fada8b019af104a0df7659ede2618f594bb3e78a test: Add missing assignment in mempool_resurrect.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: f438d85cd14a91eabfc380d9ee120cc7a7f9103cf0cd1cf565f675f386f82d966901c0ad3f60b8c462642fbf0a3791dbbd774f9b07668d22b58eb575c8d702c1
11a32722f09f1d81f34bd09b26248ba99f2e7f07 test: run mempool_resurrect.py even with wallet disabled (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Another functional test rewritten as proposed in #20078
**Request for help:**
`node.gettransaction(txid)` fails for transactions sent with `wallet.send_self_transfer`. Even though the `txid`s look correct, are added to the mempool correctly, and removed from the mempool when a block is mined - all as expected.
However, `node.gettransaction(txid)` throws the error:
```sh
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 126, in main
self.run_test()
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/mempool_resurrect.py", line 43, in run_test
assert_equal(len(list(filter(lambda txid: node.gettransaction(txid)["confirmations"] > 0, spends_ids))), len(spends_ids))
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/mempool_resurrect.py", line 43, in <lambda>
assert_equal(len(list(filter(lambda txid: node.gettransaction(txid)["confirmations"] > 0, spends_ids))), len(spends_ids))
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/coverage.py", line 47, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 146, in __call__
raise JSONRPCException(response['error'], status)
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Invalid or non-wallet transaction id (-5)
```
Anyone know what's going wrong / can point me in the right direction if I'm making a mistake, or `MiniWallet` needs to be improved for this to work correctly?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 11a32722f09f1d81f34bd09b26248ba99f2e7f07
Tree-SHA512: 13d83a13ec23920db716e99b68670e61329d1cc73b12063d85bc1679ee6425a9951da4d2e392ca1f27760be7be049ccdc6f504e192ed5cd24ed0ba003b66fab3
6b56c1f4d0d5857d9d61a81dc96db1b603c368b5 test: remove last_{block,header}_equals() in p2p_fingerprint.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
136d96b71f94bde2c7471ed852d447ec008e3a30 test: use wait_for_{block,header} helpers in p2p_fingerprint.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR takes use of the message receiving helper functions `wait_for_block()` and `wait_for_header()` (from module `test_framework.p2p`) in the test `p2p_fingerprint.py`. It also simplifies the checks for very old stale blocks/headers requests by getting rid of the functions `last_block_equals()` and `last_header_equals()` and rather only testing that not any blocks/headers message is received at all. Unneeded sending of requests are also removed and calls to time.sleep(...) substituted by ping syncs.
ACKs for top commit:
guggero:
ACK 6b56c1f4
Tree-SHA512: 9114db70f3804adad4ab658236762d4fa73fef91158c5756dd1af2d24196ea740451b0028667e0c4047f1f89fe1355031921d3dfb973acc1370052a4bc12c2ab
4f67336f1105b7c34a9e8cdafa603edc1d899fb9 test: verify best blockhash after invalidating an unknown block (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes#26051
Verify the best blockhash is the same after invalidating an unknown block, not the whole `getchaintip` response.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 4f67336f1105b7c34a9e8cdafa603edc1d899fb9
Tree-SHA512: 2d71743c1d3a317ef7b750f88437df71d1aed2728d9edac8b763a343406e168b97865ab25ec4c89caf09d002e076458376618cbd0845496375f7179633c88af9
4b1d5a10537ab48e3457606ba1cf2ae26a1cb2b2 test: invalidating an unknown block throws an error (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
While playing with `invalidateblock`, I unintentionally tried to invalidate an unknown block and it threw an error. Looking at the tests I just realized there is no test coverage for this case. This PR adds it.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 25286ead809b3ad022e759127ef3134b271fbe76cb7b50ec2b0c7e2409da8d1b01dc5e80afe73e4564cc9c9c03487a1fe772aea3456988552d2f9c8fb34c730b
4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c doc: test: suggest multi-line imports in functional test style guide (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
As long as I remember contributing to functional tests (~2-3 years), it was always kind of an unwritten rule that multi-line imports are preferred over single-line imports in order to reduce the possibility of potential merge conflicts -- at least if more than one symbol from a module is imported. This PR adds this rule to the style guide and adapts the example test accordingly. (Inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25792#discussion_r941180819).
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
ACK 4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c
1440000bytes:
ACK 4edc689382
w0xlt:
ACK 4edc689382
fanquake:
ACK 4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c
Tree-SHA512: c7b6ff62f601f4e57cc8334d291662987d6737ebca8d81c063280409f4412302172f1404ec16afc9a13007bcdba55bdab66b9b80363287e287888929cb386584
1821d92b66 test: add activate_ehf_by_name (Alessandro Rezzi)
de38dca242 feat(consensus): Generalize ehf activation (Alessandro Rezzi)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Try to sign/mine any ehf deployment and not only mn_rr. As asked in the review this decouples (and improves) commit [e24cb23](e24cb239f8) from PR #5799
## What was done?
See commit description
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7112a5214b473dea29a892563e6598eca089d2e17fdff8bda08c7777738f1054d2cb07e0a7dccf66214911fec64a6441e84100273ac2ed52abe1d33fb960e8cc
fa6065661a86656a29e89ed1a3529cb7103f5394 refactor: Avoid unsigned integer overflow in core_write (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also, I find the new code a bit easier to understand.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
Code Review ACK fa6065661a86656a29e89ed1a3529cb7103f5394
Tree-SHA512: cd751e3b4dc97ef525eb8be8d0a49e9629389cb114df18d59a06e05388822af2939078e937f01494e6b317d601743b1a433ba47aa40c4dc602372d1f0fd0dc11
1111d33532516c16fb2e22660ac2745ce56ad6cd refactor: Make MessageBoxFlags enum underlying type unsigned (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
All values in the enum are unsigned. Also, flags shouldn't be treated as signed types. So clarify the underlying type and remove a sanitizer suppression.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 1111d33532516c16fb2e22660ac2745ce56ad6cd, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 48b16c4a0ace1a1e4d351d6eadadbb1bc42aef7fd82e24e3ea50c62f2c04a552ed21027158d09aa97e630c8c7d732cb150c38065333d7c2accbae46593b7ed9f
fa99e108e778b5169b3de2ce557af68f1fe0ac0b Fix implicit-integer-sign-change in arith_uint256 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This refactor doesn't change behaviour, but clarifies that the numbers being dealt with aren't supposed to be negative. This helps when reading the code and allows to remove a sanitizer suppression for the whole file.
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK fa99e108e778b5169b3de2ce557af68f1fe0ac0b
shaavan:
ACK fa99e108e778b5169b3de2ce557af68f1fe0ac0b
Tree-SHA512: f227e2fd22021e39f0445ec041f4a299d13477c23cef0fc06c53fb3313cbe550cec329336224a7e8775d9045b8009423052b394e83d42a1e40772085dfcdd471
fa7238300c18938cdf627cacfc58d4b81602417f fuzz: Limit fuzzed time to years 2000-2100 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It doesn't make sense to fuzz times in the past, as Bitcoin Core will refuse to start in the past.
Fix that and also remove a sanitizer suppression, which would be hit in net_processing in `ProcessMessage`:
```cpp
if (addr.nTime <= 100000000 || addr.nTime > nNow + 10 * 60)
addr.nTime = nNow - 5 * 24 * 60 * 60; // <-- Here
```
This changes the format of fuzz inputs. Previously a time value was (de)serialized as 40 bytes, now it is 32 bytes.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK fa7238300c18938cdf627cacfc58d4b81602417f
Tree-SHA512: ca6e7233beec2d9ef9fd481d8f1331942a4d2c8fe518b857629bebcc53a4f42ae123b994cf5d359384a0a8022098ff5a9c146600bc2593c6d88734e25bc240ad
fa7da227daf8558be14f226c4366583fdc59ba10 refactor: Fix implicit-signed-integer-truncation in cuckoocache.h (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using a file-wide suppression for this implicit truncation has several issues:
* It is file-wide, thus suppressing any other (newly introduced) issues
* The file doesn't compile with `-Wimplicit-int-conversion`
Fix both issues by making the truncation explicit.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa7da227daf8558be14f226c4366583fdc59ba10
Tree-SHA512: bf2076ed94c4e80d0d29ff883080edc7a73144c73d6d3e872ec87966177ee3160f4760fc4c774aaa6fb591f4acee450a24b0f7c82291e0bef96582a6d134046e
fae5fec0fec851568a72724000193b2747c30414 test: Remove sanitizer suppression implicit-signed-integer-truncation:netaddress.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This reverts commit fa865287e5f35e0a376785834e966dd202d2959e.
This was fixed in commit efd6f904c78769ad2e93c1f1de43014d284e7561.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK fae5fec0fec851568a72724000193b2747c30414
Tree-SHA512: 3bebf1babd5c68cbb2506bcab9b8e9ffed8697213cf66190484748741f05c59b847a103be171360f7fd6ddb57dfd86ed34a123f72860b76e533ed46bb53a4852
fa865287e5f35e0a376785834e966dd202d2959e test: Add temporary sanitizer suppression implicit-signed-integer-truncation:netaddress.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is required to unbreak the fuzzers while a fix is being worked on.
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4787303177519104?logs=ci#L3020
```
netaddress.cpp:1190:18: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value -1 (32-bit, signed) to type 'uint8_t' (aka 'unsigned char') changed the value to 255 (8-bit, unsigned)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa865287e5f35e0a376785834e966dd202d2959e
tryphe:
untested ACK fa865287e5f35e0a376785834e966dd202d2959e
lsilva01:
ACK fa865287e5
Tree-SHA512: 4a54ec68c014c7a4c9ab268c3a04321db5eb9b2857646b41406d8d4908a3d349848b4549e80aea6afd9a0c3639522a48fe578527139519b12439eae9f0c4c46c
fa9ebedec3f982bb5bb459ea33d74c94d9b5cec4 Reject invalid coin height and output index when loading assumeutxo (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It should be impossible to have a coin at a height higher than the height of the snapshot block, so reject those early to avoid integer wraparounds and hash collisions later on.
Same for the outpoint index.
Both issues were found by fuzzing:
* The height issue by OSS-Fuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34793
* The outpoint issue by my fuzz server: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34793#c2
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa9ebedec3f982bb5bb459ea33d74c94d9b5cec4: patch looks correct
jamesob:
crACK fa9ebedec3
theStack:
Code review ACK fa9ebedec3f982bb5bb459ea33d74c94d9b5cec4
benthecarman:
crACK fa9ebedec3f982bb5bb459ea33d74c94d9b5cec4
Tree-SHA512: dae7caee4b3862b23ebdf2acb7edec4baf75b0dbf1409b370b1a73aa6b632b317ebfac596dcbaf4edfb1301b513f45465ea75328962460f35e2af0d7e547c9ac
faca40ec68a25180f90a5b9ef017f931354d5bc6 test: Add temporary coinstats suppressions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Needed for my fuzzer to continue to run
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faca40ec68a25180f90a5b9ef017f931354d5bc6: suppression looks necessary (temporarily)
Tree-SHA512: 5bdff9a24a60546cfe31e775fa2aa5e238aefda2ed2604bef18c82b1b80c51ca3cbe058d6c7988fa75305258b70076036a3e430b9b7de13a111309fa7a66745b
575792e6ffe23c8236a1f8431f6be445e448809b fuzz: Add -fsanitize=integer suppression needed for RPC fuzzer (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add `-fsanitize=integer` suppression needed for RPC fuzzer (`generateblock`).
Context: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/59/checks?check_run_id=2494624259
```
miner.cpp:130:21: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int64_t' (aka 'long') of value 244763573890 (64-bit, signed) to type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') changed the value to 4245405314 (32-bit, unsigned)
#0 0x56143974eaf3 in BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock(CScript const&) miner.cpp:130:21
#1 0x56143993690d in generateblock()::$_4::operator()(RPCHelpMan const&, JSONRPCRequest const&) const rpc/mining.cpp:370:127
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
> review ACK [575792e](575792e6ff), but this function shouldn't be called by the rpc fuzzer, at least not without sanitizing num_blocks
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 575792e6ffe23c8236a1f8431f6be445e448809b
Tree-SHA512: c2133d1064bf17df0e7749ef4a0f7664b5c8082040491a1035d39f0c6e5d96997b347ef2354411e285c7f1f973e34515f1c3c88eb3de60fab64ca4d2adf6dd74
76a84c0a6cac3df711b1ed907a46c905cb85c485 test: speedup wallet_coinbase_category.py (furszy)
Pull request description:
No need to create a chain (200 extra blocks), nor use the cache, for it.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: beec64ba6c580d475e19700371ae155f4f3d74325879802da83d02f4153a752d5829b8a4ed77e0c893e79cbc26f66389eed90ac2e8b03a59f6c630ee9333355c
ceec6808d331fa082407a734cd5f3c2f1c7d11b3 test: `-whitebind` and `-bind` with `-listen=0` should throw an error (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following init error:
b9122e95f0/src/init.cpp (L872-L875)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK ceec6808d331fa082407a734cd5f3c2f1c7d11b3
Tree-SHA512: 03068abe7199b1235f029871ab87a3dd4943738c592ad62d82cdcd3e0201e627624960bd3ea1fc6fc1e7da4b8e215ba3393d1cb8130e1108049f764e51dc75c0
5a8c321444c10c7c89c4222c0b47c2d83a1a9ea4 test: check for `getblocktxn` request with out-of-bounds tx index (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `getblocktxn` message handler, in the case that any of the contained indices is out-of-bounds:
a05876619a/src/net_processing.cpp (L2180-L2183)
ACKs for top commit:
dunxen:
ACK 5a8c321
Tree-SHA512: 2743c2c6d8aed57b22f825aefd60ba3e670321b60625a42ea7248e7b0fc41c73e9a5945153567c02824ba3b5f0fce7f4125bffc974973fc608b6ffbe49e14b65
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
that's a result of:
contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
it is not scripted diff, because it works differentlly on my localhost and in CI:
CI doesn't want to use git commit date which is mocked to 30th Dec of 2023
ea54ba2f42f6d0b23570c665c2369f977bf55cf6 [test] Fix port collisions caused by p2p_getaddr_caching.py (dergoegge)
f9682e75ac184a62c7e29287882df34c25303033 [test_framework] Set PortSeed.n directly after initialising params (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes the issue mentioned [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25096#discussion_r892558783), to avoid port collisions between nodes spun up by the test framework.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ec9159f0af90db636f7889d664c24e1430cf2bcb3c02a9ab2dcfe531b2a4d18f6e3a0f8ba73071bdf2f7db518df9d5d86a9cd06695e67644d20fe4515fac32b7
fa76d8d4d71d844e217686881d4f630eac3a8e10 test: Actually print TSan tracebacks (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Commit 5e5138a721738f47053d915e4c65f925838ad5b4 made the TSan logs to be printed before returning an error from the ci script.
However, it seems that on Cirrus CI, the `--failfast` option will kill not only all python process and bitcoind child process, but also the parent CI bash script, rendering the `trap` inefficient. I believe this bug was introduced in commit 451b96f7d2796d00eabaec56d831f9e9b1a569cc.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
utACK fa76d8d4d71d844e217686881d4f630eac3a8e10
Tree-SHA512: 686f889d38a343882cb62ad6e0c2080196330e7cc7086891a7ff66d9443b455c82ba8d7e4a5cc42daa0513b0ad2743055bfe90e2f6ac88a910ee3b663fabddcd
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
On my local kubuntu linters have way too much spam
## What was done?
See each commit
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run locally. Amount of warnings decreased from thousands to fewer
amount. Excluding typos, they are:
```
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:1420:5: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:1426:5: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:655:26: warning: Consider using std::copy_if algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/server.cpp:593:33: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/server.cpp:630:106: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1057:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1068:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1079:13: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1086:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1094:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1099:5: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1486:34: warning: Consider using std::copy_if algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/commitment.cpp:102:5: warning: Consider using std::all_of or std::none_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/instantsend.cpp:820:38: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:831:102: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/quorums.h:300:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:301:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:302:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:303:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/spork.cpp:119:58: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/statsd_client.cpp:234:63: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
Advice not applicable in this specific case? Add an exception by updating
IGNORED_WARNINGS in test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
Consider install flake8-cached for cached flake8 results.
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: error: Source file found twice under different module names: "invalid_txs" and "data.invalid_txs"
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: note: See https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/running_mypy.html#mapping-file-paths-to-modules for more info
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: note: Common resolutions include: a) adding `__init__.py` somewhere, b) using `--explicit-package-bases` or adjusting MYPYPATH
Found 1 error in 1 file (errors prevented further checking)
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-python.s
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix failures like https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/6175160403
## What was done?
use `minimumAmount` option in `listunspent` rpc call to avoid picking
coins that are too small for asset lock txes
## How Has This Been Tested?
run `feature_asset_locks.py`
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
faa94cb1675d8bd511eb593176cd07aa59465225 test: Check that invalid peer traffic is accounted for (MarcoFalke)
fae243f0cb92b5648d07d0a5033e2f4de862ae99 test: Remove confusing cast to same type (int to int) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Couldn't find a test for this and it seems something we should test, so I wrote one.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK faa94cb16
practicalswift:
ACK faa94cb1675d8bd511eb593176cd07aa59465225: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: efcdd35960045cdfbd14480e16e0d1d09e81eb01670ac541ac2b105e1a63818a157c95853270242234a224880873e79957832bf4231374d7fe81de30f35e3abf
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
The architecture of bitcoin assumes that there's no any external class
that processes network messages and knows anything about PeerManager
from net_processing; no any external call for PeerManager::Misbehaving
in bitcoin. All logic related to processing messages are located in
net_processing.
Dash has many many extra types of network messages and many of them
processed by external components such as llmq/signing or
coinjoin/client. Current architecture creates multiple circular
dependency.
## What was done?
That's part II of refactorings.
This PR removes PeerManager from several constructor and let LLMQContext
to forget about PeerManager.
Prior work in this PR: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5782
## What else to do?
Some network messages are processed asynchronously in external
components such as llmq/signing, llmq/instantsend,
llmq/dkgsessionhandler. It doesn't let to refactor them easily, because
they can't just simple return status of processing; status of processing
would be available sometime later and there's need callback or other way
to pass result code without spreading PeerManager over codebase.
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Run unit/functional tests
- run a linter test/lint/lint-circular-dependencies.sh
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
To prevent spending withdrawal before that's finalized, mined and
chainlocked, next things should be true:
- txes with spending of unlock and unlock themselves do not receive
islocks. That's true, because IS excluded for txes with no inputs.
- When the unlock is removed from mempool, so are the children.
These functionality has no tests, but that's crucial for consensus be
fine.
## What was done?
Implemented checks to be sure that IS is not send for Withdrawal txes.
Functional test for asset_locks.py are refactored a bit to make it
easier to read.
## How Has This Been Tested?
This PR is tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
