From 7e0032290669fae5f52c256856c53038511c7db4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pieter Wuille Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:29:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Add specialization of SipHash for 256 + 32 bit data We'll need a version of SipHash for tuples of 256 bits and 32 bits data, when CCoinsViewCache switches from using txids to COutPoints as keys. --- src/hash.cpp | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/hash.h | 1 + src/test/hash_tests.cpp | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/hash.cpp b/src/hash.cpp index a14a2386a2..b361c90d16 100644 --- a/src/hash.cpp +++ b/src/hash.cpp @@ -208,3 +208,44 @@ uint64_t SipHashUint256(uint64_t k0, uint64_t k1, const uint256& val) SIPROUND; return v0 ^ v1 ^ v2 ^ v3; } + +uint64_t SipHashUint256Extra(uint64_t k0, uint64_t k1, const uint256& val, uint32_t extra) +{ + /* Specialized implementation for efficiency */ + uint64_t d = val.GetUint64(0); + + uint64_t v0 = 0x736f6d6570736575ULL ^ k0; + uint64_t v1 = 0x646f72616e646f6dULL ^ k1; + uint64_t v2 = 0x6c7967656e657261ULL ^ k0; + uint64_t v3 = 0x7465646279746573ULL ^ k1 ^ d; + + SIPROUND; + SIPROUND; + v0 ^= d; + d = val.GetUint64(1); + v3 ^= d; + SIPROUND; + SIPROUND; + v0 ^= d; + d = val.GetUint64(2); + v3 ^= d; + SIPROUND; + SIPROUND; + v0 ^= d; + d = val.GetUint64(3); + v3 ^= d; + SIPROUND; + SIPROUND; + v0 ^= d; + d = (((uint64_t)36) << 56) | extra; + v3 ^= d; + SIPROUND; + SIPROUND; + v0 ^= d; + v2 ^= 0xFF; + SIPROUND; + SIPROUND; + SIPROUND; + SIPROUND; + return v0 ^ v1 ^ v2 ^ v3; +} diff --git a/src/hash.h b/src/hash.h index b8de19c0fd..b9952d39fc 100644 --- a/src/hash.h +++ b/src/hash.h @@ -241,5 +241,6 @@ public: * .Finalize() */ uint64_t SipHashUint256(uint64_t k0, uint64_t k1, const uint256& val); +uint64_t SipHashUint256Extra(uint64_t k0, uint64_t k1, const uint256& val, uint32_t extra); #endif // BITCOIN_HASH_H diff --git a/src/test/hash_tests.cpp b/src/test/hash_tests.cpp index d8de765db1..bb7e473248 100644 --- a/src/test/hash_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/hash_tests.cpp @@ -128,6 +128,23 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(siphash) tx.nVersion = 1; ss << tx; BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(SipHashUint256(1, 2, ss.GetHash()), 0x79751e980c2a0a35ULL); + + // Check consistency between CSipHasher and SipHashUint256[Extra]. + FastRandomContext ctx; + for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) { + uint64_t k1 = ctx.rand64(); + uint64_t k2 = ctx.rand64(); + uint256 x = GetRandHash(); + uint32_t n = ctx.rand32(); + uint8_t nb[4]; + WriteLE32(nb, n); + CSipHasher sip256(k1, k2); + sip256.Write(x.begin(), 32); + CSipHasher sip288 = sip256; + sip288.Write(nb, 4); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(SipHashUint256(k1, k2, x), sip256.Finalize()); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(SipHashUint256Extra(k1, k2, x, n), sip288.Finalize()); + } } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()