Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23146: Test transactions conflicted by double spend in listtransactions

502f50da12694dd0193744427f0f89238e612f54 Test transactions conflicted by double spend in listtransactions (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  Test the properties of transactions conflicted by a double spend as returned by RPC listtransactions in the abandoned, confirmations, trusted and walletconflicts fields. These fields are also returned by RPCs listsinceblock and gettransactions.

ACKs for top commit:
  brunoerg:
    tACK 502f50da12694dd0193744427f0f89238e612f54
  rajarshimaitra:
    Concept + tACK 502f50da12

Tree-SHA512: 28968f4a5f1960ea45b2e6f5b20fe25c1b51f66944062dcddea52ea970ad21c74d583793d091b84e8a5e506d6aecc1f0435c5b918213975b22c38e02bba19aa1
This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke 2021-10-07 09:58:58 +02:00 committed by pasta
parent f40055446b
commit bcb9cb546c

View File

@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996")) assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
balance = newbalance balance = newbalance
self.log.info("Test transactions conflicted by a double spend")
# Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output # Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output
# Mine double spend from node 1 # Mine double spend from node 1
inputs = [] inputs = []
@ -168,6 +169,34 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1) connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
self.sync_blocks() self.sync_blocks()
tx_list = self.nodes[0].listtransactions()
conflicted = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["confirmations"] < 0]
assert_equal(4, len(conflicted))
wallet_conflicts = [tx for tx in conflicted if tx["walletconflicts"]]
assert_equal(2, len(wallet_conflicts))
double_spends = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["walletconflicts"] and tx["confirmations"] > 0]
assert_equal(1, len(double_spends))
double_spend = double_spends[0]
# Test the properties of the conflicted transactions, i.e. with confirmations < 0.
for tx in conflicted:
assert_equal(tx["abandoned"], False)
assert_equal(tx["confirmations"], -1)
assert_equal(tx["trusted"], False)
# Test the properties of the double-spend transaction, i.e. having wallet conflicts and confirmations > 0.
assert_equal(double_spend["abandoned"], False)
assert_equal(double_spend["confirmations"], 1)
assert "trusted" not in double_spend.keys() # "trusted" only returned if tx has 0 or negative confirmations.
# Test the walletconflicts field of each.
for tx in wallet_conflicts:
assert_equal(double_spend["walletconflicts"], [tx["txid"]])
assert_equal(tx["walletconflicts"], [double_spend["txid"]])
# Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted # Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance() newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20")) assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20"))