Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
MarcoFalke
078ae49dc7
partial merge #19348: test: Bump linter versions
39d526bde48d98af4fa27906e85db0399b6aa8b1 test: Bump linter versions (Duncan Dean)

Pull request description:

  As per #19346, `mypy==0.700` was incompatible with Python 3.8.

  I've bumped the versions of all the linters to their latest stable versions.

  Checked with both Python 3.7 and 3.8 and everything still seems to work fine.

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 39d526bde48d98af4fa27906e85db0399b6aa8b1, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.

Tree-SHA512: f3ee7fda8095aa25aa68685e863076d52a6b82649770d24b0064d652763c0ceb8ebcbf9024fc74fca45c754e67b2a831dd070b3af23bc099140e6d27e89a5319
2021-10-05 20:34:01 +03:00
MarcoFalke
60b3c5a64e
Merge #15257: Scripts and tools: Bump flake8 to 3.7.8
3d0a82cff8cbb809876e82dbe62d14d2adc07d94 devtools: Accomodate block-style copyright blocks (Ben Woosley)
0ef0e51fe4bb592e67255776b5a0ba04679fb8c4 lint: Bump flake8 to 3.7.8 (Ben Woosley)
838920704ad90a71cf288b700052503db8abb17e lint: Disable flake8 W504 warning (Ben Woosley)
b21680baf5391a602b295b9d7d0ef66553661cb9 test/contrib: Fix invalid escapes in regex strings (Ben Woosley)

Pull request description:

  This is a second go at #15221, fixing new lints in:
  W504 line break after binary operator
  W605 invalid escape sequence
  F841 local variable 'e' is assigned to but never used

  This time around:
  * One commit per rule, for easier review
  * I went with the PEP-8 style of breaking before binary operators
  * I looked into the raw regex newline issue, and found that raw strings with newlines embedded do work appropriately. E.g. run `re.match(r" \n ", " \n ")` to check this for yourself. `re.MULTILINE` exists to modify `^` and `$` in multiline scenarios, but  all of these searches are per-line.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK 3d0a82cff8cbb809876e82dbe62d14d2adc07d94 -- diff looks correct

Tree-SHA512: bea0c144cadd72e4adf2e9a4b4ee0535dd91a8e694206924cf8a389dc9253f364a717edfe9abda88108fbb67fda19b9e823f46822d7303c0aaa72e48909a6105
2021-10-05 20:34:01 +03:00
MarcoFalke
dbfa92990a
Merge #21096: Re-add dead code detection
3f8776a1391c3978ed66144df15fd9bcb9edd35d Re-add dead code detection (flack)

Pull request description:

  This re-adds unreachable code detection for Python based on `vulture`.

  Effectively, this reverts f4beb4996d27f2cdaf4f0a63e7dc044bf17decce. The difference to the previous version is that this runs with the `--min-confidence 100` setting. From https://pypi.org/project/vulture/:

  > Use `--min-confidence 100` to only report code that is guaranteed to be unused within the analyzed files.

  So this should avoid the previous issues where static analysis had wrong positives due to the dynamic nature of Python code by only reporting things that are unambiguous (such as code after a `return` statement). As such, there is not suppressions list.

  My motivation was mainly #21081 which would have been caught by this (as can be seen by the CI run failing). This is still marked as draft because #21081 is needed to get the linter to pass. Also, there is a second problem that this found (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19509/files#r571454691). From what I can tell, this is a spurious type comment that could just be removed (or if that line has no side effects it could also be deleted altogether?). I could add a commit here to fix it, but I wanted to see if there is interest in having this linter again in the first place

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK 3f8776a1391c3978ed66144df15fd9bcb9edd35d

Tree-SHA512: 52314ad4f627d969de1eb15375ca677ed86a2e816fe773756a1ce22421214ba407b5a09a4bf701a3aab1a10c7b336f548e4cef3327edf154acba55e987db21f6
2021-10-05 20:34:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
313d79e319
Merge #16961: test: Remove python dead code linter
f4beb4996d27f2cdaf4f0a63e7dc044bf17decce test: Remove python dead code linter (Wladimir J. van der Laan)

Pull request description:

  Primarily I'd like to remove this because it is very imprecise, due to Python's dynamic nature, giving it a large list of false positives that need to be listed as exceptions. See for example #16906.

  It's also a frequent source of complaints. I'm doubtful of the usefulness of checking for dead code in a linter in the first place.
  Having some dead code in the test framework for a while is not a
  disaster.

ACKs for top commit:
  sdaftuar:
    utACK f4beb4996d27f2cdaf4f0a63e7dc044bf17decce
  practicalswift:
    ACK f4beb4996d27f2cdaf4f0a63e7dc044bf17decce -- diff looks correct
  jamesob:
    ACK f4beb4996d

Tree-SHA512: 329b1555210311d5d15799fd2cb794b3208b0ac4d8a2ffaf4dece1bcc3e0e8b1fe952d5e7a394f94a98919cab579fb579eae7db2a796cc9a1a42ef495dd17507
2021-10-05 20:34:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
a8f615748c
Merge #16907: test: lint: Add DisabledOpcodeTemplates to whitelist
fac35b21e2c2d798face7e289dcff4c1cce0e1a6 test: lint: Add DisabledOpcodeTemplates to whitelist (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #16906

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 98b175bb062425fd3a8bd0d0258f4c0e0d5106980f1e037df7c2b2b2e5aa6031b11b582c026265d7b2de56049ccbadb0b7add9130d323f15886f681c6268ba0a
2021-10-05 20:34:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
7aefec8de0
partial merge #16465: lint: Add false positive to python dead code linter 2021-10-05 20:34:00 +03:00
fanquake
53b2f81892
Merge #16186: doc/lint: Fix spelling errors identified by codespell 1.15.0
b748bf6f50dda6bb57eadf697edc320b2695e01a Fix spelling errors identified by codespell 1.15.0 (Ben Woosley)

Pull request description:

  Note all changes are to comments / documentation.

  After this commit, the only remaining output is:

  ```
    $ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh
    src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo  ==> of, for
    src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo  ==> of, for
    ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt
  ```

  Note:
  * I ignore several valid alternative spellings ~, but changed homogenous
  to homogeneous as the latter is a more specific term according to the
  Google dictionary definitions I found~
  * homogenous is present in tinyformat, hence should be addressed upstream
  * process' is correct only if there are plural processes

ACKs for commit b748bf:
  practicalswift:
    ACK b748bf6f50dda6bb57eadf697edc320b2695e01a
  fanquake:
    ACK b748bf6f50

Tree-SHA512: 9add7044643ce015e0a44d8b27a3f300d72c485ffff550fb6491a17f14528085289ec5caddfe02f291ea9b2cded38a0dd3079652a054e2d7fe2ff4f7b53db5d7
2021-10-05 20:34:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
26449bcccf
Merge #15166: qa: Pin shellcheck version
a517541794 Remove no longer needed shellcheck suppressions (practicalswift)
0b7196ecad Fix warnings introduced in shellcheck v0.6.0 (practicalswift)
07a53dce9f Remove repeated suppression. Fix indentation. (practicalswift)
638e53b472 Pin shellcheck version to v0.6.0 (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Pin `shellcheck` version.

Tree-SHA512: 996e438e424020fe888de1d77ffd33fa32848332febfffbc21a842784aee339332c79c41687c9c577ba1206eb20674623157d584a072e8ae88ae086ee2277bc8
2021-10-05 20:33:59 +03:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
056590a1da merge #17361: Lint Gitian descriptors with ShellCheck 2021-09-03 21:35:53 +05:30
MarcoFalke
12047d77d0 Merge #14365: tests: Add Python dead code linter (vulture) to Travis
c82190cdb6 tests: Add Python dead code linter (vulture) (practicalswift)
590a57fdec tests: Remove unused testing code (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Add Python dead code linter (`vulture`) to Travis.

  Rationale for allowing dead code only after explicit opt-in (via `--ignore-names`):
  * Less is more :-)
  * Unused code is by definition "untested"
  * Unused code can be an indication of bugs/logical errors. By making the contributor aware of newly introduced unused code it gives him/her an opportunity to investigate if the unused code they introduce is malignant or benign :-)
  * Unused code is hard to spot for humans and is thus often missed during manual review
  * [YAGNI](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_aren%27t_gonna_need_it)

  Based on #14312 to make linter job pass.

Tree-SHA512: 4c581df7c34986e226e4ade479e0d3c549daf38f4a4dc4564b25564d63e773a1830ba55d1289c771b1fa325483e8855b82b56e61859fe8e4b7dfa54034b093b6
2021-08-12 14:42:32 -03:00
MarcoFalke
fd4be2e038
Merge #14389: travis: set codespell version to avoid breakage
d10f2cd7d8 travis: set codespell version to avoid breakage (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  codespell changes the behaviour across version, so just hardcode the version to avoid warnings when they bump the version.

Tree-SHA512: f1a4d078d28c088cf0036f5160bfd79d5e4ccda061e535c066a74cd3d54d41b43ffa4df87a00d1941957ce0b5b60cb69135f6eee85e3e38bd496808fdf36743f
2021-07-19 12:51:41 -05:00
MarcoFalke
41494eea70
Merge #13954: Warn (don't fail!) on spelling errors. Fix typos reported by codespell.
f8a81f73ac lint: Add spell check linter (codespell) (practicalswift)
ada356208e Fix typos reported by codespell (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  * Check for common misspellings using `codespell`.
  * Fix recently introduced typos reported by `codespell`.

Tree-SHA512: 9974c0e640b411c7d0ebc5b45de253c19bac7fe3002cd98601ff8da8db584224c2fd7d331aee3df612c9f2cfef540d647a9b4c5a1a73fd208dc93ce4bf9e5e3e
2021-07-19 12:51:24 -05:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
a4ff5cada2 Merge #14496: build: Pin to specific versions of Python packages we install from PyPI in Travis
ee0b7c4e8a1ec88877ffa65e772f66a8a66cb928 build: Pin to specific versions of Python packages we install from PyPI in Travis (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Pin to specific versions of Python packages we install from PyPI in Travis.

  To avoid the possibility of surprise build failures when a new version of a PyPI dependency is released.

Tree-SHA512: 1c9abc094ad6b38992d0e7a5dd7f6c6c070a2eb81b052eb2397c1f1a489162cf8cedbd33db9bf97f32a81ed4dd0e986a76815c623a9b6c04b6ca6c5832d68211
2021-07-17 14:19:25 -05:00
MarcoFalke
4c2211dd41 Partial merge #13863: travis: move script sections to files in .travis/ subject to shellcheck
414326952c use export LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 (Julian Fleischer)
728c82d029 make script exit if a command fails (Julian Fleischer)
506890b24d move remaining travis build steps into individual files (Julian Fleischer)
272306ea57 number .travis/ script according to build lifecycle and add README to explain (Julian Fleischer)
519e2739cf move lint stage up to resemble travis build ui (Julian Fleischer)
86d34f0e65 abort script in END_FOLD on non-zero exit code (Julian Fleischer)
4f2f88c7b0 move script sections info individual files and comply with shellcheck (Julian Fleischer)

Pull request description:

  This PR is extracted from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13816 to make that one easier to review. It follows on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13849 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13851

  In here the shell script parts from `travis.yml` are extracted into `.travis/before_install.sh`, `.travis/install.sh`, `.travis/before_script.sh`, `.travis/script.sh`, and `.travis/lint.sh`.

  This has the benefit that `test/lint/lint-shell.sh` will also shellcheck these parts. Also it makes the individual script parts more readable.

Tree-SHA512: c497e1687ceb1c1d795de177d3fc35af908bc8e3f781a871afabdecf031e581d4db229290627249e35ef7c09952bc34884e4734ea91d40f57b4a9efb85bba2e3
2021-07-08 13:09:43 -04:00