-Johan Alm) * Merge #9847: Extra test vector for BIP32 30aedcb BIP32 extra test vector (Pieter Wuille) * Merge #9839: [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable 864890a [qa] Make import-rescan.py watchonly check reliable (Russell Yanofsky) Tree-SHA512: ea0e2b1d4fc8f35174c3d575fb751b428daf6ad3aa944fad4e3ddcc9195e4f17051473acabc54203b1d27cca64cf911b737ab92e986c40ef384410652e2dbea1 * Change back file params
2019-01-07 10:55:35 +01:00
"""Utilities for manipulating blocks and transactions."""
from .messages import (
CBlock,
CCbTx,
COIN,
COutPoint,
CTransaction,
CTxIn,
CTxOut,
ser_string,
)
from .script import CScript, OP_TRUE, OP_CHECKSIG
Merge #13669: Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations 44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott) 736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott) 157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott) Pull request description: There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other. This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149) 1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey 2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx 2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there. Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output. Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
2018-08-09 18:09:27 +02:00
from .util import assert_equal, hex_str_to_bytes
from io import BytesIO
def create_block(hashprev, coinbase, ntime=None):
"""Create a block (with regtest difficulty)."""
block = CBlock()
if ntime is None:
import time
block.nTime = int(time.time() + 600)
else:
block.nTime = ntime
block.hashPrevBlock = hashprev
block.nBits = 0x207fffff # difficulty retargeting is disabled in REGTEST chainparams
block.vtx.append(coinbase)
block.hashMerkleRoot = block.calc_merkle_root()
block.calc_sha256()
return block
def serialize_script_num(value):
r = bytearray(0)
if value == 0:
return r
neg = value < 0
absvalue = -value if neg else value
while (absvalue):
r.append(int(absvalue & 0xff))
absvalue >>= 8
if r[-1] & 0x80:
r.append(0x80 if neg else 0)
elif neg:
r[-1] |= 0x80
return r
def create_coinbase(height, pubkey=None, dip4_activated=False):
"""Create a coinbase transaction, assuming no miner fees.
If pubkey is passed in, the coinbase output will be a P2PK output;
otherwise an anyone-can-spend output."""
coinbase = CTransaction()
coinbase.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(0, 0xffffffff),
ser_string(serialize_script_num(height)), 0xffffffff))
coinbaseoutput = CTxOut()
coinbaseoutput.nValue = 500 * COIN
halvings = int(height / 150) # regtest
coinbaseoutput.nValue >>= halvings
if (pubkey is not None):
2015-08-05 23:47:34 +02:00
coinbaseoutput.scriptPubKey = CScript([pubkey, OP_CHECKSIG])
else:
coinbaseoutput.scriptPubKey = CScript([OP_TRUE])
coinbase.vout = [coinbaseoutput]
if dip4_activated:
coinbase.nVersion = 3
coinbase.nType = 5
cbtx_payload = CCbTx(2, height, 0, 0)
coinbase.vExtraPayload = cbtx_payload.serialize()
coinbase.calc_sha256()
return coinbase
Merge #13669: Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations 44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott) 736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott) 157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott) Pull request description: There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other. This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149) 1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey 2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx 2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there. Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output. Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
2018-08-09 18:09:27 +02:00
def create_tx_with_script(prevtx, n, script_sig=b"", amount=1, script_pub_key=CScript()):
"""Return one-input, one-output transaction object
spending the prevtx's n-th output with the given amount.
Can optionally pass scriptPubKey and scriptSig, default is anyone-can-spend output.
Merge #13669: Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations 44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott) 736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott) 157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott) Pull request description: There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other. This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149) 1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey 2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx 2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there. Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output. Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
2018-08-09 18:09:27 +02:00
"""
tx = CTransaction()
2021-08-27 21:03:02 +02:00
assert n < len(prevtx.vout)
Merge #13669: Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations 44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott) 736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott) 157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott) Pull request description: There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other. This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149) 1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey 2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx 2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there. Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output. Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
2018-08-09 18:09:27 +02:00
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(prevtx.sha256, n), script_sig, 0xffffffff))
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(amount, script_pub_key))
tx.calc_sha256()
return tx
Merge #13669: Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations 44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott) 736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott) 157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott) Pull request description: There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other. This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149) 1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey 2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx 2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there. Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output. Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
2018-08-09 18:09:27 +02:00
def create_transaction(node, txid, to_address, amount):
""" Return signed transaction spending the first output of the
input txid. Note that the node must be able to sign for the
output that is being spent, and the node must not be running
multiple wallets.
"""
raw_tx = create_raw_transaction(node, txid, to_address, amount)
tx = CTransaction()
tx.deserialize(BytesIO(hex_str_to_bytes(raw_tx)))
return tx
def create_raw_transaction(node, txid, to_address, amount):
""" Return raw signed transaction spending the first output of the
input txid. Note that the node must be able to sign for the
output that is being spent, and the node must not be running
multiple wallets.
"""
inputs = [{"txid": txid, "vout": 0}]
outputs = {to_address: amount}
rawtx = node.createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
signresult = node.signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx)
assert_equal(signresult["complete"], True)
return signresult['hex']
def get_legacy_sigopcount_block(block, accurate=True):
count = 0
for tx in block.vtx:
count += get_legacy_sigopcount_tx(tx, accurate)
return count
def get_legacy_sigopcount_tx(tx, accurate=True):
count = 0
for i in tx.vout:
count += i.scriptPubKey.GetSigOpCount(accurate)
for j in tx.vin:
# scriptSig might be of type bytes, so convert to CScript for the moment
count += CScript(j.scriptSig).GetSigOpCount(accurate)
return count
# Identical to GetMasternodePayment in C++ code
def get_masternode_payment(nHeight, blockValue, nReallocActivationHeight):
ret = int(blockValue / 5)
nMNPIBlock = 350
nMNPIPeriod = 10
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock:
ret += int(blockValue / 20)
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock+(nMNPIPeriod* 1):
ret += int(blockValue / 20)
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock+(nMNPIPeriod* 2):
ret += int(blockValue / 20)
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock+(nMNPIPeriod* 3):
ret += int(blockValue / 40)
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock+(nMNPIPeriod* 4):
ret += int(blockValue / 40)
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock+(nMNPIPeriod* 5):
ret += int(blockValue / 40)
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock+(nMNPIPeriod* 6):
ret += int(blockValue / 40)
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock+(nMNPIPeriod* 7):
ret += int(blockValue / 40)
if nHeight > nMNPIBlock+(nMNPIPeriod* 9):
ret += int(blockValue / 40)
if nHeight < nReallocActivationHeight:
# Block Reward Realocation is not activated yet, nothing to do
return ret
nSuperblockCycle = 10
# Actual realocation starts in the cycle next to one activation happens in
nReallocStart = nReallocActivationHeight - nReallocActivationHeight % nSuperblockCycle + nSuperblockCycle
if nHeight < nReallocStart:
# Activated but we have to wait for the next cycle to start realocation, nothing to do
return ret
# Periods used to reallocate the masternode reward from 50% to 60%
vecPeriods = [
513, # Period 1: 51.3%
526, # Period 2: 52.6%
533, # Period 3: 53.3%
540, # Period 4: 54%
546, # Period 5: 54.6%
552, # Period 6: 55.2%
557, # Period 7: 55.7%
562, # Period 8: 56.2%
567, # Period 9: 56.7%
572, # Period 10: 57.2%
577, # Period 11: 57.7%
582, # Period 12: 58.2%
585, # Period 13: 58.5%
588, # Period 14: 58.8%
591, # Period 15: 59.1%
594, # Period 16: 59.4%
597, # Period 17: 59.7%
599, # Period 18: 59.9%
600 # Period 19: 60%
]
nReallocCycle = nSuperblockCycle * 3
nCurrentPeriod = min(int((nHeight - nReallocStart) / nReallocCycle), len(vecPeriods) - 1)
return int(blockValue * vecPeriods[nCurrentPeriod] / 1000)