mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-25 12:02:48 +01:00
Expose more parallelism with relaxed atomics (suggested in #9938). Fix a test to check the exclusive or of two properties rather than just or.
This commit is contained in:
parent
929fd7276c
commit
8c2f4b8882
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct FakeCheckCheckCompletion {
|
||||
static std::atomic<size_t> n_calls;
|
||||
bool operator()()
|
||||
{
|
||||
++n_calls;
|
||||
n_calls.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
void swap(FakeCheckCheckCompletion& x){};
|
||||
@ -88,15 +88,15 @@ struct MemoryCheck {
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Really, copy constructor should be deletable, but CCheckQueue breaks
|
||||
// if it is deleted because of internal push_back.
|
||||
fake_allocated_memory += b;
|
||||
fake_allocated_memory.fetch_add(b, std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
||||
};
|
||||
MemoryCheck(bool b_) : b(b_)
|
||||
{
|
||||
fake_allocated_memory += b;
|
||||
fake_allocated_memory.fetch_add(b, std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
||||
};
|
||||
~MemoryCheck(){
|
||||
fake_allocated_memory -= b;
|
||||
|
||||
~MemoryCheck()
|
||||
{
|
||||
fake_allocated_memory.fetch_sub(b, std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
||||
};
|
||||
void swap(MemoryCheck& x) { std::swap(b, x.b); };
|
||||
};
|
||||
@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ struct FrozenCleanupCheck {
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (should_freeze) {
|
||||
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(m);
|
||||
nFrozen = 1;
|
||||
nFrozen.store(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
||||
cv.notify_one();
|
||||
cv.wait(l, []{ return nFrozen == 0;});
|
||||
cv.wait(l, []{ return nFrozen.load(std::memory_order_relaxed) == 0;});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
void swap(FrozenCleanupCheck& x){std::swap(should_freeze, x.should_freeze);};
|
||||
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_CheckQueue_Recovers_From_Failure)
|
||||
control.Add(vChecks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
bool r =control.Wait();
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(r || end_fails);
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(r != end_fails);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
tg.interrupt_all();
|
||||
@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_CheckQueue_Memory)
|
||||
tg.join_all();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Test that a new verification cannot occur until all checks
|
||||
// Test that a new verification cannot occur until all checks
|
||||
// have been destructed
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_CheckQueue_FrozenCleanup)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -361,11 +361,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_CheckQueue_FrozenCleanup)
|
||||
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(FrozenCleanupCheck::m);
|
||||
// Wait until the queue has finished all jobs and frozen
|
||||
FrozenCleanupCheck::cv.wait(l, [](){return FrozenCleanupCheck::nFrozen == 1;});
|
||||
// Try to get control of the queue a bunch of times
|
||||
for (auto x = 0; x < 100 && !fails; ++x) {
|
||||
fails = queue->ControlMutex.try_lock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Unfreeze
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Try to get control of the queue a bunch of times
|
||||
for (auto x = 0; x < 100 && !fails; ++x) {
|
||||
fails = queue->ControlMutex.try_lock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Unfreeze (we need lock n case of spurious wakeup)
|
||||
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(FrozenCleanupCheck::m);
|
||||
FrozenCleanupCheck::nFrozen = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Awaken frozen destructor
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user