Merge #16538: test: Add missing sync_blocks to feature_pruning

fa566b2601ee5a40bf814e529d7db253dacd28e7 test: Add missing sync_blocks to feature_pruning (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #16537
  Fixes #16520

ACKs for top commit:
  promag:
    ACK fa566b2601ee5a40bf814e529d7db253dacd28e7.
  jonatack:
    ACK fa566b2601ee5a40bf814e529d7db253dacd28e7. These past few months I have been seeing intermittent failures with this test on master. Ran `(for i in {1..40}; do test/functional/feature_pruning.py -l=debug; done)` overnight with this change; no failures.

Tree-SHA512: 5181d5ea525f43ad09e1c8b9ae72e32219f483948854c6dc07dda24b790cbdf4012e586253a0e158a71a980d1ca9f5fdf06aafbe95b8ea3d9154ef2c8687395b
This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke 2019-08-05 07:48:42 -04:00 committed by Pasta
parent 2204c85370
commit 7dca136101
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 52527BEDABE87984

View File

@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ class PruneTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.log.info("Mine 220 more large blocks so we have requisite history") self.log.info("Mine 220 more large blocks so we have requisite history")
mine_large_blocks(self.nodes[0], 220) mine_large_blocks(self.nodes[0], 220)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:3], timeout=120)
usage = calc_usage(self.prunedir) usage = calc_usage(self.prunedir)
self.log.info("Usage should be below target: %d" % usage) self.log.info("Usage should be below target: %d" % usage)