mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 20:42:59 +01:00
Merge #10287: [tests] Update Unit Test for addrman.h/addrman.cpp
ed36de5
[tests] Update Unit Test for addrman.h/addrman.cpp (Jimmy Song)
Tree-SHA512: e7c08c19e227c34c230900e14a176b2290022b78b0ece387452e673662491c11f26249cbf1711235276c07a964c339e27b4cda9a2730ded5c0e23a650e0d72db
This commit is contained in:
commit
776ba233e9
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple)
|
||||
|
||||
// Test 2: Does Addrman::Add work as expected.
|
||||
CService addr1 = ResolveService("250.1.1.1", 8333);
|
||||
addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1, NODE_NONE), source);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1, NODE_NONE), source));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 1);
|
||||
CAddrInfo addr_ret1 = addrman.Select();
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addr_ret1.ToString() == "250.1.1.1:8333");
|
||||
@ -99,14 +99,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple)
|
||||
// Test 3: Does IP address deduplication work correctly.
|
||||
// Expected dup IP should not be added.
|
||||
CService addr1_dup = ResolveService("250.1.1.1", 8333);
|
||||
addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1_dup, NODE_NONE), source);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1_dup, NODE_NONE), source));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 1);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Test 5: New table has one addr and we add a diff addr we should
|
||||
// have two addrs.
|
||||
CService addr2 = ResolveService("250.1.1.2", 8333);
|
||||
addrman.Add(CAddress(addr2, NODE_NONE), source);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(CAddress(addr2, NODE_NONE), source));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Test 6: AddrMan::Clear() should empty the new table.
|
||||
@ -114,6 +114,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 0);
|
||||
CAddrInfo addr_null2 = addrman.Select();
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addr_null2.ToString() == "[::]:0");
|
||||
|
||||
// Test 6.5: AddrMan::Add multiple addresses works as expected
|
||||
std::vector<CAddress> vAddr;
|
||||
vAddr.push_back(CAddress(ResolveService("250.1.1.3", 8333), NODE_NONE));
|
||||
vAddr.push_back(CAddress(ResolveService("250.1.1.4", 8333), NODE_NONE));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(vAddr, source));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_ports)
|
||||
@ -398,9 +405,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_getaddr)
|
||||
// Test 25: Ensure GetAddr still returns 23% when addrman has many addrs.
|
||||
for (unsigned int i = 1; i < (8 * 256); i++) {
|
||||
int octet1 = i % 256;
|
||||
int octet2 = (i / 256) % 256;
|
||||
int octet3 = (i / (256 * 2)) % 256;
|
||||
std::string strAddr = boost::to_string(octet1) + "." + boost::to_string(octet2) + "." + boost::to_string(octet3) + ".23";
|
||||
int octet2 = i >> 8 % 256;
|
||||
std::string strAddr = boost::to_string(octet1) + "." + boost::to_string(octet2) + ".1.23";
|
||||
CAddress addr = CAddress(ResolveService(strAddr), NODE_NONE);
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that for all addrs in addrman, isTerrible == false.
|
||||
@ -412,10 +418,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_getaddr)
|
||||
std::vector<CAddress> vAddr = addrman.GetAddr();
|
||||
|
||||
size_t percent23 = (addrman.size() * 23) / 100;
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == percent23);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == 461);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(vAddr.size(), percent23);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(vAddr.size(), 461);
|
||||
// (Addrman.size() < number of addresses added) due to address collisions.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2007);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(addrman.size(), 2006);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -493,7 +499,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(caddrinfo_get_new_bucket)
|
||||
uint256 nKey1 = (uint256)(CHashWriter(SER_GETHASH, 0) << 1).GetHash();
|
||||
uint256 nKey2 = (uint256)(CHashWriter(SER_GETHASH, 0) << 2).GetHash();
|
||||
|
||||
// Test 29.5: Make sure the buckets are what we expect
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(info1.GetNewBucket(nKey1) == 786);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(info1.GetNewBucket(nKey1, source1) == 786);
|
||||
|
||||
// Test 30: Make sure key actually randomizes bucket placement. A fail on
|
||||
// this test could be a security issue.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user