be5c84f41d Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22089: test: MiniWallet: fix fee calculation for P2PK and check tx vsize (MarcoFalke)
247141d32c Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22210: test: Use MiniWallet in test_no_inherited_signaling RBF test (MarcoFalke)
dad3ae3f33 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22130: test: refactor: dedup utility function chain_transaction() (MarcoFalke)
9dff334f47 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#361: Fix gui segfault caused by bitcoin/bitcoin#22216 (Hennadii Stepanov)
1087849955 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22216: refactor: Make SetupServerArgs callable without NodeContext (MarcoFalke)
fd94de6888 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21178: test: run mempool_reorg.py even with wallet disabled (MarcoFalke)
f1f5723fcf fix: missing changes from bitcoin#14123 (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Regular backports from bitcoin v22
## What was done?
See commits for list of backported changes. It also have some missing changes from bitcoin#14123
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK be5c84f41d
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK be5c84f41d
Tree-SHA512: 553ffde63c8409799cf6b3b87bf1ee285fbf58b13c08d04cdac29bc0e4dd75059feaa2f163803084ae85175397512517b68a6e0e0cc602d981f38ac70d96e393
47c48b5f35b4910fcf87caa6e37407e67d879c80 test: only use verbose for getrawmempool when necessary in functional tests (Michael Dietz)
77349713b189e80f2c140db4df50177353a1cb83 test: use getmempoolentry instead of getrawmempool in functional tests when appropriate (Michael Dietz)
86dbd54ae8a8f9c693c0ea67114bbff24a0754df test: improve mempool_updatefrom efficiency by using getmempoolentry for specific txns (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
I don't think this changes the intention of the test. But it does shave ~30 seconds off the time it takes to run. From what I've seen our CI `macOS 11 native [gui] [no depends]` runs `mempool_updatefrom.py` in ~135 seconds. After this PR it should run in ~105 seconds
I noticed this improvement should probably be made when testing performance/runtimes of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22698. But I wanted to separate this out from that PR so the affects of each is decoupled
Edit: The major change in this PR is improving mempool_updatefrom.py's runtime as this is a very long running test. Then made the same efficiency improvements across all the functional tests as it made since to do that here
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Tested ACK 47c48b5f35b4910fcf87caa6e37407e67d879c80
Tree-SHA512: 40f553715f3d4649dc18c2738554eafaca9ea800c4b028c099217896cc1c466ff457ae814d59cf8564c782a8964d8fac3eda60c1b6ffb08bbee1439b2d34434b
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7 test: doc: improve doc for chain_transaction() helper (Sebastian Falbesoner)
6e63e366d609312ab984b4439de2d59bb618620b test: refactor: dedup utility function chain_transaction() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Both tests `mempool_packages.py` and `mempool_package_onemore.py` define a utility function `chain_transaction` with a similar implementation. This PR deduplicates it by moving it into the util package and keeping the more general properties:
* pass a list of parent_txids/vouts instead of single values
* always mark the BIP125-replaceable flag for txs, created via `createrawtransaction` (this is needed by the `mempool_package_onemore.py` test, but doesn't hurt the other one)
This is a low-hanging fruit; as a potential follow-up one could probably also deduplicate the function `chain_transaction` in `rpc_packages.py`, which looks a bit different, as it also takes the parent locking script into account and doesn't send the tx.
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
reACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7
klementtan:
Code review ACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7 🙅
Tree-SHA512: ac7105d02c23f53d76d4ec9dc8de1074dd8faefeecd44b107921b78665279498966152fed312ecbe252a1c34a9643d531166329a4fea0e773df3bb75d43092b0
fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Needs to be done because no one has removed the years yet
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
Tree-SHA512: 210e92acd7d400b556cf8259c3ec9967797420cfd19f0c2a4fa54cb2b3d32ad9ae27e771269201e7d554c0f4cd73a8b1c1a42c9f65d8685ca4d52e5134b071a3
dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase.
The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used.
Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64
instagibbs:
manual inspection ACK dac7a111bd
practicalswift:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :)
Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
bfa9309ad606102f24c9bd3c33dfe78949f09418 Use COINBASE_MATURITY constant in functional tests. (Kiminuo)
525448df9dc2ab6b7e960ff138956ae3e2efdf60 Move COINBASE_MATURITY from `feature_nulldummy` test to `blocktools`. (Kiminuo)
Pull request description:
`COINBASE_MATURITY` constant was added to `feature_nulldummy` test in #21373. This PR moves the constant to `blocktools.py` file and uses the constant in more tests as suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21373#discussion_r605418462).
Edit: Goal of this PR is to replace integer constants with `COINBASE_MATURITY` but not necessarily in *all* cases because that would mean to read and fully understand all tests. That's out of my time constraints. Any reports where `COINBASE_MATURITY` should be used are welcome though!
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK bfa9309ad606102f24c9bd3c33dfe78949f09418 🌇
Tree-SHA512: 01f04645f05a39028681f355cf3d42dd63ea3303f76d93c430e0fdce441934358a2d847a54e6068d61932f1b75e1d406f51859b057b3e4b569f7083915cb317f
42a5e912ee4e91a5191d659588f0605e1ada2f33 [mempool] log correct messages when CPFP fails (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Fixes a logging issue introduced in #15681
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 42a5e912ee4e91a5191d659588f0605e1ada2f33 (+utACK from bluematt that isn't registered because it has no commit id)
Tree-SHA512: ff5f423cc4d22838eea00c5b1d39ceda89cd61474c72f256a97c698eb0ec3f2156a97139f537669376132902c1e3943bf84c356a4b98a9a306b4ec57302c2761
50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced [mempool] Allow one extra single-ancestor transaction per package (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This implements the proposed policy change from [1], which allows
certain classes of contract protocols involving revocation
punishments to use CPFP. Note that some such use-cases may still
want some form of one-deep package relay, though even this alone
may greatly simplify some lightning fee negotiation.
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced -- looked over code again, compared with previous commit, compiles, etc.
sdaftuar:
ACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced
ryanofsky:
utACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced. Changes since last review: adding EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT constant, changing max ancestor size from 1,000,000 to nLimitAncestorSize constant (101,000), fixing test comment and getting rid of unused test node.
Tree-SHA512: b052c2a0f384855572b4579310131897b612201214b5abbb225167224e4f550049e300b471dbf320928652571e92ca2d650050b7cf39ac92b3bc1d2bcd386c1c
