mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-25 03:52:49 +01:00
Merge #6086: backport: bitcoin/bitcoin#27610: Improve performance of p2p inv to send queues
489b44c647
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27610: Improve performance of p2p inv to send queues (fanquake) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented Couple of performance improvements when draining the inventory-to-send queue: * drop txs that have already been evicted from the mempool (or included in a block) immediately, rather than at the end of processing * marginally increase outgoing trickle rate during spikes in tx volume ## What was done? Backport bitcoin#27610 ## How Has This Been Tested? Run unit/functional tests ## Breaking Changes N/A ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK489b44c647
PastaPastaPasta: utACK489b44c647
Tree-SHA512: 4afca4705b0f9680d147f0bef006fb82a6fd9692fef898dd50aede8570d02b6fece367ec30ab2caa973279df28d90348006a1f78b550dd8b0f7e72dbcb1bba5b
This commit is contained in:
commit
3e342d797e
@ -5736,7 +5736,10 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
|
|||||||
// No reason to drain out at many times the network's capacity,
|
// No reason to drain out at many times the network's capacity,
|
||||||
// especially since we have many peers and some will draw much shorter delays.
|
// especially since we have many peers and some will draw much shorter delays.
|
||||||
unsigned int nRelayedTransactions = 0;
|
unsigned int nRelayedTransactions = 0;
|
||||||
while (!vInvTx.empty() && nRelayedTransactions < INVENTORY_BROADCAST_MAX_PER_1MB_BLOCK * MaxBlockSize() / 1000000) {
|
size_t broadcast_max{INVENTORY_BROADCAST_MAX_PER_1MB_BLOCK * MaxBlockSize() / 1000000 + (peer->m_tx_relay->m_tx_inventory_to_send.size()/1000)*5};
|
||||||
|
broadcast_max = std::min<size_t>(1000, broadcast_max);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
while (!vInvTx.empty() && nRelayedTransactions < broadcast_max) {
|
||||||
// Fetch the top element from the heap
|
// Fetch the top element from the heap
|
||||||
std::pop_heap(vInvTx.begin(), vInvTx.end(), compareInvMempoolOrder);
|
std::pop_heap(vInvTx.begin(), vInvTx.end(), compareInvMempoolOrder);
|
||||||
std::set<uint256>::iterator it = vInvTx.back();
|
std::set<uint256>::iterator it = vInvTx.back();
|
||||||
|
@ -1171,11 +1171,16 @@ void CTxMemPool::check(CChainState& active_chainstate) const
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
bool CTxMemPool::CompareDepthAndScore(const uint256& hasha, const uint256& hashb)
|
bool CTxMemPool::CompareDepthAndScore(const uint256& hasha, const uint256& hashb)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
/* Return `true` if hasha should be considered sooner than hashb. Namely when:
|
||||||
|
* a is not in the mempool, but b is
|
||||||
|
* both are in the mempool and a has fewer ancestors than b
|
||||||
|
* both are in the mempool and a has a higher score than b
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
LOCK(cs);
|
LOCK(cs);
|
||||||
indexed_transaction_set::const_iterator i = mapTx.find(hasha);
|
|
||||||
if (i == mapTx.end()) return false;
|
|
||||||
indexed_transaction_set::const_iterator j = mapTx.find(hashb);
|
indexed_transaction_set::const_iterator j = mapTx.find(hashb);
|
||||||
if (j == mapTx.end()) return true;
|
if (j == mapTx.end()) return false;
|
||||||
|
indexed_transaction_set::const_iterator i = mapTx.find(hasha);
|
||||||
|
if (i == mapTx.end()) return true;
|
||||||
uint64_t counta = i->GetCountWithAncestors();
|
uint64_t counta = i->GetCountWithAncestors();
|
||||||
uint64_t countb = j->GetCountWithAncestors();
|
uint64_t countb = j->GetCountWithAncestors();
|
||||||
if (counta == countb) {
|
if (counta == countb) {
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user