mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 04:22:55 +01:00
Merge #17138: Remove wallet access to some node arguments
This backports also includes extra changes that were missing from bitcoin#14711 They are required, otherwise impossible to remove validaion.h dependency as it meant in #17138 b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002 [wallet] Remove pruning check for -rescan option (John Newbery) eea462de9c652dca556ad241d2126b10790f67f8 [wallet] Remove package limit config access from wallet (John Newbery) Pull request description: Removes wallet access to `-limitancestorcount`, `-limitdescendantcount` and `-prune`: - `-limitancestorcount` and `-limitdescendantcount` are now accessed with a method `getPackageLimits` in the `Chain` interface. - `-prune` is not required. It was only used in wallet component initiation to prevent running `-rescan` when pruning was enabled. This check is not required. Partially addresses #17137. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: Tested ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002 ryanofsky: Code review ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002 promag: Code review ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002. ariard: ACK b96ed03, check there isn't left anymore wallet access to node arguments. Tree-SHA512: 90c8e3e083acbd37724f1bccf63dab642cf9ae95cc5e684872a67443ae048b4fdbf57b52ea47c5a1da6489fd277278fe2d9bbe95e17f3d4965a1a0fbdeb815bf
This commit is contained in:
parent
d82ec8bb6b
commit
baa37c345c
@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
|
|||||||
#include <util/string.h>
|
#include <util/string.h>
|
||||||
#include <util/translation.h>
|
#include <util/translation.h>
|
||||||
#include <util/validation.h>
|
#include <util/validation.h>
|
||||||
#include <validation.h>
|
|
||||||
#ifdef USE_BDB
|
#ifdef USE_BDB
|
||||||
#include <wallet/bdb.h>
|
#include <wallet/bdb.h>
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
@ -3150,6 +3149,7 @@ static bool IsCurrentForAntiFeeSniping(interfaces::Chain& chain)
|
|||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static uint32_t GetLocktimeForNewTransaction(interfaces::Chain& chain)
|
static uint32_t GetLocktimeForNewTransaction(interfaces::Chain& chain)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
uint32_t const height = chain.getHeight().value_or(-1);
|
||||||
uint32_t locktime;
|
uint32_t locktime;
|
||||||
// Discourage fee sniping.
|
// Discourage fee sniping.
|
||||||
//
|
//
|
||||||
@ -3172,7 +3172,7 @@ static uint32_t GetLocktimeForNewTransaction(interfaces::Chain& chain)
|
|||||||
// now we ensure code won't be written that makes assumptions about
|
// now we ensure code won't be written that makes assumptions about
|
||||||
// nLockTime that preclude a fix later.
|
// nLockTime that preclude a fix later.
|
||||||
if (IsCurrentForAntiFeeSniping(chain)) {
|
if (IsCurrentForAntiFeeSniping(chain)) {
|
||||||
locktime = chain.getHeight().value_or(-1);
|
locktime = height;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Secondly occasionally randomly pick a nLockTime even further back, so
|
// Secondly occasionally randomly pick a nLockTime even further back, so
|
||||||
// that transactions that are delayed after signing for whatever reason,
|
// that transactions that are delayed after signing for whatever reason,
|
||||||
@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ static uint32_t GetLocktimeForNewTransaction(interfaces::Chain& chain)
|
|||||||
locktime = 0;
|
locktime = 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert(locktime <= (unsigned int)::ChainActive().Height());
|
assert(locktime <= height);
|
||||||
assert(locktime < LOCKTIME_THRESHOLD);
|
assert(locktime < LOCKTIME_THRESHOLD);
|
||||||
return locktime;
|
return locktime;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user