From d5a52d9b3edaae6c273b732456d98e6b28ed7b31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gavin Andresen Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:08:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Alert system DoS prevention This fixes two alert system vulnerabilities found by Sergio Lerner; you could send peers unlimited numbers of invalid alert message to try to either fill up their debug.log with messages and/or keep their CPU busy checking signatures. Fixed by disconnecting/banning peers if they send 10 or more bad (invalid/expired/cancelled) alerts. --- src/main.cpp | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ src/main.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp index f71cfe7caa..e9bd610377 100644 --- a/src/main.cpp +++ b/src/main.cpp @@ -2997,14 +2997,27 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv) CAlert alert; vRecv >> alert; - if (alert.ProcessAlert()) + uint256 alertHash = alert.GetHash(); + if (pfrom->setKnown.count(alertHash) == 0) { - // Relay - pfrom->setKnown.insert(alert.GetHash()); + if (alert.ProcessAlert()) { - LOCK(cs_vNodes); - BOOST_FOREACH(CNode* pnode, vNodes) - alert.RelayTo(pnode); + // Relay + pfrom->setKnown.insert(alertHash); + { + LOCK(cs_vNodes); + BOOST_FOREACH(CNode* pnode, vNodes) + alert.RelayTo(pnode); + } + } + else { + // Small DoS penalty so peers that send us lots of + // duplicate/expired/invalid-signature/whatever alerts + // eventually get banned. + // This isn't a Misbehaving(100) (immediate ban) because the + // peer might be an older or different implementation with + // a different signature key, etc. + pfrom->Misbehaving(10); } } } diff --git a/src/main.h b/src/main.h index cbc48e05c0..dc9f9ee74a 100644 --- a/src/main.h +++ b/src/main.h @@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ public: uint256 GetHash() const { - return SerializeHash(*this); + return Hash(this->vchMsg.begin(), this->vchMsg.end()); } bool IsInEffect() const