From 52de8b11d57c01e5e876cc65516310c6dd0a7c3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: MarcoFalke Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 20:18:30 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Merge #10255: [test] Add test for listaddressgroupings dadfee3 [test] Add test for listaddressgroupings (Jimmy Song) Tree-SHA512: 21cf0233c7fcf585f9a31306612ae1113ea916d2972b834efef0cb2154bd4dd24d9746d0632c778c699328f7e7a336d2da6e2bac9f0fb657c30290757563ad22 --- test/functional/wallet-accounts.py | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/functional/wallet-accounts.py b/test/functional/wallet-accounts.py index 1a97403fdb..50f852b2f2 100755 --- a/test/functional/wallet-accounts.py +++ b/test/functional/wallet-accounts.py @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ RPCs tested are: - getaccountaddress - getaddressesbyaccount + - listaddressgroupings - setaccount - sendfrom (with account arguments) - move (with account arguments) @@ -26,16 +27,57 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): self.num_nodes = 1 self.extra_args = [[]] - def run_test (self): + def run_test(self): node = self.nodes[0] # Check that there's no UTXO on any of the nodes assert_equal(len(node.listunspent()), 0) - + + # Note each time we call generate, all generated coins go into + # the same address, so we call twice to get two addresses w/50 each + node.generate(1) node.generate(101) - - assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 500) - - accounts = ["a","b","c","d","e"] + assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 1000) + + # there should be 2 address groups + # each with 1 address with a balance of 500 Dash + address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings() + assert_equal(len(address_groups), 2) + # the addresses aren't linked now, but will be after we send to the + # common address + linked_addresses = set() + for address_group in address_groups: + assert_equal(len(address_group), 1) + assert_equal(len(address_group[0]), 2) + assert_equal(address_group[0][1], 500) + linked_addresses.add(address_group[0][0]) + + # send 500 from each address to a third address not in this wallet + # There's some fee that will come back to us when the miner reward + # matures. + common_address = "msf4WtN1YQKXvNtvdFYt9JBnUD2FB41kjr" + txid = node.sendmany( + fromaccount="", + amounts={common_address: 100}, + subtractfeefrom=[common_address], + minconf=1, + ) + tx_details = node.gettransaction(txid) + fee = -tx_details['details'][0]['fee'] + # there should be 1 address group, with the previously + # unlinked addresses now linked (they both have 0 balance) + address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings() + assert_equal(len(address_groups), 1) + assert_equal(len(address_groups[0]), 2) + assert_equal(set([a[0] for a in address_groups[0]]), linked_addresses) + assert_equal([a[1] for a in address_groups[0]], [0, 0]) + + node.generate(1) + + # we want to reset so that the "" account has what's expected. + # otherwise we're off by exactly the fee amount as that's mined + # and matures in the next 100 blocks + node.sendfrom("", common_address, fee) + accounts = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"] amount_to_send = 1.0 account_addresses = dict() for account in accounts: @@ -52,7 +94,7 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): for i in range(len(accounts)): from_account = accounts[i] - to_account = accounts[(i+1)%len(accounts)] + to_account = accounts[(i+1) % len(accounts)] to_address = account_addresses[to_account] node.sendfrom(from_account, to_address, amount_to_send) @@ -63,7 +105,7 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert(address != account_addresses[account]) assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account), 2) node.move(account, "", node.getbalance(account)) - + node.generate(101) expected_account_balances = {"": 52000} @@ -93,4 +135,4 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework): assert_equal(node.getbalance(account), 50) if __name__ == '__main__': - WalletAccountsTest().main () + WalletAccountsTest().main()