mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-25 12:02:48 +01:00
Merge #13783: validation: Pass tx pool reference into CheckSequenceLocks
fa511e8dad Pass tx pool reference into CheckSequenceLocks (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: `CheckSequenceLocks` is called from ATMP and the member function `CTxMemPool::removeForReorg` without passing in the tx pool object that is used in those function's scope and instead using the global `::mempool` instance. This fix should be refactoring only, since currently there is only one (global) tx pool in normal operation. Though, it fixes hard to track down issues in future settings where more than one mempool exists at a time. (E.g. for tests, rpc or p2p tx relay purposes) Tree-SHA512: f0804588c7d29bb6ff05ec14f22a16422b89ab31ae714f38cd07f811d7dc7907bfd14e799c4c1c3121144ff22711019bbe9212b39e2fd4531936a4119950fa49
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e0fdc7321
commit
14af9c67b6
@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ static CBlockIndex CreateBlockIndex(int nHeight)
|
||||
|
||||
static bool TestSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(mempool.cs);
|
||||
return CheckSequenceLocks(tx, flags);
|
||||
LOCK(::mempool.cs);
|
||||
return CheckSequenceLocks(::mempool, tx, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Test suite for ancestor feerate transaction selection.
|
||||
|
@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ void CTxMemPool::removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache *pcoins, unsigned int nMem
|
||||
const CTransaction& tx = it->GetTx();
|
||||
LockPoints lp = it->GetLockPoints();
|
||||
bool validLP = TestLockPointValidity(&lp);
|
||||
if (!CheckFinalTx(tx, flags) || !CheckSequenceLocks(tx, flags, &lp, validLP)) {
|
||||
if (!CheckFinalTx(tx, flags) || !CheckSequenceLocks(*this, tx, flags, &lp, validLP)) {
|
||||
// Note if CheckSequenceLocks fails the LockPoints may still be invalid
|
||||
// So it's critical that we remove the tx and not depend on the LockPoints.
|
||||
txToRemove.insert(it);
|
||||
|
@ -379,10 +379,10 @@ bool TestLockPointValidity(const LockPoints* lp)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags, LockPoints* lp, bool useExistingLockPoints)
|
||||
bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTxMemPool& pool, const CTransaction& tx, int flags, LockPoints* lp, bool useExistingLockPoints)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
|
||||
AssertLockHeld(mempool.cs);
|
||||
AssertLockHeld(pool.cs);
|
||||
|
||||
CBlockIndex* tip = chainActive.Tip();
|
||||
assert(tip != nullptr);
|
||||
@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags, LockPoints* lp, bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
// pcoinsTip contains the UTXO set for chainActive.Tip()
|
||||
CCoinsViewMemPool viewMemPool(pcoinsTip.get(), mempool);
|
||||
CCoinsViewMemPool viewMemPool(pcoinsTip.get(), pool);
|
||||
std::vector<int> prevheights;
|
||||
prevheights.resize(tx.vin.size());
|
||||
for (size_t txinIndex = 0; txinIndex < tx.vin.size(); txinIndex++) {
|
||||
@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
|
||||
// be mined yet.
|
||||
// Must keep pool.cs for this unless we change CheckSequenceLocks to take a
|
||||
// CoinsViewCache instead of create its own
|
||||
if (!CheckSequenceLocks(tx, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS, &lp))
|
||||
if (!CheckSequenceLocks(pool, tx, STANDARD_LOCKTIME_VERIFY_FLAGS, &lp))
|
||||
return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "non-BIP68-final");
|
||||
|
||||
CAmount nFees = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ bool TestLockPointValidity(const LockPoints* lp) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_mai
|
||||
*
|
||||
* See consensus/consensus.h for flag definitions.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags, LockPoints* lp = nullptr, bool useExistingLockPoints = false) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
|
||||
bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTxMemPool& pool, const CTransaction& tx, int flags, LockPoints* lp = nullptr, bool useExistingLockPoints = false) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Closure representing one script verification
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user