From 1621696a6f6b59fb584e9203e6806e935f507b80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kittywhiskers Van Gogh <63189531+kwvg@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:26:16 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] log: restore `LogPrintLevel` messages from prior backports

---
 src/net_processing.cpp        | 14 +++++++-------
 src/node/txreconciliation.cpp |  7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index e66e7e11ee..187d70c79c 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -3763,19 +3763,19 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(
     // from switching announcement protocols after the connection is up.
     if (msg_type == NetMsgType::SENDTXRCNCL) {
         if (!m_txreconciliation) {
-            LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sendtxrcncl from peer=%d ignored, as our node does not have txreconciliation enabled\n", pfrom.GetId());
+            LogPrintLevel(BCLog::NET, BCLog::Level::Debug, "sendtxrcncl from peer=%d ignored, as our node does not have txreconciliation enabled\n", pfrom.GetId());
             return;
         }
 
         if (pfrom.fSuccessfullyConnected) {
-            LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sendtxrcncl received after verack from peer=%d; disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
+            LogPrintLevel(BCLog::NET, BCLog::Level::Debug, "sendtxrcncl received after verack from peer=%d; disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
             pfrom.fDisconnect = true;
             return;
         }
 
         // Peer must not offer us reconciliations if we specified no tx relay support in VERSION.
         if (RejectIncomingTxs(pfrom)) {
-            LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sendtxrcncl received from peer=%d to which we indicated no tx relay; disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
+            LogPrintLevel(BCLog::NET, BCLog::Level::Debug, "sendtxrcncl received from peer=%d to which we indicated no tx relay; disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
             pfrom.fDisconnect = true;
             return;
         }
@@ -3784,7 +3784,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(
         // This flag might also be false in other cases, but the RejectIncomingTxs check above
         // eliminates them, so that this flag fully represents what we are looking for.
         if (!pfrom.m_relays_txs) {
-            LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sendtxrcncl received from peer=%d which indicated no tx relay to us; disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
+            LogPrintLevel(BCLog::NET, BCLog::Level::Debug, "sendtxrcncl received from peer=%d which indicated no tx relay to us; disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
             pfrom.fDisconnect = true;
             return;
         }
@@ -3797,16 +3797,16 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(
                                                                                      peer_txreconcl_version, remote_salt);
         switch (result) {
         case ReconciliationRegisterResult::NOT_FOUND:
-            LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Ignore unexpected txreconciliation signal from peer=%d\n", pfrom.GetId());
+            LogPrintLevel(BCLog::NET, BCLog::Level::Debug, "Ignore unexpected txreconciliation signal from peer=%d\n", pfrom.GetId());
             break;
         case ReconciliationRegisterResult::SUCCESS:
             break;
         case ReconciliationRegisterResult::ALREADY_REGISTERED:
-            LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "txreconciliation protocol violation from peer=%d (sendtxrcncl received from already registered peer); disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
+            LogPrintLevel(BCLog::NET, BCLog::Level::Debug, "txreconciliation protocol violation from peer=%d (sendtxrcncl received from already registered peer); disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
             pfrom.fDisconnect = true;
             return;
         case ReconciliationRegisterResult::PROTOCOL_VIOLATION:
-            LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "txreconciliation protocol violation from peer=%d; disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
+            LogPrintLevel(BCLog::NET, BCLog::Level::Debug, "txreconciliation protocol violation from peer=%d; disconnecting\n", pfrom.GetId());
             pfrom.fDisconnect = true;
             return;
         }
diff --git a/src/node/txreconciliation.cpp b/src/node/txreconciliation.cpp
index 8d23c85a9a..03d4258a84 100644
--- a/src/node/txreconciliation.cpp
+++ b/src/node/txreconciliation.cpp
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ public:
         AssertLockNotHeld(m_txreconciliation_mutex);
         LOCK(m_txreconciliation_mutex);
 
-        LogPrint(BCLog::TXRECONCILIATION, "Pre-register peer=%d\n", peer_id);
+        LogPrintLevel(BCLog::TXRECONCILIATION, BCLog::Level::Debug, "Pre-register peer=%d\n", peer_id);
         const uint64_t local_salt{GetRand(UINT64_MAX)};
 
         // We do this exactly once per peer (which are unique by NodeId, see GetNewNodeId) so it's
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ public:
         // v1 is the lowest version, so suggesting something below must be a protocol violation.
         if (recon_version < 1) return ReconciliationRegisterResult::PROTOCOL_VIOLATION;
 
-        LogPrint(BCLog::TXRECONCILIATION, "Register peer=%d (inbound=%i)\n", peer_id, is_peer_inbound);
+        LogPrintLevel(BCLog::TXRECONCILIATION, BCLog::Level::Debug, "Register peer=%d (inbound=%i)\n",
+                      peer_id, is_peer_inbound);
 
         const uint256 full_salt{ComputeSalt(local_salt, remote_salt)};
         recon_state->second = TxReconciliationState(!is_peer_inbound, full_salt.GetUint64(0), full_salt.GetUint64(1));
@@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ public:
         AssertLockNotHeld(m_txreconciliation_mutex);
         LOCK(m_txreconciliation_mutex);
         if (m_states.erase(peer_id)) {
-            LogPrint(BCLog::TXRECONCILIATION, "Forget txreconciliation state of peer=%d\n", peer_id);
+            LogPrintLevel(BCLog::TXRECONCILIATION, BCLog::Level::Debug, "Forget txreconciliation state of peer=%d\n", peer_id);
         }
     }