c4b0c08f7c91bcef48dd023982ff132795575247 Update tx-size-small comment with relevant CVE disclosure (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
Code first introduced under https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11423 with essentially no description and no discussion.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK c4b0c08f7c91bcef48dd023982ff132795575247
fanquake:
ACK c4b0c08f7c91bcef48dd023982ff132795575247
Tree-SHA512: 95d5c92998b8b1e944c477dbaee265b62612b6e815099ab31d9ff580b4dff777abaf7f326a284644709f918aa1510412d62310689b1250ef6e64de7b19ca9f71
59e387705c7e55ec40400301346354fa2d0c613f test: add invalid tx templates for use in functional tests (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This change adds a list of `CTransaction`-generating templates which each correspond to a specific type of invalid transaction. We then use this list to test for a wider variety of invalid tx types in `p2p_invalid_tx.py` and `feature_block.py`.
Consolidating all invalid tx types will allow us to more easily cover all tx reject cases from a variety of tests without repeating ourselves. Validation logic doesn't differ much between mempool and block acceptance, but there *is* a difference and we should be sure we're testing both comprehensively.
Right now, I've only added templates covering the tx reject types listed below but if this approach seems worthwhile I will expand the list to be fully comprehensive.
```
bad-txns-in-belowout
bad-txns-inputs-duplicate
bad-txns-too-many-sigops
bad-txns-vin-empty
bad-txns-vout-empty
bad-txns-vout-negative
```
Tree-SHA512: 05407f4a953fbd7c44c08bb49bb989cefd39a2b05ea00f5b3c92197a3f05e1b302f789e33832445734220e1c333d133aba385740b77b84139b170c583471ce20
2222c96deec0f636dee6e49efb745f29b06a40a5 test: Add notes on how to generate data/wallets/high_minversion (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I forgot to do this in #16796
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
ACK 2222c96deec0f636dee6e49efb745f29b06a40a5
Tree-SHA512: 5f24ffa641b97eac4febad42ade7228b14fa72335c918a10880c5dec86a3ecc3075a31526f275188e07fea95b8e2c6320c64f716099f604b00e13d5366fcee37
fab0c820fa4c0c3227eec85c64310a3bf938a149 rpc: Clarify that block count means height excl genesis (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is a common misconception that the block count returned by the blockchain rpcs includes the genesis block. See for example the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16292#issuecomment-506303256.
However, it really returns the height, which is `0` for the genesis block.
So clarify that and also remove the misleading "longest blockchain" comment.
Finally, fix the wallet test that incorrectly used this rpc.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK fab0c820fa
promag:
ACK fab0c82, sorry for the misconception.
Tree-SHA512: 0d087cbb628d3866352bca6420402f392e6a997e579941701a408a7fca355d84645045661f39b022e4479cc07f85a6cddaa9095b6fd9911b245692482420a5e4
fa4c8679ed94f215ce895938f7c3c169a2ce101e rpc: Avoid creating non-standard raw transactions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Multiple OP_RETURN outputs in a transaction are not standard and unlikely to be relayed, so avoid creating them.
Apart from that, the logic was broken in that it duplicated the same hex-data for each data output: Closes#14868.
Tree-SHA512: b08d08062b5622e8a7b497e490ccaf53b06e844c863fda3bf3f932a98684a809e8341aeb98232059a795afb32d8770a6c5591a66f8e6ee372b672af245607887
568a1d72619371a45b14a8356d3f80bd0c0efabc fix ecdsa verify in test framework (Stepan Snigirev)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a small bug in the test framework in `verify_ecdsa` function.
`r` in ecdsa signature is modulo curve order, so if the point `R` calculated during verification has x-coordinate that is larger than the curve order, the verification will fail in the test framework but pass in libsecp256k1.
Example (all in hex):
public key: `0289d889551598a0263746c01e5882ccf9b7dc4ca5a37108482c9d80de40e0a8cf`
der signature: `3006020104020104` (r = 4, s = 4)
message: `3232323232323232323232323232323232323232323232323232323232323232`
libsecp256k1 returns `true`, test framework returns `false`.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 568a1d72619371a45b14a8356d3f80bd0c0efabc
Tree-SHA512: 9e9c58498f10085d2ad85e95caff6c92793799d2a40696ef43febcd7d313c8c3d5ecec715ca903cbb8432a8a96bd0065d86d060966d4ee651c3871ce16c252bf
f471a3be00c2b6433b8c258b716982c0539da13f scripted diff: Improve invalid vout value rpc error message (Nima Yazdanmehr)
Pull request description:
Since the `vout` value can start at `0`, the error message for *negative* values can be improved to something like: `vout cannot be negative`.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK f471a3be00c2b6433b8c258b716982c0539da13f
promag:
Code review ACK f471a3be00c2b6433b8c258b716982c0539da13f.
Tree-SHA512: fbdee3d0ddd5b58eb93934a1217b44e125a9ad39e672b1f35c7609c6c5fcf45ae1b731d3d6135b7225d98792dbfc34a50907b8c41274a5b029d7b5c59f886560
fa1433ac1be8481f08c1a0a311a6b87d8a874c6a rpc: Remove special case for unknown service flags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The special case to return a bit as an integer is clumsy and undocumented. Probably also irrelevant because there shouldn't currently be a non-misbehaving client that connects to Bitcoin Core and advertises an unknown service flag.
Thus, simply remove the code.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa1433ac1be8481f08c1a0a311a6b87d8a874c6a
Tree-SHA512: 942de6a577a9ee076ce12c92be121617640d53ee8c3424064c45a30a7ff789555d3722a4203670768faf81da2a40adfed3ec5cdeb5da06f04be81ddb53b9db7e
fad21a1a7aa8804f4699e5821f074f5d3845c78b test: Explain that a bug should be filed when the test fail (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a bug report it is harder to fix the issue
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fad21a1a7aa8804f4699e5821f074f5d3845c78b, I have not tested the code, but I have reviewed it and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
fanquake:
ACK fad21a1a7aa8804f4699e5821f074f5d3845c78b
Tree-SHA512: db194e8f8c0f07b2f4c9ef27e456510959f89da69435cee71605d720e0ad06f18700973f5af25ea31a190b933eb35f2743f014878aa3f8293500e06b4907ebbd
fa8b9b5d1f48ad95eecf47ebbd7bf374777fc621 test: Fix intermittent failure in wallet_importmulti (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The wallet is async, so after generating a block, we must call `syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue`. Otherwise the timestamp will be of the previous block.
https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/677685073#L2648
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK fa8b9b5d1f48ad95eecf47ebbd7bf374777fc621.
Tree-SHA512: c21f9912aabbe22019d4ac9d0da06d6e46ef7f2a84d2781110e04c9836eb0ecf90a22cf2bae7f608be611670d17b20600135d1c5e5404aa1e762839816285fb4
faf6f156ffd1a8ed1aed047428d791a8c13c162b test: Add missing syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The wallet rebroadcast functionality learns about new blocks via the validation interface queue. To avoid test failures such as https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/31119387#L466 , we can sync with the queue before advancing the test.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK faf6f156 this makes sense; the fix was previously added to mempool_persist.py and wallet_zapwallettxes.py in #12217 and to wallet_balance.py in #16302. It is also used in src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp (processnewblock_signals_ordering) and src/bench/wallet_balance.cpp.
Tree-SHA512: d72fd4b597b669d8111007902b523e946712913cd6eea6f9a695b0f04ecbe2321d05019873af999a95b9e0aa0f5c140a17109b37503723e40c9eab24ec358eb7
7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was reported on [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-11.html#l-377) that `scantxoutset`'s API was broken in 0.19.0:
```
<belcher> i think scantxoutset may have been broken in bitcoin core 0.19 ? regardless of what parameters i run it with (e.g. "scantxoutset abort", "scantxoutset status") it just returns the help doc, according to the release notes the only change was https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16285/files but i dont see anything that wouldve broken it, it works fine in 0.18
<belcher> im on regtest, in case its important
<harding> I can confirm `scantxoutset abort` returns the help doc on latest master. Waiting for 0.18.1 to start now to attempt to reproduce there.
<harding> It looks like it's expecting a second parameter (even though that doesn't make sense with "abort").
<jonatack> Same for me as well
<harding> Can also confirm that `scantxoutset abort` returns the expected result on 0.18.1.
```
As noted in the conversation, previously, the second argument of `scanobjects` is only required for the `start` action. `Stop` and `abort` actions did not and could work without them.
It appears that this was broken by #16240 which enforced the size of the arguments to match the listed required arguments.
To fix this issue, this PR makes the `scanobjects` argument an optional argument. Then only in the `start` action do we check whether the `scanobjects` argument is there and throw an informative error about that. Also a test is added for this case.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b
promag:
ACK 7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b.
Tree-SHA512: 828bdfe47f4fffa5d00a2cf88db6cea4a2714d9c49276841ca5cbdd1603b87bb6862147b86edcf36d7b40314ddb80b1a07fd399faf288572c55cc788c5cf9526
a67352161c68fea9764cc31aff199f112d8572c6 test: skip tool_wallet test when bitcoin-wallet isn't compiled (fanquake)
e9277baed64e1d4054a102e40b39a9aed7839c2f test: skip wallet_listreceivedby test when the cli isn't compiled (fanquake)
621d398750d9f5ce3e7ec75ccb160b3534dcc436 test: skip bitcoin_cli test when the cli isn't compiled (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Don't try and run the `interface_bitcoin_cli.py` test when `bitcoin-cli` isn't available.
```bash
stdout:
2019-11-17T01:51:41.623000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /var/folders/z2/cn877pxd3czdfh47mfkmbwgm0000gn/T/test_runner_₿_🏃_20191116_205141/interface_bitcoin_cli_0
2019-11-17T01:51:41.890000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Unexpected exception caught during testing
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 111, in main
self.run_test()
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py", line 18, in run_test
cli_response = self.nodes[0].cli("-version").send_cli()
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 528, in send_cli
process = subprocess.Popen(p_args, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, universal_newlines=True)
File "/Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 676, in __init__
restore_signals, start_new_session)
File "/Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 1289, in _execute_child
raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/src/bitcoin-cli'
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: de27513a615d9d21271a0948e012c3209351e7374efd19bfa1bb9cda77e8fffe15d99e3424e4dbfa8cf826084f8af1670726f4703bd2b6093e7d37df4bea64f0
4412a59bfe8228698e5b5bbe8bb21c8e8a70d357 qa: Remove race between connecting and shutdown on separate connections (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Fixes the error https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14670#issuecomment-447255352 reported by @ken2812221.
There is a race between RPC stop and another concurrent call in the test framework. The connection must be established and the command `waitfornewblock` running before calling `stop`.
See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14670#issuecomment-447304513.
Tree-SHA512: 77feb8628d3b9c025ec0cf83565d4d6680cad4fb182fc93a65df8b573f3e799ba4c44e06d9001dd8a375ca0b1ee17f10e66c3902b6256d0ae2acbc64539185d7
a0ac15459a0df598e1ee1fd36a3899a129cecaeb doc: Add getrpcinfo release notes (João Barbosa)
251a91c1bf245b3674c2612149382a0f1e18dc98 qa: Add tests for getrpcinfo (João Barbosa)
d0730f5ce475e5a84da7c61fe79bcd6ed24d693e rpc: Add getrpcinfo command (João Barbosa)
068a8fc05f8dbec198bdc3fe46f955d8a5255303 rpc: Track active commands (João Barbosa)
bf4383277d6761cc5b7a91975752c08df829af72 rpc: Remove unused PreCommand signal (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The new `getrpcinfo` command exposes details of the RPC interface. The details can be configuration properties or runtime values/stats.
This can be particular useful to coordinate concurrent functional tests (see #14958 from where this was extracted).
Tree-SHA512: 7292cb6087f4c429973d991aa2b53ffa1327d5a213df7d6ba5fc69b01b2e1a411f6d1609fed9234896293317dab05f65064da48b8f2b4a998eba532591d31882
effe81f750 Move g_is_mempool_loaded into CTxMemPool::m_is_loaded (Ben Woosley)
bb8ae2c419 rpc: Expose g_is_mempool_loaded via getmempoolinfo and /rest/mempool/info.json (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
And use it to fix a race condition in mempool_persist.py:
https://travis-ci.org/Empact/bitcoin/jobs/487577243
Since e.g. getrawmempool returns errors based on this status, this
enables users to test it for readiness.
Fixes#12863
ACKs for commit effe81:
MarcoFalke:
utACK effe81f750
jnewbery:
utACK effe81f7503d2ca3c88cfdea687f9f997f353e0d
Tree-SHA512: 74328b0c17a97efb8a000d4ee49b9a673c2b6dde7ea30c43a6a2eff961a233351c9471f9a42344412135786c02bdf2ee1b2526651bb8fed68bd94d2120c4ef86
e16b6a7188 rpc: Rename size to vsize in mempool related calls (Miguel Herranz)
Pull request description:
#13008 rebased on `master`, with release notes split out.
> In getmempoolancestors, getmempooldescendants, getmempoolentry and getrawmempool RPCs size returns the virtual transaction size as defined in BIP 141. Renaming it to vsize makes it consistent with returned value and other calls such as getrawtransaction.
>
> Related to #11218.
ACKs for commit e16b6a:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK e16b6a71880052a6f7a368d8357901b0460abaef
jnewbery:
utACK e16b6a71880052a6f7a368d8357901b0460abaef
Tree-SHA512: ce95260fe7f280eacf4ff70bfffe02315c3a521b3b462a34e72a05b90733f40cc473319ac2df05d3e3c12cb7b1fbf2a1bbea632a8f979fff94207854cdbd494d
581c9be0d8bff46cd68bd6a3bf72f22d11c09aea test: speedup wallet_backup by whitelisting peers (immediate tx relay) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
approaches part of #16613 ("Functional test suite bottlenecks")
The majority of the test time is spent in `sync_mempools()` after sending to
addresses, i.e. the bottleneck is in relaying transactions. By whitelisting the
peers via `-whitelist`, the inventory is transmissioned immediately rather than
on average every 5 seconds, speeding up the test by at least a factor of two:
before:
```
$ time ./wallet_backup.py
real 2m2.523s
user 0m6.093s
sys 0m2.454s
```
with this PR:
```
$ time ./wallet_backup_with_whitelist.py
real 0m36.570s
user 0m5.365s
sys 0m1.696s
```
Note that the test is not deterministic (the `sendtoaddress` RPC in function
`one_send()` is executed with a probability of 50%), hence the times could vary
between individual runs.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 581c9be0d8bff46cd68bd6a3bf72f22d11c09aea, this test is testing the backup behaviour, not the tx relay behaviour
fanquake:
ACK 581c9be0d8bff46cd68bd6a3bf72f22d11c09aea
Tree-SHA512: d016f39cdb85501e17a74a4c4db5a9f7404baa76fbcc3675a34d3cd7bf03d7a4cb4fd3e5f17cb0597248120bb5ac8b15d3db7663007b76b010902be72954bde0
bdd6a4fd5da44c2575be9195ecb4213a13e74511 qa: Check scantxoutset result against gettxoutsetinfo (João Barbosa)
fc0c410d6e19dd8e3abbc9b0fc13c836e6678750 rpc: Improve scantxoutset response and help message (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The new response keys `height` and `bestblock` allow the client to know at what point the scan took place.
The help message now has all the response keys (`result` and `txouts` were missing) and it's improved a bit. Note that `searched_items` key is renamed to `txouts`, considering `scantxoutset` is marked experimental.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK bdd6a4fd5da44c2575be9195ecb4213a13e74511
Tree-SHA512: 6bb7c3464b19857b756b8bc491ab7c58b0d948aad8c005b26ed27c55a1278f5639217e11a315bb505b4f44ebe86f413068c1e539c8a5f7a4007735586cc6443c
662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003 Add option to create an encrypted wallet (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new `passphrase` argument to `createwallet` which will create a wallet that is encrypted with that passphrase.
This is built on #15226 because it needs to first create an empty wallet, then encrypt the empty wallet and generate new keys that have only been stored in an encrypted state.
ACKs for commit 662d11:
laanwj:
utACK 662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003
jnewbery:
Looks great. utACK 662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003
Tree-SHA512: a53fc9a0f341eaec1614eb69abcf2d48eb4394bc89041ab69bfc05a63436ed37c65ad586c07fd37dc258ac7c7d5e4f7f93b4191407f5824bbf063b4c50894c4a
7687f7873 [wallet] Support creating a blank wallet (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Alternative (kind of) to #14938
This PR adds a `blank` parameter to the `createwallet` RPC to create a wallet that has no private keys initially. `sethdseed` can then be used to make a clean wallet with a custom seed. `encryptwallet` can also be used to make a wallet that is born encrypted.
Instead of changing the version number as done in #14938, a wallet flag is used to indicate that the wallet should be blank. This flag is set at creation, and then unset when the wallet is no longer blank. A wallet becomes non-blank when a HD seed is set or anything is imported. The main change to create a blank wallet is primarily taken from #14938.
Also with this, the term "blank wallet" is used instead of "empty wallet" to avoid confusion with wallets that have balance which would also be referred to as "empty".
This is built on top of #15225 in order to fix GUI issues.
Tree-SHA512: 824d685e11ac2259a26b5ece99c67a7bda94a570cd921472c464243ee356b7734595ad35cc439b34357135df041ed9cba951e6edac194935c3a55a1dc4fcbdea
42a5e912ee4e91a5191d659588f0605e1ada2f33 [mempool] log correct messages when CPFP fails (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Fixes a logging issue introduced in #15681
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 42a5e912ee4e91a5191d659588f0605e1ada2f33 (+utACK from bluematt that isn't registered because it has no commit id)
Tree-SHA512: ff5f423cc4d22838eea00c5b1d39ceda89cd61474c72f256a97c698eb0ec3f2156a97139f537669376132902c1e3943bf84c356a4b98a9a306b4ec57302c2761
50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced [mempool] Allow one extra single-ancestor transaction per package (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This implements the proposed policy change from [1], which allows
certain classes of contract protocols involving revocation
punishments to use CPFP. Note that some such use-cases may still
want some form of one-deep package relay, though even this alone
may greatly simplify some lightning fee negotiation.
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced -- looked over code again, compared with previous commit, compiles, etc.
sdaftuar:
ACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced
ryanofsky:
utACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced. Changes since last review: adding EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT constant, changing max ancestor size from 1,000,000 to nLimitAncestorSize constant (101,000), fixing test comment and getting rid of unused test node.
Tree-SHA512: b052c2a0f384855572b4579310131897b612201214b5abbb225167224e4f550049e300b471dbf320928652571e92ca2d650050b7cf39ac92b3bc1d2bcd386c1c
fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75 test: Make PORT_MIN in test runner configurable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is needed when some ports in the port range are used by other processes. Note that simply assigning the ports dynamically does not work:
* We spin up several nodes per test (each node gets its own port)
* We run several tests in parallel
So to avoid nodes from different tests colliding on ports, the port assignment must be deterministic (can not be dynamic).
Fixes: #10869
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75 -- diff looks correct
promag:
ACK fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75.
Tree-SHA512: e79adb015e7de79064e2d14336c38bc9672bd779ad6c52917721897e73f617c39d32c068a369c26670002a6c4ab95a71ef3a6878ebdd9710e02f410e2f7bcd14
96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b Test: Move common function assert_approx() into util.py (fridokus)
Pull request description:
To reduce code duplication, move `assert_approx` into common framework `util.py`.
`assert_approx()` is used in two functional tests.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 96299a9
practicalswift:
ACK 96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b -- DRY is good and diff looks correct
fanquake:
ACK 96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b - thanks for contributing 🍻
Tree-SHA512: 8e9d397222c49536c7b3d6d0756cc5af17113e5af8707ac48a500fff1811167fb2e03f3c0445b0b9e80f34935f4d57cfb935c4790f6f5463a32a67df5f736939
fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 test: Remove unused connect_nodes_bi (MarcoFalke)
fa3b9ee8b2280af4bcbcfffff275aaf8dd125929 scripted-diff: test: Replace connect_nodes_bi with connect_nodes (MarcoFalke)
faaee1e39a91b3f603881655d3980c29af09852b test: Use connect_nodes when connecting nodes in the test_framework (MarcoFalke)
1111bb91f517838e5b9f778bf6b5a9c8d561e857 test: Reformat python imports to aid scripted diff (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
By default all test nodes are connected in a chain. However, instead of just a single connection between each pair of nodes, we end up with up to four connections for a "middle" node (two outbound, two inbound, from each side).
This is generally redundant (tx and block relay should succeed with just a single connection) and confusing. For example, test timeouts after a call to `sync_` may be racy and hard to reproduce. On top of that, the test `debug.log`s are hard to read because txs and block invs may be relayed on the same connection multiple times.
Fix this by inlining `connect_nodes_bi` in the two tests that need it, and then replace it with a single `connect_nodes` in all other tests.
Historic background:
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2
jonasschnelli:
utACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 - more of less a cleanup PR.
promag:
Tested ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2, ran extended tests.
Tree-SHA512: 2d027a8fd150749c071b64438a0a78ec922178628a7dbb89fd1212b0fa34febd451798c940101155d3617c0426c2c4865174147709894f1f1bb6cfa336aa7e24
0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2ad68719415e9c54a981441052da072 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71 test: Establish only one connection between nodes in rpc_invalidateblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Headers and block sync should eventually converge to the same result, regardless of whether the peers treat each other as "inbound" or "outbound".
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
Thus remove the `connect_nodes_bi` workaround from the rpc_invalidateblock test.
Conveniently, this also closes#16453. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16444#issuecomment-514801708 for rationale
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71
Tree-SHA512: b3614c66a205823df73f64d19cacfbec269beb5db52ff79004d746e17d7c0dfb43ab9785fdddc97e2a76fe76286c8c605b34df3dda4a2bf5be035f01169ae89a
7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34 test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (Jon Atack)
3bf2b3a37bbd550491d124b77fd7c1b2a7969f66 test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests (Jon Atack)
1eb13f09a9d8c2c7dc69f4cdf1b1ccf632543aa0 test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull request adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608 and serve as a benchmark for fixing the issue:
- Wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- Wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
Goals:
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix. Add debug-level logging for sanity checking and commented-out assertions to be uncommented when fixing the issue. Add the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
2. Add info log messages as there are currently none in the test file.
3. Split the tests out to separate functions as per review feedback.
Thanks to Marco Falke for pointing me in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34
Tree-SHA512: 16a41cce989c8f819cf5b02c6cf8ea84653ede2738fb402f6c36cf4dc075b424dff3e2c73a1cfa1ec9c75f614675baecc71e588845a2596db06ba0957db2df7b
