mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 12:32:48 +01:00
Merge #10942: Eliminate fee overpaying edge case when subtracting fee from recipients
49d903e
Eliminate fee overpaying edge case when subtracting fee from recipients (Alex Morcos)
Pull request description:
I'm not sure if this is the cause of the issue in #10034 , but this was a known edge case. I just didn't realize how simple the fix is.
Could use a couple more eyes to make sure nothing silly can go wrong here, but if we all agree it's this simple, we can add this as another 0.15 bug fix.
Tree-SHA512: db1dd1e83363a3c231267b626d3a388893ee70ba1972056fe2c339c5c9e4fbfd30f7fe837c30cc7be884d454797fd4c619b9d631a8d5eeb55cdb07402a83acb3
This commit is contained in:
commit
2e857bb619
@ -2789,10 +2789,6 @@ bool CWallet::CreateTransaction(const std::vector<CRecipient>& vecSend, CWalletT
|
||||
// selected to meet nFeeNeeded result in a transaction that
|
||||
// requires less fee than the prior iteration.
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: The case where nSubtractFeeFromAmount > 0 remains
|
||||
// to be addressed because it requires returning the fee to
|
||||
// the payees and not the change output.
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have no change and a big enough excess fee, then
|
||||
// try to construct transaction again only without picking
|
||||
// new inputs. We now know we only need the smaller fee
|
||||
@ -2819,6 +2815,8 @@ bool CWallet::CreateTransaction(const std::vector<CRecipient>& vecSend, CWalletT
|
||||
else if (!pick_new_inputs) {
|
||||
// This shouldn't happen, we should have had enough excess
|
||||
// fee to pay for the new output and still meet nFeeNeeded
|
||||
// Or we should have just subtracted fee from recipients and
|
||||
// nFeeNeeded should not have changed
|
||||
strFailReason = _("Transaction fee and change calculation failed");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2835,6 +2833,12 @@ bool CWallet::CreateTransaction(const std::vector<CRecipient>& vecSend, CWalletT
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If subtracting fee from recipients, we now know what fee we
|
||||
// need to subtract, we have no reason to reselect inputs
|
||||
if (nSubtractFeeFromAmount > 0) {
|
||||
pick_new_inputs = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Include more fee and try again.
|
||||
nFeeRet = nFeeNeeded;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user