Merge #20616: Check CJDNS address is valid

f7264fff0a098f8b6354c7373b8790791c25dd07 Check if Cjdns address is valid (Lucas Ontivero)

Pull request description:

  CJDNS addresses start with 0xFC and for that reason if a netaddr was unserialized with network type cjdns but its address prefix is not 0xFC then that netaddr should be considered invalid.

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK f7264fff0a098f8b6354c7373b8790791c25dd07
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK f7264fff0a098f8b6354c7373b8790791c25dd07: patch looks correct
  theStack:
    ACK f7264fff0a098f8b6354c7373b8790791c25dd07 ✔️

Tree-SHA512: 5300df2ffbbd69c40271b6d8df96cca98eb3e1ee76aba62c9c76025d083788ab1f1332775890c63b06e02ca593863a867cd53956bce5962383e8450487898669
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan 2020-12-15 17:51:35 +01:00 committed by pasta
parent 9ff3643bfa
commit 5ff3dd1b34
2 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -436,6 +436,11 @@ bool CNetAddr::IsValid() const
return false; return false;
} }
// CJDNS addresses always start with 0xfc
if (IsCJDNS() && (m_addr[0] != 0xFC)) {
return false;
}
// documentation IPv6 address // documentation IPv6 address
if (IsRFC3849()) if (IsRFC3849())
return false; return false;

View File

@ -549,6 +549,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cnetaddr_unserialize_v2)
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(addr.ToString(), "fc00:1:2:3:4:5:6:7"); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(addr.ToString(), "fc00:1:2:3:4:5:6:7");
BOOST_REQUIRE(s.empty()); BOOST_REQUIRE(s.empty());
// Invalid CJDNS, wrong prefix.
s << MakeSpan(ParseHex("06" // network type (CJDNS)
"10" // address length
"aa000001000200030004000500060007" // address
));
s >> addr;
BOOST_CHECK(addr.IsCJDNS());
BOOST_CHECK(!addr.IsValid());
BOOST_REQUIRE(s.empty());
// Invalid CJDNS, with bogus length. // Invalid CJDNS, with bogus length.
s << MakeSpan(ParseHex("06" // network type (CJDNS) s << MakeSpan(ParseHex("06" // network type (CJDNS)
"01" // address length "01" // address length