mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 12:32:48 +01:00
Merge pull request #2312 from gmaxwell/random_random
ApproximateBestSubset internal RNG to prevent degenerate behavior.
This commit is contained in:
commit
aaeb443791
@ -261,4 +261,66 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_IsHex)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!IsHex("0x0000"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_seed_insecure_rand)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Expected results for the determinstic seed.
|
||||
const uint32_t exp_vals[11] = { 91632771U,1889679809U,3842137544U,3256031132U,
|
||||
1761911779U, 489223532U,2692793790U,2737472863U,
|
||||
2796262275U,1309899767U,840571781U};
|
||||
// Expected 0s in rand()%(idx+2) for the determinstic seed.
|
||||
const int exp_count[9] = {5013,3346,2415,1972,1644,1386,1176,1096,1009};
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
int count=0;
|
||||
|
||||
seed_insecure_rand();
|
||||
|
||||
//Does the non-determistic rand give us results that look too like the determinstic one?
|
||||
for (i=0;i<10;i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int match = 0;
|
||||
uint32_t rval = insecure_rand();
|
||||
for (int j=0;j<11;j++)match |= rval==exp_vals[j];
|
||||
count += match;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// sum(binomial(10,i)*(11/(2^32))^i*(1-(11/(2^32)))^(10-i),i,0,4) ~= 1-1/2^134.73
|
||||
// So _very_ unlikely to throw a false failure here.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(count<=4);
|
||||
|
||||
for (int mod=2;mod<11;mod++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int mask = 1;
|
||||
// Really rough binomal confidence approximation.
|
||||
int err = 30*10000./mod*sqrt((1./mod*(1-1./mod))/10000.);
|
||||
//mask is 2^ceil(log2(mod))-1
|
||||
while(mask<mod-1)mask=(mask<<1)+1;
|
||||
|
||||
count = 0;
|
||||
//How often does it get a zero from the uniform range [0,mod)?
|
||||
for (i=0;i<10000;i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint32_t rval;
|
||||
do{
|
||||
rval=insecure_rand()&mask;
|
||||
}while(rval>=(uint32_t)mod);
|
||||
count += rval==0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(count<=10000/mod+err);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(count>=10000/mod-err);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
seed_insecure_rand(true);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i=0;i<11;i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(insecure_rand(),exp_vals[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int mod=2;mod<11;mod++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
count = 0;
|
||||
for (i=0;i<10000;i++) count += insecure_rand()%mod==0;
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(count,exp_count[mod-2]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
|
||||
|
26
src/util.cpp
26
src/util.cpp
@ -1281,12 +1281,26 @@ void AddTimeData(const CNetAddr& ip, int64 nTime)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t insecure_rand_Rz = 11;
|
||||
uint32_t insecure_rand_Rw = 11;
|
||||
void seed_insecure_rand(bool fDeterministic)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//The seed values have some unlikely fixed points which we avoid.
|
||||
if(fDeterministic)
|
||||
{
|
||||
insecure_rand_Rz = insecure_rand_Rw = 11;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
uint32_t tmp;
|
||||
do{
|
||||
RAND_bytes((unsigned char*)&tmp,4);
|
||||
}while(tmp==0 || tmp==0x9068ffffU);
|
||||
insecure_rand_Rz=tmp;
|
||||
do{
|
||||
RAND_bytes((unsigned char*)&tmp,4);
|
||||
}while(tmp==0 || tmp==0x464fffffU);
|
||||
insecure_rand_Rw=tmp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
string FormatVersion(int nVersion)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
26
src/util.h
26
src/util.h
@ -404,13 +404,27 @@ bool SoftSetArg(const std::string& strArg, const std::string& strValue);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool SoftSetBoolArg(const std::string& strArg, bool fValue);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* MWC RNG of George Marsaglia
|
||||
* This is intended to be fast. It has a period of 2^59.3, though the
|
||||
* least significant 16 bits only have a period of about 2^30.1.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return random value
|
||||
*/
|
||||
extern uint32_t insecure_rand_Rz;
|
||||
extern uint32_t insecure_rand_Rw;
|
||||
static inline uint32_t insecure_rand(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
insecure_rand_Rz=36969*(insecure_rand_Rz&65535)+(insecure_rand_Rz>>16);
|
||||
insecure_rand_Rw=18000*(insecure_rand_Rw&65535)+(insecure_rand_Rw>>16);
|
||||
return (insecure_rand_Rw<<16)+insecure_rand_Rz;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Seed insecure_rand using the random pool.
|
||||
* @param Deterministic Use a determinstic seed
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void seed_insecure_rand(bool fDeterministic=false);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Median filter over a stream of values.
|
||||
* Returns the median of the last N numbers
|
||||
|
@ -984,6 +984,8 @@ static void ApproximateBestSubset(vector<pair<int64, pair<const CWalletTx*,unsig
|
||||
vfBest.assign(vValue.size(), true);
|
||||
nBest = nTotalLower;
|
||||
|
||||
seed_insecure_rand();
|
||||
|
||||
for (int nRep = 0; nRep < iterations && nBest != nTargetValue; nRep++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
vfIncluded.assign(vValue.size(), false);
|
||||
@ -993,7 +995,13 @@ static void ApproximateBestSubset(vector<pair<int64, pair<const CWalletTx*,unsig
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < vValue.size(); i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (nPass == 0 ? rand() % 2 : !vfIncluded[i])
|
||||
//The solver here uses a randomized algorithm,
|
||||
//the randomness serves no real security purpose but is just
|
||||
//needed to prevent degenerate behavior and it is important
|
||||
//that the rng fast. We do not use a constant random sequence,
|
||||
//because there may be some privacy improvement by making
|
||||
//the selection random.
|
||||
if (nPass == 0 ? insecure_rand()&1 : !vfIncluded[i])
|
||||
{
|
||||
nTotal += vValue[i].first;
|
||||
vfIncluded[i] = true;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user