mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-24 11:32:46 +01:00
Merge #6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL
3f2e064b18
refactor: set `const auto& cbTx` to avoid using optional throughout method (pasta)0c0d91e491
fix: functional test feature_llmq_chainlocks.py should activate MN_RR instead v20 (Konstantin Akimov)af93e877f2
refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (Konstantin Akimov) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented The fork MN_RR is active awhile on testnet and mainnet and no more need legacy check ## What was done? Removes legacy version of checks for CL and related functional tests ## How Has This Been Tested? Run unit / functional test - DONE Reindex testnet - DONE Reindex mainnet - DONE ## Breaking Changes Removed pre-mn_rr version of checks for CL. It's no more relevant on mainnet and testnet. It affects behavior on new devnets and regtest for pre-mn_rr activation blocks. ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK3f2e064b18
Tree-SHA512: 8b4b3a20a54602f4df9d98e17c79004214493b15c0bce9c08c68d667a5cba86b817947f008d646c48ef9f2f86676c02085c7d0ed36e83548ef5425b64faffb89
This commit is contained in:
parent
a1f7e96025
commit
86105daab3
@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ bool CalcCbTxMerkleRootQuorums(const CBlock& block, const CBlockIndex* pindexPre
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CheckCbTxBestChainlock(const CBlock& block, const CBlockIndex* pindex,
|
||||
const llmq::CChainLocksHandler& chainlock_handler, BlockValidationState& state, const bool check_clhdiff)
|
||||
const llmq::CChainLocksHandler& chainlock_handler, BlockValidationState& state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (block.vtx[0]->nType != TRANSACTION_COINBASE) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
@ -342,44 +342,43 @@ bool CheckCbTxBestChainlock(const CBlock& block, const CBlockIndex* pindex,
|
||||
if (!opt_cbTx) {
|
||||
return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cbtx-payload");
|
||||
}
|
||||
const auto& cbTx = *opt_cbTx;
|
||||
|
||||
if (opt_cbTx->nVersion < CCbTx::Version::CLSIG_AND_BALANCE) {
|
||||
if (cbTx.nVersion < CCbTx::Version::CLSIG_AND_BALANCE) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto best_clsig = chainlock_handler.GetBestChainLock();
|
||||
if (best_clsig.getHeight() == pindex->nHeight - 1 && opt_cbTx->bestCLHeightDiff == 0 && opt_cbTx->bestCLSignature == best_clsig.getSig()) {
|
||||
if (best_clsig.getHeight() == pindex->nHeight - 1 && cbTx.bestCLHeightDiff == 0 && cbTx.bestCLSignature == best_clsig.getSig()) {
|
||||
// matches our best clsig which still hold values for the previous block
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (check_clhdiff) {
|
||||
auto prevBlockCoinbaseChainlock = GetNonNullCoinbaseChainlock(pindex->pprev);
|
||||
// If std::optional prevBlockCoinbaseChainlock is empty, then up to the previous block, coinbase Chainlock is null.
|
||||
if (prevBlockCoinbaseChainlock.has_value()) {
|
||||
// Previous block Coinbase has a non-null Chainlock: current block's Chainlock must be non-null and at least as new as the previous one
|
||||
if (!opt_cbTx->bestCLSignature.IsValid()) {
|
||||
// IsNull() doesn't exist for CBLSSignature: we assume that a non valid BLS sig is null
|
||||
return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cbtx-null-clsig");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (opt_cbTx->bestCLHeightDiff > prevBlockCoinbaseChainlock.value().second + 1) {
|
||||
return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cbtx-older-clsig");
|
||||
}
|
||||
const auto prevBlockCoinbaseChainlock = GetNonNullCoinbaseChainlock(pindex->pprev);
|
||||
// If std::optional prevBlockCoinbaseChainlock is empty, then up to the previous block, coinbase Chainlock is null.
|
||||
if (prevBlockCoinbaseChainlock.has_value()) {
|
||||
// Previous block Coinbase has a non-null Chainlock: current block's Chainlock must be non-null and at least as new as the previous one
|
||||
if (!cbTx.bestCLSignature.IsValid()) {
|
||||
// IsNull() doesn't exist for CBLSSignature: we assume that a non valid BLS sig is null
|
||||
return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cbtx-null-clsig");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (cbTx.bestCLHeightDiff > prevBlockCoinbaseChainlock.value().second + 1) {
|
||||
return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cbtx-older-clsig");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// IsNull() doesn't exist for CBLSSignature: we assume that a valid BLS sig is non-null
|
||||
if (opt_cbTx->bestCLSignature.IsValid()) {
|
||||
int curBlockCoinbaseCLHeight = pindex->nHeight - static_cast<int>(opt_cbTx->bestCLHeightDiff) - 1;
|
||||
if (best_clsig.getHeight() == curBlockCoinbaseCLHeight && best_clsig.getSig() == opt_cbTx->bestCLSignature) {
|
||||
if (cbTx.bestCLSignature.IsValid()) {
|
||||
int curBlockCoinbaseCLHeight = pindex->nHeight - static_cast<int>(cbTx.bestCLHeightDiff) - 1;
|
||||
if (best_clsig.getHeight() == curBlockCoinbaseCLHeight && best_clsig.getSig() == cbTx.bestCLSignature) {
|
||||
// matches our best (but outdated) clsig, no need to verify it again
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
uint256 curBlockCoinbaseCLBlockHash = pindex->GetAncestor(curBlockCoinbaseCLHeight)->GetBlockHash();
|
||||
if (chainlock_handler.VerifyChainLock(llmq::CChainLockSig(curBlockCoinbaseCLHeight, curBlockCoinbaseCLBlockHash, opt_cbTx->bestCLSignature)) != llmq::VerifyRecSigStatus::Valid) {
|
||||
if (chainlock_handler.VerifyChainLock(llmq::CChainLockSig(curBlockCoinbaseCLHeight, curBlockCoinbaseCLBlockHash, cbTx.bestCLSignature)) != llmq::VerifyRecSigStatus::Valid) {
|
||||
return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cbtx-invalid-clsig");
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (opt_cbTx->bestCLHeightDiff != 0) {
|
||||
} else if (cbTx.bestCLHeightDiff != 0) {
|
||||
// Null bestCLSignature is allowed only with bestCLHeightDiff = 0
|
||||
return state.Invalid(BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS, "bad-cbtx-cldiff");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ bool CalcCbTxMerkleRootQuorums(const CBlock& block, const CBlockIndex* pindexPre
|
||||
BlockValidationState& state);
|
||||
|
||||
bool CheckCbTxBestChainlock(const CBlock& block, const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev,
|
||||
const llmq::CChainLocksHandler& chainlock_handler, BlockValidationState& state, const bool check_clhdiff);
|
||||
const llmq::CChainLocksHandler& chainlock_handler, BlockValidationState& state);
|
||||
bool CalcCbTxBestChainlock(const llmq::CChainLocksHandler& chainlock_handler, const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev,
|
||||
uint32_t& bestCLHeightDiff, CBLSSignature& bestCLSignature);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ bool CSpecialTxProcessor::ProcessSpecialTxsInBlock(const CBlock& block, const CB
|
||||
nTimeMerkle += nTime5 - nTime4;
|
||||
LogPrint(BCLog::BENCHMARK, " - CheckCbTxMerkleRoots: %.2fms [%.2fs]\n", 0.001 * (nTime5 - nTime4), nTimeMerkle * 0.000001);
|
||||
|
||||
if (fCheckCbTxMerkleRoots && !CheckCbTxBestChainlock(block, pindex, m_clhandler, state, DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_consensus_params, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_MN_RR))) {
|
||||
if (fCheckCbTxMerkleRoots && !CheckCbTxBestChainlock(block, pindex, m_clhandler, state)) {
|
||||
// pass the state returned by the function above
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ from io import BytesIO
|
||||
|
||||
from test_framework.messages import CBlock, CCbTx
|
||||
from test_framework.test_framework import DashTestFramework
|
||||
from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_raises_rpc_error, force_finish_mnsync, softfork_active
|
||||
from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_raises_rpc_error, force_finish_mnsync
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class LLMQChainLocksTest(DashTestFramework):
|
||||
def set_test_params(self):
|
||||
self.set_dash_test_params(5, 4, [["-testactivationheight=mn_rr@1100"]] * 5)
|
||||
self.set_dash_test_params(5, 4)
|
||||
|
||||
def run_test(self):
|
||||
# Connect all nodes to node1 so that we always have the whole network connected
|
||||
@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ class LLMQChainLocksTest(DashTestFramework):
|
||||
|
||||
self.test_coinbase_best_cl(self.nodes[0], expected_cl_in_cb=False)
|
||||
|
||||
self.activate_v20(expected_activation_height=900)
|
||||
self.log.info("Activated v20 at height:" + str(self.nodes[0].getblockcount()))
|
||||
self.activate_mn_rr(expected_activation_height=900)
|
||||
self.log.info("Activated MN_RR at height:" + str(self.nodes[0].getblockcount()))
|
||||
|
||||
# v20 is active for the next block, not for the tip
|
||||
self.test_coinbase_best_cl(self.nodes[0], expected_cl_in_cb=False)
|
||||
@ -243,14 +243,8 @@ class LLMQChainLocksTest(DashTestFramework):
|
||||
assert_equal(tip_1['cbTx']['bestCLSignature'], tip_0['cbTx']['bestCLSignature'])
|
||||
assert_equal(tip_1['cbTx']['bestCLHeightDiff'], tip_0['cbTx']['bestCLHeightDiff'] + 1)
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Test that bestCLHeightDiff conditions are relaxed before mn_rr")
|
||||
self.test_bestCLHeightDiff(False)
|
||||
|
||||
self.activate_mn_rr(expected_activation_height=1100)
|
||||
self.log.info("Activated mn_rr at height:" + str(self.nodes[0].getblockcount()))
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Test that bestCLHeightDiff conditions are stricter after mn_rr")
|
||||
self.test_bestCLHeightDiff(True)
|
||||
self.log.info("Test bestCLHeightDiff restrictions")
|
||||
self.test_bestCLHeightDiff()
|
||||
|
||||
def create_chained_txs(self, node, amount):
|
||||
txid = node.sendtoaddress(node.getnewaddress(), amount)
|
||||
@ -293,11 +287,10 @@ class LLMQChainLocksTest(DashTestFramework):
|
||||
else:
|
||||
assert "bestCLHeightDiff" not in cbtx and "bestCLSignature" not in cbtx
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bestCLHeightDiff(self, mn_rr_active):
|
||||
def test_bestCLHeightDiff(self):
|
||||
# We need 2 blocks we can grab clsigs from
|
||||
for _ in range(2):
|
||||
self.wait_for_chainlocked_block_all_nodes(self.generate(self.nodes[0], 1, sync_fun=self.no_op)[0])
|
||||
assert_equal(softfork_active(self.nodes[1], "mn_rr"), mn_rr_active)
|
||||
tip1_hash = self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash()
|
||||
|
||||
self.isolate_node(1)
|
||||
@ -339,10 +332,10 @@ class LLMQChainLocksTest(DashTestFramework):
|
||||
mal_block.hashMerkleRoot = mal_block.calc_merkle_root()
|
||||
mal_block.solve()
|
||||
result = self.nodes[1].submitblock(mal_block.serialize().hex())
|
||||
assert_equal(result, "bad-cbtx-older-clsig" if mn_rr_active else "bad-cbtx-invalid-clsig")
|
||||
assert_equal(result, "bad-cbtx-older-clsig")
|
||||
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash(), tip1_hash)
|
||||
|
||||
# Update the sig too and it should pass now when mn_rr is not active and fail otherwise
|
||||
# Update the sig too and it should fail
|
||||
old_blockhash = self.nodes[1].getblockhash(self.nodes[1].getblockcount() - 1)
|
||||
cbtx.bestCLSignature = bytes.fromhex(self.nodes[1].getblock(old_blockhash, 2)["tx"][0]["cbTx"]["bestCLSignature"])
|
||||
mal_block.vtx[0].vExtraPayload = cbtx.serialize()
|
||||
@ -350,12 +343,8 @@ class LLMQChainLocksTest(DashTestFramework):
|
||||
mal_block.hashMerkleRoot = mal_block.calc_merkle_root()
|
||||
mal_block.solve()
|
||||
result = self.nodes[1].submitblock(mal_block.serialize().hex())
|
||||
if mn_rr_active:
|
||||
assert_equal(result, "bad-cbtx-older-clsig")
|
||||
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash(), tip1_hash)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
assert_equal(result, None)
|
||||
assert not self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash() == tip1_hash
|
||||
assert_equal(result, "bad-cbtx-older-clsig")
|
||||
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbestblockhash(), tip1_hash)
|
||||
|
||||
self.reconnect_isolated_node(1, 0)
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user