CTxMemPool: eliminate redundant lock, GetHash() call

::addUnchecked()'s only caller already takes the necessary lock,
and has already calculated the TX's hash.
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Garzik 2012-07-04 01:12:44 -04:00 committed by Jeff Garzik
parent 96929a5515
commit f77654a0e9
2 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ bool CTxMemPool::accept(CTxDB& txdb, CTransaction &tx, bool fCheckInputs,
printf("CTxMemPool::accept() : replacing tx %s with new version\n", ptxOld->GetHash().ToString().c_str());
remove(*ptxOld);
}
addUnchecked(tx);
addUnchecked(hash, tx);
}
///// are we sure this is ok when loading transactions or restoring block txes
@ -619,13 +619,11 @@ bool CTransaction::AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxDB& txdb, bool fCheckInputs, bool* pfMi
return mempool.accept(txdb, *this, fCheckInputs, pfMissingInputs);
}
bool CTxMemPool::addUnchecked(CTransaction &tx)
bool CTxMemPool::addUnchecked(const uint256& hash, CTransaction &tx)
{
// Add to memory pool without checking anything. Don't call this directly,
// call CTxMemPool::accept to properly check the transaction first.
{
LOCK(cs);
uint256 hash = tx.GetHash();
mapTx[hash] = tx;
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vin.size(); i++)
mapNextTx[tx.vin[i].prevout] = CInPoint(&mapTx[hash], i);

View File

@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ public:
bool accept(CTxDB& txdb, CTransaction &tx,
bool fCheckInputs, bool* pfMissingInputs);
bool addUnchecked(CTransaction &tx);
bool addUnchecked(const uint256& hash, CTransaction &tx);
bool remove(CTransaction &tx);
void queryHashes(std::vector<uint256>& vtxid);