mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-25 03:52:49 +01:00
Merge #17258: Fix issue with conflicted mempool tx in listsinceblock
436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73 Fix issue with conflicted mempool tx in listsinceblock (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Closes #8752 by bringing back abandoned #10470.
This now checks that returned transactions are not conflicting with any transactions that are filtered out by the given blockhash and add a functional test to prevent this in the future.
For more context, #8757 was closed in favor of #10470.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 436ad43643
kallewoof:
utACK 436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73
jonatack:
I'm not qualifed to give an ACK here but 436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73 appears reasonable. Built/ran tests/verified that this test fails without the change in rpcwallet.cpp:
Tree-SHA512: 63d75cd3d3f19fc84dc38899b200c96179b82b24db263cd0116ee5b715265be647157855c2e35912d2fbc49c7b37db9375d6aab0ac672f0f09bece8431de5ea9
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a7f6a7133
commit
d839dd4c1e
@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ static UniValue listsinceblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
|
||||
for (const std::pair<const uint256, CWalletTx>& pairWtx : pwallet->mapWallet) {
|
||||
CWalletTx tx = pairWtx.second;
|
||||
|
||||
if (depth == -1 || tx.GetDepthInMainChain() < depth) {
|
||||
if (depth == -1 || abs(tx.GetDepthInMainChain()) < depth) {
|
||||
ListTransactions(pwallet, tx, 0, true, transactions, filter, nullptr /* filter_label */);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -5,13 +5,17 @@
|
||||
"""Test the listsincelast RPC."""
|
||||
|
||||
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
||||
from test_framework.messages import BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER
|
||||
from test_framework.util import (
|
||||
assert_array_result,
|
||||
assert_equal,
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error,
|
||||
connect_nodes,
|
||||
isolate_node,
|
||||
reconnect_isolated_node,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
from decimal import Decimal
|
||||
|
||||
class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
def set_test_params(self):
|
||||
@ -33,6 +37,7 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
self.test_reorg()
|
||||
self.test_double_spend()
|
||||
self.test_double_send()
|
||||
self.double_spends_filtered()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_blockhash(self):
|
||||
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1)
|
||||
@ -289,5 +294,65 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == txid1:
|
||||
assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
def double_spends_filtered(self):
|
||||
'''
|
||||
`listsinceblock` was returning conflicted transactions even if they
|
||||
occurred before the specified cutoff blockhash
|
||||
'''
|
||||
spending_node = self.nodes[2]
|
||||
double_spending_node = self.nodes[3]
|
||||
dest_address = spending_node.getnewaddress()
|
||||
|
||||
tx_input = dict(
|
||||
sequence=BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER, **next(u for u in spending_node.listunspent()))
|
||||
rawtx = spending_node.createrawtransaction(
|
||||
[tx_input], {dest_address: tx_input["amount"] - Decimal("0.00051000"),
|
||||
spending_node.getrawchangeaddress(): Decimal("0.00050000")})
|
||||
double_rawtx = spending_node.createrawtransaction(
|
||||
[tx_input], {dest_address: tx_input["amount"] - Decimal("0.00052000"),
|
||||
spending_node.getrawchangeaddress(): Decimal("0.00050000")})
|
||||
|
||||
isolate_node(double_spending_node)
|
||||
|
||||
signedtx = spending_node.signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx)
|
||||
orig_tx_id = spending_node.sendrawtransaction(signedtx["hex"])
|
||||
original_tx = spending_node.gettransaction(orig_tx_id)
|
||||
|
||||
double_signedtx = spending_node.signrawtransactionwithwallet(double_rawtx)
|
||||
dbl_tx_id = double_spending_node.sendrawtransaction(double_signedtx["hex"])
|
||||
double_tx = double_spending_node.getrawtransaction(dbl_tx_id, 1)
|
||||
lastblockhash = double_spending_node.generate(1)[0]
|
||||
|
||||
reconnect_isolated_node(double_spending_node, 2)
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
spending_node.invalidateblock(lastblockhash)
|
||||
|
||||
# check that both transactions exist
|
||||
block_hash = spending_node.listsinceblock(
|
||||
spending_node.getblockhash(spending_node.getblockcount()))
|
||||
original_found = False
|
||||
double_found = False
|
||||
for tx in block_hash['transactions']:
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == original_tx['txid']:
|
||||
original_found = True
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == double_tx['txid']:
|
||||
double_found = True
|
||||
assert_equal(original_found, True)
|
||||
assert_equal(double_found, True)
|
||||
|
||||
lastblockhash = spending_node.generate(1)[0]
|
||||
|
||||
# check that neither transaction exists
|
||||
block_hash = spending_node.listsinceblock(lastblockhash)
|
||||
original_found = False
|
||||
double_found = False
|
||||
for tx in block_hash['transactions']:
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == original_tx['txid']:
|
||||
original_found = True
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == double_tx['txid']:
|
||||
double_found = True
|
||||
assert_equal(original_found, False)
|
||||
assert_equal(double_found, False)
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
ListSinceBlockTest().main()
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user