mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-25 20:12:57 +01:00
Merge #21713: Refactor ProcessNewBlock to reduce code duplication
9a0653553a0ec403b4e7c6713466e0c7fa10ec94 Refactor ProcessNewBlock to reduce code duplication (R E Broadley) Pull request description: There are probably a few issues with this code (maybe there's even a reason this code is duplicated as it currently is), so apologies in advance that I'm still a little (maybe very) bad with C++ ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 9a0653553a0ec403b4e7c6713466e0c7fa10ec94 💻 promag: Code review ACK 9a0653553a0ec403b4e7c6713466e0c7fa10ec94. theStack: Code-review ACK 9a0653553a0ec403b4e7c6713466e0c7fa10ec94 🌴 Tree-SHA512: f8634ffad4b2370204d1a0945db4e27248b9e579d9912784da432b8ee3303cae424fa9f7500000dcfb31e6d29d04a8f7d322d17a6fe3d4adaddd10c539458a8c
This commit is contained in:
parent
e649229046
commit
f13be5085b
41
src/net_processing.cpp
Normal file → Executable file
41
src/net_processing.cpp
Normal file → Executable file
@ -473,6 +473,8 @@ private:
|
||||
|
||||
void ProcessGetData(CNode& pfrom, Peer& peer, const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc) LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(peer.m_getdata_requests_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
void ProcessBlock(CNode& pfrom, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, bool fForceProcessing);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Relay map */
|
||||
typedef std::map<uint256, CTransactionRef> MapRelay;
|
||||
MapRelay mapRelay GUARDED_BY(cs_main);
|
||||
@ -2783,6 +2785,18 @@ std::pair<bool /*ret*/, bool /*do_return*/> static ValidateDSTX(CTxMemPool& memp
|
||||
return {true, false};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessBlock(CNode& pfrom, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, bool fForceProcessing)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool fNewBlock = false;
|
||||
m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(m_chainparams, pblock, fForceProcessing, &fNewBlock);
|
||||
if (fNewBlock) {
|
||||
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
mapBlockSource.erase(pblock->GetHash());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(
|
||||
CNode& pfrom,
|
||||
const std::string& msg_type,
|
||||
@ -3850,7 +3864,6 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
mapBlockSource.emplace(pblock->GetHash(), std::make_pair(pfrom.GetId(), false));
|
||||
}
|
||||
bool fNewBlock = false;
|
||||
// Setting fForceProcessing to true means that we bypass some of
|
||||
// our anti-DoS protections in AcceptBlock, which filters
|
||||
// unrequested blocks that might be trying to waste our resources
|
||||
@ -3860,13 +3873,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(
|
||||
// we have a chain with at least nMinimumChainWork), and we ignore
|
||||
// compact blocks with less work than our tip, it is safe to treat
|
||||
// reconstructed compact blocks as having been requested.
|
||||
m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(m_chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
|
||||
if (fNewBlock) {
|
||||
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
mapBlockSource.erase(pblock->GetHash());
|
||||
}
|
||||
ProcessBlock(pfrom, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true);
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main); // hold cs_main for CBlockIndex::IsValid()
|
||||
if (pindex->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS)) {
|
||||
// Clear download state for this block, which is in
|
||||
@ -3943,20 +3950,13 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(
|
||||
}
|
||||
} // Don't hold cs_main when we call into ProcessNewBlock
|
||||
if (fBlockRead) {
|
||||
bool fNewBlock = false;
|
||||
// Since we requested this block (it was in mapBlocksInFlight), force it to be processed,
|
||||
// even if it would not be a candidate for new tip (missing previous block, chain not long enough, etc)
|
||||
// This bypasses some anti-DoS logic in AcceptBlock (eg to prevent
|
||||
// disk-space attacks), but this should be safe due to the
|
||||
// protections in the compact block handler -- see related comment
|
||||
// in compact block optimistic reconstruction handling.
|
||||
m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(m_chainparams, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true, &fNewBlock);
|
||||
if (fNewBlock) {
|
||||
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
mapBlockSource.erase(pblock->GetHash());
|
||||
}
|
||||
ProcessBlock(pfrom, pblock, /*fForceProcessing=*/true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -4021,14 +4021,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(
|
||||
// cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine.
|
||||
mapBlockSource.emplace(hash, std::make_pair(pfrom.GetId(), true));
|
||||
}
|
||||
bool fNewBlock = false;
|
||||
m_chainman.ProcessNewBlock(m_chainparams, pblock, forceProcessing, &fNewBlock);
|
||||
if (fNewBlock) {
|
||||
pfrom.nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
mapBlockSource.erase(pblock->GetHash());
|
||||
}
|
||||
ProcessBlock(pfrom, pblock, forceProcessing);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user